Everyone has thought about it - what happens when a bigfoot crosses paths with a grizzly bear? Are there other animals out there a bigfoot would be wise to avoid?
Never happened. Stupidity!!!! Why is it that only white people see bigfoot? Seems a bit strange. I still haven't seen anybody writing terds 100 times. Looks like Itkomi is wrong as usual. He can't back up his comments unless he can cut and paste someone else's opinion. That's because he is a moron.
It's a sure sign of how bad it's got for you, that you should focus on a simple figure of speech to try and help that meagre self esteem of yours. You keep focussing on faeces statements buddy... It's most certainly your level.
D'you know what's a far more fascinating question? Why someone would maintain one of the poorest illogical theories in ages, even though it's been explained away with easily attainable official statistics & figures. Maybe you're too stupid to understand them? Maybe you're Brandon and particularly upset that you've been outed as a scum bag?
Again your definition of a troll is off. There are 2 sides to bigfooting, believers and skeptics. Both sides, who have an interest in bigfoot have equal standing on a bigfoot site. You can not label one side as trolls. Why should belief trump skeptism? Calling skeptics trolls is no more than an ad hominem, a weak unfounded one at that.
Should he carry on with his attacks, or just come on out ?
But he probably can't give us some relief by doing the latter because he can not handle the truth about his feelings about the guy who he desires so so much. The guy who puts him in his place every single day. Iktomi
For starters, you are not a sceptic. A sceptic refrains from passing judgement and questions long standing ideals, even his own ideas. You are a pseudosceptic, so please stop butchering the concept.
Secondly, trolls particularly like to stick around here because this is where they get least satisfaction and self esteem from... It's a Crusade. Because they haven't the slightest idea how to counter the scientific evidence for relict hominids, they spend their days religiously pretending to be multiple posters, sensationalising the paranormal side of this topic, in a roundabout way of attacking enthusiastic people's credibility. It's pretty much pseudosceptical cowardice at its purest. The trolls here can be divided into three distinct types; *Some actually believe in "Bigfoot" but are a little too scared to admit it and for the sake of not being caught being positive on a blog like this, pretend to be "sceptical" and get there queries answered about the creature's existence by pasting the ISF's best pseudosceptical mantras. *Others are trolls who suffer emotional issues such as depression, low self-esteem, and anger. They want to inject their own emotional turmoil into other people by luring them into negativity. It's a way for them to feel some kind of control or power over their own disruptive emotions, at other people's expense. http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/11/world/internet-trolling/ *And then you have the others who are quite simply on the psychopathy spectrum. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/internet-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists
If I was to not ever address your points presented and attack your character, then than would be ad hominem... But I think I address your drivel rather well.
the skeptrolls are desperate today. They deny bigfoot exists yet they can't stay away from this site in an obsessive paranoid kinda way. wake up lads and put the cheetos down
One of the pgf proponants arguements is that there is no examples of costumes with the same fur. Here we have one. So according to joe this is also a real bigfoot because this type of fur doesnt exist in costume form.
Sorry 4:26... Nobody is seeing presenting a footage source as scientific evidence for one of those sensationalised examples, and hey certainly don't have three databases of contemporary reports as well a unique species trait in psychical evidence.
Nope! ONE of the arguments (of many, many) for its authenticity is that there is no known for cloth technique in almost 100 years of costume making, that accounts for what we see in that footage. Not one of the most awarded of professionals in all of Hollywood, who all like to claim that they're the best, can account for it.
I really don't think Roger would have been so detailed in his "costume", shooting in shakey 16MM, to have mastered an unprecedented fur cloth technique that wouldn't even have been noticeable. I don't think he anticipated the footage being digitalised and stabelised 45 years later and decided to put SFX defying detail to his costume just in case. Detail that could have got him a job in the most well paid of Hollywood SFX as opposed to "swindling about Bigfoot".
So please don't try to condescend anyone about what's logical. The audacity from you angry trolls is incredible some times.
