Robert doesn't hoax. His eye shine video is legit and Dan Shirley just caught the same thing. RD probably puts more time in than almost any other researcher and if he anted to hoax, he would atleast have had something better than just eyeshine and would have made some money off of it. People that hoax are the city folk type like Rick Dyer that go to a state forest or something, for the first time in their life, and happen to get an amazing video. If you want to know these things are real, get a job as a solo logger or something, do something where you are in the remote forest 365 and you will notice stuff.
Of course Dodson doesn't hoax. He misidentifies, which is not the same thing.
Hoaxing is fooling other people. Dodson only makes a fool of himself.
Dodson has integrity, but lacks ability. Hoaxers like Dyer have the brains, but lack integrity. And then there's Kelly Shaw, who has neither brains nor integrity.
Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more information? It is extremely helpful for me. miami surveillance cameras
Kittalia A. sent us the following questions about Patty, the Bigfoot in the Patterson-Gimlin film. They are all very good questions that we we wish we knew the answers to. We're no "Henry May" and it's times like this that we wish we had his number. Since we don't have Henry around whenever we need him, here are some easy questions for all you Patterson-Gimlin believers to try and answer:
Thanks to Matt Moneymaker for sharing this story with us from a guy named Thomas S. who was camping with some friends near the French Meadows Reservoir in August 2012. This remote, forested basin is located on the American River approximately 58 miles east of Auburn in the Sierra Nevada's. Before his encounter, the man thought Bigfoot "was just for entertainment purposes", but he changed his tune when he ended up with messy drawers that night. "That will teach to goof on our show," says Matt.
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
Settle down now - and steady yourselves for another hoax.
ReplyDeleteRobert doesn't hoax. His eye shine video is legit and Dan Shirley just caught the same thing. RD probably puts more time in than almost any other researcher and if he anted to hoax, he would atleast have had something better than just eyeshine and would have made some money off of it. People that hoax are the city folk type like Rick Dyer that go to a state forest or something, for the first time in their life, and happen to get an amazing video. If you want to know these things are real, get a job as a solo logger or something, do something where you are in the remote forest 365 and you will notice stuff.
ReplyDeleteMost of these guys never leave the basement so thats never going to happen.
DeleteOh that`s right - none of them hoax at all, ever ,nope ,not ever ever ever.
DeleteOf course Dodson doesn't hoax. He misidentifies, which is not the same thing.
ReplyDeleteHoaxing is fooling other people. Dodson only makes a fool of himself.
Dodson has integrity, but lacks ability. Hoaxers like Dyer have the brains, but lack integrity. And then there's Kelly Shaw, who has neither brains nor integrity.
^ + 1000
DeleteThis is a fantastic website , thanks for sharing.
ReplyDeleteSecurity Camera Systems
Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more information? It is extremely helpful for me. miami surveillance cameras
ReplyDelete