Listen To Ron Morehead Explain His Research Into Bigfoot Sounds
During the early 1970s, Ron Morehead and his long time friend Al Berry went into the woods of the Sierra Nevada Mountains in eastern California and collected a series of alleged Bigfoot vocalizations called the "Sierra Sounds." Contained within the Sierra Sounds collection are interaction vocalizations popularly known as "Samurai Chatter." Experts like R. Scott Nelson, a crypto-linguist, have declared the mysterious to be Sasquatch language.
Check out this fascinating Ron Morehead interview posted by Bigfoot Project:
Listen to the sounds below:
Bock Bock First for Big Jon!
ReplyDeleteAnd Uno :)
Delete;-)
DeleteHey chick!! May I suggest a Brazilian wax and no more sun!!
DeleteI was going for comedy but she looks a little nashty. She is making me uncomfortable lol!
DeleteHaha! I'm sure shes beautiful on the inside. ;)
DeleteChick I don't care about that pic I need ur feet in my face rite now!!!!!
DeleteChick, how in the world did you get that picture of Eva. I don't think he will, um um she will appreciate you using the pic for your Icon.
DeleteIt is funny though!
I ain't sure she's not a guy on the outside. Ever hear of catfishing?
DeleteAnon 9:12. Those comments about Eva were not necessary! If you could try and turn that negative energy in to a positive, this world would be a better place.
DeleteOops, you have a name. I'm not used to trolls having names. Sorry Leon. My post still applies though.
DeleteLeon- uncool. ;( Eva is a great person and never attacks anyone. I like Eva!
DeleteMy blogger account is not open to messages. I have no contact with anyone on my account. I am also 100% chick- female- girl. Sorry no pics unless you post your up first. BUT, if you want to send me money I will accept it ;)
That is why I cannot be a catfish^
DeleteTrollikins :) are these the type of toes you had in mind?
Omg that comment sounded so wrong, I was joking about the money. JOKING.
DeleteIm going to bed all :o I am turning into a pumpkin.
Also JOKING about the pictures. I am imploding lol!
DeleteHahaha! Tell'em chick!!! I must admit, i've never been a feet guy but that new pic of yours is sexy! :) i would recommend some lotion though.
DeletePlease put a pair of socks on Chick !
DeleteHey Clive!!
DeleteEvening Jon
DeleteI was a little shocked when Chick took her shoes off.
Hahaha! Maybe she'll heed my advice and get that lotion that I recommended. :)
DeleteShe's a wonderful person though, one of my favorites on this blog. Right up there with Joe, Eva, Mike B., MMC, MMG, yourself etc.
Crap, I forgot ALL CAPS, rush, rum, ernie, Danielle campbell, commander zoloft, average joe. I've been drinking, if I left you out I'm truly sorry.
DeleteWho the fuck is this Leon you losers keep falling back on? Face it moron, there's a 50/50 chance you're wacking it to a tranny every night. Imelda Marcos didn't have the shoe fetish this sucker has.
DeleteI make bumper sticker slogans. I also luck feet and guys butts because I'm gay. I'm on my boyfriends computer so I can log in as myself. I'm soooooooo gay. I want Joe's wiener. I really do!!
Delete-big john
^ Chick?
Delete^^ Imelda?
DeleteLooks like Im getting my wish from the other night and getting trolled ;)
DeleteUno!
ReplyDeleteOops...dos!
Deletewasn't funny the first time and it's definitely not funny now
DeleteI can't believe anyone takes these recordings seriously. I guess if you are really, really gullible. I first heard the sounds when I was young and ready to believe almost anything about bigfoot, but still wasn't able to buy this silliness. Nelson is a self appointed expert. Crypto linguist gives him no qualifications to dicepher undocumented languages. That would require some education in anthropology, something the Navy doesn't really teach.
ReplyDeleteI have taught myself the ability to communicate with brine shrimp through interpretive dance.
DeleteMMG
I'm not sure if this is the real MMG being humorous or the fake MMG trying to be an ass as usual but that was funny!!
DeleteIt's the fake MMG John.MMG left a awhile back and said f this place.
DeleteBrine shrimp? Don't you mean "Sea Monkeys" majestic royalty of the deep?
DeleteMMG in da haowse
Delete7:02... Lies. Cryptolinguistics has contributed to war efforts for a long time. I don't think you know what you're talking about, do you? Scott Nelson - Retired from the U.S. Navy as a Crypto-Linguist with over 30 years experience in Foreign Language and Linguistics, including the collection, transcription, analysis and reporting of voice communications. He is a two time graduate of the U.S. Navy Cryptologic Voice Transcription School (Russian and Spanish) and has logged thousands of hours of voice transcription in his target languages as well as in Persian. He is currently teaching Russian, Spanish, Persian, Philosophy and Comparative Religions at Wentworth College in Missouri. It's really quite simple... If you slow chatter down to half it's speed and you come up with a complex layered dialect; then it's pretty much self evident.
DeleteOnce you have recorded language where Sasquatch have been seen, and experienced numerous times, with tracks being accumilated; an eight hour trek into wilderness terrain at a ridiculous altitude, it doesn't take Sherlock Holmes.