It would be hell of a scrap. It's worth noting however that a part of native oral history that keeps surfacing, is an ancient agreement the natives had with the "tall hairy tribes", in that they would keep the grizzly bears away from their settlements.
There's an amazing account in Monsters and Mysteries of Alaska here; https://youtu.be/M1cv5xEkx14
... And if my memory serves me correctly, a 9 foot Grizzly gets spooked away by a Sasquatch. The fisherman goes through a test by an expert as well to determine whether he's lying or not.
It is a proven scientific fact that black people are horribly afraid of the woods and forested areas. Many within the scientific community hypothesize that this phobia is a genetic trait deeply embedded into the black man genetic code from the early underground railroad days and from the days when the honky slave traders would catch the escaped slaves and beat them whilst in the forest.
Since my phone is a LGL34C. I AM LIMTED TO A FEW SENTANCE'S. The mexican and black dudes I work with will laugh thier butts off after I Show them your (7:33) post.. haa haa ha AC collins
I've said it before and I'll say it again. A male grizzly would be wiping his ass with bigfoots corpse before Fasano could get his camera out of the cab. For the love of Christ thy have railroad spikes for claws. And did I mention, that as rule, they're kinda grumpy 24/7? If you ever met Mrs. Grizzly, you'd understand. She's not winning any Nobel prize's herself anytime soon. Sasquatch's best option is to avoid eye contact, mumble a hello and run like a mofo.
Just few weeks ago I saw a comment about Dr. Ekpen Temple, someone talking about how he has help him in his relationship break up, I also contacted him because i was facing the same problem in my relationship, today i can boldly recommend Dr. Ekpen Temple to someone who is also facing break up in his or her relationship to contact him for help today because he has help me restore my relationship back to normal, here is he contact details (ekpentemple@gmail.com) or 2347050270218
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Never happened. Stupidity!!!!
ReplyDeleteWhy is it that only white people see bigfoot? Seems a bit strange. I still haven't seen anybody writing terds 100 times. Looks like Itkomi is wrong as usual. He can't back up his comments unless he can cut and paste someone else's opinion. That's because he is a moron.
Since when are the indigenous people White? moron!
DeleteWhat's the matter bro? You seen a little upset about something??
Delete: )
It's Stuey after wall! The angry resident village idiot who's always looking to get even with not an ounce of common sense!!
DeleteHa ha ha ha!!
Hey Crapo, who said indigenous people where white? Maybe the same idiot that said somebody posts the word terd 100 times a day on here.
DeleteIt's a sure sign of how bad it's got for you, that you should focus on a simple figure of speech to try and help that meagre self esteem of yours. You keep focussing on faeces statements buddy... It's most certainly your level.
DeleteD'you know what's a far more fascinating question? Why someone would maintain one of the poorest illogical theories in ages, even though it's been explained away with easily attainable official statistics & figures. Maybe you're too stupid to understand them? Maybe you're Brandon and particularly upset that you've been outed as a scum bag?
The mind Boggles.
: )
Bigfoot dont exist
DeleteYes... Even though you keep coming here every day to check on its existence.
DeleteI come here to check your mental health and to continue to attempt to educate you
DeleteNot according to the psychologists who are concerned with your behaviour, you're not.
DeleteThats based on your lack of understanding of what a troll is.
Delete... Not according to anyone with the capacity to understand what the psychologists who are concerned with your behaviour say.
DeleteAgain your definition of a troll is off. There are 2 sides to bigfooting, believers and skeptics. Both sides, who have an interest in bigfoot have equal standing on a bigfoot site. You can not label one side as trolls. Why should belief trump skeptism? Calling skeptics trolls is no more than an ad hominem, a weak unfounded one at that.
DeleteStuey has issues with his feelings toward Iktomi
DeleteHe does not know what to do
Should he carry on with his attacks, or just come on out ?
