Leading Skeptic Ponders the Question Is the "Crying Woman" Really a Bigfoot?


World renown and leading skeptic Joe Nickell weighs in on the myth of the Crying Woman, and if it might be a bigfoot as it was discussed recently on an episode of Finding Bigfoot.

While the Animal Planet TV series Finding Bigfoot never does find the elusive man-beast, the show’s “team” tries hard to convince us they have. Again and again, they try to conjure up the mythological creature with a fuzzy photo, bent twig, or fleeting shadow. Their leader, Matt Moneymaker, is, at least, aptly named for a Bigfoot ballyhooer.

He and other team members, including Bigfoot caller “Bobo,” even try to find their quarry in the merest old tale—namely, that of “the Crying Woman” of Zwolle, Louisiana. As Bobo confided to the show’s fans (in an episode titled “Beast of the Bayou,” aired June 22, 2014), “We think those stories are about a ‘squatch.” Now, you might fear that, in so quickly jumping to a conclusion, team members might hurt themselves, but I rather think the only damage will be to their reputation for critical thinking—which is already not high.

Nevertheless, this tantalizing possibility—that tales of “a woman crying and screaming at night” (as Bobo says) could actually be Bigfoot—shouldn’t be dismissed out of hand. Never mind that various non-Bigfoot forest denizens actually make such vocalizations.

To read the rest of the article, click here.

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Cold War II: Russian Nuclear Bombers Conduct 16 Incursions Of U.S. Air Defense Zones.
      THE NEW NORM

      Delete
    2. obamacare covers all your hurts and its FREE

      Delete
    3. Remember Hillary knows nothing about Benghazi

      Delete
    4. ^ got it Hillary KNOWS NOTHING

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. Trapper and the AIMS team learn the hard way that sheepsquatch is one onry critter, Wild Bill and Willy razor trap for the critter, Wild Bill had a USMC flash back while placing that razor wire – and point man Buck tore up his pants while going down that thar hill to check Trapper and Huckleberry - dang that SHEEPSQUATCH .

      Delete
    2. Yeah, "Wild Bills" flashback occurred when he got the sh...t kicked out of him, for being a PHONY Marine!

      Delete
    3. wait a tick Wild BIll always talks of his dayz in the USCM back in the day flashbacks

      Delete
    4. He also has FLASH BACKS being with his Mother!

      Delete
    5. wild bill had a mother? I thought one of his father's sheep, was his mother!

      Delete
    6. WILD BILL sayin he cut tham critters deep and wide like he did in the USMC

      Delete
    7. WILD BILL always talks of his day in the CORPS and TRAPPER also brings up WILD BILL as an old Marine and BUCK said he to big to be a Marine

      Delete
    8. WILD BILL full of OORAH !!!!

      Delete
  3. Oh boy what an obliteration. I can't believe Joe actually defends this topic. Shameless.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joe thinks that US Caucasian people were jealous and felt inferior because American Indians were 9 feet tall so the US Government and Smithsonian Institution hid or destroyed all the skeletons of 9 foot tall Indians.

      That's not a joke.Joe really believes that. ^

      The problem is that there never were 9 foot tall human skeletons. Joe can stop whipping himself.

      Delete
    2. Big Jon wants your Sperm!

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Oh... And every tribe in North America have referred to the Sasquatch as another tribe of humans... Nearly all maintained at having cannibalistic tendencies.

      Peace.

      Delete
    5. What are the "reliable sources that show this"?

      Delete
    6. Don't hold your breath for anything "reliable".

      Delete
    7. When, where or how did they "show this"?

      Delete
    8. Oh lord... I've posted this about a million times, troll...

      (Sigh)

      ... Are you that desperate for attention?

      Delete
    9. Sorry, I don't have an encyclopedic knowledge of every post in this blog's history.

      Delete
    10. This time it's your loss I'm afraid. You'll have to wait for next time, I'm bored.

      Laters.

      Delete
    11. Joe thinks everyone spends as much time here as him, reading every post on every thread. He thinks it's normal to go 3 days back to a dead conversation to post his last word.

      Delete
    12. Aw. Poor Joe got shown up again.

