Kelly Shaw Found Les Stroud While Squatching
It's official! The rumors are true! Les Stroud and Kelly Shaw are now squatchin' together for the upcoming Survivorman: Bigfoot episodes. There's somewhere in Utah, possibly Colorado where it's below 0F. If you think these images are photoshopped, check out the rest below:
 |
| The guy on the left looks like Les Stroud |
 |
| Wait a minute. It's him alright. |
First Putos
ReplyDeleteKEEP UP THE GOOD WORK KELLY SHAW!!!!!!!!!!!
DeleteSPOILER ALERT:
DeleteThey find NOTHING!!!!!!
The Welshmens Hagus... A microwaved Colostomy Bag.
DeleteThat just made me scream laughing.
DeleteIs it sad that Todd Standing is the only mainstream or popular footer that is even remotely in shape?
DeleteBart is in good shape but he's not on the forefront of faces in footery.
Are a bunch of fatso's going to be the ones to prove bigfoot? Smell 'em a mile away.
DSA. Sometimes I just don't know what's in your inbox. Down below you think Kelly Shaw is the grandson of Jaw's actor Robert Shaw? Here you decry the physical posture and makeup of what you quip are " mainstream footers"? Look. "Hooper drives the boat Chief" so like it or not Kelly Shaw is the man who's drinking from the fountain at the top of the mountain. He's bringing you grade A research and he's doing it with Les, who is the best, at what he does. As for your phrase I believe mainstream footer is an oxymoron. And if you're looking for in shape footers. I still fit into the same size six they tore off me at prom. Now stop all this candy assing and as Ali G says Respect. R E S T E C T........P!
DeleteHa ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!
DeleteHuh? Try to formulate a coherent response. I never said a word "down below."
DeleteAs for you, who are you exactly? Should anyone know who you are? And why?
As for Kelly Shaw's research, he's provided nothing substantial. Keep at it, that's the best he can do, but don't act like he's producing quality evidence.
^
DeleteWell put
Jeb Bush to save US all in 2016 : )
Delete7:12... Oh you did, you're not as clever as you would like to think. Everyone knows who Mike is... Nobody cares who you are and that's the reason you're so bitter.
DeleteKelly Shaw very regularly turns in physical evidence in the form of tracks and puts some very good research in with sighting reports that are of utmost interest to enthusiasts.
What do you contribute to other that hate and the charade that you're not an impatient insignificant?
: )
Hillary in 2016
Deleteand Hillary knows nothing about benghazi
^nobody knows anything about Benghazi
DeleteObama said so....
video of Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber saying a “lack of transparency” was crucial in fooling ‘stupid Americans’ which caused controversy was subsequently deleted by the University of Pennsylvania only to be reinstated after a backlash.
DeleteWHAT THE
Kelly Shaw needs shoe lifts. It's messed up when you are smaller than a midget to begin with! Dam Kelly hope you don't ever run into a gay/homo bigfoot!
ReplyDeleteor jon
DeleteThey should call their exploits....ready?....More or Les. Kelly needs to quit sayin', Sauce-quatch too. Seriously, great team. Les shouldn't have aligned himself with a hoaxer like the last guy.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the "sauce" squatch pronounciation as well. I can't even listen to it - it's too annoying.
DeleteLook at his physique! A handsome face and kind eyes. That is a good looking man. He can say sauce squatch to me any day.
Deletethe last guy is NOT a hoaxer
ReplyDeleteAn early shout out to my fellow veterans! Even any Marines that stop by. But tomorrow it's back to business as usual, Jarheads!
ReplyDeleteOORAH!!!!!!!
Deletewar criminals
Deletethat be WILD BILL old Marine and such
Delete^^ Blow me you sack of crap. Take your opinions to the nearest VFW. They'd love to hear it straight from the horses mouth.
DeleteGood for Kelly and his team.
ReplyDeleteChuck
He's found more Strouds than sasquatches, you know...
Delete"Kelly, for God Sakes be careful. If you don't put poor Les on a Subject he's liable to resort back to filming stock Survivorman footage in which case as an opportunistic omnivore in a cold weather emergency he will likely eat you." In any case I'm happy to see two of my favorite researchers working together. I'm so excited about this I'm leaving a quote for my new favorite troll: "Watson, The Game's afoot!" Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes........
ReplyDeleteGood stuff, Mike.
Delete: )
Delete"Keep up the good work" as Joe likes to say.
