This Is Frickin Adorable: Monkey Teaches Human How To Crush Leaves
Seriously. How can you not enjoy this? Crushing leaves is one of the most satisfying things you can do in life and this monkey knows it!
Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Eva. !!!
ReplyDeleteThanks my little cherry pie for helping me get that first xx
DeleteA gentleman always lets a lady go first
DeleteXX
lady?
DeleteThanks to our newfound celebrity status I will now be firsting by appointment only.
ReplyDeleteYou can now attach an irrelevant degree to your name and be heralded as a 'homonologist' and 'expert' in the field.
DeleteDr. Nonarchaic Hominin
Has a good ring to it.
A brown ring perhaps?
DeleteA ring that would be the same color as your tongue Dan?
MMG
Glad someone else has noticed it in recent weeks.
DeleteNot my fault your ol' lady likes it kinky, MMG.
DeleteShe sure does Dan. Just a pity you are too busy rimming fellow nay-sayers to notice.
DeleteBigfeet denial is hungry work Daniel!
MMG
Its cool MMG's ole lady likes woman on woman ^
DeleteI didn't realize the evidence for Bigfoot was this compelling.
ReplyDeleteScientists sequence oldest human DNA from fossilised leg bone found in Spain
ReplyDelete"European was more closely related to a much earlier species of human living in Siberia about 700,000 years ago than to the later Neanderthals of Europe"
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/scientists-sequence-oldest-human-dna-from-fossilised-leg-bone-found-in-spain-8983416.html
ZZZZZZZZZZZ
DeleteJoey's got a fossilized boner.
DeleteWhat's your point joe?
DeleteScience.
DeleteSpain.
Schooled.
Yawn
DeleteHa ha ha!
DeleteMy point is it's interesting... The understanding of the origins of early humans is changing all the time it seems. Who knows what secrets will be unlocked before long.
; )
Sometimes monkey who teaches humans how to crush leaves gets them menstrual cramps real hard after reading PJ's Copy Pastes.
DeleteLearn summin.
DeletePJ is a Welsh Energizer Bunny....takes a lickin and keeps on tickin...and copying...and pasting...and dreaming...and getting angry and ultimately, getting nothing and liking it
DeleteYou want a copy and paste? Here we go...
Delete"Charleston Gazette, June 15, 1930
Salem Professor Discovers Huge Skeletons in Mounds
Dr. Sutton Believes Tribe of Giants Once Inhabited Doddridge County Section; Data on Exploration Will Go to Smithsonian Institution.
SALEM, June 14-Excavation of two mounds near Morganville, in Doddridge county, about 11 miles west of here revealed what Prof. Ernest Sutton, head of the history department of Salem college, believes is valuable evidence of a race of giants who inhabited this section of West Virginia more than 1,000 years ago.
Professor Sutton revealed tonight that he had been excavating the two mounds for the past several months. Skeletons of four mound builders indicating they were from seven to nine feet tall have been uncovered. Professor Sutton believes they were memebers of a race known in anthropology as Siouan Indians.
The best preserved skeleton was found enclosed in a casting of clay. All the vertabrae and other bones excepting the skull were intact. Careful measurement of this specimen indicated it was a man seven and a half feet tall."
To give someone a 'licking' would be to have regular sources to back up claims... Would it not?
DeleteSchooled.
I have many regular sources/ on this website that would agree that you more times than less, are a complete douchebag. Are these the kinds of back up claims in which you seek? Get real pissed about it and maybe you can get yourself banned from a Bigfoot site "Twice" in 6 months. Wouldn't that be something?
DeletePeace...and Schooled and Haa Haaaa Haaa and all that other bullshit
Notice you don't debate the subject matter and attack me, and you wanna talk of others being pissed?
DeleteSchooled old boy... Schooled.
There is no debate to be had.
Deletespamming asshole no one wants you here
DeleteYou're talking to PJ, right?
DeleteNo debate?
DeleteYou're trolling a Bigfoot blog, I would think there's plenty to debate. It's trolls and cynics that don't want me here... I'm on a Bigfoot blog and I think you'll find my comments highly relevant.
Spamming assholes are equally as credible as anyone else in the Bigfoot Community.
DeleteHey Joe, a serious comment. From your words:
DeleteMy point is it's interesting... The understanding of the origins of early humans is changing all the time it seems. Who knows what secrets will be unlocked before long."