      Delete
    13. Pffffffff, you've justs shown how butthurt you are, ha ha ha!! M

      Good.

      ; )

      Delete
    14. I NEED SPERM,,,,
      NOW!
      Big Jon.

      Delete
    15. I just wanted to look at the source of the information with an open mind and instead I was personally insulted and it was assumed that I had instant access to every comment that was ever posted here.

      Delete
    16. Says the boy with tears on his face as he takes his ball and goes home to mommy.

      You've been a real loser since you lost to Danny boy. He stole your mojo, exposed you as you truly are. People come here and see you post the same exact things to the same exact trolls everyday. Insanity is repeating the same thing expecting different results, eh?

      Delete
    17. my god joe you really think you are far superior than anyone on here dont you?so much as to post your expressions. thats just insane ....i think your the one starving attention you are a text book megalomaniac..Noun 1. megalomaniac - a pathological egotistmegalomaniac - a pathological egotist
      egoist, egotist, swellhead - a conceited and self-centered person

      Delete
    18. Wow... I sure know how to reel in the t*rds, ha ha ha ha!!

      10:29... You were being clever, it's sociopathic to then okay the victim card.

      10:31... Your argument would work if I had repeated myself by posting the comment (duh?), what's worse, reposting the same source relevant to backing points, or requiring that post for the tenth time to understand it? Oh... And last time I checked, I'm still here, right?

      10:35... I only think in superior to people like you.

      (Sigh with headshake how telling of a beating these people have had in their time being supervised by me)

      Delete
    19. So I played the "victim card" by pointing out that I was called a "troll" with absolutely no evidence to back up the assertion. I respectfully requested some documentation for what I thought was a remarkable claim. I was willing to look at the source with an open mind, but I now understand that it was a naïve request. There appear to be some long standing feuds occurring to which I am not privy. I apologize for taking up your time and I will be on my way.

      Delete
    20. For someone who lamented 45 minutes ago that he was "bored," you've managed to experience great excitement by posting multiple times since your announcement.

      Delete
    21. Joe feels guilty because he belongs to a jealous race of people who steal 9 foot tall Indians to feel taller.

      If it makes you feel better, bizzitch, there never were 9 foot tall Indians.

      The unwarranted guilt of some idiotic bitcches is beyound belief.

      SheJoe has to make things up to feel aad about.

      Delete
    22. ^ You're half a man. That's for sure. Bittch.

      Delete
    23. And also bipolar judging from your constantly changing moods.

      Delete
    24. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    25. Wear a dress, Joe. Make us proud.

      Delete
    26. The “reports”—from old newspapers—are assumed true, so the fact that no such remains exist (or ever existed) at the Smithsonian is now proof of a cover-up. The claim that the Smithsonian had the skeletons of giants, incidentally, does not appear in the literature of the nineteenth century, when these giant bones were allegedly consigned to the museum.

      Delete
    27. jist lack tham bigfeets half men half critter thays shure is

      Delete
    28. Half a man? Ha ha ha ha!! Who's got their name up in writing, boy?

      Pretty astounding ignorance.

      Delete
    29. Dance for us, little Joe.

      Delete
    30. It is interesting that no one can track down a claim of missing giant bones from the Smithsonian until the rise of the modern creationist and alternative history movements in the middle twentieth century, when suddenly Victorian yellow journalism became proof of biblical truths.

      Delete
    31. 11:11... I would change that to;

      "Though a percentage of newspaper reports were sure to be of some level of hoaxing, the sheer frequency of reports in reference to archeological and anthropological studies has credence in the consistent documentation of some of the most significant science publications of then and today."

      The science journals comes first, then it makes you wonder about the newspaper articles. It works like that.

      ; )

      Delete
    32. SheJoe believe the world is 6000 years old but SheJoe will not acknowledge it on this blog.

      Afraid of your beliefs, SheJoe?

      Delete
    33. Another claim suggests that the 1990 Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act—which, incidentally, does not apply to private land or state-owned land, only federal lands—is a conspiracy to hide the bones of giants. Since all of the bones that are repatriated are documented, where exactly is this hiding the giant bones? Are all the Native Americans in on it, too, choosing to bury giants’ bones as Native American and willfully ignoring ten-foot-long femurs?

