Breaking: Turner Maine Bigfoot Footage


Bigfoot sightings in Maine are rare. According to the BFRO the last documented sighting was back in 2001. Monsters Underground host, Bill Brock has been in hot pursuit of a report out of Turner Maine. What Brock didn't expect was to see when he got to the property was actual footage of something walking around a property. While the footage is not as clear as we would like, it's obvious that the subject in the footage is a biped. In one cellphone video, the witness captured what appears to be a bipedal creature lurking in the trees. It's pretty mind-blowing. Watch the video for Bill's reaction and the sincerity of the witness.




First footage shows a bipedal creature

Second footage captured days later on the property


Comments

  1. Replies
    1. I would rather see the dog dragging it's butt through the leaves.

      Delete
    2. Hey! Don't worry, there's always plenty more footage out there!

      YGPANLIVMAA

      Delete
    3. No, there isn't,

      ReTodd Standing

      Delete
    4. Let me know if you want some help with that.

      Delete
    5. His backside got handed to him over a week ago... Again, let me know if you want help with that.

      Delete
    6. Very useless Video! why bother to show this? Wasted effort as usual!

      Delete
    7. Happy New Year everyone xx
      The year of Bigfoot is upon us xx
      (¯`v´¯)
      `*.¸.*´
      ¸.•´¸.•*¨) ¸.•*¨)
      (¸.•´ (¸.•´ .•´ ¸¸.•¨¯`•.×°×

      Delete
    8. ...In about 9 more hours the number of years since Wallace hoaxed his crew and put Bigfoot in the news hits 55...I'll give you these last nine hours then I'm calling BS on Bigfoot...

      Delete
    9. 12:18... You might want to read the very bottom of the article in this link;

      http://sasquatchresearch.net/billmiller.html

      ... Also, notice how Wallace's carved fake feet don't match any of the Jerry Crew castings? You listen to the lies of a hoaxer hoaxing a hoax, and you get reassurance, but not the truth. Let me know if you need any more explaining on that.

      Delete
    10. Rogan is a tiny little man.

      Delete
    11. The buxom Doctor Squatch needs to paint Rogan with peanut butter and place him in a gifting basket for the squatches to lick.

      Delete
    12. Haha! Good point Joe! Lulled into the happy place by the hoaxer but disturbed by the truth. So backword.

      Delete
    13. BOBO likes peanut butter! he says Bigfoots like what he likes so the more peanut butter the better : )

      Delete
    14. ,,,Yeah Joe, I know all about it from a debate on BFF: The double ball stamps match the 67 onion creek prints; you are right that they dont match the 58 tracks though...We should not assume Wallace only made one kind of false feet though..who knows...We do know 55 years have gone by since that famous photo of Jerry Crew....Happy New Year....

      Delete
    15. Do you think Bobo Will take a bite so ole Biggy knows its safe?

      Delete
    16. Is it SAFE !!! If it is BOBO be onit !!!

      Delete
    17. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    18. 1:20... Um, no... The Blue Creek Mountain (Onion Mountain), California 67 cast doesn't fit Wallace's carvings either, they at the bottom of the link I provided you. We should also not assume Wallace had any part of faking tracks if there's no sign of them in existing castings too, right? Especially when the main source of such a story has so many red flags and holes in his "research". 55 years and we have every sort of evidence just short of modern type specimen, keep patient.

      Happy New Year.

      Delete
  2. South Korea - will start dropping 100,000 DVDs and USBs of the The Interview by balloon into North Korea as early as next month. If carried out, the move is expected to draw a furious response from North Korea. The two Koreas traded gunfire in October over propaganda balloons.
    THE NEW NORM !!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WHERE'S JOE'S RESPONSE TO THIS ONE?!?!?!?!?!

      Delete
    2. NOooooo.... the GRAYs got Joe.....
      GRAYs find U U dont find them...

      Delete
    3. and the GRAYs they control Bigfoots and BIgfoots collect DNA for the GRAYs
      GRAYs got bases all abouts to conduct Cloning and Hybrids

      Delete
    4. The hacking of the Japanese company Sony appears to have been done by someone who worked at or for Sony. It has been concluded that the emails and information illegally obtained and subsequently released by the hackers prior to thanksgiving of this year were "walked out" of Sony on a flash drive by leading security experts and Sony themselves within days of the initial release if said documents and emails.

