Bigfoot peeking at game camera?
Our Facebook page has grown a lot over the years, and over the years, people have shared some strange photos on our wall. This latest one was taken on December 20, 2014. It appears to be an image taken by a game camera. While we're reaching out to the person for better context, check out the uncropped image below:
 |
| Game Cam Photograph from Dec. 20, 2014 |
Unfortunately, not a sasquatch in
ReplyDeletemy opinion.
^ concur
DeleteI think this is a picture of Richard Porter hiding behind a tree..?
Deleteifn tham bigfeets abin in da boosh thans thar fotos needin fixin
Deletethats a Batsquatch or iam a FOOL !!!
DeleteEvidently you can wipe your ass on a piece of toast and a photo of it would qualify for bigfoot on this site.
ReplyDeleteI see this was taken at Mono Lake. This is an old Sasquatch. During the filming of High Plains Drifter this one sneaked into the set on night and stole a bucket of red paint. You can see he has set it down beside him in the most clear shot. He has be caring it around for almost 42 years now waiting for the production company to return and get it autographed by Clint Eastwood. Out in New Jersey in Sussex County the bigfoots there are known as Big Red Eye. This old fellow is know as Big Red Bucket.
ReplyDeleteChuck
Chuck
When I found out that Patterson drove round in a truck with "bigfoot' plastered over it in big letters ala dyer, that was it for me. Im done. No bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteWhen I first read, from the same poster that Patterson drove round in a truck with "Bigfoot' plastered over it in big letters, I went and had a look for a corroborating source, and guess what?
DeleteEven if Roger did have anything of the sort, Dyer is trying to convey the image of a legitimate researcher.
You let that dispute all the good evidence found in the patterson film?
DeleteWhen I found out that Anonymous 4:40 was paid to post disinformation on this website, that was it for me. Bigfoot is real. No question about it.
DeleteBipto is currently hunting a troup of apes. Joe says they are 100% modern human. Who is wrong?
ReplyDeleteBipto is welcome to his opinion, as I am mine. I've said a million times that Sasquatch are archaic human, with possibly the same DNA... You're pushing the boundaries of "slow learner" it seems.
DeleteBipto says they have no human like behaviour what so ever but lots of ape like behaviour. Ouch.
DeleteBipto needs to familiarise himself with the language of Sasquatch (and published audio), the innumerable eyewitness reports of human like features, along with the thousands of years of native culture that have maintained they are another tribe of humans, on some instances sharing burial mounds with them (Cherokee), all pointing to something animals don't have;
DeleteCulture.
Bipto doesn't need to familiarize himself with any of the above Joe.
DeleteHe's more aware than most of what has been passed down throughout the centuries.
MMG
Hmmm, I would have hoped you could have read between the lines of what went on there, MMG... I don't know the guy.
DeleteWhy are footers reluctant to release a copy of Patterson's documentary? Is it because it actually does no favours for the film, instead revealing what a circus show it all was? The sort of stuff footers want to keep hidden so they can chant in harmony "just look at the film".
ReplyDeleteRoger was never able to obtain funding to finish and/or distribute his documentary prior to his death. The documentary and footage of Patty are two separate things.
Delete(Duh?)
But the documentary does exist its what he toured with and a few copies are in the hands of a couple of footers
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteNonsense, enough sceptical people have seen what's in his footage intended for his documentary and that and the footage of Patty are different things, even one of your prophets, Kitakraze acknowledges this to be the case;
Delete"Roger's film Bigfoot: America's Abominable Snowman with Bob Gimlin, Bob Heironimus and other friends was taken, remade and adapted by Ron Olson and directed by Ed Ragozzino...
http://upload.wikime...t_Sasquatch.jpg
http://www.cryptomun...s/8eed5c421.jpg "
http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/33571-roger-pattersons-bigfoot-documentary/
I don't know what you are saying is nonsense? The guy up top was asking why that footage hasn't been released and you are acknowledging that it does exist.
