Mike Wooley's Amazing Encounter with Bigfoot
Mike Wooley has one of the most amazing bigfoot encounter stories out there. The details of his story not give credibility to his claims, but tend to make people believe he is telling the truth. Listen to this recent interview with Mike:
Want more? Revisit a previous post we did on Mike's story with video by clicking here.
FIRST
ReplyDeleteLove this interview! His emotion at the end of the interview is telling. In his other interview on YouTube; he details the evil grin one of the Sasquatch give him before chasing him off.
DeleteOnly Joe would think a mythical animal would be capable of giving an evil grin. And only Joe would believe some nutjob who claims to understand mythological animal facial gestures. Nobody is that stupid. Joe is a troll
DeleteDon't be scared... Nothing will hurt you.
DeleteTroll on king troll, troll on
DeleteI wonder which of the jref heavy weights joe really is
DeleteCalling Joe a troll makes no sense. This is a Bigfoot blog, Joe has an interest in Bigfoot. Therefore, he posts about Bigfoot. Anons following others around with personal attacks and calling them trolls, yah that's trolling.
DeleteWell, if you want to argue semantics, I've never seen Ernie ever be involved in any sort of actual bigfoot dialogue, at least one of substance.
DeleteHe spends most of his time chasing around people he believes are obsessed with someone else and talking about them.
So what is the difference between Ernie not posting about bigfoot on a bigfoot blog and any other random anon that doesn't post about bigfoot? Answer: Random anons aren't hypocritical.
Sure, if you want to address my second point I'll agree that I've trolled the trolls on occasion. That hardly makes me a hypocrite. My first point however was about Joe, there in lies the true hypocrisy. Trolls calling Joe a troll, when Joe is here to talk about Bigfoot. Do try to keep up. You can do that can't you?
DeleteAs for you opinion about my on topic posts being of little substance, I could care less what you think. How bout them apples?
Joe, when you post as Ernie, do you to be a hypocrite?
DeleteHa! Ernie, you got smoked.
DeleteNot even. Read what I wrote, rinse and repeat. Danny got annihilated. The only one getting smoked is you by your mom on her knees.
DeleteDamn. Been gone for a couple weeks, come back, and Ernie is still Joe's white knight.
DeleteNothing seems to have progressed much further, eh?
Come to think of it, I've never witnessed Ernie post a single time when he had some type of legitimate bigfoot content in his musings.
DeleteI even scrolled back through the comment section for the past week and couldn't find one.
The only posts I can find by him are either referencing the actions of anonymous posters and having idle chatter with Joe, Eva, and Chick.
Odd for someone with such a burning curiosity about bigfoot.
Guess you didn't look hard enough.
DeleteAnd for that comment I just went back through another full week and there still are no posts by Ernie that contain bigfoot subject matter, it's all idle banter and posting as Captain Obvious.
DeleteSo, Ernie, on a scale between Bigfoot and The Ark Of The Covenant, how hard must one search to find a single, on topic, bigfoot information post by you?
Well, it's certainly not a surprise that your research skills are sub par. But here's the funny thing. Cleary you have no interest other than to make personal attacks. You are making comments about my posting, when you, yourself, are not on topic. Clearly you're a hypocrite. The point I made earlier was pretty clear though - and you lose, so you deflect and try to make it about me. Hilarious. Thanks for playing.
DeleteIt's nothing to take personal, the exposure of your hypocrisy and deceit, that is. I never claimed to be above anybody else, even the most vile trolls or Shawn The Puppet Master. Ernie seems to believe he is different though, dare I say better than.
DeleteSince you seem to have exceptional research skills, why don't you link me to a post in the last 2 weeks where you left a comment containing bigfoot information, statistics, or evidence? I'll even accept a legitimate question about bigfoot being asked.
It's not a direct personal attack when placed in proper context, it's just pointing out glaring faults in your argument.
I educated a fellow in the thread about Mr. Kryder's track castings today on natural barefoot bipeds and those that wear footwear, complete with source backing.
It took me 2 minutes but in 2 weeks, I can't find anything of substance provided by you, sir.
You lose because Ernie said so.
DeleteThe new guy is ripping Ernie and joe apart.
Delete^Hah, hardly. But your failed judgment on who is getting annihilated here only exemplifies your own utter stupidity and that you're very obviously handicapped. Or that you enjoy talking to yourself.
DeleteAnd to the post at 7:39
DeleteI offer no hypocrisy. None. Your reading comprehension really needs some work. Go back and read through this discussion. If you want to join in on the conversation discussed in this sub thread regarding Joe being a accused of being a troll, feel free to do so. But you wanted to make it about me with points that had nothing to do with that.
To your other long winded text, you have no identity here other than anon, so your post is pretty much worthless. Question me all you want, you're of zero relevance. Thanks for playing. :)
It's perfectly acceptable if you fail in the request because I already know the answer but:
DeleteSince you seem to have exceptional research skills, why don't you link me to a post in the last 2 weeks where you left a comment containing bigfoot information, statistics, or evidence? I'll even accept a legitimate question about bigfoot being asked.