      In the initial documents there was no mention of north Korea, or the movie titled "the interview". Approximately 10 days after the initial release of internal memos and emails by Sony executives the narrative regarding the entire situation changed. At the same time all msm media outlets from national to local picked up on the cyber-terrorist north Korea theatre shooter narrative shortly after they dubbed the hacker group the "guardians of peace" or GOP. Within days the president of the USA got on TV and attempted to legitimize the narrative.

      In the week to ten days since Obamas fallacy ridden double speak statements on global media we have seen more net security experts conclude the entire hack was carried out by disgruntled employees or with help and stolen passwords and Intel from employees. Yet, still today the all mighty drudge report is linking to a ABC news story still pushing the "cyber terror" narrative.

      So where did this contradictory narrative come from? How did all the msm media distribution services pick up on the same narrative, using the same labels, at the same time? Why is it still being pushed?

      Grammer > logic > rhetoric. Identify contradictions. Separate abstracts from absolutes. Do not get caught up in minutiae. Intellectual self defense is all we really have.

      Happy new year, I love all the regulars here!

      Delete
    5. YES - THE NEW YEAR
      is the NEW NORM !!!

      Delete
  3. o please... i don't need to watch to know its fake. its fake.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "... It's fake... It's always fake!!!"

      Rocking in the corner, sweating profusely.

      Delete
    2. Boy Footers are getting DESPERATE! In the last 3 years none, Zero, were any good at all!
      Boy these "Researchers" sure know what their doing! incompetent people, that's for sure!

      Delete
    3. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwumPyQuCwA

      Also... There has been innumerable instances of physical evidence such as tracks been accumulated, not to mention examples of unknown primate hair. I would say as incompetent as civilian researchers can be because of mainstream science's dogmatic approach.

      Delete
    4. No there hasn't. Pull your head out of your arse. If there was evidence we would have seen it on Bigfoot Evidence. I guess what you're saying is Shawn is incompetent?

      Quit badmouthing Shawn. He tolerates your whiny ass.

      Delete
    5. Ha ha ha ha!! What a loon... The evidence posted around here is precisely what I'm referring to. Lucky for you this stuff is archived, it helps if you're actually keeping up to current affairs with the topic you're disinforming about... You people are creepy.

      Delete
    6. Joe, you deceitful horse's arse.

      How can it be unknown primate if bigfoot is 100% human? You want repetitive dialogue it seems as you have been informed on this before.

      The hair should be human with unknown characteristics. If you continually speak and reference Rene Dahinden, why leave out bigfoot hair lack medulla for DNA testing? Conflicts with any dna tests at all.

      Problem with all the physical evidence is that it has been and can be hoaxed, no matter how intricate. There is no verifiable specimen or sample to reference the tracks to.

      I'm starting to think you don't post anywhere else bf related because you don't want accountability on a daily basis with countless researchers and enthusiasts. Your portfolio would be laughable in the business world, not even rank amateur.

      Happy New Year.

      Delete
    7. Ok... It's like this. Hope this helps, sometimes putting it all in a little story helps the little ones understand a bit better;

      Let's just imagine a second that Cro-Magnon man committed a murder. The investigators don't know he is Cro-Magnon because the DNA taken from the murder scene says Homo Sapien, but because he is a wild human, his hair fibre taken from the scene's morphology was evolved to suit his environment, therefore, like small amounts of his morphological & anatomical features that that are different to ours, so is his hair... But he's still Homo Sapien.

      "I have by now a dozen purported sasquatch hair samples, all morphologically congruent (which rules out hoaxing) and all effectively indistinguishable from a human hair of the particular structure (great variability is available among the latter). DNA extracted from both hair shaft or roots (hair demonstrably fresh) was too fragmented to permit gene sequencing. That characteristic is also sometimes found in human hair that lacks the medulla (as does sasquatch hair - at least what I am willing to identify as such)."
      - Dr Henner Fahrenbach

      I think you meant Henner, not Rene, right? Are you confused or are you just angry and not thinking straight? We don't know what the DNA of the fibres Henner speaks of says, because we don't have medulla, whilst none of us know the morphology of the hair fibres that came back human... (Thank god for cut and paste). No... Every source of evidence submittable in any judiciary or scientific arena can be hoaxed, yet the the two aforementioned pillars of modern society stand. I'm starting to think that when you post comments my way there are tears falling on to your keyboard about my presence here... Just think, 2015's gonna be just as tough for you.