The thing is, a news given by a journal is not equal to have this news as a new scientific approved fact. Many times is just blabla that no one will ever talk anymore about or that will be contradicted by a new piece in the same journal some months later. Just look at all the garbage the TV news channels give us.
Again, to me it seems that you lack the proceeding of scientific approval.
Remember: everyone can make claims of new discoveries, few can prove those claims and make them accepted.
I use references to prove my points and that means you are left trying other angles as opposed to debating those sources.
DeleteDeal with it... Don't cry about itz
I was trying to have a civil conversation making a legitimate question, but it seems you are not able of doing it. Instead, you use your usual sarcastic and empty tone.
DeleteAnd only that proves your weakness and the weakness of your arguments
Look at the time of your comment and look at mine... It appears you are a little too quick to jump on a hate campaign as opposed to looking at who I was obviously talking to, I haven't even read your comment yet... I will do and respond accordingly.
DeleteMe...
Delete"My point is it's interesting... The understanding of the origins of early humans is changing all the time it seems. Who knows what secrets will be unlocked before long."
You...
"Many times is just blabla that no one will ever talk anymore about or that will be contradicted by a new piece in the same journal some months later."
... It appears we agree on some level, but what I keep hearing from you is that you know better than me the 'scientific method', yet don't seem to grasp the point I was making? If the process of re-evaluating science is so important to modern thinking, then why do you discard it as mere 'blaba'?
Hmmmmm... It seems to me you are a little preoccupied with shooting me down and contradict the very nature of science in the process. If you don't find the piece I referenced at least interesting, then I don't think you should be lecturing anyone on scientific related issues.
There is no point in trying to have a civil conversation with Joe unless you agree with everything he says.
DeleteJoe I'm on my way to take a Ph.D in geology so I do think to know fairly well the "scientific method".
DeleteMy point is that, as far as I learnt, the world is full of people making an observation A and coming directly to a conclusion B. Especially if this conclusion is something "big", they do all they can to spread their work as much as possible even if they do not have the absolute proof of what they're saying. But if in fact their conclusion is proved real, then they can shout to the world that they were the first to make the discovery and they deserve fame and glory (politics also plays a big role in this). But if their conclusion comes up empty, nobody cares because it was only a news given by a TG or by a journal.
But serious research is not about making "I observe A, then this implies B", but is about making A, B, C, ..., Z observations, understanding how they work singly and then in conjunction (modelization), make an assumption, make undeniable checks of the assumptions and finally come up with an undeniable result and take conclusions.
Otherwise is just nonsense, and it is equal to say that if I use to eat chicken every day and I get cancer, than eating chicken makes you get cancer. You have to go a bit farther than that to prove something
And I'm not refering to the latest article you posted, I didn't even read that, but in general (you post a lot of links)
DeleteGood post, 11:20.
DeleteIt will fall on dead ears among its intended target but a strong post nonetheless.
Almost as strong as Nonarchaic Hominin's haircut.
I enjoyed reading your post but I don't see how it makes scientists sequencing the oldest human DNA from fossilised leg bone found in Spain any less interesting? Are you suggesting that your opinion is more important or something??
DeleteAlso... If you are referring to the manner in which various observations should lead to proper conclusions when applied to this subject, then as I have said before... You need a fair playing field for your scientific methods to be applied correctly. If various scientific research steps were to follow, then why is denialism being at the forefront of your scientific idealism? True skepticism is self correcting and should look at the situation impartially.
Good luck with you geology PHD though yeah?
Oh and Danny Boy, I'm curious to see how this gentleman's poetry applies to your old theories of hominids that you claim to one minute prop up your counter arguments, that then end up contradicting yourself by saying modern theories like Nature Journal are sure to be proven wrong?
Hmmmmm, very intersting indeed...
Scientists from the University of Oxford and Plymouth University, both in UK, have found evidence of Neanderthal and Denisovan viruses in DNA of modern humans.
Delete"In 2012, researchers from Albert Einstein College of Medicine identified remnants of 14 ancient viruses in the genome sequences of Neanderthal and Denisovan fossils, dating back about 40,000 years ago. But they failed to find remnants of these viruses, belonging to the HML2 retrovirus family, in the human reference genome sequence.
In a new study, Oxford University researcher Dr Gkikas Magiorkinis with colleagues compared Neanderthal and Denisovan data to genetic data from modern-day cancer patients and managed to identify remnants of one Neanderthal and seven Denisovan viruses.
The discovery will enable scientists to investigate possible links between HML2 retroviruses and modern diseases including HIV and cancer.