      Delete
    34. These reports have several sources, ranging from misidentified mastodon and mammoth bones to outright hoaxes; nevertheless, many believers in alternative history hold that these newspaper accounts, for which there is no extant physical evidence, are prima facie proof that giants once wandered ancient America.

      Delete
    35. WHERE'S. MY SPERM???
      Big Jon!

      Delete
    36. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    37. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    38. I'm popping out, I'll be back to counter any copy and pastes in an hour and a half.

      Delete
    39. The Smithsonian had the Patterson-Gimlin film on display during the summer of 1968 for a couple of months. The FBI asked them to take it down. I saw it there and the attendant told me why it would be coming down soon.

      Delete
    40. (Yawn) (Sigh) (Tisk)

      SheJoe at her best.

      Delete
    41. Countering with paranoid conspiracy theories with absolutely no evidence to back up your claims other than hearsay reports (which themselves are not sourced)? That's rich!

      Delete
    42. Joe's supervisor at McDonald's just cussed him out for diddling on his phone instead of flipping burgers and kicking out happy meals to snot nose brats.

      Delete
    43. We'll see the 9 foot tall skeletons the moment we see a real Bigfoot. Joe's core beliefs are fantasy.


      Delete
    44. Avtually, I have science journals of some of the biggest hitters in science backing my claims... What hilarious is you'll use hearsay to try and counter those claims, ha ha ha ha!!!

      11:18... Skulls with Neanderthal features blow any mammoth claims apart.

      Delete
    45. Give the link to the Lovelock skulls.

      Delete
    46. so we know that the world is 6000 years and we know where the starting point is

      Delete
    47. "Though a percentage of newspaper reports were sure to be of some level of hoaxing, the sheer frequency of reports in reference to archeological and anthropological studies has credence in the consistent documentation of some of the most significant science publications of then and today."

      So the sheer frequency of hoaxes proves that the subject of the hoaxes must be real? Is that really your argument?

      Delete
    48. Some of the "biggest hitters of science, huh?" Whenever someone cites to a scientist who doubts the claims, they are part of your proposed "conspiracy." But conveniently you have "the biggest hitters" who are not part of the conspiracy. Can you see how this does not add up Mr. Hamburger Flipper?

      Delete
    49. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    50. The far fetched concept in relation to mainstream scientists perception of the subject.

      Delete
    51. So your "biggest hitters" are not part of mainstream science? Put the spatula down and read my comment again. Your argument is that the frequency of hoaxes somehow bootstraps the subject of the hoaxes into reality. If that were true, we would have to admit that Elvis is alive (thousands of alleged sightings). And why is it that when I google the subject, of the "giant skeletons," the vast majority of websites are devoted to a creationist, religious attack on evolution? Is that where your "biggest hitters" come from?

      Delete
    52. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    53. You didn't answer the question about whether your "heavy hitters" are part of mainstream science or provide any information about who they might be exactly.

      But I agree with you that "three generations of acid" would explain things nicely.

      Delete
    54. Here are some of the google hits:

      "Nephilim Skeletons | Giant Bones and Skulls Discovered"

      "Giant Nephilim in North American Coastal Regions"

      "Nephilim Hunters Giants of North and South America"

      Nephilim=giants from Bible unearthed throughout earth

      "Nephilim Built Mounds In North America"

      I can most dozens of more hits it you like.

      Delete
    55. The heavy hitters would account for the Smithsonian and Scientific American.

      Delete
    56. But I thought it was the Smithsonian covering up the evidence? So they are simultaneously the "heavy hitters" of science who confirm the reports, while at the same time participating in a gigantic conspiracy to hush things? Which is it?

      Delete
    57. Those sources are taking a stab at explaining biblical concepts in relation to modern fringe topics, like ancient aliens, etc.

      When you have the science journals in libraries, ou can bait creationism and Nephilim all you like, it's irrelevant, dear boy.

      Delete
    58. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    59. Yes, and other "modern fringe topics" like giant skeletons.

      So you've now convinced me that every science journal in every library in the world contains absolute 100% truth, even when many science journals contradict each other on several topics . That's neat. If I can find one science journal anywhere in the world to support a lunatic theory, then it's the truth! Thanks for the lecture.

