Tim Stover's Bigfoot Encounter Is Inspirational


When we hear Ohio Bigfoot researcher Tim Stover talk about his Bigfoot sighting that happened over 20 years ago, he reminds us why people will spend their lifetime searching for the answer. Stover has been searching the woods every night, ever since his encounter with gray Bigfoot while sitting on a deer stand. Like clockwork, as soon he gets off work, he drives around Salt Fork, hoping to catch another glimpse of one -- this time he's going to be prepared he says.



Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Tim comes across like a totally credible guy and you only have to look at the work he's put in for 20 years to know he must have been pretty sure what he saw.

      Grey Sasquatch are always amazing accounts too... An 'old man' is an interesting description.

      Delete
    2. Congrads !.........seeing doubles. Are you going for a tri-fecta ?

      Delete
    3. You better believe it Skunkey! Hope you are well ma boy!!

      Delete
    4. I know a couple of people that know Tim and say he is totally credible and I am sure I will meet him in the next year or two.

      For JOE. The video of Sam and Myself I had you look at last month came from the Salt Fork Area. There was a pretty good sighting out there recently of two walking a trail and a photo of it that is better than most, but since it involved woods, just not clear enough.

      Tim is a dedicated as it gets and I hope he gets that second sighting and interaction.

      Chuck

      Delete
    5. I know a couple of people that know Tim and say he is totally credible and I am sure I will meet him in the next year or two.

      For JOE. The video of Sam and Myself I had you look at last month came from the Salt Fork Area. There was a pretty good sighting out there recently of two walking a trail and a photo of it that is better than most, but since it involved woods, just not clear enough.

      Tim is a dedicated as it gets and I hope he gets that second sighting and interaction.

      Chuck

      Delete
    6. I know a couple of people that know Tim and say he is totally credible and I am sure I will meet him in the next year or two.

      For JOE. The video of Sam and Myself I had you look at last month came from the Salt Fork Area. There was a pretty good sighting out there recently of two walking a trail and a photo of it that is better than most, but since it involved woods, just not clear enough.

      Tim is a dedicated as it gets and I hope he gets that second sighting and interaction.

      Chuck

      Delete
    7. I know a couple of people that know Tim and say he is totally credible and I am sure I will meet him in the next year or two.

      For JOE. The video of Sam and Myself I had you look at last month came from the Salt Fork Area. There was a pretty good sighting out there recently of two walking a trail and a photo of it that is better than most, but since it involved woods, just not clear enough.

      Tim is a dedicated as it gets and I hope he gets that second sighting and interaction.

      Chuck

      Delete
    8. Of course! I remember now Chuck! How are you buddy? The more I hear about Ohio the more it sounds like one heck of a place!!

      Delete
    9. cbrippee I didn't understand, can you repeat the message please?

      Delete
    10. sorry man- my cbrippee bot actin up again. Joe's got swing by in his spaceship and give it a looksee

      Delete
    11. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    12. You really do miss Mike when he's not around don't you?

      Delete
    13. Have no idea how that happened. Computer was running diagnostic at the time. SORRY

      Delete
    14. You need not ever apologise buddy.

      Much respect Chuck.

      Delete
  2. Congrats. A rare occurrence in the bigfoot world. First second

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think Tim is a great guy and wish him all the luck in the world.

    If he gets a chance to stomp a hole in SquatchMasterHoaxer while on his travels then I will smile a little smile.

    But violence solves nothing.

    I don't care lol.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Inspirational" is not the word I'd use

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey, if a guy's not brought to tears by his own bigfoot story, it can't be true. That's what Dr, Johnson says.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't believe a word of it. Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No reason to be sorry.


      You're mom was sooo sorry last night I tell you what.

