Many people speculate that bigfoot use tree knocks to communicate with one another. Our friend Dredfunn takes a look at this phenomenon in a humorous way through a time lapse drawing. Check out his awesome work:
GREAT, ANOTHER LITTLE KID PLAYING ON THE NET. I AM FLATTERED YOU IDOLIZE ME BUT THIS SITE IS FOR GROWN UPS. NOW RUN ALONG KIDDIE, US ADULTS HAVE SERIOUS THINGS TO TALK ABOUT. AND I DOUBT A LITTLE KID WILL HAVE ANYTHING OF VALUE TO SAY ABOUT BIGFOOT.
Alas, it was you, poor fool, who was owned epically. Why you ask? B/c that wasnt All caps, it was me impersonating him. Woops, guess you should pry that foot out of your mouth now. LOL. oh yeah, got patty diaper butt??
* Special note to the real ALL CAPS: Please wear hip waders if you are going to engage in foot in the as s activities. You just don't know where these trolls have been.
^OH YEAH, YOU WANT SOME TOO SUCKER. YOU BETTER SIT BACK IN YOUR SEAT SON, BECAUSE IN MY NECK OF THE WOODS FOLKS KNOW BETTER THAN TO MESS WITH ME. WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THAT SON?
LOOK GUYS, ITS TIME TO GROW UP. I CANT EVEN POST ON HERE ANYMORE BECAUSE OF YOU TROLLS. HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO SAY HELLO TO JOE, CHICK, EVA, AND MMC 25 TIMES DAY?? HUH??? ANSWER ME THAT. DO YOU REALIZE WHAT ITS LIKE NOT BEING IN CONSTANT EMAIL COMMUNICATION WITH MY BIGFOOT EVIDENCE FRIENDS. I HATE YOU TROLLS, I HATE YOU SO MUCH. PLEASE POST THAT TROLL PSYCHOLOGICAL QUOTE JOE, PLEASE!!
This site is full of little kids who love to see their own stupid posts. Useless articles and discussions. Unless that is the whole point of this site. Then I would say you are right on the money.
You anons will just never learn. Everyone knows your not me. You continue to mock me, Joe, MMG, and many others and it just makes you look stupid. So you have driven me away from posting under the name i used too, so what? I just post under a new one now, so have you really accomplished anything? No i didnt think so. You little creeps are obsessed with me and Joe and MMG. You obsessive little freaks dont like it when you get trolled though do you? Thats what i thought. Obsess much?
So MMC, why dont you tell us about how you have been driven off due to the trolls. We know your not totally gone as you post anon now, but we know its you making the sleeveless posts and the redneck posts. And more than likely, its you making the alien posts as well. But its okay, we will call you out on it. What a sad waste you are.
Oh remember this was the guy who claimed he only made attacks on people when he posted under the MMC name. He claimed that in a post, and that he never went after anyone as just a random anon. Then he got mad dealing with the trolls one day and admitted that it was him who was behind the Sleeveless posts being left everyday. Criticizing Smeja wasnt the issue, who cares, but never once did MMC leave his retarded tag mark on any of the sleeveless posts. Woops. There you have it, MMC, a known liar, hypocrite, and a troll to boot.
Were it not for the hoaxers, we wouldn't be here tonight enjoying each other's company. God bless Ray Wallace, Rick Dyer, and Lord Lickerpuss. The holy trinity of Bigfootery.
Show us the verified evidence of bigfoot? We can do it no problem for every other species. Why not bigfoot? Too easy. Cos it don't exist.
Royally smoked.
The funniest thing is the footers will attempt to shoehorn anything they can to be "evidence" of bigfoot. None of it is scientificly acceptable of course but it sure does give us a hilarious circus show to watch. No complaints here.
Let's go back to the packham bigfoot suit that joe and the resident butthurt footer and poster boy for footer stupidity were talking about earlier. Do you really look at that and think that was a recreation of the pgf? Of course it wasn't. If it was an actual recreation attempt you'd think they would at least get the colour right. The bbc just got a costume company to make them a bigfoot suit and that is what they got. This is a classic example of one of many failed arguments put forth by the footers.