Delete"Why are footers reluctant to release a copy of Patterson's documentary? Is it because it actually does no favours for the film...?"
DeleteNonsense.
Why won't they release it then?
DeleteAre you serious??
DeleteI think the self proclaimed best researcher in the world Joe should track down the documentary
DeleteAlready did up top... Clever clogs.
Delete4:45: "just look at the film". Well yes, the film is the evidence in question; the surrounding events are circumstantial.
DeleteIf you were able to credibly replicate the film subject, then you could move on to the circumstantial evidence. But you're doing it backwards: You are unable to credibly duplicate the film subject and discredit the film, so you are looking for circumstantial events and material to attempt to discredit, which you hope will cast discrediting light on the film itself. You are doing this because you are aware that the film subject so far can't be convincingly duplicated. So, you are looking for another way out, an escape.
Someone connected to the film selling miniature carved bigfoot heads out of the trunk of his car, still is not a deciding factor on the status of the film; carved bigfoot heads sold out of the trunk of a car do not determine if the film is genuine or not, as much as you pray on your knees that it does.
The film subject being so far unreplicated, after basically half a century, is "evidence" or information or data, which leans in favor of the film subject not being hoaxed. People can't say with authority what is in the film, but this disastrous failure of replication is a strike in favor of the film as evidence of its subject not being a modern human being in disguise.
Damn' now that's hard to refute. Great points^^^^^^^^^
Delete...Joe, this guy is referring to the so-called "barnstorming" footage..It is what Roger showed to audiences before the PGF itself...It exists, and Mike Rugg has a copy but Patricia wont let him release it for some reason....
Deletehttp://bigfootdiscoveryproject.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/patterson-big-reel-one-documentary.html?m=1
Delete"The second reel we all have only seen bits and pieces from, and there's even debate if what we've seen is really on the second reel. So, frankly, we don't know what all it contains. This new film copy that surfaced is assumed to have more second reel content on it than we have seen before, but that is speculation at present. Given we don't know exactly what's on the second reel, it is common for those who feel the film is a hoax to think the content is missing to hide evidence of a hoax. But in truth, whether or not any such footage, if finally found and studied, would prove a hoax, no one knows for certain at this time.
DeleteThe copy recently publicized is presumed to be one of those made by Roger Patterson and Al DeAtley for the theatrical showings they did presenting to the public the Bigfoot film footage. We presume Roger may have included footage in that program we haven't seen today, and there was no copy of that program reel known in anybody's archives, so we hoped one such copy would surface but we didn't know where to look or who to ask.
So it's appearance now is a quirk of fate and thus we look forward to knowing more about what is really on it.
Bill"
http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/33120-patterson-lost-reel-to-be-released/
Yes you can clearly see everything...FFS! seriously does this or will this help in any way prove BF is real? FFS!
ReplyDeleteI think you miss the point. Whether Bigfoot is real or not is irrelevant. Mystery, controversy, celebrity and the ramblings of over-opinionated people generate hits on web sites dependent on advertising revenue. Welcome to the digital revolution!
DeleteEvery since, one of John W. Jones friends wrote about an Bigfoot encounter at West Point, N.Y.
ReplyDeleteEver since one of John's friends commented about stalking John is from sick and creepy people.
Ever since some Anon was asking for more info on JWJ, the Trolls came out of their sewers making the point! "There ARE a lot of Sick obsessed trolls on this site"!
At the Tannersville, N.Y. town hall, and it's police department,their phones have been ringing off the walls from '"Sick Computer Nerds" trying to find out if JWJ is sa real person!
Again making his friends point about this site having a lot of sick people!
Why is it that these "sick' people are so obsessed with JWJ and. . . Joe F from Wales? When they comment, do they stike a wrong nerve with some of you?
You 'sick" people, calls anyone who comments here about Big foot encounters or experience as HOAXERS! Are you unable to broaden your vocabulary? Yep! Sick low IQ people alright!