      Delete
  7. How many years, he's been searching 20! And never had another sighting? Then he must be doing something wrong? Maybe he should think to change his search methods? Reminds of another guy from Ohio, that's been tracking squatches for 25 years!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Isn't that OCD when you try something and fail yet continue to try without changing the formula yet expecting a different outcome

      Delete
    2. OCD is characterised by persuing routines in an effort to make oneself feel better, that in fact have the adverse effect and can make the subject more anxious.

      Kind of like people who troll a Bigfoot blog, no?

      Delete
    3. Harry- that is the definition of insanity, I think. Quite common among the general bigfoot viewing public.

      Delete
    4. Says the guy muttering his therapy sessions brought on by the anxiety of his back yard.

      Delete
    5. Joe do you really wanna go that route I didn't poke a jab at you a couple threads ago you do tought MK's garbage

      Delete
    6. And to update you I hung out with Stevie strings and Stacey so I'm no troll but when someone is doin something repeatedly getting the same result a little problem there isn't it

      Delete
    7. Hey Bandini! I wasn't having a pop at you, you know how I feel about trolls?

      Delete
    8. I believe there's a Bigfoot I just don't believe every Tom dick and Harry with a story to sell

      Delete
    9. I didn't know the second comment was to the original post then I apologize

      Delete
    10. Ha! That's cool Bandini, we have at least one misunderstanding a month, it really wouldn't be the same!

      We have a mutual friend in Steve... Or Uncle Steve as I call him.

      Delete
  8. Hey TIM! It's Ranae, from the FINDING BIG FOOT show. It was a kid in a suit, you lying fool!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Nothing but, idiotic childish comments! What's happening to America? We used to look up to you, and respect your country! But I come on here to learn about Big foots, and all i read is stupid, childish in-mature comments!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not since the dead rats incident.

      Delete
    2. You must be the same guy of some days ago...

      I'M FROM ITALY AND I PROUDLY SAY THAT I REALLY HAVE FUN ON THE ALL-AMERICAN BIGFOOT EVIDENCE!!!

      Delete
    3. Here in the US of A we take two things dead serious-
      bigfoot and pot pies.

      Delete
    4. We may be childish and immature, but just remember we have nuclear weapons and we are childish enough to use them.

      Delete
    5. I've been in the US many times and yes, I love America, with all his controversies is still far better than much of this world (better than Italy for sure)

      Delete
    6. You must be from Mexico to look up at our country and Canada to look down and every thing else is a side view dumb ass.

      *<B-(/)

      Delete
    7. In my country, we make funny by putting on Chewbacca mask and growling at each other. Then we celebrate with vodka and hookers. Is good time.

      Delete
  10. Hell anybody can be ohio bigfoot hunters all you need is a car and 500 foot of video cable.he too scared to get out of his car and far as that tree they showed on tv where his deer stand was there is no way that tree could of held a stand with him in it 20 years ago.he is bullshitter

    ReplyDelete
  11. Just imagine that you misidentify something that is quite common to be a mythical creature that doesn't exist and then you devote every free moment of the rest of your life looking for it. Quite sad, really.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just imagine as a child, you require such reassurance that the boogey man isn't real that you have to sleep in with moma and popa... And that the fear of the unknown and things that aren't under control should follow you around in that you troll a subject you know nothing about, like the reasurance hug you always needed?

      Quite sad really.

      Delete
    2. Do not interact with him

      Delete
    3. PROOF OF AUSTRALIAN GIANTS:

      In old river gravels near Bathurst, NSW, huge stone artifacts -- clubs,pounders, adzes, chisels, knives and hand axes -- all of tremendous weight, lie scattered over a wide area. These weigh anything from 8, 10, 15, to 21and 25 pounds, implements which only men of tremendous proportions could
      possibly have made and used. Estimates for the actual size of these men range from 10 to 12 feet tall and over, weighing from 500 to 600 lbs. A fossicker searching the Winburndale River north of Bathurst discovered a large quartzitised fossil human molar tooth, far too big for any normal modern man. A similar find was made near Dubbo, N.S.W.