      : (

      Delete
    8. Oh, and I can't count the amount of times I've posted that quote by Henner about lack of medulla.

      2015 = : (

      Delete
    9. "Also... There has been innumerable instances of physical evidence such as tracks been accumulated, not to mention examples of unknown primate hair. I would say as incompetent as civilian researchers can be because of mainstream science's dogmatic approach."

      Precious... This is a gem of a comment.

      Mainstream science is dogmatic? Really? Science is a methodology. You don't go into things saying "Here's some sasquatch hair, lets study it." Approaching science like that is about as bad as creation science and their backassward attempts to legitimize their position.

      What's sadly the most ridiculous aspect of all of this is that people think a tall, hairy, bipedal being would be in the Americas in the first place. The amount of science you would have to ignore for that to be a thing is quite staggering. We know when hominids came to the Americas. We have substantial evidence with nothing remotely suggesting other bipedal creatures came over with them.

      The only hail mary you could have is trying to argue large apes somehow developed in the Americas and were here prior to humans, during humans coming to America, and are still here.

      It would be unfathomable that such creatures would be seemingly so savvy and stealthy that we've had none wandering about developed regions in search for food where cameras catch them, undeniable evidence is found of them, or better yet with all the hunting humans have done in the past and up to the present bones, remains, anything.

      And yet... some blurry images in 2014 (which should be a crime) and footprints are still all big footers can muster.

      Ridiculous.

      (Not the same anonymous as the OP, but still)

      Delete
    10. ""Here's some sasquatch hair, lets study it." Approaching science like that is about as bad as creation science and their backassward attempts to legitimize their position."

      ... I think you'd better understand the series of events concerning the evidence in question, especially since you use mere circular reasoning as a basis for your stance. If the hairs in question have been sourced from a direct sighting by multiple government employees, have been accompanied with physical evidence in tracks, are then analysed by multiple camps of primatologists to be primate in origin but unique, and that these are then uniform to 12 other samples that have been linked to their own activity and sources of physical sign... Then your "version" of what's been proposed up top kind of goes right out of the window.

      What's more, is it is rhetorical to the extreme to state that an unclassified primate cannot be the case because it has not been classified by the standards of which have not yet been applied in attempting to classify it. The Bili Ape is a prime example of a man-sized primate that required a consorted effort from mainstream science to investigate the readily available evidence. These standards have not been consistent with what we would expect from a creature that requires far less extraordinary evidence. Might I add, that there are three generations of archeologists and anthropologists in the US that have documented skeletal remains in the region of 7-8 foot. We also have skulls like this;
      https://thedavisreport.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/unusual-skull-found-near-lovelock-nevada-in-1967/

      Could you look down the scope and shoot something that you both cannot quite identify, and looks so human? One of the main issues for gunmen who have opened up on one of these creatures, is the persistent details that they move too fast. You also have to consider that for these creatures to have evaded so well as they have, they would have to do so in social groups, with this bringing the added possibility of mama and papa coming along to see what the commotion is should one be shot. Plenty of missing hunters, remember.

      And lastly, what would be your approach should someone present you with a photograph of a Sasquatch? Come on... Do you really think anyone with half a brain would expect anything less than more rhetorical nonsense from you? Sasquatch have been photographed for decades, spanning the earliest of research into the subject to that of the most modern technological methods, and that hasn't been good enough for people like you who don't know the first thing about the current state of evidence.

      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot2.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot1.jpg
      http://www.texasbigfoot.net/images/bigfoot3.jpg

      http://cliffbarackman.com/research/field-investigations/the-brown-footage/

      Delete
  4. ThinkerThunker where are you ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who needs him? We've got all the amazing, talented anonymous desktop experts right here at BFE to lend their expertise!

