Spectral Motion Just Released Some Awesome Photos of The Bigfoot From "Exists"
Exists, the new horror film from The Blair Witch Project director Eduardo Sánchez is awesome if you haven't seen it. The lifelike Sasquatch creature is one of the most spectacular Bigfoots ever featured in a film. The guys at Spectral Motion just recently released some photographs of their work. Check it out:
Uno is a dyke!!
ReplyDeletePretend bigfoot photos suck.
DeleteThey do! But pretend bigfoot photos are the same as real bigfoot photos.
DeleteTHERE IS NO SUCH THING AS BIGFOOT!! HOW CAN AN ENTIRE SPECIES OF GIANT 8 FOOT APES EXIST IN AMERICA WITH OUT BEING DISCOVERED??? IDIOTS!!
Still desperate for attention...
Deletewhat a child!
LOL! Still only 1 troll having a conversation with himself.
DeleteAbout 9 yrs old I am guessing. Go to bed twerp!
We can reconstruct an entire dinosaur from 10 million years ago with fossils yet there is nothing other than hoaxed footprints that lead the simpletons to believe in a bigfoot. WAKE UP YOU IGNORANT DOLTS!!
DeleteBe sure to put your pull ups on this time. Tired of your "accidents".
DeleteAnon 1:13 and anon 1:14 are the same person. Go to bed twerp.
DeleteAnon 1:17 is same person too. Put your pull-ups on.
DeleteK... thx for that update you retard.
DeleteAnon1:16 said it all. Dispute it or bow out. Period. I'll wait........
DeleteDispute 1:16. Otherwise, leave or bow out. You cant! Goodnight.
DeleteByebye
DeleteSilence...... (crickets chirping) : )
Delete^thank you. Prove me wrong or shut your mouth. Your only response was an insult which means you know I'm right. Again, byebye.
Delete: )
DeleteAnybody else want to argue with 1:16????? Hahahaha
DeleteMake me FAG
Delete^Hahahaha
DeleteByebye
Fuck face^
DeleteCrickets
Delete10 million, TEN MILLION year old dinosaurs.........
DeleteAnon 1:46 (me) just trumped footers. And I did it on the most simple level. Heck, even fake MMG showed up. I broke it down in dumb footer lingo.No takers? I set the bait out there, let's dance!
Delete1:12... Last time I checked, your biggest obstacle was as real as this;
Deletehttp://wwww.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf
... And it's simple, 8 foot apes have been discovered, we just don't know how to track them is all.
1:16... There is 150 years worth of giant human skeletal remains been documented in the US, and castings that have species traits that transcend States and decades, that are found 30-50 miles into wilderness areas are not hoaxed.
You were very, very welcome.
Ah joey, show me where (in my best redneck voice) "them 8 foot apes have been discovered" show me!
DeleteIt's a government cover up, ay joey?
DeleteP.s. no giant skeleton remains that are documented in North America. All speculation. Check the Smithsonian inventory. 100% speculation. Period.
DeleteJoey Wales believes e erythema he sees on the telly and reads on the internet. Dinosaurs. Dinosaurs. Dinosaurs. Game set match
DeleteThe discovery is in the mounds of evidence which accounts for everything short of modern type specimen (one source being the link I gave you), and scientific big hitters like the Smithsonian and Scientific American says we can only speculate about your mental age.
DeleteSmithsonian has no bones? Just like your lack of bone LOL!
DeleteNow I fully understand your motivation here Joe! These idiots are begging for it.
Joey says 150 years. My great grandfather was alive 150 years ago! Fact.
DeleteI guess time is different in great Britain.
Joey is reaching now. Fishing even.
Delete*mounds of evidence he says
DeleteHe resorted to throwing insults at Americans. That means he is at a loss for a decent argument.
Deletedinosaurs, dinosaurs, dinosaurs
Deletedinosaurs, dinosaurs, dinosaurs, dinosaurs, dinosaurs, dinosaurs, dinosaurs, dinosaurs, dinosaurs, Dumbass
DeleteWow still a fag^
DeleteThe Smithsonian has miles of vaults. Decent argument? And you post all that?
DeleteProve me wrong.
; )
I agree with everything you said in your last post.
DeleteI have to go to work now joey. The "super friends" might bite and hopefully they will because you are obviously in a mood to show off like you normally are. You lost this duel. Unfortunately I have to go. Until next time, godspeed.
"Lost this duel", and you failed to present any counter argument to show that my information is wrong?
DeleteRun along Einstein, I've had better 'duels' with a ten year old.
That was fun to watch Joe, see ya round!
DeleteGet a counter argument son.
DeleteAnonymously trolling a Bigfoot forum on a Sunday morning just before you have to report to work is no way to lead your life.
DeleteSuch sad circumstances. I hope hes not so sleepy that he gets fired from his job as an adult diaper model.
DeleteIt's nice you've got a job 2:40,it's good for kids to have a paper round.
DeleteAs good as that bigfoot suit is it still looks like a man in a suit unlike Patty who looks like a real bigfoot because that's what she is xx
There is hope. Les Stroud is in the mountains with Kelly Shaw this weekend. For some of us, that's a very good thing.
DeleteKEEP UP THE GOOD WORK KELLY SHAW!!!!!!!
DeleteGreat suit. Would imagine a fair chunk of the budget went towards it.
ReplyDeleteStill no where near the best 'suit' of all however. Roger Patterson with zero training and no cash still trumps Hollywood to this day. Just wonder how this 'dumb cowboy' managed that?
MMG
Flip side of that is, grainy video. How can any "expert" analyze it.
DeleteMMG
Patterson had no cash? Do your research fake MMG
DeleteIt was probably a freak with hypertrichosis. Google it and check out the images. They are some that are a dead ringer for Patty. Perfect match.
DeleteSo it's a human with a rare genetic condition. We have pictures, we have specimens.
And Joe, or MMG, has never explained adequately why I couldn't hunt down and kill every bigfoot with a pack of Irish Wolfhounds. Huge dogs, great sense of smell. Let's hear their paranormal BS about why dogs can't track bigfoot. That's always good for a laugh.
C'mon Joe. Drop your dingus and start explaining.
OMG tell me you aren't serious!
DeleteI'm afraid he is.
Delete(Pfffft)
A hypertrichosis giant lady roaming through the woods? I thought you said it was a costume? Grasp those straws real tight buddy! I am going to laugh myself to sleep!
DeleteHa ha ha ha ha!!