^ self promotion to drum up interest for a "supposed" book coming out
DeleteYou scared Bro?
DeleteOf course he is... He's scared of any one person presenting they're encounters around here and any one person presenting their research, it's one creepy little nerd with very low self esteem issues, terrified of the boogeyman and spoilt enough to want to control everything in his experience.
DeleteI FOUND JOHN W> JONES!
DeleteSince everyone is trying to find out if JWJ is a real person, I've ben searching for info on him for the past several days. I had no luck finding anything until i remebered he also trains horses. On youtube I typed in the search engine Traing horses. a lot of sites popped up but 2 caught my eye. It was titled Traing horses for Rodeos.
In it there was JWJ himself along with an indian women. I think he i s in his sixties and he looks to be in great physical shape. He has a full set of hair with a DA (Duck ass think Lord of Flatbush) throughout the Video he only talks and shows about training horses.
he never mentions Big foot
So JWJ is a real person. I will be spending the rest of today looking for more info on him. I need to find out if he is full of it or a real Bigfoot researcher. I also am looking into NY Fish and Game for any info on him as I believe I read he was a Bear hunting guide. So the Fish and game must have a listing of certified licensed Bear guides. i also read somewhere he has a long rap sheet (mostly for fighting) and have to pay $49.95 to get since record if he has any I also am searching the Native american sites especially on the Mohawk tribe (he said he was married to one). If i find anything on him good or bad I'll let youall know on here. If ANY of you have any information on this guy or can think of other areas to look please let me know here.
The main reason I'm going after him is that some of his Mohawk friends beat up my cousin when he and a friend went to NY state. I'm not from Ohio in live in Kentucky and my name is Mike Daily.
If you JWJ read this I am for ral and I will stop at nothing to get dirt on you! Get ready I'm coming~
)
John W Jones is a star!
DeleteWhat the crap is this tomfoolery?
DeleteIf this is the grand business plan for ya, I almost feel bad.
Go take your face to the toilet, you don't know anything.
Delete^ more self promotion to get everyone interested in "John W. Jones" Surely it would not be much trouble to provide a link to this "Training Horses For Rodeos" video.
DeleteAs for being a "star", it begs the question - a star of what?
where may one purchase the books frequently referred to that old jonny has written?
Deletewhere are the mystery photos claimed by mike brookerson?
where at most of joes sources of information found?
one can easily see through this charade.
The guy has stated, on too many occassions to count, that his two books are written and not published yet.
DeleteStop trying too hard Jezza, you only look stupid in the end.
why is everybody worried what this John W. jones guy does? He or a friend, has commented very clearly about his books. The stories he or others written are very clear, full of details and has evidence to back up some of his claims.
DeleteOne has to be very careful when writing books and including names of sources. any mistake, and he could be sued for Libel.
It is up to the publisher's legal department to make sure written claims and stories are correct before publishing.
in some of John's stories, he might have illegal possession of government property. (The large snares, and encounters at West Point) I don't think the DOD would want anything negative (even if true) written about West Point cadets.
I made one phone call, just one to the Highland Falls government office, easily got the name of their fire chief, and asked him about incidents at West Point that his Fire department responded to. I had the dates, the time, the location, the reporters etc.
The Fire Chief was very, very, reluctant to give out any information on this incident and others. He did admit, that he and his fireman was told very strictly not to talk to anyone by a DOD official! I did obtain, very easily a report of the incident in question, and yes! it was all about a female cadet getting injured, just like John said it would be.
In reading some of the comments, it becomes very obvious that some of them are scared, jealous envious etc.
This is a Big foot Blog, is it not? This is a site about Big foot encounters/sightings, is it not? Then why, when ANYONE comments here about a Big foot story,some of the commenters say vicious things and name calling, instead of an honest mature discussion.