“How HIV patients respond to HML2 is related to how fast a patient will progress to AIDS, so there is clearly a connection there,” said Dr Magiorkinis, who is a co-author of the paper published in the journal Current Biology.
“HIV patients are also at much higher risk of developing cancer, for reasons that are poorly-understood. It is possible that some of the risk factors are genetic, and may be shared with HML2. They also become reactivated in cancer and HIV infection, so might prove useful as a therapy target in the future.”
The team is now investigating whether the ancient viruses affect a person’s risk of developing diseases such as cancer.
Combining evolutionary theory and population genetics with cutting-edge genetic sequencing technology, the scientists will test if these viruses are still active or cause disease in modern humans."
... I found this highly fascinating too... Anybody else want to overlook that in an attempt to just disagree with me?
Delete(Sigh)
I love the way modern scientific theories that you people would normally use to bat your corner are suddenly disagreeable because the Footer who schools you posts them.
Quite hilarious actually.
"Both in UK" Thanks for that.
DeleteMissing the point. The point is that you have to wait that something is properly proved before claiming it as absolutely real. History has shown that what were apparently great discoveries were then found to be great mistakes.
DeleteBut I see that you keep your sarcastic tone (for real now), so yeah, that only makes your position clearer for everyone, sir.
Bye
Missing the point and easily offended. The point is that after ten thousand years science has not investigated this subject.
DeleteMissing the point further in an effort to just disagree with me too much... It appears you in fact agree with me as your comment would articulate rather well my feelings about human evolutionary biology (that I don't claim to know an awful lot about).
You are very welcome around here and would much rather converse with someone like yourself as opposed to the numpty's who moan about spamming. Apologies if I came across rude.
(sigh)
Delete"Quite hilarious actually"
"I love the way modern scientific theories that you people would normally use to bat your corner are suddenly disagreeable because the Footer who schools you posts them."
"Good luck with you geology PHD though yeah?"
It's not the way to talk science. It's more of a man that tries desperetly to defend himself, recognizing he has enough knowledge to support his gorgeous claims.
"The point is that after ten thousand years science has not investigated this subject."
Bad luck for you, my Ph.D is in paleontology. And no, science has widely tried to investigate the subject of human evolution, the uncertainty that reigns is because of the shortage of hominid fossils, thus a complete modelization (do you remember when I was saying "A, B, C," etc.?) of the entire human evolution phenomenon is still not possible, but subject to hypotesis and corrections. That doesn't mean we do not have a good idea of what happened, just that there are a good amount of aspects yet to be filled.
Anyway, I do not have the intention to discuss with a guy that, at the first time being challenged, gets so rude. Childish.
Bye
* he has not enough..."
DeleteNice try anon 1.00, but you know how stupid and ignorant people behave... when they realize they're too stupid and ignorant to talk with someone that has a knowledge of the matter, they get angry and rude for self-defense, typical.
DeleteJoe being incredibly schooled
"You're very welcome around here"
DeleteNow Joe thinks he's the boss of BE and decides who is welcome and who's not!
Oh dear... I tried being polite, and it appears your agenda to be as offended as possible, probably due to an earlier exchange, is dictating your tone.
DeleteI think you are slightly confused sir, I am referring to the subject of Bigfoot when I say that for ten thousand years it still has not investigated... I thought that with all your glamorous qualifications you would at least be able to read between the lines of a comment?
I have no doubt that science has investigated the origins of hominids, I would have to be a complete fool to suggest otherwise. I will maintain that I very much enjoyed your comments, I am clearly conversing with an talented person and you are welcome to initaite a chat with me whenever you like, there is probably a lot I could learn from you. Hopefully that happens on better terms next time sir.
1:07...
DeleteSays the guy who claims I should leave this blog daily. He IS welcome around here, it has nothing to do with my opinion, I'm sure there are loads that would agree with me that they would rather read his posts as opposed to yours.
Hee heeee.....you said "Loads"
DeleteI saw this with an endearing heart, PJ, no one wants to argue (or debate) you because it's like arguing with a brick wall. Nothing good comes of it, not the speaker nor the spectator nor the wall.
DeleteIf you wish to furiously debate and still have an open means towards 'schooling' skeptics and such, I please recommend taking your name and catalogue to http://www.bigfootforums.com
Before you lose your marbles and proclaim this blog as yours and not free reign of those who spread lies, I'm not saying leave this blog, I'm saying you can have all the super serial indepth Squatch discussions there while utilizing this place as a light hearted jaunt from te super serial discussions.