DeleteAs always Joe knows he has as much evidence of Bigfoot existing as Unicorns existing. Hes just going to do his tired old "Prove it" argument and then him and his groupies are going to do their victory dance because we cant prove it DOESN'T exist. Even though they haven't proven anything themselves. It doesnt matter to them they base everything off a video filmed by a known liar, whos authenticity is verified by a known fraud. Why because they have a bunch of unproven conspiracy theories. "Miles of vaults", so there MUST be giant bones in there. Thats a legitimate argument for them. I mean it couldnt possibly be filled with just plain old native american bones and artifacts could it? MILES.. that pretty much proves the whole giant bone theory. I only pop in here to show any possible new people how ridiculous Joe and his lackeys are. There really is no point in arguing with people who base the majority of their claims off of evidence that is very much likely hoaxed(some of it is blatantly obvious.) Even less pointless to argue with Joe who changes the facts around to suit his own needs as I have shown multiple times. He will deny that and ask for it to be shown again but I won't oblige, only here to point out that in a sense these are children here that believe in almost anything. And Joe will use his fancy words to convince them hes trouncing us, when if they had the intelligence to actually comprehend and look up what he was talking about they'd see the game he runs. You should see Joes definitions of delusional and psuedo-science, my sides actually hurt from laughing the first time I did.
DeleteEven your fellow trolls aren't going to read all that! Next pulease!!!
Deletenot a person with hypertrichosis living in the woods you retards. filmed on purpose. you delusional retards are experts at anti-thinking.
Deletenow please explain why dogs haven't tracked down every bigfoot in North America?
A woman with hypertrochosis... With longer arms, receding forehead, steroid abused that just so happens to look exactly what people have reported as Sasquatch for the past ten thousand years.
DeleteIf you knew anything about this subject, you'd know that there are inumerable reports of dogs being scared of Sasquatch and trained dogs not even being interested in doing their jobs in areas of missing people linked to Sasquatch activity... Also a minorty of these reports account for dogs not being so scared but ending up a dog burger. It's even theorised that younger Saaquatch are more gentle towards dogs.
Is the present Bigfoot evidence reliable? Well about as reliable as any falsifiable source that can be presented as evidence in any scientific or judicial arena. There are in fact plenty of facts that denialists choose to ignore, like the pristine professionalism that has transitioned scientific careers into this field, by methods tried and tested to be legitimate and totally reliable. Like the very best primatologists and conservationists repeatedly telling you that there is nothing in the environment of the US that prohibits the existence of an unknown primate, and in fact... It is likely to be there. Considering that every single source of evidence exists short of type specimen, is it healthy to maintain the tunnel vision, dentists stance that there is nothing what so ever to the claims of an unknown primate residing in the wilderness of the US?
DeleteIt's simple, most psuedoskeptics are ignorant of the facts and celebrate their own ignorance to attain a sense of community. In sheer naivity of the facts regarding evidence, it's easy to come across so confident, but it only lasts as long as someone can point out these facts to which it then turns into aggresive denial, because they've sounded off so much, for so long.
Psuedo(not genuine, sham)-science is in fact maintaining that there is nothing worthy of analysis until such a process of conclusive research is reached, such as type specimen. Psuedoscience is also ignoring data based on subjective assumptions and inaccurate data, reclining to preconceived preferences that cannot be supported, and is in fact heuristics (what the scientific method was designed against)... Some of your very regularly expressed fallacies... Like providing a means to test the sources presented sufficiently and show that your position is not one hypocritically based on lies that you point to others making.
not buying the proportion garbage. neither are the majority of reasonable people, according to reality.
Delete'looks exactly'? the descriptions vary as greatly as those of dog breeds. you are floundering badly today.
go eat some protein.
that's all you're going to say about dogs? PAH! I suppose dogs avoid them instinctively, then? What complete and utter hogwash. My dogs will chase down and bark at garbage trucks, But a big smelly, hairy mammal (potential food to the canid carnivore) they avoid. Interesting how that completely fails on every level, isn't it?
Unfortunately for you, merely stating "no it doesn't" and stamping your feet like a child doesn't really affect the data to which if you actually went and had a look before you sounded off, you'd prevent yourself looking like a total twonk. Also... Like was said to you up top... The dogs that do attack end up dog burger.
DeleteNot buying the proportion thing? That's cool... It's a shame your mere opinon doesn't threaten facts. A hairy woman that fits ten thousand years of anatomical & morphological traits of Sasquatch reports, isn't a Sasquatch, it's a human tgat happens to have the exact same traits as a genetic disorder?
I'm 'floundering'?
(Pfffft)
badly joe, very badly
Deleteyou're deflection and accusations are meaningless
people use dogs to track a great variety of animals
are you suggestions bigfeet kill all of the dogs and this goes completely unreported? no remains left to be tested?
that is beyond stupid
10,000 years of incredibly divergent and unreliable sasquatch reports
a few months ago we were told they had black noses and look like wookies
or do they look like patty, and walk slowly away from humans in their line of sight for as long as possible?
i am done humoring your stale, lame arguments
so if you're done stamping your feet and crying i'd like to talk to somebody else who has at least one foot in the real world
you big baby
Deflection? Are you sane?
DeleteYour dog vomit got taken apart down below. Um... No, nobody has said that Sasquatch kill dogs and it doesn't go reported... In fact the fact tat it gets reported is how I can state it. You really are one dense mother trucker aren't you?
Ten thousand years of consistent reports, even whole cultures. We are still finding native names for this creature and references to Sasquatch have transcended ethnicities who didn't want anything to do with native culture... A culture that didn't have the slightest idea what an ape looked like should they devize a secret society of ape wearing hoaxers that jump out and say boo to people... People with guns.
Again... Sasquatch are prone to mistakes and curiousity and there are inumerable reports of Sasquatch behaving exactly how we see in the PGF.
My word, I can't believe I'm stooping this low to be honest...
?? TEN THOUSAND YEARS OF CONSISTANT REPORTS!!!
DeleteThe oldest known alphabet,
Is approximately 5000 yrs old
Oral tradition,is not much more than heresay,
"BOOM"..POP,POP,POP, GOES THE WEASEL,WEASEL!!!
Natives share their culture down generations by something called oral tradition, because written texts can be manipulated and interpreted.
Delete(Sigh)
After this teaching by Joe, DSA there will be a brief oral exam by our female instructor. Let's hope it's "not too brief and mostly oral...baby". In the interim, as Dallas spanks The JV team, Jacksonville, in jolly old England let's not take too many shots at Joe F-- He knows all about the Woodwose and whether Joe Gallo was right that Grendel may have been a Sasquatch. I am Hygelac's Thane. What am I telling you DSA?............."I AM BEOWULF !!!!"