ReplyDeleteIf good work is consistently producing zero bigfoots then I guess the bar isn't set very high.
That's the point.
DeleteFooters purposely set the bar low to preempt the inevitable failure due to "looking" for something which they know doesn't exist.
The idea is to place the bigfoot just out of reach so you can say "we nearly got him but we will get him next time". This has been part and parcel of bigfootery in the last 50 years. It is why it persists and will always persist. The non existent end goal being unobtainable, resulting in a perpetual never ending "ride".
In a footers mind the "problem" is only solved when the bigfoot is found. No other alternatives are even considered. Footers contribute to footery by contributing to the ride, never the goal.
He's in the field being productive. You're on the couch drooling over re-runs of baywatch.
DeleteHe is in the field, sure. Is he productive in something? Sure, but not in finding bigfoot.
DeleteAnd to the point, what have you ever done? Had a couple rugrats? Got married?
Congrats!
Different than op anon.
This pre-empt failure 'footers' are supposedly partaking in is in fact 6:16's chronic impatience. He just wants that 'monkey' in he bag so he can come out of the closet and not worry about having the Mickey taken out of him by his parents of course... And in essence is role playing the skeptic; ironic really. Some people haven't the best of interactive day to day experiences, so why not stir the pot in the cyber world and get some attention, get some concerns regarding the subject matter eroded by looking like posting cynisicm?
DeleteThe idea is to place so much rhetorical input towards the topic of Bigfoot, so that people can in countering present evidence that in fact helps educate them in the charade of debate, helping one's ambitions to develop knowledge on the topic without losing ego, evidence that does indeed show that researchers are just out of reach in wilderness that the role playing skeptic has no concept of how difficult to negotiate is from behind his desktop. The "ride" is learning whilst enthusiasts then reel off the evidence of the last 50 years; learning and attention at the same time!
In a role playing 'skeptic's' mind the inpatience problem is only solved when the Bigfoot is found. No other forms of evidence are even considered, because they have a lack of understanding of scientific research... Only until it's pointed out to them of course. They contribute to 'Footery' by contributing to the comment sections of blogs where learning a topic can be typed out and shown to the next 'skeptic' who has a similar poor understanding of the data that's too proud to simply ask, or risk coming out of the closet. The goal is eroding the closet impatience.
6:22... Learn from the comment above.
Brilliant post. Stringing people along with the thought that we are so close its just a matter of time is what draws people in. Layer that with conjecture and theories and throw in some flawed science and people will believe it no matter how ridiculous it is. Its how people keep making money of the reality shows and bigfoot conferences. Bigfoot has become big business, and the lie has to be kept alive to support it.
DeleteThe only people attempting to string anyone along are the poor dumb-dumbz crying the same myth that there is no evidence... Disinformation with no supporting data is one of the saddest, lowest forms of intelligence possible, not to mention one of the most sour forms of expression any excuse for an existence ever attempted.
DeleteTheorising in a field that has every source of evidence short of conclusive research, in this case a body, is in fact how scientific research has evolved, scientific research self corrects in order to get closer to the goal of using the physical, biological and anecdotal evidence as conducively as possible.
Pop culture's a bit*h... If it upsets you stop watching it and stick to Call of Duty. A conference with data out of your intellectual capacity's a bit*h... If it upsets you stop trying and again... Stick to Call of Duty.
Figured it would be a matter of time before the head moron had to throw in his half cent on the matter. "They contribute to 'Footery' by contributing to the comment sections of blogs." Is really explaining yourself honestly. But everyone knows you are a big hypocrite. I mean yes, you have all these nonsense theories that you cant prove and some questionable evidence. But thats all you add. Its not like you are doing anything more constructive. You make long winded posts using your extensive vocabulary so that the people here exclusively buy into it and they dont even check what you are saying. If they did they would realize you dont actually know anything, you take a bunch of data, throw it at people mix in your own unproven theories and beliefs, and make a bunch of excuses to make the whole thing work. It should be obvious that your entire charade lies in a bed of excuses. I mean for gods sake you actually take the definition of a word and substitute words to make it whatever you need it to be. So you contribute to this blog by keeping the people here believing in these hoaxes, and you've succeeded in that to a small degree. But as far as actually contributing to the field, your not any more than I am. Youre actually hurting it by keeping these hoaxes going to the gullible.
