Sign of the times. That simple video of two idiots releasing a snake would be rated R if rated by the MPAA movie ratings board but yet here it is for children of any age to hear Shirt anf Fark......
How can it be a moose? It's on a slope! It is a mother and baby bigfoot. There were likely prints as well. There is no greater evidence than dermal ridges in plaster casts. Game over. Go back to school, kid.
what a couple of rejects....one guy looks inbred, he has those "Deliverance" close together eyes, from fucking ones sister.. not that i would know..;-)..thank you Howard Stern
Kittalia A. sent us the following questions about Patty, the Bigfoot in the Patterson-Gimlin film. They are all very good questions that we we wish we knew the answers to. We're no "Henry May" and it's times like this that we wish we had his number. Since we don't have Henry around whenever we need him, here are some easy questions for all you Patterson-Gimlin believers to try and answer:
Thanks to Matt Moneymaker for sharing this story with us from a guy named Thomas S. who was camping with some friends near the French Meadows Reservoir in August 2012. This remote, forested basin is located on the American River approximately 58 miles east of Auburn in the Sierra Nevada's. Before his encounter, the man thought Bigfoot "was just for entertainment purposes", but he changed his tune when he ended up with messy drawers that night. "That will teach to goof on our show," says Matt.
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
corny turds
ReplyDeleteSign of the times. That simple video of two idiots releasing a snake would be rated R if rated by the MPAA movie ratings board but yet here it is for children of any age to hear Shirt anf Fark......
DeleteThis is you.
Deletehttps://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/104026591/Poo-8906.jpg
^
Deletewill not click
Snake saved by Beavis and Butt head xx
DeleteWhat about the transgender and transsexual agenda of this site?
DeleteWhat is the agenda?please enlighten me xx
DeleteAt 4:42 you can see something in the trees.
ReplyDeletethat's just bigfoot tying a blue plastic bag around some branches. That or possibly a few bigfoot performing a sky burial. Nothing to see there
DeleteJohn W. Jones Spoke
Stolen from r/videos just like every thing on molders world.
ReplyDeleteHow can it be a moose? It's on a slope! It is a mother and baby bigfoot. There were likely prints as well. There is no greater evidence than dermal ridges in plaster casts. Game over. Go back to school, kid.
DeleteCould it possibly have been stolen from BenD Dovers buttcheeks??
DeleteMr. Frank Evans
It was at least 43 ft tall and was hanging from one of the branches
Deletewhat a couple of rejects....one guy looks inbred, he has those "Deliverance" close together eyes, from fucking ones sister.. not that i would know..;-)..thank you Howard Stern
ReplyDeleteBabba Booey says F off.
Delete