DeleteHa ha ha ha ha!!!! How are you Texan!! I'm in Edinburgh until Wednesday and will finish off your latest video then.
DeleteNo problem my brother. DSA claims I'm hoaxing videos I haven't even released yet.....we must be dedicated Joe. Like a Cowboy's cheerleader in Jude Law's trailer we must remain cautious and optomistic. I'll talk to you soon.
DeleteLook you two, y'all need to git off this "SASQUATCH " is
DeleteHuman(hss)crap!
If y'all claiming bigfoot are human(hss, even cro magnon) ,both u guys Are gonna learn,uh get"schooled"
On the why your theory's are
A impossiblity
Jacksonville jaguar's rule!!
DeleteDallas cowboy's Stink!!
No matter what u have to say! DSM. (dear sweet Mike).
; )
They are being traded to London for Ricky Gervais, Stephen Merchant and depending upon their record Karl Pilkington and a comedian to be named later.....
Delete12:06... Shivering in my boots!
DeleteThat is because you know Nothing about genetics and or chromosome allocation &
DeleteAnd parameters . YA DUMMY.
DSM = Friggin smart ass!
DeleteLol.
You can look at Patty who's, who's got archaic human features, has the anatomy of a human with proportional differences and claim you need to know about chromosome allocation and perimeters to know she's what... An animal?
DeleteBurial, language, tool use, culture, human. Now shut up and sit down.
Ok little boy,you dont even know what I am even talking about SON! Do you even know about 48vs46Fused chromosomes (hss) and the
DeleteImplications of that fact!!
I know you dont even know
what im on about. Huh? Son.
Im gonna pick my time for your total ASS Stretch ,
Your not going to wait much
longer!
Peace out . ; )
BY THE WAY, SONNY BOY(joe) . Homo neanderthalensis ALSO has 46(1base fused) lol.
DeleteHow about them apples. SON
? I shure you have no clue what im saying!! Its staring you in the FACE you low IQ.
Fool.
(Pfffft)
DeleteNeanderthals had morphological diffrrences, that had culture too. Brrrrr, shivering in my boots.
... And you have grammar like that and I'm the one with a low IQ?
Delete(Cringe)
The skull of Cro-Magnon is longheaded, the forehead is straight, the brow ridges only slightly projecting, the cranial vault noticeably flattened, and the occipital bone (at the back of the head) projects backward. The cranial capacity is large, about 100 cubic inches. Although the skull is relatively long and narrow, the face appears quite short and wide. This combination is often regarded as a common feature of the Cro-Magnon race. The forward projection of the upper jaw is also distinctive. The eye sockets are low-set, wide, and rather square in shape; and the nasal aperture of the skull is narrow and strongly projecting. The mandible is robust, with massive ascending ramus (the upward projection of the lower jaw, where it attaches to the skull), has strongly developed points of muscular attachment, and a quite prominent chin.
DeleteThe standard arm to height ratio is .44H. The ratio extracted from the film is .49H. The arm length of Patty for example is 5.5 standard deviations from the human mean which is the 99.9999981 percentile or is present in one out of 52.5 million people. the earliest Homo sapiens had bodies with short, slender trunks and longer limbs. As it turns out, Otamids (American Cro-Magnons and what have been documented around native burial areas linked to giant tribes) are defined as long and low headed with elongate distal limbs (ie. they were hunters like Late Pleistocene Europeans), are present right into the eastern Archaic and Middle Woodlands periods and are described simply as plesiomorphic (meaning primitive ancestral or primitive character) relative to 'derived' Americoids, resembling similar populations in Europe and Siberia and lacking Mongoloid features in their cranium and face.
Scientists have discovered that about one in thirteen people have flexible ape-like feet. A team studied the feet of 398 visitors to the Boston Museum of Science. The results show differences in foot bone structure similar to those seen in fossils of a member of the human lineage from two million years ago.
All these traits are associated with Sasquatch morphology & anatomy, and are very much human traits. Baring in mind Sasquatch bury their dead and have language, whilst they have always been reported to use clubs (tools)... This is culture in its purest and humans have culture.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread730058/pg1
Delete4:04 check your grammer, you hippocrate! Yes you are a redundant low IQ DIP!
DeleteI'm flabberghasted at how dumb you are to not even know what im talking about.
Look son,If sasquatch was human it would be nothing More than andre the giant!
It would not be able to twist 3in tree limbs, run 30-45 mph
ect.ect.that type of muscle performance would require
48 chromosome (gorilla,chimp).my phones goining dead bye.
Holmes you've cracked the case! Bloody good explanation!
DeleteJoe @4:02 thats my point! You stupid,stupid,little fool! NOW GET BACK TO YOUR CORNER! And wait till the class bell BEGINS,,,"SON"..
DeleteMy grammar's bad and you even spelled it "grammer"? Ha ha ha ha!! Was that really meant to stretch? Ha ha ha ha!!! Until we sit down with a Sasquatch and so relevant tests, how the heck do we know... Whilst someone like us, merely twice almost three times the size would be able to achieve what you claim would require less chromosomes, we have normal sized humans that can run 30mph already, the strongest man who ever lived could carry two tons on his back... You stupid, stupid little twonk, ha ha ha!! More gray matter means more motor neurons and having more motor neurons means more muscle control. Our surplus motor neurons allow us to engage smaller portions of fewer motor neurons, each neuron triggers a higher number of muscle fibres, therefore if Sasquatch merely had more, using a muscle would be an all of or nothing proposition... Sasquatch can't do things like this like thread needles, but you don't need to have a different chromosome count, merely more or less motor neurons.
DeleteSomething about school? Ha ha ha!!
Adam Glass holds 13 world records in grip strength and have some of the strongest hands in the entire world. As a performing strongman, he has destroyed metal spikes, torn thousands of decks of cards, scrolled miles of steel bars and horseshoes. This is a normal man like you and me... Imagine what a human almost three times his size could accomplish?
DeleteVery, very basic thought processes are your bane, sonny Jim.
Every thing you said is COMPLETE BULLCRAP you slow Doltish stooge!!! HOW CAN YOU LIE WITHOUT ANY GUILT??
DeleteEasy its called bieng intellectualy
Dishonest. That is you,MY weak,weak, SON. in a few days.
you can call Dr Sykes and his work
In genetics, UH "BANE??
NOW get back in your corner SON!
as the school bell hasn't rung yet!
