5 Most Compelling Pieces Of Bigfoot Evidence
This video is actually pretty good if you're looking for more clout when making your argument with skeptics. Some of the evidence presented in this video have stood the test of time and very compelling indeed. Watch it below:
Jolly good !
ReplyDeleteExcellent ammo against skeptical trolls !
Joe
No need to watch the video because bigfoot doesn't exist. Only a retarded monkey would believe anything else.
ReplyDeleteGot monkey suit mate ?
Deleteif not bugger off
Joe
"No need to watch the video because bigfoot doesn't exist. Only a retarded monkey would believe anything else."
DeleteWhat's the matter... Scared you might watch something that'll add to your year long meltdown? Something scared you along the way, and it is a natural human response for a spoiled little brat to act like you do when your safe little world comes crashing down. You pathetic, hateful little insignificant.
Keep praying, you get no closer to closing out your burden, ha ha ha ha ha!!!
How come you get so upset when someone blows your fantasy out the water? Grow up.
DeleteI'm sorry, you didn't seem to manage that, now there's a fantasy if ever I've read one on here. No, calling people stupid, merely shows your superiority complex... Your burden still exists.
DeleteGet busy.
Calling people stupid when they are objectively stupid sounds about right.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteIronic really then that you're no closer to closing off that burden. You see, "stupid" to me is someone that for all the alleged obviousness of the situation, he can't develop the capacity to show how obvious a decision it is, in regard to the evidence. Now... Your "outrageous claim" and burden is to show that for thousands years of cultural and contemporary anecdotes, that are accompanied by supporting physical, biological, video and audio evidence has nothing to it. That is your burden. You claim "Bigfoot don't exist" in the face of all of that, then prove the evidence is bunk... You are no better than anyone to be excluded that requirement. An adult would understand this, it is lost on a spoiled little child though.
DeleteEasy.
Irony abounds in these comments. Joe is the king of irony.
DeleteYet you can't get rid of that dammed burden eh?
DeleteYou must be "stupid" or something.
: )
The PGF stands above everything else as far as evidence. it's been almost 50 years since Patterson and Gimlin encountered the beast and even though many have tried to discredit the film claiming it was a suit no one has even come close to recreating it . even some of the specials tried and their suit looks like bollocks . So how can someone like Patterson who wasn't a special effects professional and didn't have a huge bankroll behind him produce a suit that is still confounding experts ? I'll tell you why mate- because despite his reputation he was lucky enough to come across a real life creature one October back in '67 and had said so til his dying days. Any skeptics care to try and reproduce the suit with the same visible muscle movements then be my guest but I have a feeling i'll be enjoying more than a few pints til i ever see the day it is proven to be a hoax 100%
DeleteTil then i ask again- got the monkey suit ?
Didn't think so plonkers
Joe
The Freeman Footage is hoaxed BS. This was Freeman's second bigfoot footage. How many people have multiple sightings let alone film "bigfoot" twice? Freeman was a BS hoaxer.
ReplyDeleteThe Jacob's Creature is a bear. Look at the feet of the creature at 8:10. The cryptid is called bigfoot, not bearfoot. Bigfoot is called bigfoot because of large human looking feet. Is that what you see at 8:10? No.
This has been addressed too many times to count. When people like Freeman have so many encounters, it never has to have anything to do with anything he's doing... It could quite simply be down to Sasquatch having the curiosity, the relaxed nature to be around Freeman. In one of Freeman's encounters, he was accompanied by two other government employees, and they accumulated tracks and hairs that Sykes now has in his possession that have quite amazing initial testing results (watch this space).
Delete"An English Professor in Vermont was able to apply some mathematics to the Jacobs photos within months of their release. His results showed a scientific way to study the photos, and strengthened the case that the Jacobs creature is a primate rather than a bear. He focused on the different torso/limb ratios of bears and primates, and the torso/limb ratios seen on the Jacobs creatures. He also referenced the limb ratios of the bear cubs seen in the earlier photo taken by the camera. The glacially slow inertia of the scientific community will, in time, be affected by his analysis."
http://www.bfro.net/avevid/jacobs/jacobs_photos.asp
Does anyone know what the name of this English Professor in Vermont is? Also I have read comments concerning the Jacobs photos that not all were shown. In other words pictures taken just before and after were not released. True?
DeleteI'm currently trying to source that, in the mean time here's this;
Deletehttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LG2PHVq4Gfk
Oh, and I'm really not sure about additional before and after photos. The only photos I thought existed were those of the Jocobs subject and bears that are in the BFRO link in my initial comment.
DeleteScroll down to the comments and click on Terry McCormick's channel. There are some interesting comparisons and breakdowns regarding said photos. Hope you enjoyed your music fest.
DeleteThanks NC!! It was great my friend!! Very exhausted now though!!
DeleteSorry NC, what page is that??
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteMy apologies. It's Kerry McCormick. Third comment from the bottom of page 1.
DeleteJotomi went to a queer fest??
DeleteThanks NC!!!
DeleteHere's that video;
Deletehttp://youtu.be/GL4KFApaWXs
The video description to the experiment says it all my friend.
LOL stupids. That Jacob creature thing does not have big feet like bigfoot. You people only see what you want to see.
DeleteIt most certainly does. And he's a biologist as well.
DeleteThanks for the head's up friend! Made my day!
DeleteUnlucky 11:47.