      Delete
    60. So some scientific journal in the distant past had a discussion of the skeletons and that ends the debate -- absolute proof and no need to look further. Anything subsequently stated by the same organization is automatically part of a giant conspiracy. Thanks for the clarification.

      Delete
    61. Ha ha ha ha!! Few fringe topics actually have science journals that have consistency over three generation's worth of printed media.

      Man, you're really are an angry cynical twonk. That's all you've done is bait and ask repeated questions a ten year old would ascertain from my comments. It's not like I haven't baby sat before, I'm happy to help.

      The point is there there are Bureus upon Bureus of this stuff, in the hundreds.

      Delete
    62. 1:07... You're so naive it's painful, ha ha ha ha!!!

      Delete
    63. Teach him Joe. Those skeletons the remains of what we call bigfoot.

      Delete
    64. because you have proof right or talking out of your anus again

      Delete
    65. I'm sorry for asking for citations to works that you still haven't provided, except for vague references. I suppose a 10 year old would just blindly accept everything you have claimed at face value -- yes, the Smithsonian documented finds of gigantic skeletons that were absolutely confirmed over "three generations" and left all those printed materials open to people like yourself. But then at some unspecified date, they decided to perpetrate a huge cover up and deny all of the evidence. As part of this effort, they hid all of the skeletons and other physical evidence, but they somehow did not consider scrubbing the public record of the "journals that have consistency over three generations worth of printed materials." We're lucky that there are geniuses like you to point this obvious series of events. ROFTFLMAO

      Delete
    66. (sigh)

      Listen to what Joe is telling you.

      Delete
    67. 1:24

      What is your problem? You can accept what Joe says as articles of faith. You're ARE supposed to have the faith of a child. Trust that there are bigfoot skeletons that Caucasians hid due to eugenics ans mass murder. I hate white people. I lie about white people. It is for the greater good. All hail Joe!

      Delete
    68. Whut all tham WILD BILLs knifes ans such he gona needs tham fer tham Bear Hunts

      Delete
    69. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    70. 1:27... Somebody been burned much? Ha ha ha ha ha!!!

      Delete
    71. 1:24... This guy isn't looking to listen, he's having some fun. It's ok... I'll be here aaaaaaaaaall night to help.

      ; )

      Delete
    72. You should do a little more research into how "natives were persecuted." In the 1930's and 40's (when this alleged cover up was supposedly commenced), FDR appointed a man named John Collier as the Commissioner of Indian Affairs. Collier was a revolutionary reformer who embraced and greatly admired native traditions and ended the policy of assimilation. The policies which Collier pursued ended the conception that native cultures were inferior and aided greatly in restoring them.

      So, we are supposed to believe that this wild conspiracy was hatched by the federal government to suppress the importance and significance of native history and culture at a time when the president and the leading government official in charge of Indian affairs were actively and passionately restoring native legacy?

      And that is not copied and pasted.

      Delete
    73. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    74. Bro, I'm trying to be polite and I mean no offense, it's just that I think you're deliberately avoiding key information in my comments just to have the last word.

      Delete
    75. So wait a second, there is paper trail from scientific journals that can be traced for three generations, right? The paper trail begins when -- in the late 19th Century and ends in the 1940's? So when did the conspiracy begin? You're saying now that it began with a eugenics movement in the late 19th Century that included the Smithsonian. But isn't that when all of your articles were written, including those from the Smithsonian? I know I think like a 10 year old, so please baby sit me and elucidate this seeming contradiction.

      Delete
    76. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    77. Try again, the Smithsonian Institute was not even created until 1846 -- well after the turn of the 19th century.

      Delete
    78. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    79. Try again, Scientific American came into existence in 1845 (well after the "turn of the 19th century).

      Delete
    80. "The printed sources I reference start around the turn of the 19th century."

      The two journals that you have referenced did not even exist until more than 40 years later.

      " . . the eugenics regime started around mid to late 19th century."

      Sot the journal sources and the "eugenics conspiracy" began at the same time.

      Makes perfect sense, thanks for explaining.

      Delete
    81. "Avtually, I have science journals of some of the biggest hitters in science backing my claims... What hilarious is you'll use hearsay to try and counter those claims, ha ha ha ha!!!