Is that it? Your best come back for?? What an absolute siolen you are! Ha ha ha!!
DeleteYou're the one with the big claims, big threats, where were they son? You thought you were clever, turns about you're another spoiled brat who's best argument is "no it's not!" And not very clever a all.
Eh son?
: )
Oh... And just to finish up on your education you stupid excuse for an existence, early human ancestors and most other mammals' brains are wired with straightforward circuits that pick up information from the surrounding environment through the senses and relays that information to motor neurons so the body can move and respond to the surrounding environments.
DeleteSuch big talk... So little brain cells. Now shut up and sit down!
; p
"A hypertrichosis giant lady roaming through the woods? I thought you said it was a costume? Grasp those straws real tight buddy! I am going to laugh myself to sleep!"
ReplyDeleteYet you believe the more plausible explanation would be a Giant Ape Woman that noone can find or track and the government has been covering up. Im going to laugh myself to sleep.
A hypertrichosis giant lady roaming through the woods NAKED = your MOM. Thats why it seems so common place to you.
DeleteIm still laughing
see above.
DeleteYes, it's plausible because there is suficient physical and biological evidence to back up ten thousand years of cultural & contemporary anecdotes.
DeleteSasquatch are giant, hairy, wild humans; plenty found, none caught and yes... We need to know how to track the "boss of the woods". The natives are the very best trackers in the world, and seeing that's what they refer to him, kind of ours things into perspective.
there is NOT sufficent physical and biological evidence, dolt.
Deletecan we put aside the magical thinking for one day?
Tracks are physical evidence, hair is biological.
DeleteI'm the ignorant dolt?
: )
tracks proven to be fake, never proven real
DeleteWHAT HAIR? simply repeating a lie does not make it true
DWA got smoked on this repeatedly on BFF
you are a liar, liar truth denier
we will no longer tolerate you INSANE LIES
Tracks not proven to be fake at all... And verified by a long line of wildlife biologists, anthropologists & forensic experts. Every effort at dismissing dermals has been thrown out the window because such traits were found in the actual impressions prior to them being cast.
DeleteWhat hair? This hair...
http://www.texlaresearch.com/unknown-chimp-bear.jpg
Easy.
oooh a cryptozoological research website!
Deletewas this given to Sykes?
what did he find?
lame
I'm done with you chimp
you've got NOTHING but tracks, which are useless without an animal. come back when you have something worth talking about
good day
A Cryptozoological research website... Yes, and where else would you find such?
Delete(Headshake in disbelief at sheer stupidity)
You need medulla to sequence a hair fibre for DNA, there has not been Sasquatch hair recovered that so far has this... You can be Sykes or superman, you won't get DNA from it. What we do have is primotologists verifying the uniform morphology, which is what you see in the link.
No... You're done with your lame questions that have the most obvious answers, and lookey here! An admition on tracks... If you have tracks, then you have a creature leaving them and are not useless as wildlife biologists conduct much of their research on tracks.
Man... You're one dumb kid.
What I take from this article is a claim how this is the most lifelike bigfoot ever. From the pictures it looks like they spent a good deal of money on trying to make this so. And yet this suit pales in comparison to PG. I do not see any bulging muscles, just a lot of hair on a form fitting suit. How can this be in this day and time someone can not make a suit that is as good as Patty?. Not even close. Maybe the company should have hired a real Sasquatch for exists like Patterson did. I imagine they work for a whole lot more money today though and it might take a big budget film to pay its salary. For sure it would be worth more than Clooney or Pitt.
ReplyDeleteChuck
woman with hypertrichosis, probably paid a nominal fee to be filmed slowly walking away in direct line of sight. a behavior that has never been explained adequately or repeated.
Deletegoogle hypertrichosis and check out the images. some of the faces are a perfect match.
so we have a plausible explanation, with specimens and photographs that predate PGF by quite some time
If that where true who is she?where did she live?who were her neighbours and her family?some one would know who she was unless of course her family are bigfoots like her :) xx
Deleteexactly. i imagine they were relegated to the sidelines and sideshows back in the day. my 'theory' is probably from Mexico in the states illegally.
Deleteis this really more improbable than the existence of a breeding population of completely unknown primates?
that we have literally no record of?
c'mon
Where on earth would someone find, in 1967, a woman with hypertrichosis willing to walk naked in front of a camera? The disease is embarrassing enough to those who have it. Embarrassment + modesty = Not a woman with hypertrichosis. That's simply not a reasonable alternative theory.
Deletewhy does she have to be willing? I imagine an itinerant, proverty stricken woman with this abnormality could be coerced, if not forced to do it.
DeleteIt is certainly more probable than bigfoot. By a long, long way.
American Horror Story is doing the freak thing. It had to have been a miserable life. Desperate people do desperate things.
A woman with hypertrochosis... With longer arms, receding forehead, steroid abused that just so happens to look exactly what people have reported as Sasquatch for the past ten thousand years.
DeleteDesperate people so desperate things, like trying to claw back reassurance from tbe boogeyman.
Deletelooks like a heavy set human to me! the face is a perfect match. you did google images and see that, right?
Deletenow you have to argue about arm length and shape of the forehead. that's an uphill task given the quality of the video.
your little corner of the world keeps getting smaller and smaller.
In the realm of probability, the hypertrichosis theory has your idiotic, ever changing, completely anecdotal theory beaten to a pulp.
gloat gloat gloat
DeletePlenty of quality here old boy;
http://wwww.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf
A woman with hypertrochosis... With longer arms, receding forehead, steroid abused that just so happens to look exactly what people have reported as Sasquatch for the past ten thousand years.
Also... I've cringed enough and stooped low enought providing you with the attention you clearly don't deserve. Have a nice day Einstein.
: p
run away little boy. you have two idiots making their livelihood off of saps like you supporting your argument.
Deleteflee, joe!
and don't come back.
you have failed spectacularly today
as you will every day I find you here and unable to deal with these two completely reasonable assumptions
PGF subject was a woman with hypertrichosis
dogs could and would track and lead us to bigfoot if it existed
i am now doing a happy dance and peeing on your cracked, broke pedestal
you lose. good day sir!
A woman with hypertrochosis... With longer arms, receding forehead, steroid abused that just so happens to look exactly what people have reported as Sasquatch for the past ten thousand years... Yes.
DeleteI can't believe I've got yo point this out to you, but you have to train a tracking dog with the sent of a Sasquatch to then track them down. Since we don't have that, then you can't train tbe dog to do it.
(Sigh)
So angry and so boundary breaking for stupidity.