I don't know this guy at all, but what I read and now know about him and his stories add up.
Why would Military soldiers (not the Fish and Game) be putting out leg snares bigger than needed for Bears? If John has these Government snares, he has vital evidence to back up his story. I can see why he might have some Legal problems!,
Also, I forgot to mention, if he has the "written" and signed authorization to investigate strange encounters by the superintendent of West Point, then that paper would be clear vital "evidence"!
DeleteThe Publisher's and John, have to be very careful what, how, and what they show. John has to be extremely careful, when dealing with the government!
F, this John W. Jones guy! Get WILD BILL and the AIMS team there.
DeleteHow come Joe sticks up for JWJ everytime he comments? What's Joes connection with him?
DeleteNo one is worried or frightened about what this "John W. Jones" does, we are just tired of the same crap being presented. Look, we have been though this hype how many times before? There was Dyer, Ketchum, Standing and the list goes on and on with ALL saying they had positive proof of bigfoot's existence and what came of it? Nada, zip, empty promises. Now we have someone once again saying he has proof but . . . wait a minute . . it's being held up by the government, the publishers, the military and who knows what else. You see - it's always just out of reach with these stories. If it comes back human DNA then it suddenly becomes more of a wild human than ape. If they suddenly vanish while tracking then they become inter-dimensional. They are not caught because they are ultra intelligent, have heightened senses and so on and so on. They sprinkle it with just enough facts to make the story plausible but when you dig deep you find it's been stretched, embellished and just flat lied about. Now of course one has to be careful of libel because when you LIE about details this is what can happen.
DeleteWhy go on about a book(s) here that hasn't even been published yet? The answer of course is to generate interest so people will be inclined to buy it. It's all about the money - Dyer charging to see his fake, Ketchum charging to see the report, Standing with his Kickstarter campaign, bigfoot conventions, bigfoot expeditions, bigfoot books - all designed to give hope to believers (and line the pockets of some). For all I know all these posts could all be from "John W. Jones" himself promoting the book but I have to comment that (if true) illegal possession of government property does not put him in the best light right off.
How about this - (and I can only speak for myself) I will not comment about him again if there are no more posts concerning him UNTIL the book(s) come out? Of course if there is more posts about his upcoming book(s) then he is fair game to me. Deal?
While I know nothing about John Jones I can speak from experience concerning the stories which came from Carter Farm. Upon closer examination and talking with many in that area, it became readily apparent that much of what was in the book 50 Years With Bigfoot was conjured up. I now believe it just makes good sense that every story should have the background checked to see if it holds up to what is presented.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteCurious... I have spoken to an anonymous researcher who has spent many years at the Carter research site and has stated that all of her accounts are legitimate and that in fact he has been witness to many different Sasquatch in the many years he been a party to visiting the farm.
DeleteCan you see what I did there? It is a contradiction, sir, to state that you require credentials and interviews and supporting evidence for claims... When you do exactly the same. None of us know you and at least John W Jones is intending on publishing his research, you are just am anon on a blog expecting us to swallow YOUR claims. I guess I believe it just makes good sense that every story should have the background checked to see if it holds up to what is presented, eh?
In countering your comment regarding the book you mentioned, though I have doubts about much of it, I in fact do indeed know a long term researcher in close affiliation with the author, who confirms that there are Sasquatch on that very property. Sometimes, people mix up their personality traits of exaggerating and telling lies with telling the truth. I know this person and don't know you, and though I'm sure many here would love to put words in my mouth on my stance on the Carter topic, you still haven't presented anything to sway me from sitting on the fence on the matter... Unlike you being "unconvinced" on giant skeletons, I can at least show you science journals to support my claims, I think it's time for you to cough up... Or I'll be far more warranted of being genuinely unconvinced of your claims, sir.