You go ahead and keep repeating yourself and deflect, making this about me. You failed. Thanks for playing :)
DeleteActually, I do have an account, I was posting here in 2011, but I don't want my name and reputation tarnished by this blog and it's commenters or attachments. This is much of the reason, I presume, you use a Sesame Street character as your identity. There is no difference in my posting anonymously as there is yours posting under the guise of some pseudonym. Neither are truly credible or accountable accounts.
DeleteI find you to be a living and breathing hypocrite.
Deflection and avoidance seem to be Ernie's biggest character attributes. All one has to do is provide one lone comment fitting the prerequisite from the past 2 weeks and Ernie would be vindicated.
DeleteIs it bitter tasting? You know, being demoralized and shown that you haven't made a single bigfoot related post on a bigfoot blog?
Yah there is a difference actually. I'm still using a form of an identity. It's easy for people to troll an identity, as you're doing now, and I'm sure you can understand the psychology of it if you pondered on it. It's not quite the same as posting under anon. You could be anyone ,and you really have zero relevance. You sound like a complete whiner really.
DeleteAnd calling me a hypocrite when you yourself are doing the very thing you accuse me of is pretty amusing. Thanks for the laugh.
.
^ You must have been picked on terribly when you were younger (or possibly still now) to turn around and be the bully you are today. I almost pity you, DC.
DeleteSorry Ernie. The above post at 8:17 was meant for 8:03 and 8:09
DeleteSo Ernie has an interest in Bigfoot, seeing as he is here, much like Joe, but he doesn't post about bigfoot? So far it goes back 2 weeks without a single bigfoot comment, wonder exactly how many bigfoot posts Ernie has in his tenure here? Less than 10, perhaps?
DeleteErnie accuses people of trolling behavior, yet engages in it daily himself. This is a bigfoot blog, as you so accurately pointed out and people like Joe are enthusiastic about the subject which is why he posts about bigfoot on a bigfoot blog.
If you have such a curiosity about bigfoot, if you were interested in bigfoot, if you want to talk about bigfoot on this bigfoot blog...why are posts by Ernie on the subject of bigfoot so conspicuously missing?
Is this your social medium or do you like to play unassuming white knight across the interwebs?
Yep, its gotta be DC. Notice he's been M.I.A. lately? Writing style is the same. NEXT!
DeleteWow, you're looking for more eh? So let's back track to the start since you seem so very dim. This is what I said at the start of this thread when Joe was accused of being a troll. You feel free to read back now:
Delete"Calling Joe a troll makes no sense. This is a Bigfoot blog, Joe has an interest in Bigfoot. Therefore, he posts about Bigfoot. Anons following others around with personal attacks and calling them trolls, yah that's trolling."
Does that make sense to you now? Or do you want to continue to make this about me since you lost on that? I said nothing about me there. I do my share of trolling and getting into off Bigfoot discussions, like now with you for instance.
You really seem to have a poor grasp of reading comprehension so I'll leave you to continue your whining rants and trying to win a battle that you can't. Just don't beat yourself up to much.
You can call me whatever you wish, AC, DC, John Smith, Tom Tucker, Jim Jeffries, or a plain ? If you want.
DeleteI'm genuinely curious now as to the reason Ernie comes to a bigfoot blog if he doesn't talk about bigfoot...ever.
Since you never have actual bigfoot dialogue, just chit chats and trolling, do you even have an interest in bigfoot or is it some novelty that wore off and you just hung around to swap pleasantries with a couple people?
DeleteIt simple, guys, Ernie is one of Joes accounts. Joe is a troll himself, either a mod or a close friend of the blog. He is here to increase blog traffic. The Joe account holder runs many accounts that post on this page and Ernie is one
DeleteWhile I don't think Ernie is Joe, you're spot on with the rest. I'm sure Ernie's original intentions were honest well meant, he's kind of lost touch with all of that and has joined the ranks of the rest of them. Rotting away on this blog, deviating so far from the actual subject and getting extremely defensive whenever someone points this out.
DeleteNo amount of self appointed "wins" will actually make it one, Ernie.
Maybe from this point on we can all focus on the actual point of all of us being here. You know, the subject of this blog?
Nah, you could care less about this blog, you even said so yourself, so cut the crap. You're clearly highly unstable and have some personal issues you might want to address. Cleary you missed the mark to the point I originally made and went off the rails.
DeleteWhat's really sad is your obsessive behavior and requirement to write essays about it all. I bet it's you that was spamming that mental health produced questionnaire as well. It is certainly your style. It's all so very important to you, huh? Seriously butt-hurt over there on your side of the screen for what ever reason, probably because when you did use an account on here you got your a$$ handed to you daily. And now you hide in the shadows whining and crying in your irrelevancy. Funny, but pathetically so. :)
Might as well point it out, 10:16 and 10:07 are two different people, neither of which are my postings. I'm the original person that called you out on your complete lack of bigfoot related comments.