      Delete
    2. Two words: Turkey Hunter.

      Forever obliterated.

      Delete
    3. Four words; sometimes people are wrong.

      When some day you contribute something & stick your neck out and it doesn't align with your life's failures, you'd have qualified to judge.

      Delete
    4. But but but but tha RATIOS! It makes it proof in tha RATIOS!

      Delete
    5. Well it works for the PGF, must me something to the method I guess.

      ; )

      Delete
    6. Dos this mean we don't get to see thee dog dragging it's butt on the leaves?

      Delete
    7. I'm sure you'll get something on YouTube.

      YGDDBALOYTALI

      Delete
    8. 50 years investigating the Chinese wild man. All those witnesses, all those tracks, all of those hairs.

      Number of cases that held up: zero.

      Pause.

      Delete
    9. 50 years investigating the Chinese wild man. All those witnesses, all those tracks, all of those hairs and all those government funded research expeditions, and the number of cases that held up regardless of the research of one man; all of it...None of it goes away. When said researcher says things like "improbable" and "5% chance they exist", I think you need to stop clenching those straws so hard...

      The truth is that the Chinese government embrace their wildmen to be factual... Let me know if you come up with a reason as to how that would help your angle in any remote way.

      Delete
    10. I suppose that the complete failure after 50 years of investigating every lead and every angle and finding nothing makes my case painfully clear to anyone but a completely delusional idiot.
      Quit pretending you believe.

      Delete
    11. "50 years of investigating every lead and every angle and finding nothing..."

      Bro, you didn't even read the guy's conclusion that's far from proving anything, I wouldn't be making allegations on the angles researched from this guy. Hey, go take a look at the link provided, you'll see plenty of reason to be enthusiastic with the majority of reports in recent times, anyone would think the Chinese government were actually close to catching one?

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/bigfooting-with-kelly-shaw-rmso-1st.html

      : P

      Delete
    12. Where are all these Chinese Wildman casts????

      Delete
    13. Here's some... Oh, and by the way, this is a paper Zhou Guoxing wrote with Meldrum. Not so "Yeren debunking" here, is he?

      http://www.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Footprint%20Evidence%20of%20Chinese%20Yeren.pdf

      Delete
    14. "The remarkable similarity of the midtarsal pressure ridge in the yeren casts to that present in the example attributed to the sasquatch, i.e., referred to Anthropoidipes ameriborealis MELDRUM 2007 (Fig. 9, 10), denotes a common architecture of the foot,
      characterized by a flat flexible midfoot lacking a fixed longitudinal arch, and retaining considerable mobility at the midtarsus (Meldrum, 2004; 2007)."

      Delete
  5. Are footers even trying these days?

    These people need to get a guy in a monkey suit and have him walk along at a distance while shaking the camera like Patterson did.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Got monkey suit? I think it is you folk who need to get 'trying'.

      Delete
    2. Well I haven't personally but that is was I was suggesting for footers to get to make their hoaxes like Patterson. So yes you will need to make or buy a monkey suit for your hoax

      Delete
    3. You haven't? Well I was suggesting that before you make any claims that Patterson was a hoaxer you go show us a magic moneky suit that defies SFX suit making for 47 years.

      Your claim; your problem.

      Delete
    4. I had a brown snowsuit in the 1970s that looked more ape-like than Patterson's bulky-assed monkey suit.

      Delete
    5. Great! Shame it's not at the focus of one of the most elaborate unknown alleged fur cloth mysteries of the past 50 years, eh?

      Got monkey suit?

      Delete
    6. Only two attempts were ever made to reproduce it, only one was decent: Blevins.

      You can say a lot of things about the footage and figure but to blatantly say it has defied legitimate SFX artists attempts is utterly false.

      Delete
    7. No... The one you're drawing on wasn't "decent";

      http://bigfootbooksblog.blogspot.co.uk/2011/03/leroy-blevins-unfinished-aborted.html?m=1

      ... And took almost ten years to make. How can I make the claim that it's defied SFX for that long? Cause I watch films, and I understand an industry that's always striving to better itself and take credit for its costumes to win awards... And not one you can point to cuts it or ever has. There's that, plus there is also not a single expert who can point to a fur cloth technique from the past 100 years that accounts for the alleged costume's 'anomalies' not being highlighted in direct sunlight; the most unforgiving of lighting conditions in 1967.