4:42... Standing had a DNA result, two sets of results; one confirming a 100 per cent link to humans, another finding an 85 per cent match to chimp DNA. These are unusual and inconsistent with what we know of existing primates. In theory, 15% gap is too big to be human... But this was ignored by you in your ballets of stupidity when you kept requesting "human DNA with unknown properties", you prized prat. Like always... Your stupidity is "everyone else's problem".
DeleteJohn hasn't stated he has proof, he has evidence of long term research that has yielded some very interesting accounts and physical evidence. Your fear proceeds you in that you have jumped the gun in cartwheels of concern, a Freudian slip on what fears you the most, making allegations of what other people have laid claim to. Though I have no means of verifying the claims, if you have information regarding the government then it is of course a very natural thing for publishers to seek legal advice prior to it being published, or the publishers are going to get sued. Surely that pea brain can understand that? In the world of a spoiled brat, I can understand why you would demand something "now, now, now!!!"
You may have only been into this topic since the second series of Finding Bigfoot came on the TV, but Sasquatch being human is nothing new. Sasquatch being hyper evasive in line with a far higher understanding of their intelligence is nothing new. Sasquatch having animalistic/wild attributes/advantages to their evasion; you guessed it... Nothing new. Inter-dimensional stuff is contested and ridiculed more from within this very field than from any other group. When you have your gross naivety pounced upon, these are your failures and not people filling in the blanks... This has been stated to you time and time again. You've also been invited time and time again to show that your ideas have anything in the way of debatable strength and you are nowhere to be seen like a little coward, redundant of not only your own ideas, but the research methods of a ten year old on the Internet. Many times your own arguments have been sourced and in turn countered by those in the next comment; not a good look.
John has not pursued any of the publicity methods of anyone you can sensationally compare him to, he's merely posted on a Bigfoot blog, along with his email address for anyone with queries or questions, to approach him respectfully and like adults. You embarrass yourselves when you fail to remember this plain and simple fact, and it measures you perfectly in the manner in which this bothers you all so, so clearly. Honestly, if this wasn't a means of threatening your fragile quest for control, and if you weren't hell bent on a communal type attack on anyone suggesting honest research with positive results, then you wouldn't have taken the time. You demand that Sasquatch yield results, demand that things be published and that the field present a means of legitimate research, and then use conventions and books being published, along with the very normal financial input required for achieving all the above, as detrimental to the field... What a rhetorical twonk. You never were the cleverest son.
"How about this - (and I can only speak for myself) I will not comment about him again if there are no more posts concerning him UNTIL the book(s) come out? Of course if there is more posts about his upcoming book(s) then he is fair game to me. Deal?"
Who the **** do you think you are? Ha ha ha ha ha!!! This is the single most incredible thing I've ever read from this absolute clown of a boy. Put it like this you cancerous, evil little slime, I'll always be here to make sure you look exactly like you come across. Nobody is scared of you, I think you are going to need reminding of how much of a coward you are every time you attack from behind anonymity... Cause that's all you are... And you still haven't proven any of your points.
Hi Joe: Although I am very busy these days I want to have the courtesy of responding to you. Forgive me for not emailing you directly but I have no wish to engage in any long debates on the existence of Bigfoot. Those days are over for me as I have spent nearly 50 years interested in the subject and have now come to the conclusion it does not exist. I am absolutely fine with those who do believe it exists as I was once there with them. I now just maintain a passing interest and peruse the Bigfoot and Cryptozoology sites from time to time just to keep up. But now on to Carter Farm -
DeleteI'm afraid I would have to just agree to disagree with your researcher friend as to Bigfoot being ever on that property. I was aware at that time that Ray Crowe was endorsing her story as well as others who actually went there - Mary Green and her group, Will Duncan and Dmitri Bayanov. It is important to note that none who went there actually ever seen a Bigfoot. It is also important to note that the Bigfoot seem to disappear when Janice left the farm. If I remember correctly all the so called evidence seem to come to naught with nothing definitive ever being proven. You ask for credentials but I have none - only being an interested party who once believed. But I do have supporting evidence of what I speak. Please check the link - I am the Randy Garlipp in the story and there is a picture of me in the white shirt.