DeleteIts not out of my intellectual capacity its false data. You can make all the excuses in the world for Meldrum but as hard as you try you cant erase the fact hes been wrong about a lot of things so hes not a valuable source of information. The majority of the scientific community will tell you that. Ive sourced where hes been purposely misleading people and you only have a half assed excuse to cover for it. But this is what you do, try to say that people just arent intelligent enough to see the truth. But thats a 2 way street buddy. I could argue the same thing. I mean youve been shown multiple documents discrediting your biggest source material, PGF, Standing, Meldrum and maybe you just arent smart enough to put it together. You have a pattern of make an excuse, show another conspiracy theory, and then resort to calling people stupid. You are the one that has to make constant excuses to make your story work, not me. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to come up with a story to make your BS data work. Dont try and act like you are theorising to advance the field. You are pulling things out of your ass that you really have no clue about, like the giant bones, whether they are even real, when they were buried, anything. You have no clue about any of that. You have no giant bones. In their place sits another one of your excuses. It doesnt take intellectual capacity to see that. This isnt the stone age anymore Joe, when the majority of the scientific community says youre an idiot, well then odds are you are an idiot. The sooner you come to grips with this reality, the sooner youll quit making yourself look like a fool in public.
Delete^
DeleteTeacher: What does your daddy do for fun at home when he's not working ?
Kid : He looks up Bigfoot stuff.
Teacher: Oh.
Kid : He posts about it on a bunch of different websites and he also watches Bigfoot shows and has some books about it.
Teacher: So he's a footer ?
Kid : No, he says he's not like those idiots cuz he's a skeptic.
Teacher: Sure he is.. LOL
Kid: Mommy doesn't believe him either...(giggles)
"They contribute to 'Footery' by contributing to the comment sections of blogs."
Delete... Was explaining you honestly, learn to read boyo.
I'm a hypocrite = show it to be the case.
Nonsesne theories that I can't prove = show it to be the case.
Questionable evidence = show it to be the case.
I must be doing something constructive, you wouldn't spend all day thinking about me otherwise, such big claims for someone so much inclined to resort to mere names and accusations, cowardly references and inaccuracies. For every remark of my alleged self regarded importance, you in fact perpetuate that with the very obsessive attention you provide.
I take a bunch of data and throw in a mix = show it to be the case.
Unproven theories and beliefs = show them to be the case.
My 'excuses' are in fact your very limited understanding of the subject, it's why you're so buttburned.
If I'm keeping people believing in hoaxes = show it to be the case.
I've never claimed to have contributed anything to the field, I'm just a guy that posts on a blog that gives spoiled little brats that can't provide and supportive evidence for their arguments their only rush of blood for the day.
Misleading people = show us where.
You've sourced things that discredit my experts = find an counter argument once those sources fail to stand up.
No giant bones = show the source I gave you with photogpraphs is bunk then.
I'm pulling things out of my behind = show it to be the case.
I'm a idiot = show us how.
You've made great essays at not getting anywhere... And you still haven't proven any of your points.
: )
I will demonstrate how your BS machine works.
DeleteWhy doesnt anyone know where the original PGF reel is? If someone had in their possession such a significant piece of film then why hasnt it been brought forward to be reviewed. Seems rather suspicious to me that if the original film was brought forward and could be verified that it had not been edited and there were not multiple takes as been pointed out by many different sources, it would put this whole thing to rest. Where is the film?
Now, excuse, cosnpiracy theory, insult or all of the above incoming....
"They contribute to 'Footery' by contributing to the comment sections of blogs."
Delete... Was explaining you honestly, learn to read boyo.
I'm a hypocrite = show it to be the case.
Nonsesne theories that I can't prove = show it to be the case.
Questionable evidence = show it to be the case.
I must be doing something constructive, you wouldn't spend all day thinking about me otherwise, such big claims for someone so much inclined to resort to mere names and accusations, cowardly references and inaccuracies. For every remark of my alleged self regarded importance, you in fact perpetuate that with the very obsessive attention you provide.
I take a bunch of data and throw in a mix = show it to be the case.
Unproven theories and beliefs = show them to be the case.
My 'excuses' are in fact your very limited understanding of the subject, it's why you're so buttburned.
If I'm keeping people believing in hoaxes = show it to be the case.
I've never claimed to have contributed anything to the field, I'm just a guy that posts on a blog that gives spoiled little brats that can't provide and supportive evidence for their arguments their only rush of blood for the day.