      11:18... Skulls with Neanderthal features blow any mammoth claims apart."

      LOL. Backing your claims? You have no claims. You are backing their claims by copy and pasting their own comments and findings. You have zero original claims of your own.

      Get some perspective. YOU backing THEIR claims. Good lord, the boy is as deluded as they come.

      Delete
    82. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    83. GIVE ME SPERM NOW!!!
      Or GIVE ME DEATH!!

      Big Jon, the thirsty texan! ;~{}

      Delete
    84. Yes, when caught in a lie, change the subject or insist that it is my duty to prove that there were 10 foot giants in North America when all you have done is claim "three generations of science journals" beginning at the "turn of the 19th Century." It just so happens that the only journals you have reference did not exist until more than 40 years later. Your "science journals" (which you have not specifically cited) are your only evidence for proof and you laughably lied about them. Try to at least come up with something that cannot be thoroughly debunked in less than five seconds. =-)

      Delete
    85. The funny thing is Joe that I had much more in my arsenal, but, because your own effort were so pitifully lacking, I did not even have use 90% of it. Maybe we will get to some of it next time.

      Delete
    86. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    87. 3:13... Yes, yes, we know... Ha ha ha ha!!!

      Delete
    88. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    89. Hint hint, I already know the source of your "journal articles" and that you have outright lied about them (because you cannot admit you are wrong). You shifted the date of your "eugenics conspiracy" three times to try to fit it into your shifting narrative and painted yourself into a corner with impossible dates. So your last resort was to lie, you know that all of your "scientific journal" claims come from the late 19th century. Thanks for playing, have fun digging yourself out of the hole.

      Delete
    90. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    91. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    92. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    93. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    94. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  4. WILD BILL needin to gits that BIG KNIFE sharpe for that thar Bear Huntin seshun fer nex munth,
    WILD BILL bein a Bear Hunter ans all

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WILD BILL ans WILLY on a Bear Hunt
      that would be AWSOME

      Delete
    2. Neither one ever shot a bear!

      Delete
    3. "Wild Bill' got that big knife stuck up his Arse, for being a PHONY Marine!

      Delete
    4. in boot camp, we call WILD BILL, "Little Dicky, and Mary!

      Delete
    5. WILD BILL bear huntin in Raleigh County.
      that whars Wild Bill ans AIMS shot that bear beast ans TRAPPER said it was a KIA for the AIMS Team - ans BUCK noted the lung blood

      Delete
    6. When not filming, "Wild Bill' works for the state utility co. He just love sliding up and down those big poles!

      Delete
    7. ans WILD BILL gots that BIG KNIFE

      Delete
    8. Wild Bill said he goes out bear huntin ever yeer with tham other bear hunters like Badger,Pee-Wee, Joe, and Jake all huntin bear in Raleigh County, West Virginny

      Delete
    9. that thare LUNG BLUD on tha grownd be PROOOF ol mr BEAR BEEST aint gonna be harmin no mor of WILD BILLS bears

      Delete
    10. shure do old Mr bear beast now @ davy jones locker, Nows WILD BILL ans all tham bear hunters can hunt ans shoots ans kiills tham bear rilly proper like

      Delete
    11. if 'wild Bill' ever saw a bear, he'd pi2ss his pants with that little dickie!

      QUESTION?
      Who dickie is bigger? "Wld Bill's or Buck's?

      Delete
  5. The Cry Women, was a constipated Mexican lady!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. thays abin mexicun border jumpers shure is

      Delete
    2. I've accepted 6 of those "illegal Aliens" into my home. I have 100 acres of Watermelons to pick, and the BEST part is! "I don't have to pay them"! the Government, will PAY ME $1500.00/person/month! It all comes out of YOUR tax dollars! Only in America!
      Thank you Obama! Your the greatest president, we ever had!

