There is no scientific premise put forward for the authenticity of Mark Anders subjects. That is because the subjects in his sources are clearly photoshopped and don't have the organic consistency of anything you see in the PGF. The very obvious thing to draw upon, are the reactions of ten years olds, who wouldn't even take the Anders stuff seriously. You must test science, get scientific backing behind a few photoshopped sources, and you have a comparison.
Bob H's first polygraph was refused a peer review, and he second that was broadcast on a shoddy lie detector's show's presenter was shown to be a fraud. Roger Patterson's was arranged by National Wildlife Magazine.
But haints, there is 1,000 years of cultural tradition regarding the existence of bigfoot backed up by multiple databases cataloging thousands of modern sightings and bolstered by physical evidence authenticated by elite scientists in their respective disciplines. And there is also blah blah blah . . . oh never mind.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
First First First First!!!!
ReplyDeleteSex, breakfast of champions.
DeletePayment due in full before 10am please !!
Delete
ReplyDeleteThe Roger Patterson and Mark Anders videos are real.
Like Joe Welsh says "Got monkey suit?"
Patterson was hoaxed. Bob Hieronimus already admitted to it.
DeleteHi there Stewart darling!
DeleteOOOOO steamy!
DeleteYes there is romance in the BF world and its right here
DeleteThere is no scientific premise put forward for the authenticity of Mark Anders subjects. That is because the subjects in his sources are clearly photoshopped and don't have the organic consistency of anything you see in the PGF. The very obvious thing to draw upon, are the reactions of ten years olds, who wouldn't even take the Anders stuff seriously. You must test science, get scientific backing behind a few photoshopped sources, and you have a comparison.
DeleteBob H's first polygraph was refused a peer review, and he second that was broadcast on a shoddy lie detector's show's presenter was shown to be a fraud. Roger Patterson's was arranged by National Wildlife Magazine.
I keep thinking that one day I'm going to drop in at Bigfoot Evidence and actually see some evidence.
ReplyDeleteBut haints, there is 1,000 years of cultural tradition regarding the existence of bigfoot backed up by multiple databases cataloging thousands of modern sightings and bolstered by physical evidence authenticated by elite scientists in their respective disciplines. And there is also blah blah blah . . . oh never mind.
DeleteMmmmm - sounds familiar. I think I have heard that somewhere before.
Delete5:35... You're learning. Haints is a slow learner though... Bear with him.
DeleteIf you are going to write your police brutality essay soon, try to read these advices. These are my fav writing advices
ReplyDelete