So these fools, and make no mistake there is only a couple are now hanging there hat on hypertrochosis. Must be about 100,000 of these hypertrochosis people out there because they are being seen by the dozens every day all over the NA continent. Does this disease or whatever ailment it is give you great benefit to living out in the vast forests even unclothed in the dead of winter? Does it give you the ability to grow to over 700 lbs and carry that weight well. Does it give you the ability to run at over 35 mph and grow large feet up to 22 inches and more and walk in a straight linewith a 3 to 4 foot stride. Does it give you the ability to develop lung power with a volume so loud it rivals or surpasses the largest mammal on the continent?
DeleteChuck
He has to be trolling, Chuck... Nobody could be that stupid.
DeleteChuck,
DeleteGreat Work!
Hey buddy!
Delete100,000 bigfoots out there? wow- I'm glad somebody had the balls to give us a number- unfortunately it shows how completely out of touch with reality you have become.
DeleteI can show you actual, rare organisms that look exactly like the creature in the PGF.
you got nothing to show
you can site all of the believer crap in the world about proportion and size, and i can counter with skeptics saying the exact opposite
you say it couldn't be a suit
i say it doesn't have to be
the argument that this human lives 'in the wild' is a false argument. it is far more likely that she was paid/coerced/forced to go along with the charade
100,000 bigfoots...that is rich
incredible!
joe- do your and your student agree with this number?
yes or no will suffice
PGFs days may be numbered- better be careful
DeleteNo... You cannot show us anything that can be attributed to a genetic dissorder that accounts for having longer arms, receding forehead, steroid abused that just so happens to look exactly what people have reported as Sasquatch for the past ten thousand years. Chick took your vomit apart comprehensively, and I bet she felt as low stooping as anyone else once they take the time to respond to your tantrums.
DeleteWe in fact have plenty to show... You need to test it, not attribute the traits of a Bigfoot to a genetic dissorder, it's embarrassingly bad son. You can counter with 'skeptics'' saying the contrary to proportional data, but you have merely that. You have nothing for the facts I can source you in an instant, and you didn't the first time around. No... You say it doesn't have to be a suit because you realize how stupid that argument is right? Cause you've got the claim that Patty's appearence is attributed to a rare genetic dissorder, right?
Wa-wa-wi-wa.
You do realize that you and your 'facts' represent a microscopic percentage of college educated people?
DeleteYou act like some superior intellect, while, in fact, the world is laughing at how idiotic your convictions are.
Show me a college or university where this nonsense you spout daily is considered factual?
Hypertrichosis is certainly more plausible than your idiotic belief of a massive, undiscovered primate, based on nothing but fake hair, phony tracks, and campfire stories.
But it is less plausible than a man in a suit. I'm just humoring you, showing that there are always alternatives, when the day comes that you wake up and realize what a fool you are, and what a colossal waste of time you have invested in a child's fantasy.
You are a loser, held in high regard only by a pathetic few other losers.
And at the end of each and every day, without a specimen, you will just be 'that guy ranting about bigfoot who's full of crap.'
A man in a suit you say? But of course! Holmes you've cracked the case! Bloody good reasoning!
DeleteNo... My facts in fact are based around the research of pioneering scientists who have excelled all others in their respected fields... One of whom used to be an advisor to the UN. Consitent scientific method being applied and then attacked for its credibility is in fact a contradiction of scientific method which you celebrate. Also... Pioneerd tend to be in the minority any way, eh?
DeleteThe world is laughing at me whilst you are stamping your feet and too stupid to counter me with anything concrete other than your spoiled brat opinion.
I can show you representatives of universities and other institutions where such pioneering people are present; Colin Groves, PhD Australian National University, Canberra, Australia... Chris Loether, PhD, Idaho Sate University
Pocatello, ID... Jeffrey McNeely, PhD
Chief Scientist IUCN - World Conservation Union Gland, Switzerland... Lyn Miles, PhD
University of Tennessee, Chattanooga... Anna Nekaris, PhD, Oxford Brooks University, Oxford, England... Esteban Sarmiento, PhD, Human Evolution Foundation, East Brunswick, NJ and Zhoua Guoxing, PhD, Beijing Museum of Natural History, Beijing, China.
From Chick below;
"I spent the last 1/3 hr looking at photos of people with hypertrochosis. I noticed that though the faces are sometimes but not usually completely covered in thick hair, their bodies NEVER come any where near being covered like Patties. In fact it is strange how naked of hair their bodies are in comparison to the hair on their faces. Patty was so completely covered in very thick hair. Not the same. Google images and see for yourself. There were a couple that had me going but ended up only being makeup for movies."
A woman with hypertrochosis... With longer arms, receding forehead, steroid abused that just so happens to look exactly what people have reported as Sasquatch for the past ten thousand years... Yes.
Collosal waste of time = show it to be the case.
Fairytail = show us you haven't contradicted yourself like a ten year old by claiming on this comment section that your 'fairytail' could then be reality.
To nkt support your case adequately in these areas mean you are the loser son. Considering we have every source of evidence short of type sepcimen, we merely have to get one and have plenty of reasons to invest effort in such based on the circumstances listed to you every time you vomit on your keyboard.
: )
And you still haven't proved any of your points.
is there a database of people with hypertrichosis from 1967? I kind of doubt it. all we need is a heavy set woman from this period and this area.
ReplyDeleteIn 1648, Aldrovandus first documented a family with hypertrichosis. Originally from the Canary Islands, Petrus Gonzales was brought to France as a curiosity for the nobles. He, his 2 daughters, a son, and a grandchild were affected. This kindred was dubbed the Family of Ambras after a castle near Innsbruck where their portraits were discovered. Over the next 300 years, more than 50 similar-appearing cases were described, and 34 patients with presumed congenital hypertrichosis were identified. In 1873, Virchow described an edentate form; in 1876, Bartles added the descriptor "universalis;" and, in 1890, Chiari called the syndrome "hypertrichosis of the dog-men."
this is a very interesting theory and even though the real solution is that it is a man in a suit, this theory is still way more plausible than it being a bigfoot
Deleteit completely destroys the entire costume argument, which is all Joe has left.
Deletethe giant skeleton this is horsecrap. giant humans have been recorded at all points in time.
Where on earth would someone find, in 1967, a woman with hypertrichosis willing to walk naked in front of a camera? The disease is embarrassing enough to those who have it. Embarrassment + modesty = Not a woman with hypertrichosis. That's simply not a reasonable alternative theory.
Deletesee above. cutting and pasting the same thing repeatedly smacks of complete desperation, btw.