      Delete
    3. el jefe Obama mucho gracias por la apertura de fronteras

      Delete
  6. On tonight's episode of "Mountain Monsters" The AIMS team finally leaves their home state of West Virginia, and travels to Louisiana to search for "The Crying Women Monster"!
    Before leaving, "Buck' and "Wild Bill' asked; 'What is a Women"?!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bob MaloogaloogaloogaloogaloogaThursday, August 7, 2014 at 10:07:00 AM PDT

    Kieth Sanducci newsletter, July, 1980

    Tom Taylor talked to Joe ? ""a Boy Scout Leader of a sort"" who said that at a campground at Lake Arrowhead he went about 70 feet to the river for water and saw a 7-foot, green-eyed, brown-haired creature staring at him. Both took off. Story that the creature was known at the came as ""green eyes.""

    Sorry Joe I found this funny.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. good to know George Bush is SAFE in Texas

      Delete
    2. is this your new alter ego big gay jon?

      Delete
    3. Bob MaloogaloogaloogaloogaloogaThursday, August 7, 2014 at 10:18:00 AM PDT

      erm yeah if you wish. But please call me Big Gay Bob so not to confuse matters even more.

      Delete
    4. Don't mind 10:17... He see's Big Jon everywhere.

      ("Cuckoo")

      Delete
    5. Lol^ my work is almost complete
      Muhaaaaaaa!

      Delete
    6. Big Gay Bob MaloogaloogaloogaloogaloogaThursday, August 7, 2014 at 10:44:00 AM PDT

      Bob don't mind 10:17 if he wants me be big gay jon Bob happy be big gay jon, but prefer Big Gay Bob to stop confusion.


      Jeffrey Mika intv. by John Green

      Parked in Pat Tuttle's driveway, backed in facing across 434th Ave. and down 173rd Place hill. Driveway very steep. Something came out of trees between houses onto 173rd about 500 feet away, with driveway light from house behind silhouetting it. It wandered up the road towards them, coming within 20 feet, stopped a few seconds, then went left on 434th, faced left towards a bright light from another house, then jumped over three-foot bush and went into trees. Witnesses took flashlights and tried to follow, but only heard it. Height estimated by street sign it stood by. Steps too long for human, and human could not have leaped brush as it did. Dog barking at corner house until creature got close, then quiet. Creature ignored dog, but seemed confused.

      Delete
    7. Big Gay Bob MaloogaloogaloogaloogaloogaThursday, August 7, 2014 at 10:48:00 AM PDT

      Dennis Gates intvs. with Jeff Watson

      Jeff Watson and William Marshall, security guards at Bellingham Airport, heard crashing sounds in the woods on airport property opposite an animal shelter (apparently South of the runways). The noise was moving West, so they drove to the end of the South runway, to see if anything would cross the open area South of the runway. Spotlight immediately picked up an 8-foot, black, manlike animal 150 yards away, in high grass, heading West. It stopped still for three or four minutes, then turned back into the woods. Sheriff's office contacted, and deputies and state troopers attended, confirming smell and crushed grass. Watson, regular night patrolman at the airport, had been hearing yells and smelling a foul smell for about a month, but the source was never seen to cross a runway. Location is only 2 miles from the Nooksack River delta where there have been many previous reports.

      Delete
    8. Big Gay Bob MaloogaloogaloogaloogaloogaThursday, August 7, 2014 at 10:59:00 AM PDT

      John Green interviews with Jeannie Chapman

      Small child called his mother's attention to creature approaching across their field. She took the children and ran away. Later her husband and other members of the railroad section gang found tracks indicating that the creature had entered a shed, bit and scattered salt fish from a barrel, then went down to the river, then back to the mountains. The tracks indicated that the creature had stepped over the railroad wire fence, probably about four feet high, not jumped or climbed. Where they went through the vegetable garden they crushed the potatoes in the ground. The Chapman home was on a small Indian reserve beside the Fraser River, only a few hundred yards from the mountain foot. A deputy sheriff, Joe Dunn from Bellingham, made a cast of a track. It was later lost but a tracing of it survives. Track depths shown in footprint report are those in vegetable garden, others were much shallower. Many people saw the tracks, including. Mr. and Mrs. Esse Tyfting, Mr. and Mrs. George Cousins and a Mr. Foley, George Chapman Charlie Chapman, Ivor Lettonen, Bob Quinton. The Tyftings and the Cousins in 1957 signed statutory declarations as to what they saw. Joe Dunn's children said he photographed the tracks and sent copies to Mrs. Chapman, but no photos have turned up. Foleys and the Tyftings in 1957 gave sworn statements as to what they saw.