If we want to look at a patty recreation how about we actually look at one rather than using one that clearly wasnt meant to be a patty recreation.We have 2 examples of these. We have the dfoot recreation and the blevins recreation. Both excellent examples. Blevins recreated the arm proportions perfectly but his budget was too low to get a similar style fur. Dfoots recreation showed identical "muscle" and bulk, quite excellent really. This is the same guy that made patty bleevers on the bff look like fools when he photoshopped patty onto a different background and all the bleevers said it was an obvious suit. He embarrassed them so bad they banned him and swept the whole thing under the giant footers rug of ignorance. Also lets not forget that side by side shot of a gemora butt with the patty butt. Identical.
And anyway the whole notion of requiring an identical replication is nonsense anyway. The footers know this which is why they use it, instead of doing something like, oh I dont know, find a real life specimen that matches patty.
1. Packham's BBC bigfoot was not an attempt at a PGF repro, and that the costume used was just a handy ready-made job.
2. Dfoot/Pruiit tricked all BFF members by simply placing an image of Patty against an urban background.
Both are false.
Packham used the same model of camera which Patterson used. Packham introduced camera-shake to duplicate and evoke that in the PGF. The origin of the Packham costume is uncertain, however some assert that it came from a top Hollywood costume maker.
In any case regarding the Packham suit, the BBC is hardly going to use the same type of camera, all in an effort to debunk the PGF, but then fudge the costume: just throw out any off-the-rack suit and put it on an actor and bang, you're done. This bleef demonstrates delusion. Due to Packham’s over-zealous hyperventilating obsession with debunking the PGF and bigfoot full-stop, it’s more than likely that Packham took serious pains with his bigfoot costume, and put the best people he could find on the task of creating the suit.
(Packham announced after his PGF repro fail/BBC bigfoot butcher job that he had proven both that the PGF was a hoax and that bigfoot doesn’t exist. Yes, this is what makes a hero to the skepflunks.)
Now that you have read that, consider again that bloke in a suit helplessly impotently cries out that the Packham job was no attempt to replicate the PGF.
Dfoot/Pruiit created a malformed image of Patty and placed it on an urban background. Some of the BFF members said it didn't look right and doubted its authenticity. Others smelled a rat and saw that pieces of the image matched Patty, but that the overall image didn't match Patty. Dfoot was booted based on this trickery.
Now that you have read that, keep in mind bloke in a suit's claims regarding Dfoot and the superimposed image.
Bloke in a suit is mistaken on both claims, either due to being misinformed, an inability to comprehend, delusion, or intentional lying, or some combination of some or all of the preceding. You will see bloke in a suit repeat these claims until it's obvious everyone sees they are false, and bloke in a suit will then drop them and move onto his or her next fantasy.
Bloke in a suit is making it awfully easy. Deluded fish in a leaky barrel.
DOUCHBAGS HAVE SPOKEN.... THE TRUTH HAS BEEN FORSEEN....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................YOU CAN CLOSE THE THREAD...
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
He does???
ReplyDeleteTHE PLANETS STUPIDEST GENERATION CAN BE FOUND POSTING ON THIS SITE..... CONGRATS DOUCHBAGS.
ReplyDeleteGREAT, ANOTHER LITTLE KID PLAYING ON THE NET. I AM FLATTERED YOU IDOLIZE ME BUT THIS SITE IS FOR GROWN UPS. NOW RUN ALONG KIDDIE, US ADULTS HAVE SERIOUS THINGS TO TALK ABOUT. AND I DOUBT A LITTLE KID WILL HAVE ANYTHING OF VALUE TO SAY ABOUT BIGFOOT.
DeleteALL CAPS
Goonie goo goo.
DeleteShe's a big foot isn't she Gus.
DeleteAny thing of value? Give us some thing of value then maybe you'll get some serious discussion. Till then. Live with it.
Delete^All caps owned you dude. Owned you hard.
DeleteAlas, it was you, poor fool, who was owned epically. Why you ask? B/c that wasnt All caps, it was me impersonating him. Woops, guess you should pry that foot out of your mouth now. LOL. oh yeah, got patty diaper butt??
DeleteNO YOU DIDN'T. NOW STOP TAKING CREDIT FOR MY WORK SON. THAT'S JUST REALLY SAD. NOW RUN ALONG BEFORE I TAUNT YOU AGAIN WITH MY FOOT IN YOUR ASS.
DeleteALL CAPS
* Special note to the real ALL CAPS: Please wear hip waders if you are going to engage in foot in the as s activities. You just don't know where these trolls have been.