DeleteI cut and pasted one time, not "repeatedly" , and did so merely for the sake of simplicity, because my response to two different conversations was the same. Cutting and pasting rather than retyping was merely an exercise in reasonableness.
Deletegoogle images for hypertrichosis. perfect match for Patty.
DeleteMany specimens, photographs, etc. We know, for a fact, they exist, usually on the sidelines of humanity ( just like bigfoot ).
but your theory, a population of unknown, massive, temperate zone primates, with no visible impact on their environment and zero biological evidence makes more sense?
dude
You would have to know how to track them should you recognise their impact on tbe environment... But the evidence for the mountain gorilla didn't stop being a reality during the 60 years it took to track them. You've also been shown biological evidence in the link up top.
DeleteLike... Totally.
In those days it took 60 years. Now it should take 60 days max.
DeleteCue Joe and his special pleading for magical, mystical poop apes. Primitive people believed in it, so why shouldn't we?
Joe is setting us back 1000 years minimum.
Should it? I don't think you have the slightest idea what you're talking about, do you? Some of you had the Attenborough box set last xmas and you think you've seen the world, ha ha ha!! Sasquatch are not dumb animals and have all the space they require to evade in as sufficiently as they have done. When they slip up or get curious, that's when we see them and the frequency of reports are exactly what you would expect from a largely nocturnal wild human that buried it's dead.
DeleteSpecial pleading is maintaining that scientific methods should be altered, bent and twisted to suit preconceived preferences and heuristical conclusions. What do I plead for? An even playing ground, t'is all.
The only people who are setting us back are those reclined to methods and approaches that the scientific model was designed against... And heuritical ideals are your one major fallacy vomited daily.
so many ape men and ape women from the circus' throughout time.
ReplyDeleteso many giants as well.
check out Martin Van Buren Bates (November 9, 1837 – January 7, 1919), known as the "Kentucky Giant"
while you dorks are checking out the well documented cases of dog men and ape girls and giants that are just humans with genetic conditions, i'm going back to liveleak to check out the real world.
ReplyDeletefinding bigfoot lol
Enjoy the Russian car crashes and security footage of convenience store robberies .
Deletedon't forget arabs getting blasted into chunks
DeleteRegarding the "dinosaur. dinosaur, dinosaur" argument: While it's true there are dinosaur bones that have been found, there may not be as many as some think. Are you aware that many of the reconstructions of "entire dinosaurs" are made using just a few actual bones, with the rest being man-made "bones" based on scientific theory and speculation (and yes, sometimes even a little imagination)?
ReplyDeletegigantopithicus teeth on the other side of the planet = bigfoot in your back yard
DeleteFor six million years of chimps and gorillas living on the African continent, we only have a handful of teeth... Whilst there's 150 years of giant skeletons being documented in the US.
Deleteskeletons of giant humans
Deletedid you look up the Kentucky giant? His wife was a giant too
lots and lots of giant humans. NBA, Guiness book.
what is the conspiracy? are these skeletons obviously not human?
Lots of giant humans with hair in be wilderness too. The Europeans in the 19th century needed to subjugate natives to take their lands and show they were inferior. How could they do this if their burial mounds and history of North America had links to other ancient cultures around the world that are cherished, and the giant skeletons were giant (superior)?
DeleteSasquatch are giant hairy humans with archaic features... Their skeletons would look like giant human skeletons with archaic features.
whatever joe
Delete"How could they do this if their burial mounds and history of North America had links to other ancient cultures around the world that are cherished, and the giant skeletons were giant (superior)?"
DeleteHow could they do that. Hmm well lets think.. oh wait. We allready know how they did that, with guns you giant moron. What was left of the Natives that didnt die off from the diseases we brought were massacred by the United States army. To say that we needed to show they were inferior by hiding giant skeletons decades after we had allready conquered them with vast military force shows a clear lack of logic. Just to further demonstrate how absurd your claim is, if the race of giants were actually superior wouldnt they have been the dominant race in North America then? So clearly your imaginary giants could have been superior only in strength and height because obviously they didnt have the intelligence to establish a civilization. Which is amusing because as stupid as they must be to not have any signs of ever forming a civilization, they still somehow after all these years manage to avoid cameras and capture. Save for the few blurry, shaky videos that get posted here which could all easily be hoaxes. It took 55 years for man to discover a mountain Gorilla. In a continent far away with technology and transportation that was vastly inferior to ours. Its been 47 years since PGF was filmed. In that time with all the technology and hunters and fisherman with cell phones with cameras on them we dont have one single piece of film nearly as convincing. No modern remains of any, noone apparently is any closer to tracking one then we were 47 years ago, not one shred of physical evidence. We have some inconclusive footprints and blurry videos.
^^^^Receives daily beating from Joe^^^^^
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Deletethe only thing joe beat today was his flaccid meat.
Deleteposting the same fringe crap all the time certainly does not advance his lost cause.
So fringe, so obvious you're here reinforcing your pathetic disposition every day.
DeleteI wonder of Sykes thinks it's a lost cause?
We know that giant Indians were not sharing the land with smaller tribes of the time that these mounds were excavated, which means the mounds were shared from a time prior to these giant tribes retreating back to wilderness areas. What was important was not letting a people with such a rich culture and history to keep their lands and rights. This is in line with thousands of years of native culture that have stated there was a moment, for whatever reasons, when the Sasquatch tribes stopped trading and communicating with us... This happened long ago before any Europeans could influence the situation 200 years ago. It's anyone's guess, but I think that these creatures have withdrawn even further into pockets of the country after seeing how the closest homo sapien tribes treated each other and were in turn treated by Europeans and this over time would try and shed some light as to why these creatures require to evade us so badly. We also have inumerable examples where native cultures were wiped out by disease.
DeleteSasquatch do not altogether successfully avoid cameras, because we have footage of them and pictures on trail cams. The PGF was blurry and shaky at one time, not so much anymore now that it's stabelized and digitalized. It took 60 years for man to discover a mountain Gorilla, in a continent far away with technology and transportation that was vastly inferior to ours... But gorillas are also not as sentient and calculative as a giant human could be, and there's a reason why the best trackers in the world refer to the Sasquatch as the boss of the woods, or master of the mountain... And you forget that we still have every single source of evidence short of modern type specimen to account for the efforts... All this over 47 years, even matching specimens filmed. Dermals that transcend States and decades found in remote wilderness are anything but inconclusive and are the very definition of physical evidence... When documented by professionals who have a direct sighting and who recover hair fibres later to be verified as unknown primate; game changer son.
