You're sick of people rubbing scientifically repeatable evidence in your grill, more like. If the subject makes you feel like that, go do something else. It's a sure sign of an idiot, that he should spend time around something that brings out so much negativity in him.
Kittalia A. sent us the following questions about Patty, the Bigfoot in the Patterson-Gimlin film. They are all very good questions that we we wish we knew the answers to. We're no "Henry May" and it's times like this that we wish we had his number. Since we don't have Henry around whenever we need him, here are some easy questions for all you Patterson-Gimlin believers to try and answer:
Thanks to Matt Moneymaker for sharing this story with us from a guy named Thomas S. who was camping with some friends near the French Meadows Reservoir in August 2012. This remote, forested basin is located on the American River approximately 58 miles east of Auburn in the Sierra Nevada's. Before his encounter, the man thought Bigfoot "was just for entertainment purposes", but he changed his tune when he ended up with messy drawers that night. "That will teach to goof on our show," says Matt.
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
First!
ReplyDeleteTurds?
YES YES YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Delete^ Loser
Deletenotice the dumbcluck @ 6:31 pointing to hisself saying LOSER??
DeleteHAA HAA HAA LOL,WHAT A MORON!
What's going on in those swamps?
ReplyDeleteIndeed! I think there is more going on between those two than what's being told.
Take one out and bring it to the world for display or shut up!
ReplyDeleteWe're sick and tired of decades of the same old "evidence" that proves nothing!
You're sick of people rubbing scientifically repeatable evidence in your grill, more like. If the subject makes you feel like that, go do something else. It's a sure sign of an idiot, that he should spend time around something that brings out so much negativity in him.
DeleteThere is no evidence that proves the existence of bigfoot. If there was irrefutable proof, bigfoot would already be accepted by mainstream science.
DeleteIf they exist, bring in a body to prove it.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteYou were f'n schooled on the following comment section about all this just a few hours ago;
Deletehttp://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2016/11/bigfoot-super-powers-or-super-powerful.html
... Man up and address what's been put to you, rhetorical boy. You're like a stuck record... That doesn't know much.
Like I said: If there was irrefutable proof, bigfoot would already be accepted by mainstream science.
DeleteAnd like I said... you have points to address here;
Deletehttp://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2016/11/bigfoot-super-powers-or-super-powerful.html
... Troll. What's the matter, you too dense?
6:43 displays the same type of behavior associated with children who like to throw temper tantrums
ReplyDeletesomeone give this baby a pacifier
Joe