      Delete
    4. Who made the cover up in Australia then? The Smithsonian? Why no bones in Australia found in the last decade? God, what a loser

      Delete
    5. Oh dear...

      I doubt there would be too much of a cover up required for a molar?

      Learn to read, loser.

      Delete
    6. Well, one could assume it was a type of decoration from what was found altogether?

      Delete
    7. I see only excuses and assumptions and no physical evidence that I can touch

      Delete
    8. Shall we list the things that have innumerable consistencies that are outside of your immediate experience, that you believe in?

      Delete
    9. I wanna touch, sorry. I know the Shuttle exists because I can go to cape canaveral and touch it. Let me touch something, please!

      Delete
  12. Joe believes that Patty has 100% modern human DNA

    LOL, he surely studied biology, anatomy and genetics

    LOOOOOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do not interact with him

      Delete
    2. There are examples of early hominids within the same species that have morphological differences, and we are are learning more and more about our own biological evolution all the time... Last time I heard Sykes was also investigating the morphological differences of Kwit's skull. You also have the possibility of Microevolution.

      http://bf-field-journal.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/the-human-side-of-bigfoot-comparing.html?m=1

      The link above has renditions of Patty with no hair on her face; one digital and the other by the best forensic artist in the country. I think you'll agree, she looks very human.

      You were very welcome.

      Delete
    3. Joe schools himself every single time.No need to argue with him because he loses by default.

      Delete
    4. I am still very welcome. It seems you quite not understand the distinction between morphological and anatomical differences.
      Black people and white people have morphological differences, but anatomically they are the same: the bones, the muscles, everything is in the same order and has the same relative proportions.

      Now, if you didn't notice that, Patty (and all the supposed Bigfoot tracks also display this) have way big ANATOMICAL differences (coned head, midtarsial break, and let me underline, MIDTARSIAL BREAK that is an enormous anatomical difference that leads to differences in species cataloging, arms proportions, different pelvis structure that leads to different gait, differences in chest structure, etc.), and anatomical differences lead to differences in DNA and in taxonomy classification.

      Glad to have taught you something

      Delete
    5. Don't waste your time, he's always right.

      Even if he's pwned brutally like now, he's always right

      Delete
    6. "Scientists have discovered that about one in thirteen people have flexible ape-like feet.

      A team studied the feet of 398 visitors to the Boston Museum of Science.

      The results show differences in foot bone structure similar to those seen in fossils of a member of the human lineage from two million years ago."

      http://doubtfulnews.com/2013/06/bigfoot-trouble-mid-tarsal-break-not-indicative-of-bigfoot-anymore/

      ... From one of your own gurus.

      Also, you forgot to read the part where I wrote about microevolution (thanks to Tzieth).

      "Microevolution is the changes in allele frequencies that occur over time within a population.[1] This change is due to four different processes: mutation, selection (natural and artificial), gene flow, and genetic drift."

      Who's learning something?

      ; )

      Delete
    7. LOL
      maybe you're a little bit overexagerating the scale of the thing, "ape-like" doesn't mean "equal to apes", apes have prehensile feet, human don't.

      Still, you pretend to talk about evolution having read something on the internet. LOL, go to university and then come back.

      Oh and the article just pwns Bigfoot

      Anyway, you're always right

      Delete
    8. Joe, as the guy stated above, midtarsial break was not the only anatomical difference. Let's explain all the others with other links, please!

      Delete
    9. Today I learnt that all the animals have the same DNA

      Delete
    10. Just ignore him, he's always right

      Delete
    11. Unlucky guys...

      You got clever, but it turns out... You weren't so clever after all. The article does not 'pwn' Bigfoot because it tries to align such things with human examples; Bigfoot are humans, so it 'pwns' itself cause it serves as a lovely example.

      And... You avoid the slightly awkward topic of microevolution.

      Schooled... Next?

      Delete
    12. Next you have to explain the other anatomical differences.
      You failed to explain properly the midtarsial break as I pointed out, but assume to ignore it.