Where's Joe?
ReplyDeleteInterested to hear why this couldn't be just a person with hypertrichosis?
Or why he has convinced himself that tracking dogs couldn't find bigfoot anywhere, anythie, anyplace.
It is pretty unreasonable to assume they couldn't. It is a very un-scientific point of view.
Teacher: What does your daddy do for fun at home when he's not working ?
DeleteKid : He looks up Bigfoot stuff.
Teacher: Oh.
Kid : He posts about it on a bunch of different websites and he also watches Bigfoot shows and has some books about it.
Teacher: So he's a footer ?
Kid : No, he says he's not like those idiots cuz he's a skeptic.
Teacher: Sure he is.. LOL
Kid: Mommy doesn't believe him either...(giggles)
Skeptic: Why does the bigfooter have to make up imaginary conversations with imaginary people?
DeleteSkeptic to self: Because the bigfooter believes in an imaginary creature and lives in an imaginary world.
To clarify though, I dont think its impossible for Bigfoot to exist, just highly unlikely. My problem is your evidence for it presented here. Its garbage, its why itll never be taken seriously. Its why we now have 4 or 5 reality shows that are garbage as well. Its why people go out and hoax this stuff because they can watch you fall for it hook line and sinker. Its why there are bigfoot conferences all over the country, to make money. Im not saying Bigfoot isnt real, Im saying quit listening to Joe and the rest of the crap posted here and start looking into LEGITIMATE research. The rest of the world might stop laughing at you then.
Why do you care? Why are you here? That is stranger than anything Joe or anyone else can say on this blog. Your obsession is not with Bigfoot, but being contrary to those who believe it exists.
DeleteNow that's weird.
"Skeptic to self: Because the bigfooter believes in an imaginary creature and lives in an imaginary world."
DeleteAnd the very next line of vomit...
"To clarify though, I dont think its impossible for Bigfoot to exist..."
And then...
"Im not saying Bigfoot isnt real..."
Are you confused or stupid as well as angry and naive? I think all to be the case. The problem is having a mere opinion with nothing to support your claims isn't good enough in science... The only garbage is between those ears son. The reason there are reality shows is because the subject is pop culture in a time where reality shows are the hot format. Hoaxing mimics things in society to convey authenticity, UFO's were the case in the 90's... We now know alien races are a major scientific probability and are in fact hard to argue against. Bigfoot conferences are important as you have pioneering people applying very hard work who travel hard who deserve to make money for their efforts. You have scientists from all fields doing the exact same. You suggest that I'm not referencing legitimate research, yet every source of evidence has been put your way and you not only have the most embarrassing of approaches to it, but can't prove anything you say to show where it's not legitimate. Where's this legitimate research? You've had to be helped source links to your own arguments in recent weeks, you know nothing son. The only people laughing are those at your little fascination with getting all your arguments blown away by me.
: p
You only win in your head and you have a few people here who support you, because, well they arent smart enough to see what a fool you are. Ive shown time and time again, you just wont acknowledge which is to be expected. Trust me when I say that I have a group of coworkers who love reading your new half baked agruments, conspiracies and excuses. Its like our new hobby. A lot of them never knew there were people this stupid out in the real world, yet here you are with your little support group everyday spouting off the same nonsense.
DeleteWhere have you achieved this? Show me the comments, show me the arguments. Saying things over and over and over on here doesn't make things a reality, I'll agknowldge when I'm wrong when you show me to be wrong. Don't you think you would have one follower, don't you think you would have SOME positive feedback for your comments if you'd have achieved anything of the sort? There's a long like of people who hate me, not one of th chimes in to give you congratulations, and it's because when you're not asking naive questions with obvious answers, you're using straw man arguments and baseless accusations. This is why you're getting nothing but negative feedback, because you come across young, stupid and upset.
DeleteTell your friends to come and have a go, if you have any. No one as hateful as you could possibly be recieving any positive social stimulation or affection for that matter.
And you still haven't proved any of your points.
Hey Joe. Good Day to you, sir.
ReplyDeleteHello my friend!!!
Deletegot a little too hot in here for thick joe today
ReplyDeletehe is going back to crying alone in his room in his underpants
his entire world revolves around munns meldrum and gimlin
while the rest of the world does not
bad brain
(Pfffft)
DeleteKeep up the good work bro, you really are ahead of the game.
: )
oh, and some crypto group in texas
Deletewooooooh
Verified by primatologists around the country.
Delete: )
was this evidence sent to Dr. Sykes?
Deleteseems like it should have been.
of course, it's BS. they want suckers like Joe to believe.
Go and Google medulla and cry into your cornflakes kid.
Deleteback in about 30 mins
ReplyDeleteget your stupidest arguments up here
This coming from someone who's main arsenal is stupid questions.
DeleteI'm on holiday, so I'll be back along to to make you look even sillier later.
Get 'em Joe !
DeleteAnd by making you look sillier he means hes pretty much going to say "Nuh-uh" to everything you offer up. Then him and his support group are going to hug and hope they dont get ripped into shreds by a giant monkey man when they walk out side. PGF is fake, not proven, but enough evidence is present to say so with reasonable certainty. Munns-Meldrum, who cares. Meldrum has no credibility, in this for his own profit, been wrong on many occasions. And Munns well this is from his own website
Deletehttp://themunnsreport.com/tmr_v2_design_011.htm
After he couldnt hide the fact anymore. And plus he now tells people he isnt sure its a real Bigfoot, but he is sure its a Hominid. Groundbreaking.
Plus theres
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2011/11/breakdown-of-patterson-gimlin-footage.html
Bunch of Bigfoot kooks attacked the guy that wrote it and offered up all kinds of excuses why hes wrong but never debunked any of it or addressed Pattersons sudden beard. I find it funny how angry people got over that article. Plus you can use your own two eyes to see the leg get bunched in the butt cheeck of the costume and push it out then come untucked. Move on with your lives, there may be proof out there, this isnt it.
^^^Trolls bigfoot websites and Joe because that's normal. I think I'll get up and every single day and troll a blog about an imaginary creatures and attack those that believe in them. I'm totally normal.
Deletehas homoerotic dreams of joe while watching the walking dead..^
DeletePGF fake with enough evidence - show it to be the case.
DeleteMeldrum has enough credibility to get people like Jane Goodall, Ian Redmond, Anna Nikaris, Zhoua Guoxing, Lyn Miles, Jeffrey McNeely, Chris Loether, Colin Groves and none other than George Schaller very much enthusiastic about this subject (I wonder how many primates have been discovered between all them), not to mention open skeptics that promote the idea that there has to be something to reports like Esteban Sarmiento.