But he probably can't give us some relief by doing the latter because he can not handle the truth about his feelings about the guy who he desires so so much. The guy who puts him in his place every single day. Iktomi
Skeptics are trolls...All they need to do is get off the couch, do some research, and they would find out we're right!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteFor starters, you are not a sceptic. A sceptic refrains from passing judgement and questions long standing ideals, even his own ideas. You are a pseudosceptic, so please stop butchering the concept.
DeleteSecondly, trolls particularly like to stick around here because this is where they get least satisfaction and self esteem from... It's a Crusade. Because they haven't the slightest idea how to counter the scientific evidence for relict hominids, they spend their days religiously pretending to be multiple posters, sensationalising the paranormal side of this topic, in a roundabout way of attacking enthusiastic people's credibility. It's pretty much pseudosceptical cowardice at its purest.
The trolls here can be divided into three distinct types;
*Some actually believe in "Bigfoot" but are a little too scared to admit it and for the sake of not being caught being positive on a blog like this, pretend to be "sceptical" and get there queries answered about the creature's existence by pasting the ISF's best pseudosceptical mantras.
*Others are trolls who suffer emotional issues such as depression, low self-esteem, and anger. They want to inject their own emotional turmoil into other people by luring them into negativity. It's a way for them to feel some kind of control or power over their own disruptive emotions, at other people's expense.
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/11/world/internet-trolling/
*And then you have the others who are quite simply on the psychopathy spectrum.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/your-online-secrets/201409/internet-trolls-are-narcissists-psychopaths-and-sadists
If I was to not ever address your points presented and attack your character, then than would be ad hominem... But I think I address your drivel rather well.
Your lack of understand of your opponants position is worrying.
DeleteI've had time to study it, in fact, and the heights of denial you hit is beyond worrying my friend.
DeleteWhat exactly is being denied?
Delete... Add rhetoricals to that list of new heights.
DeleteYou use rhetorical far too often. Expand your vocabulary.
Delete@ 6:45 You Are 100% correct!!
DeleteRhetorical.
Deletethe skeptrolls are desperate today. They deny bigfoot exists yet they can't stay away from this site in an obsessive paranoid kinda way.
Deletewake up lads and put the cheetos down
Joe
@ 9:20 You Are literally correct 98% of the time!!
Delete^ what's a man to do when he see's rhetorical comments from this one 98% of the time?
DeleteKeep shining Don's ****, he likes that.
awe,poor little ikky.Where's
DeleteVtD??
Why, you worried?
Delete(cringe)
DeleteIf you are concerned about n*t shining you better talk to Joe, Iktomi. That bloke gives you tongue action.
DeleteFur looks the same as pgf
ReplyDeleteGot monkey suit?
DeleteGot frogman suit?
DeleteGot dogman suit?
Got unicorn suit?
Got Nessie suit?
Must all be real then.
One of the pgf proponants arguements is that there is no examples of costumes with the same fur. Here we have one. So according to joe this is also a real bigfoot because this type of fur doesnt exist in costume form.
DeleteSorry 4:26... Nobody is seeing presenting a footage source as scientific evidence for one of those sensationalised examples, and hey certainly don't have three databases of contemporary reports as well a unique species trait in psychical evidence.
DeleteNope! ONE of the arguments (of many, many) for its authenticity is that there is no known for cloth technique in almost 100 years of costume making, that accounts for what we see in that footage. Not one of the most awarded of professionals in all of Hollywood, who all like to claim that they're the best, can account for it.
I really don't think Roger would have been so detailed in his "costume", shooting in shakey 16MM, to have mastered an unprecedented fur cloth technique that wouldn't even have been noticeable. I don't think he anticipated the footage being digitalised and stabelised 45 years later and decided to put SFX defying detail to his costume just in case. Detail that could have got him a job in the most well paid of Hollywood SFX as opposed to "swindling about Bigfoot".
So please don't try to condescend anyone about what's logical. The audacity from you angry trolls is incredible some times.
Cor , futt me !!!
DeleteWow what a meltdown. Fur looks the same. Watch side by side
Deletehttp://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf
DeleteYeah... And you folk keep telling witnesses they're seeing things that aren't there.