"The existence of the Sasquatch Being is hereby assumed, since any Being must exist before his language. Any argument for the existence of Sasquatch or his language should be given outside of this standard and outside any transcription endeavor that uses this standard. Transcripts should stand alone as tools for the language researcher; whereas S.P.A. transcripts and excerpts should be freely used in other works to support language arguments. Since the Sasquatch Being has the ability to produce utterance at frequencies above and below those of human ability, he must also be capable of producing utterance within the limits of human ability. Consequently, utterances that that fall within human levels, while evidencing characteristics of unknown language, remain useful in comparison studies of Sasquatch Language. If a recorded utterance is not Human (i.e. exceeds human ability in Frequency, Pitch, Prosody, Resonance, etc.), and,
DeleteIf the utterance demonstrates language,
Then the subject producing the utterance is deduced to be the Sasquatch Being, any alternative conclusion being absurd (i.e. extraterrestrials, demons, angels, etc. in contrast to an undocumented species native to this planet)."
- Scott Nelson
Again... Pair this up with the track accumilation and sightings in that area of the said subject, not to mention a verified published study of the recordings by the university of Wyoming; you have something highly credible.
"These recordings later became the subject of a year-long University of Wyoming-based engineering study to determine their authenticity and to understand the nature of the vocalizations relative to those of humans and other primates. The results of that study were published by the University of British Columbia Press in 1980 in ?Manlike Monsters on Trial,? an anthology of professional papers presented at a 1978 UBC-sponsored symposium entitled Anthropology of the Unknown. The study concluded that the unusual vocalizations were primate in origin, and that at least one of the voices exceeded normal human ranges. Although the study did not rule out the possibility of human source, it established that the vocalizations were spontaneous at the time of recording and that there was no evidence of pre-recording or re-recording at altered tape speed."
DeleteThe published paper is called Manlike Monsters on Trial - early records and modern evidence by Majorie M Halpin and Michael Ames.
Nice work JOE. I have the complete collection and play from time to time. I have as yet to meet Ron Morehead and am hoping to soon.
DeleteChuck
The deep sea self-aware hatertole fish is the majestic royalty of the deep.
DeleteThe problem is that those credentials are meaningless when decipher a completely unknown language. I understand your overwhelming tendency for confirmation bias, Joe, but it doesn't change a thing. Why cling to the verdict of a single authority, then ignore every verdict to the contrary? In science you need a consensus, no one "authority" has the power to make the declarations Nelson has. Since you make the argument to authority, and indulge in confirmation bias, making a claim to knowledge you can in no way substantiate, you reveal yourself to be a closed mind, unwilling to consider the work of other qualified scientists who do not support your conclusions. There are so many problems with your logic l am actually embarrassed for you.
DeleteAgree ^
DeleteFew things get joe going like a good Scott Nelson joke or just simply saying bigfoot doesn't exist.
Ok...
DeleteI find it rather audacious that someone, when presented with academic credentials of verification, can not only suggest that I'm being confirmation biased and closed minded, but also deliver not one single source that promotes his idea that there are verdicts to the contrary... Even one, not to mention of the level of expertise that has been applied to this source.
I think you need to reassess your understanding of confirmation biases to stop making your arguments look so hypocritical, look at it in relation to your argument that counters scientific research with no equivalent, bro. In the mean time, here's one for you...
"Cognitive bias - Biases are often result from using shortcuts in thinking called heuristics. Such shortcuts allow us to make quick decisions about otherwise complex problems by following instinctive rules of thumb. Although useful in many situations (such as rapidly determining the mood of someone you just met), heuristics can lead us astray. Many problems should be thought through with intention and deliberation. When we settle for quick heuristics in our thinking, we often end up with biases."
... In your case, you have used it in an attempt to support a preconceived notion, ignoring impartial studies that have not got a single source to not consider said research. The acidification method was designed against such fallacies, and you are back in the dark ages, my friend.
Also... You show a very low understanding of scientific research because making suggestions of methods failing when coming upon a potential discovery, probably goes against every single discovery ever made in scientific history. All research starts somewhere, and pioneers are spawned from such circumstances.
Closer minded? I don't think you know what you're talking about, do you?
Meltdown mode: engage. LOL what a peckerhead!
Delete^ Obliterated.
Delete; )
Joe fitzgerald = fuctard
DeleteAww how cute he wants the last word again
DeleteFirst!!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletePut your pants back on, Jon! :)
Deletewhere do they get there research license ... out of a cracker jack box. cheesus
ReplyDeleteDrunks aren't known for their wise judge of character, are they? Or anatomy. Dude, Chick might be Jim in real life...
ReplyDeleteHis friends call him Jamie.
DeleteTrue, but she/he has great taste in shoes. Ya gotta like that.
DeleteI heard a Bigfoot fart a few times. I got it on tape, wanna hear it?
ReplyDeleteI had it run through analysis and they concluded that there's no way a human could have farted like that. The oriface had to be thre times as large as a human.
DeleteWasn't a near either as bear farts are well documented in the fart acoustic science world. They could only say for certain that the fart came from a previously unrecorded large unknown primate. It'll make the hairs stand up in your nose!
DeleteMy second recording came back inconclusive. They said it was contaminated with human farts. I'm calling BS because they don't want to acknowledge how human bf REALY is.
ReplyDeleteThe power of these farts was incredible. The ground actually shook from the sheer size of the fart.
DeleteHere's the most interesting thing. Bigfoot tends to have a rank body odor but their farts smell like roses.
DeleteThis is all true. It happened in my backyard.
DeleteOk here's the audio. Just let me press play, ok listen close...............PTSSSSSSSSSSSST.....PTSSSST......PTSSSST.......ptssst....ptsst.
DeletePretty freakin creepy huh?
This is all true. It happened in my pants.
DeleteMorehead fell off the deep end a long time ago!
ReplyDeleteSounds and sounds and sounds and sounds and more sounds and yes you guessed it folks, and no darn proof.......
ReplyDeleteMore nothing about nothing for idiots to believe in.
ReplyDeleteGot monkey, Joe?
ReplyDelete