Delete^OH YEAH, YOU WANT SOME TOO SUCKER. YOU BETTER SIT BACK IN YOUR SEAT SON, BECAUSE IN MY NECK OF THE WOODS FOLKS KNOW BETTER THAN TO MESS WITH ME. WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THAT SON?
DeleteALL CAPS
Fake ^ Way over done.
DeleteLOL!! Sorry, too much trouble to put on my waders this late at night. You are entertaining I will give you that. Plus what makes you think Im a "son"?
DeleteLOOK GUYS, ITS TIME TO GROW UP. I CANT EVEN POST ON HERE ANYMORE BECAUSE OF YOU TROLLS. HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO SAY HELLO TO JOE, CHICK, EVA, AND MMC 25 TIMES DAY?? HUH??? ANSWER ME THAT. DO YOU REALIZE WHAT ITS LIKE NOT BEING IN CONSTANT EMAIL COMMUNICATION WITH MY BIGFOOT EVIDENCE FRIENDS. I HATE YOU TROLLS, I HATE YOU SO MUCH. PLEASE POST THAT TROLL PSYCHOLOGICAL QUOTE JOE, PLEASE!!
DeleteWoo-hoooo!! Ha ha ha!
DeleteKaboom!
This site is full of little kids who love to see their own stupid posts. Useless articles and discussions. Unless that is the whole point of this site. Then I would say you are right on the money.
DeleteI will suck anyone's dirty cock...
ReplyDeleteMMC
Daniel?
DeleteNah, just another anon stray looking for a man date.
DeleteYou anons will just never learn. Everyone knows your not me. You continue to mock me, Joe, MMG, and many others and it just makes you look stupid. So you have driven me away from posting under the name i used too, so what? I just post under a new one now, so have you really accomplished anything? No i didnt think so. You little creeps are obsessed with me and Joe and MMG. You obsessive little freaks dont like it when you get trolled though do you? Thats what i thought. Obsess much?
ReplyDeleteMid Michigan Calling
So MMC, why dont you tell us about how you have been driven off due to the trolls. We know your not totally gone as you post anon now, but we know its you making the sleeveless posts and the redneck posts. And more than likely, its you making the alien posts as well. But its okay, we will call you out on it. What a sad waste you are.
DeleteOh remember this was the guy who claimed he only made attacks on people when he posted under the MMC name. He claimed that in a post, and that he never went after anyone as just a random anon. Then he got mad dealing with the trolls one day and admitted that it was him who was behind the Sleeveless posts being left everyday. Criticizing Smeja wasnt the issue, who cares, but never once did MMC leave his retarded tag mark on any of the sleeveless posts. Woops. There you have it, MMC, a known liar, hypocrite, and a troll to boot.
Mid Michigan Cumming.
MMC ......Mid Michigan Cumming
DeleteMMG.......Mid Michigan Gone
Both trolled off like the little pansies they are
You will never truly drive me off this site trolls. You can make fun of me all you want. I'm here to stay. Albeit with another identity.
DeleteMid Michigan Calling
Also if anyone didn't know. I'm Ernie Streets now.
DeleteMid Michigan Calling
At least get the screen name right numb nuts.
DeleteErnie's best argument to date. Good job Ernie. You got him real good.
Delete^^ Kent or MMC obsessed with Joe obsessors
Deleteyes, get the name right. Hes not called Kent, oops, MMC, oops Enema Ernie for nothing.
DeleteYou suck at trolling kid, suck real hard^
DeleteWere it not for the hoaxers, we wouldn't be here tonight enjoying each other's company. God bless Ray Wallace, Rick Dyer, and Lord Lickerpuss. The holy trinity of Bigfootery.
ReplyDeleteamen brotha
DeleteI don't like brotha. The other day he pushed me.
DeleteHe pushed me real harrd.
And a goonie goo goo to you sir!
ReplyDeleteErnie?
ReplyDeletewhatever gets your jollies off.
ReplyDeleteMore Sketches !
ReplyDeleteFor the record...Bigfoots knock ONLY once. There may be a bit of "spacing" in between. A couple minutes or so...
ReplyDeleteIt drives me nuts to see the Finding Bigfoot crew whacking away at trees like they just snorted coke or something. WTF ?