      Delete
    8. A fur cloth technique. Great.

      I love the way these guys make you dance.

      Delete
    9. I call "keeping up on current affairs with Joe"... I'm only happy to help people like you learn a bit more about the topic.

      Happy New Year.

      Delete
    10. Joe- you and I don't agree about much of anything, but I still wish you a happy new year!

      Delete
    11. I never mean any malice, I hope yours is a good one.

      Delete
  6. The dark one is way to inconclusive, however to me the steps are to short and seem to shuffle like a human, but way to dark. Bill must be looking at a lighter copy to see the arms. The bright one is a human.

    I do think these folks are having bigfoot activity however. Maybe the videos are of someone else that has been hearing the night sounds and is checking out the woods.
    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
  7. Why no unambiguous photos of bigfoot?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://www.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf

      Delete
  8. Credible witnesses,I live in New Brunswick Canada east of Maine,,same terrain and climate,,same amount of sightings,,not publicized.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cut to the chase Joe and just go ahead and verify it already. This one very poorly-written sentence should be enough for you to count as more evidence.

      Delete
    2. You come across so threatened it's beautiful.

      : )

      Delete
    3. You tell me, I'm not the one scrambling all panicky cause someone alluded to some sightings, ha ha ha ha!!

      Delete
    4. Time to pretend you're going out and getting drunk now Joe like you have something fun and interesting to do in the real world.

      Delete
    5. There is an interesting story from Maine that happened back in the seventies, involving multiple witnesses over several days. It's on the bfro site

      Delete
    6. Eh? One day you'll be old enough to buy alcohol son... Maybe it's time for you to reel off some essays pleading for my removal from the blog cause you haven't the belly to address your failures?

      Delete
    7. 10:47... I'll check that out, thanks very much, Happy New Year.

      Delete
    8. Slap'em silly Joe! They have no chance!

      Delete
    9. "While returning from a trip at around 3 am at the corner of route 11 and north raymond road in Polan Me. androscoggin county. My brother-in-law was turning off rt. 11 onto the raymond road when he said "do you see that?" and I said what and he said "that big hairy thing in the bushes!" It was off to the left about 100 feet in the woods and big and hairy, I mean real big. We only caught a glimpse of t in the headlights."

      Interestingly, 10:03 & 10:47...

      "This is more comon than you may think, people up hear see this stuff often but the locals keep it quiet. I know of several other reports from this area."

      http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=2678

      Delete
    10. I think the reason there are not more bfro reports from Maine as they do not have an associate working the area currently. I am sure they get calls but will not publish a report until it has been thoroughly researched to the point that it satisfies them. Glad Bill in in the area and can take some of these. I imagine the same goes for the New Brunswick person. I do know this as a fact. This kind of terrain and water availability is very conducive to the Forest Giants and they are here.
      Chuck

      Delete
    11. Oh and have a great New Year JOE. You will be seeing it sooner than us. My prediction is that 2015 will be the year of the Forest Giants ----- maybe. My prediction for 2014 came true in a much bigger way than I thought possible, that being gasoline would hit $2.50 per gallon.
      Chuck

      Delete
    12. Have a great New Year Chuck, my friend!!

      Delete
    13. My prediction for 2015 is:
      NO BIGFOOT "PHYSICAL" EVIDENCE FOUND! NONE!
      I also predict hundreds of more Hoaxed and very crappy Videos.
      anyone want to bet on this? Starting at $1,000.00!

      Delete
    14. Do you even understand what physical evidence actually means? You'll only have to wait a number of weeks before new tracks get put up as an article around here, and you'll have the same old excuses, and the same old rhetorical dribbles.

      Delete
    15. Well since there has been physical evidence in abundance every year I have walked this earth and all my fore fathers your prediction is doomed to failure. I course you will not realize this and that is my prediction. I do agree about the hoaxed and crappy vids though. Hope they entertain you.
      Chuck

      Delete
  9. Are things that slow that there's a need for 4 Bill Brock postings within 24 hours? Or is this just some type of ad blitz?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Boy Was that "Monster Underground show great!
      I didn't know that there were all these "Monsters' living underground? They must have ate all the Hobbits!
      You Go Bill Brock! Your the man?

