Is This The Sound Of Bigfoot Crying?


Something people sometimes report from the field is the sound of an infant crying. Nobody is quite sure what makes this sound, or what it means. Is it a distress call. A way to lure prey? The biggest question however, is it a bigfoot?


Comments

  1. That's the sound sweaty yeti makes when microsoft paint crashes

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh for goodness sake it is a cat. Either big or small variety, but it is definitely a cat. Anyone who has cats will recognize the sound.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wrong.

      It is in fact a 9 foot ape that is also 100% modern human apart from when certain attributes require it to be an ape or something like that.

      Delete
    2. ^ Dr.Meldrum, its a pleasure to see you commenting here, or whatever.

      Delete
    3. 5:06... Ancient human with archaic features with possibly, modern DNA. Just like we have examples of in fossils, you dig?

      You people need to actually learn something for once; dense as a bucket of dog ****.

      Delete
    4. lktomi, the human features of sasquatches is key; their infants have been observed crying like human babies.

      I read one story of a female sasquatch that appeared to be washing an infant in a river and it was crying. If I find it I'll post it.

      Here is a story of an infant that was shot, but it didn't die right away. It cried.

      http://sasquatchresearchers.org/forums/index.php?/topic/323-monkey-like-a-child-shot-in-new-york-forest/

      I'm sure sasqatches have a difficult time with crying infants too.

      Delete
    5. Great information Dover, I am aware of Mike B having a similar experience, I'll try and source that for you accordingly.

      Delete
    6. Here's the by line with the video at youtube:

      Many witnesses hear this cry at certain times throughout the year. This digital recording was captured in a research area located along the river banks on the Navajo Reservation. The recording was noise filtered and amplified to hear the cry and chirp. Possible young baby creature.

      Delete
    7. It`s joetomi blubbling into his Welsh sheep dip as he learns bigfoot isn`t real.

      Delete
    8. Do you know how much you sound like an immature child, not just a child, but an immature one? You write like this so often that you really must have this immature mentality -- a man that never grew to live in an adult world.

      I'm not just saying this as a come back; its how you are. Adults grow out of how you conduct yourself on this site. If you want to live in normal society you have to start acting like an adult.

      Delete
    9. 11:45... Learning is a process I don't think you're much capable of. Especially in that you spend all your time around a topic & your best argument is still "Bigfoot don't exist".

      Keep doing your theory group proud.

      Delete
    10. Total stupidity. No one has shot a bigfoot. No one has heard one 'cry' with any real bona fide proof or evidence.
      There is absolutely no bona fide proof they even exist, yet there is this entire lore and myth of 'facts about bigfoot' that people quote ad nauseum as if it was real information.
      It is fine to believe there may be a giant primate in the woods but for goodness sake stop trying to act as if you are an expert on a crypto animal.
      It is the height of ridiculousness.

      Delete
    11. The height of ridiculousness is to automatically dismiss thousands of reports, many by credible people, because it doesn't fit your preconception.

      Delete
  3. I heard of the international skeptics forum and I went there looking for the bigfoot threads. I could not find any in the science section. Does anyone know which section the bigfoot threads are in?

    Thank you

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is the sound Shawn Evidence makes as his click count enters a death spiral.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Bigfoot does not exist" - Bryan Sykes

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The most Sykes could actually say is 'I don't think BF exists'.

      All he would be doing is offering an opinion. Sykes would never claim to have proven that BF does not exist.

      Even if haf discounted a thousand hair samples.

      MMG

      Delete
    2. ^ you can never prove it doesn't exist. That's a fallacy and you know it.

      Delete
    3. Did you not read what I posted on the previous thread?

      Delete
  6. When the best evidence for bigfoot is a turd that sasfooty bagged up the whole thing starts to become somewhat questionable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry friend.

      Nothing from those crazy cat lady habituators is remotely taken seriously by anyone but other crazy cat lady habituators.

      MMG

      Delete
    2. You can always tell a crazy cat lady. But you can't tell them a thing.

      MMC

      Delete
    3. Actually, I think its hysterical that people go into the woods and scoop up turds, then take them home in plastic bags. Who cares if there's a Bigfoot, that's comedy gold!

      Delete
    4. Actually, the best evidence for "Bigfoot" (I hate using that word) would be the accumulation of many different sources, such as hairs, dermals, audio and footage.

      Corrected.

      Delete
  7. The test I use is to place a house cat near a speaker and play the sound. If the cat doesn't stop licking its butt when it comes on, the sound is bogus. They will react to other cats, including large cats, dogs, birds, and other real animals.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "There's a hell of a lot of space in America, but its trampled all over, and in biological terms, there is absolutely no chance at all that there's an unknown species of giant apes stalking around California or for that matter Canada. You see the bigfoot phenomenon isn't based on good science. It rests upon one thing, the Patterson film, and that is a hoax" - Chris Packham, Zoology PHD

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's 'trampled all over'?

      The lisping Englishman should know huh?

      Peckham doesn't discuss BF anymore. Who can blame him?

      He sticks to what he knows about. Squirrels and Woodlice.

      MMG

      Delete
    2. ^ what precisely are your qualifications?

      Delete
    3. Packham hasn't even got a PHD, knows nothing of the genuine, conistent science that has been used to show sign of a yet to be classified bipedal primate that is twice the size of normal human primates... And had to edit an interview Goebbels style because the suit he made was this embarrasing;

      http://www.bigfoot-lives.com/assets/images/comparison1.JPG

      ... When that's the best you've got, one does not require to know your qualifications.

      Delete
    4. ^ "conistent science" ... ?

      hmmm ... that sounds like science of the "footer " kind.

      Delete
    5. "Footer kind"? That sounds like more rhetorical nonsense pal. Remember you're amongst people with a higher than average intelligence when next time you demand "footers" present evidence, it'll save us the charade.

      You don't seem like you'd fathom "consistent science" anyway.

      Delete
    6. Iktomi and Dover are one and the same person?
      I think we could tell with some poop samples and hair, perhaps we could cast their foot prints and tell that way.
      I think it is a good plan.
      Who's in?

      Delete
  9. I'm a raging simpleton who was banned from the BFF who now posts on the old JREF where I can pretend to be a skeptic like the rest of them do. I'm so happy !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hmm..yes..well you know what is said about simple things and simple minds I am certain.

      Delete
    2. I thought the JREF changed its name.to the International Skeptics Forum ISF.

      Delete
  10. That's the sound of me crying over all of the bigfoot idiocy.

    ReplyDelete
  11. This page is page is shit. Take it the fuck down!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story