      Delete
    9. Big Gay Bob MaloogaloogaloogaloogaloogaThursday, August 7, 2014 at 11:04:00 AM PDT

      Ogden, Utah, Standard Examiner quoting Jay Barker

      Jay Barker and his sons Brent, 12, and Danny, 6, and Larry Beeson and his sons Scott, 14, Michael, 11, and David, 5, and Paul Carling, 14, looked down from a ridge in the Uinta Mtns. and saw half a mile away and 1000 feet below an animal down on all fours drinking from a small lake. Some rocks rolled down from the ridge and the animal stood up on its hind legs and looked at them, then turned and walked off on two legs, in sight for about half a mile among scattered trees before it disappeared in heavy timber. They climbed down where it had been, and from trees and rocks at the site estimated that it must have been 10 feet high. They found large, shallow, "pawlike" marks by the lake, but no clear imprints. The creature looked somewhat like a gorilla, with long arms, not much of a neck, hunched shoulders. It walked fast, with arms swinging, looking back a couple of times when they shouted at it. Following its route in the trees they found a rabbit carcass, completely skinned and half eaten. Location was between Pass Lake and Cuberant Basin, six miles from Pass Lake, at the head of the Weber River drainage. Also near Fish Lake.

      Delete
    10. Big Gay Bob MaloogaloogaloogaloogaloogaThursday, August 7, 2014 at 11:06:00 AM PDT

      Cryptozoology 6, James A. Hewkin article.

      James Hewkin investigated two lines of tracks found about 300 yards from the home of a family engaged in logging a 1700-acre tract in the Clackamus River drainage, with equipment and vehicles, plus chained dogs, goats, chickens, ducks, geese and a horse all in the vicinity. There had been considerable disturbance among the animals for several nights before the tracks were found by one of the boys. All the tracks were about 16 inches long, with maximum width varying from 9 to 12 inches because of variable spread of the large fat toes, all of which were about the same size. Hewkin determined that both sets of tracks were made by the same individual. The boy later tried to trap the animal, baiting the traps with a cage of chicken guts. The trap was torn apart and the cage taken.

      Delete
    11. Big Gay Bob MaloogaloogaloogaloogaloogaThursday, August 7, 2014 at 11:09:00 AM PDT

      Jack Wilson, intv. by John Green

      Teddy Osborne, one of the promoters of a ski development in the Callahan Valley, encountered tracks in the snow on Powder Mountain. His partner, Jack Wilson, hired a helicopter and a photographer, John Helcermanas, and went to investigate. Tracks were apparently bipedal, fairly shapeless, in deep snow, but Helcermanas noted that there were toes. Size of prints estimated 12 to 14 inches, stride about 30 inches. Followed for several miles across valley from steep rock faces to ice caves at the foot of a glacier. Tracks went from one stand of balsams to another, and were full of husks from balsam buds, suggesting that the creature was picking and eating the buds, discarding the husks. Helcermans' photos leave no doubt that the tracks were as described, but they were not clear enough or large enough to give them full marks for authenticity.

      Delete
    12. Big Gay Bob MaloogaloogaloogaloogaloogaThursday, August 7, 2014 at 11:19:00 AM PDT

      Ron Olson, quoting Jack Harris, Bud Miller

      Jack Harris, Bud Miller and Charles Ross were clearing a right-of-way for a road into a wilderness area along the McKenzie River (presume South Fork, as was Southeast from Blue River, and there was already a highway following the McKenzie proper). Coming to work one morning they topped a knoll and saw 100 yards away a dark brown, hairy creature, about 7 feet tall, standing erect in the middle of the timber they had felled the day before. It apparently heard or smelled them, and walked quickly into the timber without turning towards them. Three weeks later there was another sighting on the same road job.

      Delete
    13. Big Gay Bob MaloogaloogaloogaloogaloogaThursday, August 7, 2014 at 11:26:00 AM PDT

      True Magazine, quoting Harvey Parry

      Harvey Parry said that as he and two others were in a helicopter flying over mountains to a movie set for ""Paint Your Wagon"" they saw from 400 feet up a huge, stooped creature covered with heavy hair, walking upright down a logging road. They watched it for 45 seconds before it ran off the road, after running faster than any sprinter.

      Delete
    14. Big gay bob is good!!

      But everybody would appreciate if you would
      call yourself "Big gay Jon
      And your wonderful stories
      Would have a little bit more
      Brand recognition

      Delete
    15. that was just lee marvin looking for the booze hut...true magazine lol

      Delete
    16. Big Gay MaloogaloogaloogaloogaloogaThursday, August 7, 2014 at 1:42:00 PM PDT

      How about this then, will that make you happy?

      Delete
  8. dang SHEEPSQUATCH he bein doin it fer yeers

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My dog Tucker hunts dem sheep affer he hunts dem sqwirrls.

      Delete
    2. sos yuns gits tham huntin dawgs traxin tham critters shure do

      Delete
    3. My udder dawg Yoda trackin them fur shuur.

      Delete
    4. ans tham JEWsquatchs in da boosh shure is

      Delete
    5. I Love the smell of Roasted Jew in the Morning!

      Delete
    6. ans tham JEWsquatchs aborder jumpin shure do

      Delete
  9. I have heard that "crying woman" one time...or something similar while (deer) hunting many years ago. It was dark - I was putting some bait out. About 60 or 70 yards away in the thick brush. It sounded a little bit more to me a bit like a woman being "attacked" a little bit..? I didn't think much of it really. I chalked it up to a possible bobcat or something? But later I had more activity (woodknocking etc) so - who knows. It could have been a squatch lurking nearby.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Big Gay Bob MaloogaloogaloogaloogaloogaThursday, August 7, 2014 at 11:16:00 AM PDT

      Stan Gordon, MUFON UFFO Symposium 1974, quoting a woman and her son.

      About 11.30 p.m. woman and son heard something scratching at the back ofûtheir trailer, and a sound like a crying baby, then their lights began toûgo on and off. They opened the back door and standing in front of it was a large apelike creature with long arms. The woman screamed and the creatureûran between the trailers. The power box on the trailer had been ripped open and a wire polled aside.



      N.A.B.I.N. Journal, Mark Francis, 1991, quoting couple from Newark, OH.

      Couple were fishing in a 'bottom' off a forest road along Wills Creek Lake,ûwith two Coleman lanterns for light. About 1 a.m. they heard sounds across the water, like a crying baby, a man moaning in pain and a high-pitchedûwailling. They came closer, right up to the far side of the water, then stopped for a half hour, but when the man got a bite and jumped up to grab his fishing pole, a large, hair-covered creature, tall and slender with arms hanging below its knees jumped up from a thicket on the far bank andûwalked away on two legs

      Don Keating letter quoting unnamed woman living 3 miles S.S. of Newcomerstown, OH.

      Don Keating went to an area where a woman had been hearing screams and sounds like a baby crying and a hoot owl, and in a field found a set of 13"" tracks. He returned next day with a camera and found the field freshly plowed. A week lateer the woman phoned to say that while driving to pick up her daughter at school she saw a large black creature on two legs pushing its way into the trees below the road.





      Delete
  10. There is some pretty wild video making the rounds today of a (wild) black bear walking around on two legs. Interesting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. the beast that walks like a man BUT doesn't run on two legs.

      Delete
    2. but batsquatchs ans sheepsquatchs be reels ans walkin ons 2 feets thay shure do

      Delete
    3. And wild bill prefers the bent over position. Buck likes it standing up!

      Delete
    4. WILD BILL old Marine ans Bear Hunter dont has time achasin tham woman folk !!!

      Delete
  11. Did you hear the latest news? Matt MoneyMaker had a heart attack, when he saw his Nazi wife, in the shower!

    ReplyDelete
  12. as long as they ants sallygasters cawz WILD BILL hates tham critters

    ReplyDelete
  13. TRAPPER ans WILD BILL ben huntin tham Cave Critters shure do, ans WILD BILL sayin leave tham cave critters alone, caws thays to smart to be trapped

    ReplyDelete
  14. no thanks no need to see merchants yes man

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story