Go and check out their resume's son.
No... Munns is pretty sure it's a Bigfoot, Bigfoot are hominids. Also... The Roger clean shaven? Is that the accepted time frame??
"According to long term research from the likes of Christopher Murphy and others, these images were taken at Bluff Creek. They are on the second film roll that Patterson was going to use for his documentary, not “Rene’s film.” The images were naturally taken by Bob Gimlin using Roger Patterson’s rented camera.
Murphy, working with image upgrades from Bill Munns, passes this along: “The images are on the second roll. I am reasonably sure this roll was sent for processing with the other roll on the evening of October 20. The film images could not, therefore, have been taken in Yakima, or anywhere else for that matter, the next day.
“Given the second roll was not sent with the first roll: The images are taken in sunlight. It rained the next day. Although I suppose the sun could have come out briefly."
“Patterson is unshaven and in his grubby clothes. If he took the images the next day, then he either did not shave or change (slept in his clothes) or put the same cloths on the next day for the benefit of the photos."
Also... Your buttcheek issues addressed on page 15 here;
http://wwww.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf
... Leaving you butthurt.
: )
Allready shown it to be the case. You have just more excuses here, and done the predictable repeating yourself. Now one of your fellow idiots will pat you on the back.
DeleteDefeated, bloated and balled, that's how I imagined you typing that out, pretty funny seeing you capitulate after talking such a big game.
DeleteYou've already shown it? Excellent, can you post the comments please? We would love to read them you know. I read a lot about how you've ahieved this and that, funny things is there is in fact not one counter argument put your way that you haven't to provide rebuttal for. Those aren't excuses son, those are counter arguments that you nee to address, you can't do that because of a number of things, all have been addressed here on this thread.
Before I go... I'll remind you that you were asked where the "legitimate evidence" is. Not that I need someone as clueless as you to point this out, it's just that for someone who's maintained every last piece of research is bunk, I'm just curious to bait you into more contradictions, and will remind you later on should you avoid it again.
And you still haven't proved any of your points.
: )
I left around noon EST because I have a life.
DeleteYou won nothing, proved nothing.
You looked especially stupid on the canine vs, dog issue. It remains one ( and only one) of your arguments that defies nature, logic and common sense.
Exactly Holmes! Speaking of canines, do you remember the case of THE HOUND OF THE BASKERVILLES in which the hound was doctored to look like something supernatural? Well here we have here a case of a man dressed in a suit made to look like some mythical creature nothing more. As you would say "Elementary my dear Watson".
DeleteYou left at noon and thought about me the whole time... Awh!
DeleteIt's not about winning, it's about putting a case forward, showing supportive data to your claims and testing what's been put forward... You haven't done any of that. You haven't shown anyone that what I present is bunk, therefore, in your little world and what's so important to a spoiled little brat; you lose. I haven't the slightest idea what canine vs dog is.
Got monkey suit, kid?
: )
I spent the last 1/3 hr looking at photos of people with hypertrochosis. I noticed that though the faces are sometimes but not usually completely covered in thick hair, their bodies NEVER come any where near being covered like Patties. In fact it is strange how naked of hair their bodies are in comparison to the hair on their faces. Patty was so completely covered in very thick hair. Not the same. Google images and see for yourself. There were a couple that had me going but ended up only being makeup for movies.
ReplyDeleteIf Patty were real then it would be the only primate to have hair completely covering its breasts and buttocks.
ReplyDeleteThere are many segments of footage showing chimps and bononbos with hair on thier breasts, those two primates live in tropical an subtropical areas. Take the mountain gorilla as a prime example, it lives in the colder mountains has the thickest hair of the gorillas, would it not be logical, perhaps even expected for a ape livin' in the cooler climate of North America to have a thicker coat of hair than those other primates livin' in the tropics? If you Google 'Rare Mountain Gorilla Born in Congo' you'll find a nice National Geographic image of a female gorilla with interesting breasts.
DeleteGood ol' Pervy Joe.
DeleteYes yes yes, trallalalalalala but but sasquatch are HUMAN?? Right? My god you and the superfriends. Are Total Idiots.its funny yet sad!!!! HA HA HA HA..
DeleteYou do know humans are primates, right?
Delete(Did I really just have to do that?)
True that, Chick, true that! Not Hypertrichosis.
ReplyDeleteand your degree is from???
Deletetrue that?? what are you 11??? or a white suburban kid trying to be down with your hommies
DeleteWhether I have degree or not, I would certainly not feel the need to offer proof of such to an anonymous poster whom I will likely never meet and to whom I owe nothing, not even this response.
Delete"True that" simply means I agree with the assessment of Chick. I am not 11, I am 50. Nor am I "trying to be down" with any homies (correct spelling). It happens to be the way I speak, and I am comfortable being who I am. I needn't change my style to conform to something with which a stranger may be more comfortable.
As to my race, that is so insignificant to any truly decent person, I will not even engage in that conversation.
True dat BigfootStudent, true dat!
DeleteThanks Chick.
Delete: )
DeleteEntertainment at its finest, huh Joe?
DeleteHa ha ha!!
DeleteHey, I admit it im a total assh**e!! But damnit, I truly am starting to become a fan of BigfootStudent's comments , keep on keeping on. ; )
DeleteWhy, thank you Anonymous 10:00
DeleteHey Joe F, "Question" what are some very good Bigfoot documentaries to watch? I have seen "I think" most if not all, but maybe there is a few I have missed, Thank YOU :)........
ReplyDeleteThis is a personal favourite of mine, though you've probably seen it;
Deletehttp://youtu.be/TDkPwHnccgY
... To The Ends of The Earth. I'm pretty sure you've probably seen everything I have, it anything you care to suggest? I've got loads of interviews I could recommend if that's your type of thing?
Oh, please don't.
Deletethats what she said. to you. a minute ago.
DeleteThanks much Joe, but have watched it. Did ya see this one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oc7jVPsvsJE Do you have a link for this one? "Sasquatch Odyssey: The Hunt for Bigfoot". I have searched and searched and just found trailers for it and sites that charge $ for it. It was made many many years ago, Thanks again :)........
ReplyDeleteYes I've seen this but very recently, thought it was excellent!! I will see if I can do a little digging for the one you're looking for, haven't seen it myself!
DeleteThanks very, very much!!
People that think that the Patterson film is a fake need to see these photos and what it takes to make it look convincing!
ReplyDelete