DeleteI'd ask for clarification on certain items such as where I commented that I "could care less about this blog," or about the accusations in your last paragraph...
But you can't even find a post you have made on bigfoot specifically so I will spare you the strenuous activity of backing up your claims.
"Actually, I do have an account, I was posting here in 2011, but I don't want my name and reputation tarnished by this blog and it's commenters or attachments."
DeleteHmmm, yah that is a good indicator that you really don't care about this place. You're only here looking for negative attention hiding under anonymous , pretty easy to see. You're just chasing me around looking for internet quarrels.
You continue to whine. And for the record, I never stated I'd find my posts for you.
That is a narrative on the downfall of the blog and it's contributors, as well as my use of a key feature here to mask my professional reputation.
DeleteClearly doesn't say I "could care less about this blog." Quite the contrary, I'm disturbed by the lack of bigfoot subject matter being discussed outside of the same copy pastes that have been posted daily for 6 months.
I contribute more on bigfoot in one day than you have contributed in your entire time posting here under 2 seperate accounts and countless anonymous postings.
I remember not more than 2 months ago you were busted on several occasions responding to your account postings by the anonymous feature.
Yah, clearly you're driving that topic now by spending a good portion of the evening doing just that *eye roll
DeleteLook, no one knows who you are, and no one cares.
Tell you what, you keep doing what you're doing, hiding behind the anon thing, skulking around and making personal attacks, being a hypocrite by whining about me being off topic while doing the same. Calling people tranny's and heffers etc. Acting like the internet tough guy. But really, there's no point responding to you any further; it's very obvious you've got a screw loose.
Who and when did I call anyone a heffer or a tranny? Where did I pretend to be a tough guy?
DeleteThe thread was already off topic and it's the middle of the night, so yes, it is hypocritical. It needed said though, I can't find a single post from you on the topic of bigfoot in over a months archive now. Why do you post on a bigfoot blog yet not post a single thing about bigfoot?
Yeah, I'm hypocritical in this moment but at least I talk about bigfoot every day I post here. More than can be said about you.
7:39... It didn't take you two minutes, it took you three quarters of an hour, and I ruined all that hard work with a one word answer, not to mention the comment I left at the end for you.
Delete; )
And as we watch Hula girls ,lochness,chupra,5 photos of the day,ufo's, ghost images on the great Bigfoot evidence site..Ernie isn't all that bad and is quite witty comment addition !
DeleteHe's a good guy... And my buddy.
DeleteJohnny Cumlately.
DeleteMr. Nosey.
I bet you two have so much fun responding anonymously to your account posts.
Rush rules
ReplyDeleteSo close,lost to a pro
ReplyDeleteI can lie very easily too !
ReplyDeleteHe does look homeless
ReplyDeleteI like turtles
ReplyDeleteI like mike b. balls!
DeleteTerrapin
ReplyDeleteGrateful Dead sucks. Not as bad as rush but still.
DeleteTin ear
DeleteMost definetly a hoaxer. Proven time and time again
ReplyDeleteHERE IS ANOTHER GREAT QUOTE FROM PEDOBEAR LINDSAY
ReplyDelete"Everyone is fading at my age.
Most men my age can’t cum more than once a night. It’s normal. However, last night I got off two times in less than five minutes, which almost otherworldly.
Most women do not ignore me, not all of them. Actually few women ignore me. I tend to provoke reactions in women. At the very least they look at me. But guys my age do get ignored a lot by women.
Women do all of us wrong sometimes or all the time. But enough do me right that life is good.
Some women find me irresistible. How many? Enough.
Not hundreds, that’s not true. I have not had sex with hundreds of females, sorry. I am definitely not screwing hundreds of women at the moment, that’s for sure. Or not even in the last 10 years.
Only want more? True for some. Most women are nymphos though.
I was much more of a player as a young man, not so much as I am getting older. Most such types tend to slow down in middle age."
I pledge allegiance, to the pedobear, of the United States of Lindsay. And to the pedobear for which it stands.....
DeleteThere is a pedobear sign on the road ahead,
DeleteTheres alot of people saying wed be better off dead,
Dont feel like a pedobear but i am to them,
So ill try to keep bloggin, any way i can
Like Pedobear Kisses,
DeleteAt a bedtime prayer,
Sprinkling little white flowers,
All up in Pedobears hair
Peter Freakin' Criss.
ReplyDeleteHe seen it
ReplyDelete"The details of his story not give credibility to his claims..." That hasn't stopped ANY believer. They eat this s*it up.
ReplyDeletebigfoot is for kids you silly wabbit.
ReplyDeleteI wonder how many of these comments have been written in their parents basement.... 70?
ReplyDeleteYours was.
Delete