Misleading people = show us where.
You've sourced things that discredit my experts = find an counter argument once those sources fail to stand up.
No giant bones = show the source I gave you with photogpraphs is bunk then.
I'm pulling things out of my behind = show it to be the case.
I'm a idiot = show us how.
You've made great essays at not getting anywhere... And you still haven't proven any of your points.
: )
LOL its the make believe conversation guy again. You could have at least come up with a new imaginary conversation this time. I mean with your huge imagination, I mean you believe in imaginary giant monkey people and you can only make up one imaginary conversation?
Delete"They contribute to 'Footery' by contributing to the comment sections of blogs."
Delete... Was explaining you honestly, learn to read boyo.
I'm a hypocrite = show it to be the case.
Nonsesne theories that I can't prove = show it to be the case.
Questionable evidence = show it to be the case.
I must be doing something constructive, you wouldn't spend all day thinking about me otherwise, such big claims for someone so much inclined to resort to mere names and accusations, cowardly references and inaccuracies. For every remark of my alleged self regarded importance, you in fact perpetuate that with the very obsessive attention you provide.
I take a bunch of data and throw in a mix = show it to be the case.
Unproven theories and beliefs = show them to be the case.
My 'excuses' are in fact your very limited understanding of the subject, it's why you're so buttburned.
If I'm keeping people believing in hoaxes = show it to be the case.
I've never claimed to have contributed anything to the field, I'm just a guy that posts on a blog that gives spoiled little brats that can't provide and supportive evidence for their arguments their only rush of blood for the day.
Misleading people = show us where.
You've sourced things that discredit my experts = find an counter argument once those sources fail to stand up.
No giant bones = show the source I gave you with photogpraphs is bunk then.
I'm pulling things out of my behind = show it to be the case.
I'm a idiot = show us how.
You've made great essays at not getting anywhere... And you still haven't proven any of your points.
: )
"The second reel we all have only seen bits and pieces from, and there's even debate if what we've seen is really on the second reel. So, frankly, we don't know what all it contains. This new film copy that surfaced is assumed to have more second reel content on it than we have seen before, but that is speculation at present. Given we don't know exactly what's on the second reel, it is common for those who feel the film is a hoax to think the content is missing to hide evidence of a hoax. But in truth, whether or not any such footage, if finally found and studied, would prove a hoax, no one knows for certain at this time.
DeleteThe copy recently publicized is presumed to be one of those made by Roger Patterson and Al DeAtley for the theatrical showings they did presenting to the public the Bigfoot film footage. We presume Roger may have included footage in that program we haven't seen today, and there was no copy of that program reel known in anybody's archives, so we hoped one such copy would surface but we didn't know where to look or who to ask.
So it's appearance now is a quirk of fate and thus we look forward to knowing more about what is really on it.
Bill"
Show me inconclusive proof of a bigfoot.
DeleteShow me Standing isnt hoaxing.
Show me Meldrum hasnt been wrong on several things.
Show me that the PGF isnt hoaxed.
Better be something new because everything youve shown prioir is inconclusive. I find it odd that you demand that I show proof when you cant. Oh wait, youre a hypocrite, nevermind. Besides,Ive shown multiple sources for everything youve asked to be shown. I really think there might be something wrong with you, dementia kicking in? Dont you remember? Since somehow you think that this validates anything Ill play show me pattycake with you, since your groupies are watching.
I'm going to watch Interstellar... Be back later.
DeletePresume, presume, quirk of fate, thats your life story Joe. Sorry you dont have the intellectual capacity to see that. I do appreciate you providing the excuse and conspiracy theory as asked of you.
Delete"So, frankly, we don't know what all it contains."
Yep, exactly my point.
Oh... And the imaginary conversation guy absolutely schools you every time 8:38... Ha ha ha!! The only thing imaginary is your alleged intelligence.
DeleteLaters y'all!!
Never claimed to have proof of Bigfoot, only the evidence = must be confused.
DeleteNever claimed to be able to prove Standing isn't hoaxing = must be confused.
You've shown one instance that Meldrum didn't update his material = you've shown nothing else.
I've shown you fat deposits, muscle groupings and skin folds outside of any fur cloth method of time... You need to now test that. No... Everything I've shown you have failed to counter with anything other than tantrums son. I don't demand proof, I demand you provide data so that we should believe you when you say its bunk. If you can't do that, then it's not bunk and you lose. You've shown nothing... Absolutely nothing. If you had you'd have at least one person patting you on the back, you just have yourself.
