I'm sorry... Did you finally get around to proving that thousands of years of cultural and contemporary anecdotes, as well as physical, audio and video evidence is bunk?
Didn't think so... Another day, another failure at substantiating what is allegedly "so obvious". You're either stupid, or what's allegedly "so obvious", isn't very "obvious" at all.
I`m afraid Joe has succumbed to religion...each night he kneels and prays for there to be just a scrap of something that could be deemed evidence on the morrow...but his lord always forsakes him.
Poor chap he is...I feel almost sorry for him...but not quite.
Sorry kid... And not for the first time today... Science isn't a freethinking entity. It is a tool, and has been used to verify repeatable, scientific evidence. If this is so blatantly obviously wrong, and scrutinised by so many "proper scientists", you'll no doubt be able to source a solid scientific argument to conclusively show that the evidence for enthusiasm is none existent...
Science acknowledges reason, empiricism, and evidence. How this is relevant to my situation, is that there is reason to invest enthusiasm in the subject matter based on the accumulated data that accounts for the experiences of tens of thousands of people, spanning different cultures, that is supported by means of physical and even biological evidences that can't be scientifically shown to be false.
Religions include revelation, faith and sacredness, and how this is relevant to your situation is that you have nothing but dataless opinion void of any scientific factual basis, with a requirement to be devoted in expressing your sentiment at every opportunity.
^ 3:35 LOL you sound like an uneducated lush trying to sound scientific. What's your degree in, Mr. scientist? Empirically speaking, that is, of course.
The only thing that get's "owned" around here are the silly anonymous bloggers that have zero input on this discussion.
Iktomi and the others are kicking your asses every day and night because all you have is abuse and they have sightings, reports, witnesses and other evidence.
You trolls cant even find the Chimp suite that you claim is evidence, so dont tell me who is getting a beating.
Yes, doesn't matter how many times they say we are owned or beaten doesn't make it true does it?
All that matters is the evidence.
Here is a link to British Columbia Sasquatch reports: http://www.sasquatchcanada.com/uploads/9/4/5/1/945132/british_columbia-sasquatch-sighting-reports.pdf
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Peace!!
ReplyDelete^ cREEPY BOY.
DeleteBest Cryptid movie ever: Herzog and Penn's mockumentary within a mockumentary, Incident at Loch Ness.
DeleteOh my gosh! Yes! Loved it and loved Herzog's Grizzly Man. Timothy Treadwell was so brave.
DeleteMMC
Thoroughly enjoyed Grizzly Man as well. Tragic and horrific how Treadwell passed on.
DeleteAnother day of footers getting a beating has almost passed .
ReplyDeleteThe fact that bigfoot doesn`t exist is the real Coup de Grace for their ailing sanity.
A miserable night of reality looms for them.
Ho ho ho
I'm sorry... Did you finally get around to proving that thousands of years of cultural and contemporary anecdotes, as well as physical, audio and video evidence is bunk?
DeleteDidn't think so... Another day, another failure at substantiating what is allegedly "so obvious". You're either stupid, or what's allegedly "so obvious", isn't very "obvious" at all.
Which one is it?
^ You clearly haven`t yet mastered to understanding the simple scientific evaluation of evidence formula.
DeleteIt really isn`t that hard...you`ve not any evidence that is accepted...simples.
You berk.
I`m afraid Joe has succumbed to religion...each night he kneels and prays for there to be just a scrap of something that could be deemed evidence on the morrow...but his lord always forsakes him.
DeletePoor chap he is...I feel almost sorry for him...but not quite.
Hahahahahaha
Sorry kid... And not for the first time today... Science isn't a freethinking entity. It is a tool, and has been used to verify repeatable, scientific evidence. If this is so blatantly obviously wrong, and scrutinised by so many "proper scientists", you'll no doubt be able to source a solid scientific argument to conclusively show that the evidence for enthusiasm is none existent...
DeleteRight?
Science acknowledges reason, empiricism, and evidence. How this is relevant to my situation, is that there is reason to invest enthusiasm in the subject matter based on the accumulated data that accounts for the experiences of tens of thousands of people, spanning different cultures, that is supported by means of physical and even biological evidences that can't be scientifically shown to be false.
DeleteReligions include revelation, faith and sacredness, and how this is relevant to your situation is that you have nothing but dataless opinion void of any scientific factual basis, with a requirement to be devoted in expressing your sentiment at every opportunity.
^ 3:35 LOL you sound like an uneducated lush trying to sound scientific. What's your degree in, Mr. scientist? Empirically speaking, that is, of course.
DeleteMy degree is in "shut up and sit down".
Delete4:12, ...and you comply very nicely.
DeleteYou're too easy, joe. LOL
Do your sausage fingers mistakingly hit the space bar too much, or do you think it makes your comments a little less cruddy somehow?
DeleteSee ya tomorrow, troll!
DeleteNo one gets your sausage finger reference. Arthritis? That's your joke? How is that relevant or remotely funny?
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThe only thing that get's "owned" around here are the silly anonymous bloggers that have zero input on this discussion.
ReplyDeleteIktomi and the others are kicking your asses every day and night because all you have is abuse and they have sightings, reports, witnesses and other evidence.
You trolls cant even find the Chimp suite that you claim is evidence, so dont tell me who is getting a beating.
Deleted post: Missing Word.
Hey Anton!
Delete(I know how much it kills the two trolls when I say hello to you!)
Anton Pattison, tells us more about midtarsal breaks.
DeleteTell us how you blither around all the while midtarsal breaks are still indicative of Sasquatch evidence.
DeleteYou missed what your moronic buddy said, joe. Back to school for you. LOL
DeleteI caught a typo... And all the while midtarsal breaks are still indicative of Sasquatch evidence.
DeleteYou caught a typo.. You're one up on you're hunting hero's... did you use night vision?
DeleteWas that meant to be some witty correlation between a typing error and "Bigfoot"?
DeleteFail.
Not talking about a typo, Joe. Are you as clueless as anton?
DeleteYes, doesn't matter how many times they say we are owned or beaten doesn't make it true does it?
ReplyDeleteAll that matters is the evidence.
Here is a link to British Columbia Sasquatch reports:
http://www.sasquatchcanada.com/uploads/9/4/5/1/945132/british_columbia-sasquatch-sighting-reports.pdf
Anton, you're clueless. Please, impart your midtarsal break wisdom. Your pub hopping Indian girl will jump in if you get confused.
DeleteIktomi and the Hendersons: He sexually molests their children and blames it on Bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteI made the bestest bigfeets movie ever,it stood the test of time.
ReplyDelete