One knock. oh....my....god.....
This is a knocker!
Delete( . ) ( . )
) . (
Delete8===D - - - ,
Delete€==========%
DeleteIts just too easy.
ReplyDeleteBloke in a suit.
Show us the verified evidence of bigfoot? We can do it no problem for every other species. Why not bigfoot? Too easy. Cos it don't exist.
Royally smoked.
The funniest thing is the footers will attempt to shoehorn anything they can to be "evidence" of bigfoot. None of it is scientificly acceptable of course but it sure does give us a hilarious circus show to watch. No complaints here.
Let's go back to the packham bigfoot suit that joe and the resident butthurt footer and poster boy for footer stupidity were talking about earlier. Do you really look at that and think that was a recreation of the pgf? Of course it wasn't. If it was an actual recreation attempt you'd think they would at least get the colour right. The bbc just got a costume company to make them a bigfoot suit and that is what they got. This is a classic example of one of many failed arguments put forth by the footers.
If we want to look at a patty recreation how about we actually look at one rather than using one that clearly wasnt meant to be a patty recreation.We have 2 examples of these. We have the dfoot recreation and the blevins recreation. Both excellent examples. Blevins recreated the arm proportions perfectly but his budget was too low to get a similar style fur. Dfoots recreation showed identical "muscle" and bulk, quite excellent really. This is the same guy that made patty bleevers on the bff look like fools when he photoshopped patty onto a different background and all the bleevers said it was an obvious suit. He embarrassed them so bad they banned him and swept the whole thing under the giant footers rug of ignorance. Also lets not forget that side by side shot of a gemora butt with the patty butt. Identical.
And anyway the whole notion of requiring an identical replication is nonsense anyway. The footers know this which is why they use it, instead of doing something like, oh I dont know, find a real life specimen that matches patty.
Its just too easy.
Fish in a barrel.
Bloke in a suit has been making two claims:
Delete1. Packham's BBC bigfoot was not an attempt at a PGF repro, and that the costume used was just a handy ready-made job.
2. Dfoot/Pruiit tricked all BFF members by simply placing an image of Patty against an urban background.
Both are false.
Packham used the same model of camera which Patterson used. Packham introduced camera-shake to duplicate and evoke that in the PGF. The origin of the Packham costume is uncertain, however some assert that it came from a top Hollywood costume maker.
In any case regarding the Packham suit, the BBC is hardly going to use the same type of camera, all in an effort to debunk the PGF, but then fudge the costume: just throw out any off-the-rack suit and put it on an actor and bang, you're done. This bleef demonstrates delusion. Due to Packham’s over-zealous hyperventilating obsession with debunking the PGF and bigfoot full-stop, it’s more than likely that Packham took serious pains with his bigfoot costume, and put the best people he could find on the task of creating the suit.
(Packham announced after his PGF repro fail/BBC bigfoot butcher job that he had proven both that the PGF was a hoax and that bigfoot doesn’t exist. Yes, this is what makes a hero to the skepflunks.)
Now that you have read that, consider again that bloke in a suit helplessly impotently cries out that the Packham job was no attempt to replicate the PGF.
Dfoot/Pruiit created a malformed image of Patty and placed it on an urban background. Some of the BFF members said it didn't look right and doubted its authenticity. Others smelled a rat and saw that pieces of the image matched Patty, but that the overall image didn't match Patty. Dfoot was booted based on this trickery.
Now that you have read that, keep in mind bloke in a suit's claims regarding Dfoot and the superimposed image.
Bloke in a suit is mistaken on both claims, either due to being misinformed, an inability to comprehend, delusion, or intentional lying, or some combination of some or all of the preceding. You will see bloke in a suit repeat these claims until it's obvious everyone sees they are false, and bloke in a suit will then drop them and move onto his or her next fantasy.
Bloke in a suit is making it awfully easy. Deluded fish in a leaky barrel.
Got Patty Diaper but Kent??
Deletehttp://youtu.be/wQr922oWdgY
DeleteJoe loves men. Big strong black men.
Delete^troll looking for love.
DeleteGoonie?
ReplyDeletebigfoots a Knocking for sure
ReplyDeleteDOUCHBAGS HAVE SPOKEN.... THE TRUTH HAS BEEN FORSEEN....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................YOU CAN CLOSE THE THREAD...
ReplyDelete