And you still haven proved any of your points. Oh... And stating that we don't know what it contains, as well as well as its presumed relevance is fact.
Be back to upset you more later.
; )
This comment has been removed by the author.
Delete^ Doing what you do ain't exactly note worthy in the grand scheme of things now is it? People who pump out porta-potties contribute more to society.
DeleteOk... It's like this...
DeleteIf I show you uniform hair morphology of unknown primate hair, it's then your job to challenge that.
If I show you a study of dermals that were seen to exist in the impressions of tracks pre-casting process, it's then your job to challenge that.
If I show you published audio of a Sasquatch, it's your job to challenge that.
If I show you science journals and bureaus of giant skeletons, and a statement from the top guy of the Smithsonian stating that anything of be sort will not be even considered, it's your job to challenge that.
... The list goes on, with the only pitiful counter claim coming my way is you with your personal attacks and claims that people are making things up, your lack of counter argument, your naivity, you never once picking up a book on the subject is everyone else's problem, like a spoiled little brat. When you're not learning new vocabulary from me and putting it into practice, you're learning slowly that when you're long gone I'll still be here doing what I do using the exact examples of evidence that you, along with many before you, have failed to show can't stand.
Unknown primate hair???
DeleteWhy you little Low IQ UK FOP!! Yesterday You ,(boy joe),were saying sasquatch are human( hss). Now they are unknown primate.WHAT A COMPLETE FOOL!!
Now get back inthe corner "boy" till the school bell rings!
Humans...
Delete... Are primates.
(Pfffffft)
Not blessed with too much upstairs are you "boss man", ha ha ha!!
DeleteHa Ha Ha, Got more brains in the head of my Dick than you have between your ears Son!
DeleteGet back to your corner rope a Dope!!
Humans are UNKNOWN primates, All 6 billion of us??
Deleteback to your corner Son!!
I just had to point out to you that humans are primates.
DeleteI won't let you forget it.
Who is Kelly Shaw?
ReplyDeleteWho's Kelly Shaw?how dare you,he's Chicks husband :) xx
DeleteHahaha!! Good morning Eva! I never hear about these wild things I do until later. ;)
DeleteReally great photos of Kelly and Les! What a nice story! Some of y'all might be a little jealous tho ;)
ReplyDeleteHowdy Eva R and Chick ...your both looking good !!
Deleteand so am I hahaah!! :)
Hope they find bigfoot ! Jeeez!! :)
Hello Chick and Ruff,nice to see you both xx
DeleteAwe Ruffy! you are looking FAB!
Deletewho let the dogs out?....^^
Deletedrinking whiskey + guns + hunting @ night = shooting bigfoot
ReplyDeleteThere are no Bigfoot in Utah. Too dry. Wait, there are no Bigfoot anywhere. LoL
ReplyDeletehttp://www.bfro.net/GDB/state_listing.asp?state=ut
Deletehttp://www.bfro.net/gdb/#usa
"Lollaz!"
There are Bigfoot in Utah. They like Utah so that they can have as many wives as they want.
DeleteJeff Meldrum BOOK -
DeleteSasquatch: Legend Meets Science
BIGFOOTS are real
Jeff Meldrum makes his pilgrimage to Utah every year. He's not high up on the list though, back behind Mittens Romney and co.
DeleteThis is all they will find, too.
ReplyDeleteLes was probably looking for a squatcher who had produced no evidence, so that there could be no possibility of that evidence having been hoaxed. The second reason was Kelly knows where Skinwalker Ranch is.
ReplyDeleteResidents in Ferguson, Missouri and neighboring cities are buying firearms to protect themselves against violence expected after a St. Louis County grand jury decides the fate of Darren Wilson, the police officer who shot and killed Michael Brown.
ReplyDeleteTHE NEW NORM
Nothing new at all. What are you 12 or something?
DeleteThe Hunter, The Hoaxer, And The Battle Over Bigfoot
ReplyDeletehttp://www.buzzfeed.com/timstelloh/the-hunter-the-hoaxer-and-the-battle-over-bigfoot
the Battle for Ferguson is about to begin
DeleteThis is exactly why so many do this. This guy has talked about bigfoot for a couple years and now is an expert...
ReplyDeleteY'all wanna go fuck yourselves
ReplyDelete