A grizzly bear would kill a bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteIt certainly would kill a bloke in a suit which is all bigfoot is
Delete^ You know that isn`t true..you jerk.
DeleteIt would be hell of a scrap. It's worth noting however that a part of native oral history that keeps surfacing, is an ancient agreement the natives had with the "tall hairy tribes", in that they would keep the grizzly bears away from their settlements.
DeleteThere's an amazing account in Monsters and Mysteries of Alaska here;
https://youtu.be/M1cv5xEkx14
... And if my memory serves me correctly, a 9 foot Grizzly gets spooked away by a Sasquatch. The fisherman goes through a test by an expert as well to determine whether he's lying or not.
Absolute fantasy^
DeleteYes... Now tell us all about your hundreds year old conspiracy to explain it away.
DeleteI'D LIKE TO SEE A BIGFOOT FIGHT A 30-06 BULLET BETWEEN THE EYES!!
DeleteLOL...
AC collins
^ obviously it would not be you who shot it.
DeleteBecause you are not going to see a bigfoot from your mom's basementwindow and shooting an air soft does not qualify you for anyrhing
"ANYRHING"??? WTF??
DeleteHey Hey Hey it's,,,,,,,
....Troll Killer in duh house!
No A.C., WRONG LOOOOOOOOOSER!
DeleteSo how long you in for?
Goo Goo Gaa Gaaa Duh uhh !
DeleteThere I just answered your question in a format you would understand!
AC collins :-))
So you have a baby fetish ------
DeleteWear's the diaper, sucks his thumb, likes to shit himself......
Sounds about right.
Whats your convict No.?
Who's AC ?
Delete@11:45 ,stop projecting,because now "WE ALL" know more about you than you know about you!!
DeleteAC collins
when I SAY "WE ALL". I mean the demons in my head!
DeleteAC collins
Friggin TK ^
DeleteAC
It is a proven scientific fact that black people are horribly afraid of the woods and forested areas. Many within the scientific community hypothesize that this phobia is a genetic trait deeply embedded into the black man genetic code from the early underground railroad days and from the days when the honky slave traders would catch the escaped slaves and beat them whilst in the forest.
ReplyDeleteSince my phone is a LGL34C.
DeleteI AM LIMTED TO A FEW SENTANCE'S. The mexican and black dudes I work with will laugh thier butts off
after I Show them your (7:33) post..
haa haa ha
AC collins
We don't care what your phone is. We don't care who you work with. We don't care what you think at all, get lost tard!
DeleteBeing locked up is not work A.C..
DeleteWhat A.C. calls his basement!
HA HA HA HA ,WE????
DeleteNOBODY CARES WHAT YOU THINK
11:01.
Go Hug A Root!
Did you make trustee A.C.. Is that why your allowed to have a phone. Better not get caught talking trash to woman. You'll be back on shovel detail!
DeleteWhy do you hate woman 11:38??
DeleteOnly white people see the magic monkeys of the mushroom forest.
ReplyDeleteThats not true → https://www.youtube.com/user/reiaccus55/videos
Deleteeat this!
I've said it before and I'll say it again. A male grizzly would be wiping his ass with bigfoots corpse before Fasano could get his camera out of the cab. For the love of Christ thy have railroad spikes for claws. And did I mention, that as rule, they're kinda grumpy 24/7? If you ever met Mrs. Grizzly, you'd understand. She's not winning any Nobel prize's herself anytime soon. Sasquatch's best option is to avoid eye contact, mumble a hello and run like a mofo.
ReplyDeleteJust few weeks ago I saw a comment about Dr. Ekpen Temple, someone talking about how he has help him in his relationship break up, I also contacted him because i was facing the same problem in my relationship, today i can boldly recommend Dr. Ekpen Temple to someone who is also facing break up in his or her relationship to contact him for help today because he has help me restore my relationship back to normal, here is he contact details (ekpentemple@gmail.com) or 2347050270218
ReplyDelete