http://www.prairieghosts.com/carter_farm.html
There was actually 7 of us (that I know about) who were there at various times and came away with the same conclusion. There was one very significant thing that was revealed in that investigation but alas I am not at liberty to say as a promise is a promise. Jerry Coleman makes reference to it in our conversation with Lila. I went down there simply to find out if there was any truth to the story not to hurt people but I stand on my statement that Janice's story was fabricated for reasons known only to her. There may be some substance for belief on other stories but not on this one I'm afraid.
I wish you well in your pursuit Joe. As you say - PEACE!
Thanks for the link Curious. When you're not being outwardly cynical your comments are enjoyable to read. Also, the email address was for exchanging ideas, not debate.
DeletePeace.
Got monkey?
ReplyDelete^???
DeleteYou asked for monkeys... They are in abundance, put the above DVD on your next Santa list.
DeleteIronically its clear footage of a species that actually exists.
DeleteYou've clearly been lining under a rock for the past 47 years;
Deletehttp://www.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf
Lol what ^
DeleteLol that ^^
DeleteAbout that Florida skunk ape picture:
ReplyDeleteI cannot believe, that people are still commenting about it! It's Fake as heck, yet some still think it just might be real! LOL!
I didn't know that Todd Standing moved to Florida!
Where Fat Tim/ We need his "expert' opinion on this!
sometimes reptilian humanoids looking like skunkapes, so you seeing a reptilian humanoid but you thinking its a skunkape
DeleteIt's bad when even people like Joe aren't blindly defending it.
Deletebatsquatch !!! or reptilian humanoid !!!
Delete"over the years," this blog has fallen and can't get it up
ReplyDeleteCheck out the bigfoot reddit, much better discussion and most importantly no Joe.
DeleteLaters, gators!
DeleteWell, there he goes to ruin it.
DeleteMeaning, "run along"... I have no intention what so ever in visiting whatever blog you plug.
DeleteThis past week, a plane crashed in Kentucky woods. only a little 7 year old girl survived! She walked a 1/4 of a mile through the cold dark woods to a house and safety. She is okay!
ReplyDeleteMSNBC reported it this way:
A plane crashed in Kentucky, only a brave little 7 year old survived. she was helped out of the woods, by a Big foot! When they got to a house, the owner of the house was a Redneck Republican, and shot at the Big foot, but killed the little girl instead! Ban all Guns!
We don't need to ban guns. We should just ban conservatards. Would do far more service to the country.
DeleteMore GUN CONTROL needed in NY
Deletefor the Police SAFETY
When the race war comes, you liberal will wish you had a gun! i would love to be there as they love white women!
Deletebut U got the POLICE for your SAFETY
DeleteGUNs kill people !!!
POLICE fer U SAFETY
Delete911 ans its all GOOD : )
no worries
"A gun in the hands of a bad man is a very dangerous thing. A gun in the hands of a good person is no danger to anyone except the bad guys - Charlton Heston.
DeleteI'd rather have a gun in my hand, than a phone dialing 911...HELLO!
WHAT THE !!!!
DeleteFBI: No Expectation of Privacy from Stingrays in Public
ReplyDeleteAgency claims citizens' cell phone data up for grabs!!!!
THE NEW NORM
if they check my phone I'm done for. I'm black and a Muslim!
Delete^ U be the NEW NORM : )
Deletelooks like one of them Snallygasters that WILD BILL said to leave them critters be!
ReplyDeleteWILD BILL couldn't find a drug dealer on a street corner!
ReplyDeleteWILD BILL huntin BEAR gots a hat that say so!
Deleteand he hunts them BEAR in Raleigh County, West Virginia
Um...that's a picture of a dog. But it's probably not in Raleigh County, West Virginia.
ReplyDelete