      Delete
    2. the next video is of bill brockitch stopping at a rest area to investigate a strange hole in the mens restroom stall...stay tuned

      Delete
    3. TRAPPER & Mountain Monsters (AIMS) team went into caves lookin for the Cave Creature !
      TRAPPER & WILD BILL said leave it be

      Delete
  10. Joe seems more butthurt today than usual.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just mopping up the vomit, son. Got an argument?

      Delete
    2. I think he's still got a rectal prolapse from the Rogan video. It was too much. Joe got plowed right here in his own dojo
      .

      Delete
    3. http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/joe-rogan-totally-rips-on-bigfoot.html

      Glad I could help.

      Delete
    4. Oh... And look for the b-slap under my name.

      ; )

      Delete
    5. Joe must really be Egyptian because hes always in DENIAL. Dont pretend its not overly transparent that all you do is make a half assed rebuttal then say you won. Sorry but it doesnt work that way. You actually have to prove something to win an argument. Which you've never done. To this day for all your asking to "prove it" you've never proven one damn thing. Is that why you're so upset all the time and act like a 12 year old? The bulging weight or your hypocrisy to much for you to bare? Or is it the amount of hurt you feel inside knowing how much time you've devoted to the subject and year after year passes and you cant prove the subject even exists? Why so frustrated all the time old man?

      Delete
    6. I say if we take the time weve spent researching Bigfoot and apply that time to researching Joe, we might find a cure for him someday.

      Delete
    7. Yes, yes, yes, yes... Your argument?

      : )

      Delete
    8. And you still haven't proven any of your points... That's how I get closer to proving mine. Please... I am inviting you to post your arguments here and I will address them...

      : )

      Delete
    9. No? This is an odd reoccurrence, nowhere to be seen when asked to show his arguments?

      Funny that?

      Nighty, night.

      Delete
  11. Replies
    1. LONG LIVE MUCKLEGRUNT!!!
      LONG LIVE POOP IN A JAR GUY!!!
      LONG LIVE ANONY!!!
      LONG LIVE BIGFOOT EVIDENCE!!!

      Delete
    2. Alas, poor Mucklegrunt! I grieve for what might have been....the good ones always leave us too soon!

      Delete
    3. Joe, why do you keep getting drawn in by these guys. There whole existence is to get you going. Bigfoot is real that's all that matter. Thanks Steve

      Delete
    4. Hello Steve, I simply enjoy it... And I use them as the archetype of mainstream ignorance; a medium to transmit my ideas, if you will.

      Hope you had a great New Year Steve.

      Delete
    5. Lol I see. Have a good New Year.

      Delete
    6. Basically it gives him a podium because otherwise his bland schtick is ignored among the bigfoot community. He's worked a messed up niche for himself in the nest of trash dump blogs.

      Why do you think he doesn't post on BFF, Proboards, or anywhere else?

      Delete
  12. The first footage is way too dark to see anything and the second one...uh...yeah. Wow. How much more useless can bigfoot footage be? The answer is none. None more useless.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At least this footage goes to 11. It's 1 blurrier, innit?

      Delete
  13. Chilling Threats to Kill Cops On New Year’s Eve
    Violence against police officers continues to escalate!!!
    NEW NORM FOR THE NEW YEAR

    ReplyDelete
  14. Skunkapes abouts in Jeb Bush state of Florida ....

    ReplyDelete
  15. They redrew my congressional district to give the several thousand sasquatches that livee here fair representation.

    ReplyDelete
  16. BFRO has a few,amongst several,NB Canada sightings,
    My nephew had a 2 minute open meadow sighting at National park

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Care to elaborate? Would love to read of that.

      Delete
    2. GRAYs have bases in NB folks seeing Bigfoots and UFOs @ the same time coincidence i think NOT

      Delete
  17. Hey to Anon 11:59 was it at Kouchibouquac National park?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes it was at that park last spring early evening near the huge bog.