Turtlehole
DeleteWe've never seen so many tards.
DeleteIt's literally a tard-fest.
I've not seen so many brainwashed individuals since David Koresh took his extended 'family' to the movies.
MMG
I'll be back with some special pastes for you tomorrow old Danny Boy!
DeleteSpam away. I don't read them and it will only be a short while until you get yourself banned.
DeleteI just don't like needing to scroll past all your drivel to get to the gems.
Ok, I couldn't resist this last cut and paste...
Deletespam
spam/
verb
gerund or present participle: spamming
1.
send the same message indiscriminately to (a large numbers of Internet users).
reference
ˈrɛf(ə)r(ə)ns/
noun
noun: reference; plural noun: references
1.
the action of mentioning or alluding to something.
"he made reference to the enormous power of the mass media"
synonyms: mention of, allusion to, comment on, remark about; More
a mention or citation of a source of information in a book or article.
"each chapter should have references to books covering the subject in greater depth"
a source of information cited in a book or article.
synonyms: source, information source, citation, authority, credit; More
2.
the use of a source of information in order to ascertain something.
"popular works of reference"
the sending of a matter to an authority for decision or consideration.
"the publishers reprinted and sold the work without reference to the author"
synonyms: referral, transfer, passing on, handover, direction, remission More
3.
a letter from a previous employer testifying to someone's ability or reliability, used when applying for a new job.
"I was dismissed from the library, but with a good reference"
synonyms: testimonial, character reference, recommendation, good word, backing; More
verb
verb: reference; 3rd person present: references; past tense: referenced; past participle: referenced; gerund or present participle: referencing
1.
provide (a book or article) with citations of sources of information.
"each chapter is referenced, citing literature up to 1990"
2.
mention or refer to.
"the media referenced our association in almost 40 articles"
schooling
ˈskuːlɪŋ/
noun
1.
education received at school.
"his parents paid for his schooling"
synonyms: education, teaching, tuition, instruction, tutoring, tutelage, pedagogy, andragogy; More
2.
RIDING
the training of a horse on the flat or over fences.
"schooling fences"
synonyms: training, coaching, instruction, drill, drilling, discipline, disciplining; More
The only one that will get banned around HERE is that SICK FREAK ! who likes to piss on other folks interests! MIKE BROOKERSON!!
Delete^ Don't be so hard on yourself Mike.
DeleteHow is the cold/toothache/leprosy?
MMG
Daniel campbell,,,Is it true you were on a monsterquest show ?
DeleteDear 3:16. Just scrolled through before bed. I can see how I may have metaphorically urinated on your dreams. Is you are the big girl I think you are. Taking the last cream horn and ginger bread cookies while you salivated was truly wrong and I apologize. Since I have never, to my knowledge interfered with the dreams of any others on this blog if you are a guy you must long to be a big girl who can enjoy the cream horn and ginger cookies for yourself. Either way let me know your real name and address by posting it here and I'll see you get what you deserve. Happy Holidays. M
DeleteThe only sarcasm you get!! (understand) ,is the stupid shit that comes of your own mouth,,its so funny how much i have to dumb it down so you can get it!!! P.S ,, we are all waiting for 30 hrs of Hdef footage of bigfoot's doing all sorts of CRAZY STUFF" as you,, say, give me your ph # and I will be happy to give you my address , BIG DORIS ,
DeleteI'm getting Eva the Edible Anus Chocolates from dudeIwantthat.com
ReplyDeleteEdible Anus Chocolates are the most credible voices in the Bigfoot Community
DeleteI've just checked and to my surprise they really do make those xx
DeleteTaterhole treats...if you will.
DeleteTaterhole treats.
DeleteWho would have thunk it?
Remarkable...
MMG
I thunk it and you will like it.
DeleteCampz schooled by Fritz yet again.
DeleteDoes the schooling never end?
I want to say I appreciate Joe. Sometimes I get kind of down, and then I think " cheer up dude, at least you're not Joe Fitzgerald " does the trick every time!
ReplyDelete#1 I Think its a good thing you appreciate Joe F, . However my friend you will NEVER have to worry about being Joe F ,, The reason is quit simple stupid ,,, YOUR A DIPSHIT !!!
Delete^ careful you might get banned BIG DORIS. ^
DeleteSome guys just like to be contrary.
ReplyDelete