..Rene Dahindren agreed with the OP..He called Freeman a "repeat offender"..Indeed, Rene knew more than anyone how rare decent evidence is, and was suspicious of people like Freeman who had an uncanny amount of success...Its difficult to quantify, but the chance of filming bigfoots twice must be very, very small...
DeleteSome of Freeman's tracks have been verified by a long line of forensic experts to have dermal ridges, that in their opinion, are impossible to fake. Sykes' initial analysis on a hair sample of his is an exact to a feral human in Uzbekistan.
DeleteSome of Freeman's results are 100% an eyebrow raiser, but I think he's legitimate.
What long line of forensic experts? Names?
DeleteTatyana Gladkova, Dermatoglyphics expert at the USSR Institute of Anthropology. Mikhail Urisson and Vladimir Volkov-Dubrovin (Deputy Director of the Institute) agrees with her opinion. Henrietta Heet, Candidate of Biological Sciences and Senior Scientific Worker, Institute of Ethnography of the USSR Academy of Sciences. Douglas M. Monsoor, Supervisor, Criminalistics Unit, Department of Public Safety, Lakewood, Colorado. Certified Latent Print Examiner, and fellow of the Fingerprint Society of the United Kingdom. Robert D. Olsen, Sr., Criminalist, Kansas Bureau of Investigation, Topeka, Kansas. Certified Latent Print Examiner, Fellow of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Fellow of the Fingerprint Society of the United Kingdom,Member of International Association for Identification, etc. Edward Palma, Fingerprint examiner for the Laramie County Sheriff's Department, Cheyenne, Wyoming. Benny Kling, Instructor, Law Enforcement Academy, Douglas, Wyoming.
DeleteHi Iktomi!
DeleteHere's a new BFRO report that I find interesting. I wonder if this is anywhere around Mikey?
Oops! Here's the link.
Deletehttp://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=47702
Looks to be fairly close, Uno. About 43 miles east of San Antonio.
DeleteThanks Uno!! Will check it out!!
DeleteThanks guys!
DeleteThe use of the rock and the stick is something I hadn't read about previously.
Iktomi, check out McCormick's second breakdown regarding the Jacobs photo on his channel. Here you will find how the photo piqued his curiosity as a biologist, and some interesting size comparisons between the subject in the photo and the bears that were previously photographed. Hope you enjoy.
DeleteHere's that link;
Deletehttp://youtu.be/kar3kQWzUw8
... Excellent video which basically PROVES it's not a bear!! Double unlucky 11:47!! All of the Western World will hear of this!!
On and on the Debate go. 3 years from now, if this site still exists, people will still be debating the existence of Bigfoot. those that do not believe, will still come on this site whining why it doesn't exist (they themselves never go into the woods) and those that are Believers or knowers.
ReplyDeleteJoe, it's a waste of your talent to argue with these skeptic Trolls!
Hope you are well my friend.
DeleteHey Iktomi, I've been meaning to get back to you but I've been busy working. Hope all is well.
DeleteAll in good time brother!! No worries! Hope you are well!!
DeleteSometimes I'm confused by what I think is really obvious. But what I think is really obvious obviously isn't obvious.
ReplyDeleteI really do think the Skookum cast is an elk lay. The video mentions a lack of hoof tracks, but what about the lack of Sasquatch tracks? It is not unreasonable to think there would be handprint evidence as well considering the propensity for using the hands when rising from an inclined position. I recently wrote Dr.Meldrum about these thoughts, and he replied that it is being reconsidered, although no conclusion has been drawn.
ReplyDeleteI'm with you guys, I believe the Skookum cast and Jacobs creature are both explainable as being known animals. What should have been included in this video is Michael Townsend's Mt. Saint Helens teeth imprints. I'm having a issues coming up with a explanation as to how those imprints could have been made by anything else.
ReplyDeleteWood carving chisels come in 1000's
Deletesizes and shapes.
Vegas brother, this is what made me think twice about it;
Deletehttp://thebigfootnews.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/new-jonny-dagger-scientific-paper-seeks.html?m=0
11:23 - if you think they were made with chisels then perhaps you can try to reproduce them if you think it's that easy. The skookum cast may or may not be real but the thousands upon thousands of eyewitness reports must count fro something. They all can't eb lying or mistaking a bear for a bigfoot
DeleteJoe
Thanks Iktomi, I hadn't seen this yet.
DeleteI took your advice and watched the video. It has made my beliefs stronger that bigfoot doesn't exist. There was not one valid point. I'm starting to think that vegastheflog and Itkomi/Joe live in a special needs home together and lick windows and s hit in the adult diapers all day.
ReplyDeleteyes you are correct for one iktomi is a woman named sandy...yes its true and vegasshole well he's just a bored bald middle aged nobody that thinks he is superior to all, because he just got the manager position at burger king
Delete^^ You guys try oh so very hard but in the end you bring nothing to the debate . I may have never seen a bigfoot but i know they exist quite like you've both never talked to a real girl but i'm sure you know they exist as well.
DeleteCheerio fellas
Joe
2:32 and 2:36 are the same person, you can easily tell because nothing written was remotely funny. Good on ya for thinking people would feel superior for being the manager of a Burger King. I think it says everything we need to know about your employment situation.
ReplyDeleteJoe gots smoked again . . . time to change your name.
ReplyDelete