      Delete
  18. Nephew walked off of trail and saw backside of Sasquatch kneeling over digging in brush.It stood up to approx, 7-8 feet in height and extremely broad.It turned its head semi sideways and immediately walked calmly to the wood line and disappeared in Forrest.No tracks no smell no sound,

    ReplyDelete
  19. To 12:20 yes it was at Kouchibouquac park

    ReplyDelete
  20. Nephew says facial was hairy with some grey,He was in shock.He is a veteran and hunter.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Yes missing people in that area and surrounding region.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Face was human like but covered mostly with dark brownish hair.He only saw profile. He is a Canadian Special forces Vet a sniper having had tours in Bosnia and Afganistan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Has he started looking for them now?

      Delete
    2. That's amazing 1:26... Really appreciate the information. Good question Chick, also... Do you have any more sightings to discuss?

      Delete
    3. In the NAM GIs called them Rock Apes

      Delete
  23. He is looking past few months without firearm..hunting not allowed in park.Bfro has a sighting or 2 from same park.I heard of 2 other sightings very brief.Park has massive amounts of forest,bogs,rivers,ponds and abundant game like moose,deer,coyote,fox,pheasants etc.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. BOBO being a bigfoots gugu said U only need to make noise and wait for the big guy (Bigfoot) to showup! And some bacon - peanut butter and donuts to get the JOB DONE

      Delete
    2. I know the park visited family near there a few years ago...very pristine hardly anybody around there,

      Delete
    3. then it would be a great place for TRAPPER and the Mountain Monsters (AIMS) team to go hunt down and trap 1 of them bigfoots

      Delete
    4. It would be a great spot for them but it's isolated and cold there now approx 45 minutes north of Moncton NB or 2 and half hrs northwest of Halifax NS

      Delete
  24. My mind is blown. I surely didn't expect another blurry video of something to pass off as bigfoot. And wow does that kid seem sincere. Boy do I feel stupid now, all this talk of the evidence and I didnt believe and then right before the New Year, BLAM! I hope they got some more known primate/unknown primate hairs to solidify this great find and further back up the known fact now that theres 8ft magic monkeys running around. You know who I miss right now is DS who was whining that Dyers pic got posted and not his. Then his did and was instantly debunked as a fraud. No small coincidence that hes Joes good buddy, huh.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. http://www.texlaresearch.com/okhair4.jpg
      http://www.texlaresearch.com/okhairroot.jpg
      http://www.texlaresearch.com/unknown-chimp-bear.jpg

      Man... You know how to cry.

      : )

      Delete
    2. Ok... It's like this;

      Let's just imagine a second that Cro-Magnon man committed a murder. The investigators don't know he is Cro-Magnon because the DNA taken from the murder scene says Homo Sapien, but because he is a wild human, his hair fibre taken from the scene's morphology was evolved to suit his environment, therefore, like small amounts of his morphological & anatomical features that that are different to ours, so is his hair... But he's still Homo Sapien.

      Peace.

      Delete
    3. Hope that helps, sometimes putting it all in a little story helps the little ones understand a bit better.

      Delete
  25. Here is a real world experiment to try: Go to a football or basketball game at a high school or above level. Try to see how clear of a photo you can get of a fast break or a wide receiver on a fly pattern down the sidelines with your phone or pocket camera. Then try it again, but this time start with your phone or camera in your pocket as the football is snapped or a inbound pass is thrown onto the court.

    When you are looking at the non Pulitzer quality photos you took keep in mind, those photos you just took were preplanned, with excellent artificial lighting on the field or court, no trees or brush in the way, and your subjects were not capable of moving nearly as fast as a sasquatch.

    I imagine that any good quality media that surfaces of a sasquatch will be dismissed or attacked as CGI or a really expensive suit by many of the same people who complain about the lack of quality in the existing footage we are aware of.

    Until someone drags in a body or atleast a significant chunk of a body we are just arguing abstracts as far as the believer/skeptic flame wars are concerned.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree.Last year I took a pic of a bobcat in my backyard.He was sitting.....pic come out looking like a household 40 lb dog.

      Delete
    2. ...If a professor on a field trip came back with video or photos, I would be impressed no matter how crappy the result...reputations matter, and serious academics guard theirs jealously...