      Now explain the others

      Delete
    13. Oh dear... This is the same dense character that couldn't read yesterday, yes?

      Here's a little practice for you; have a look at my last post, the word is in the last but one line, and it starts with the letter 'M'.

      Concentrate...

      Delete
    14. LOL I have no idea of what you're talking about, I'm sorry if it suprises you that more than one person thinks you're a fool.

      Anyway, LOL at your evolution logics, many scientists are rolling in their graves.

      But you're always right, bye!

      Delete
    15. Hey Joe, Ph.D. paleontologist here, do you remember me?
      Just want to say that all the things you say about evolution just totally crash against all the universally accepted things we know about the history of the animals evolution.
      Again, if one person comes out and has a "thunder idea", this does not make it real, facts must be proved way much harder than just saying "it could be in this way, so sure it is".

      Thanks for reading, goodbye

      Delete
    16. "Still, you pretend to talk about evolution having read something on the internet. LOL, go to university and then come back."

      The scientists you could list would at least be able to have a grasp of microevolution. You were schooled by Wikipedia in the end old boy... Not by one of the best universities in the UK that I attended.

      Cheerio!

      Delete
    17. Microevolution is still a badly debated idea and many things point to it as being very hard to accept as concept.

      Still, many scientists refuse to aknowledge it as a physical process and suggest that there are no differences between micro- and macroevolution.

      Ph.D

      Delete
    18. Evolution was a tough topic to start when Darwin said evolution doesn't really explain it all you know there's a problem

      Delete
    19. For all your fancy labellings and inabilities to read between the lines of a comment (for which I remember you for), to suggest that Microevolution is a 'thunder idea', is not really looking at the many examples there are to validate the process.

      "Microevolution over time may lead to speciation or the appearance of novel structure, sometimes classified as macroevolution. Contrary to claims by creationists however, macro and microevolution describe fundamentally identical processes on different time scales."

      I've got work in the morning, so nighty night, Ph.D!

      Delete
    20. As usual, it's impossible to have a discussion with you.

      You know, you should bring to the table something more than Wikipedia. There is much much more behind the concept of microevolution, and you just ignore it.

      You neither can have the patience to listen what someone has to say.

      Sad.

      Delete
    21. Yeah basically it's always this way with Joe, he taps his ears and begins to scream "I'm right! I'm right! I'm right!"

      Impossible to have a debate with him

      Delete
    22. That's why you have to learn to ignore him

      "Never argue with an idiot..."

      Delete
    23. "Never argue with an idiot..."

      An idiot always wants the last word

      Delete
    24. Exactly!

      And an idiot preaches avoidance of interaction, but is too stupid to realise that is exactly what he's doing.

      Keep up the good work Tard.

      Delete
  13. Joe, what re-enactment group do you practice with? Or perhaps you are into LARP?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Tim Stover's Bigfoot Encounter Is Inspirational....

    and his hat and shirt are FABULOUS!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. nope, I am not a tim stover kool aid drinker either.i think that guy is full of crap and afraid to leave his car to research what a joke

      Delete
    2. I was talkin to the guy that replied to you besides that anyway

      Delete
  15. Just call me a well wishing skeptic who thinks footers are psychopath idiots.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If Footers are psychopaths, denialists are hell bent sociopaths that are fear ridden and require the regular reassurance of visiting a Bigfoot Blog to check when they have to go into doomsday prep mode!

      Delete
  16. Stover is a liar and media whore, who thinks squatching in parking lots and state parks in the middle of cities is legit. Total poser.

    ReplyDelete
  17. another liar
    sees a bear 20 years ago and attatches a BF story toit
    same as smeja etc

    no evidence asusual sowhy say it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We either believe you who can't spell and has terrible grammar, is angry misinformed (by Bigfoot Files) and is obviously slightly silly in the mind... Or Tim.

      No brainer really.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?