      Delete
    3. Pro wildlife photographers and filmmakers can track down just about any elusive animal in the world, some in much more remote locations and less populated than the supposed bigfoot.

      Guess what? They all think it's BS like any credible scientist or person with common sense.

      Delete
    4. I think you'll find that wildlife photographers are assigned specific instruction based on what experts know of how to track the particular subject they want to film, and are allocated specific areas that would imply specific results. When we learn how to track these subjects, then you'll have a lot more than photographs. They are also professionals with professional equipment, whereas the majority of this field are people from the general public who have to capture images of a far more evasive and intelligent creature than that of the projects of most wildlife biologists. I find it laughable that most 'sceptics' require photographs so badly, when every photograph or footage has and always will be a man in a suit.

      The appliance of rhetorical arguments to make the perception of normal circumstance... Oh, and you can't get more credible than the very nest primatologists in the world.

      Delete
    5. They've spent countless hours in the woods with proper equipment and the knowledge how to use it, and not one of them ever came across one of the 'thousands' of bigfoot roaming around.

      Gee, why is that?

      Delete
    6. Plenty filmed;

      http://youtu.be/cR2cREt95sU

      http://youtu.be/luue2Mv_VNM

      http://youtu.be/lOxuRIfFs0w

      ... None caught.

      Delete
    7. Sorry but they have run across them, many times
      Chuck

      Delete
    8. So... since nobody can take clear photos or video of Bigfoots then that explains why they haven't been able to photograph other extremely rare animals. Oh wait...

      Delete
    9. You were just sourced a handful out of many video sources.

      Oh wait...

      Delete
    10. Joe are you suggesting those three videos linked are clear and unambiguous in the same way that professional wildlife documentary makers film extremely rare animals in the wild today? No I didn't think so. Previously you indicated professional wildlife photographers can't photograph bigfoot because they don't know where to find it. I think you hit the nail on the head there. Many amateurs all over the US claim to be able to find bigfoot relatively easily but they aren't capable of capturing it on film. On the other hand the professionals can capture good footage but don't know where to point their cameras... hmmm...

      Delete
    11. "They've spent countless hours in the woods with proper equipment and the knowledge how to use it, and not one of them ever came across one of the 'thousands' of bigfoot roaming around."

      No... It was in a means to counter that vomit, as there are plenty of people who have come across Sasquatch accidentally and successfully filmed one, regardless of professional wildlife photographers' agendas to accomplish other projects. One of those sources I posted is unambiguous, so much so that we can make comparatives here;

      http://www.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf

      ... Oh I think so. No, wildlife photographers aren't out looking for Sasquatch, there are no TV programmes employing them to film Sasquatch, nor do they or anyone else have any idea how to track them, regardless of anyone else's claims... If that were the case then we would have the last piece of the puzzle; a body. Some Sasquatch researchers can interact with them, but on the whole Sasquatch's current state of discovery is largely down to every source of evidence short of being able to track them, being very much the case.

      Delete
    12. Actually you are wrong again.

      Bigfoot Bounty had a professional wildlife photographer and camera man that works for hunting shows and magazines. Didn't believe in bigfoot though.

      Delete
  26. M.k get on this lighter video and let's see what more we can find out

    ReplyDelete
  27. Why would anyone release such important video footage as a sideways video of a phone screen? The answer to that is obvious and reveals the real intention is to draw out the mystery for entertainment purposes. It also reveals the filmer knows the footage is not useful evidence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Total rubbish.The majority of sightings are at distance. If you got remotely "entertained" by the source in question, then that's a good thing, stop moaning.

      Delete
  28. In NB Canada Sasquatch exists.We have seen clans.We do not report all sightings like Americans ...it's more discreet but still valid.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In NB we think Dyer is a douche,,,Noël is odd,,,,Green is respected,,,Bindernagle as well,,,Dr Johnston is odd but probably had an encounter,,,Sasquatch Ontario is habituating,,

      Delete
  29. I am really surprised this video has not received more attention since it was first put out on the internet............

    https://thedavisreport.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/calgary-bigfoot-video-animation-cropped.gif

    ReplyDelete
  30. I believe in Santa Claus too!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia