M.K. Davis Interviews a Bigfoot Witness (With Voice Obscured)


Over the years, Bigfoot researcher M.K. Davis has interviewed a lot of witnesses. We've seen many videos from Davis, but is a little different and it's a welcome change from videos of white Bigfoots causing havoc around a property. The entire witness interview is being uploaded to YouTube, and this is part 1: "A family living in the deep south have a series of three encounters with Bigfoot. Follow along as the events are relived through an interview process. The events seem to come alive as the witness describes what they saw and how it affected them personally. The identities have been obscured to protect their privacy."



Comments

  1. FIRST, SUCKAS!!!!!!!



    ALL CAPS

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Joe has something to research now

      http://bigfootresearchuk.com/category/bigfootresearchuk/uk-bigfoot-sightings

      Delete
  2. Fantastic stuff MK!! Keep up the good work bro!!

    Peace.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Attention John Jones. This is mission control. ABORT the mission and return home. A fine upstanding Englishman named Sykes has determined no bigfoot exists.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well... As long as there are dermals, a transcribed language, unknown primate DNA (There have been plenty of hair samples that have come back unmatched to anything else. The Skookum cast hair samples, the Pangboche Yeti hand tissue samples came back “near human, but not human,” in other words, “almost human” in 1991), undebunkable footage, tens of thousands of eyewitnesses, 100 years of printed news media of skeletal remains...

      I think I'll just thank Sykes for his efforts and carry on just fine.

      Peace.

      Delete
    2. Furthermore... Let's just say that Sykes was to have some results that could be interpreted as being possible evidnece for Bigfoot being a real creature... Would you still be taking his word as gospel?

      I would very much like an answer to this.

      Peace.

      Delete
    3. Joe hows that plate of smoked crow working out for you?

      Delete
    4. It's in the freezer for the end of Sykes' long term study... Better watch out recipe doesn't land in your lap.

      Peace.

      Delete
    5. ^ lollers at the pwned, bitter footer.

      Delete
    6. Good grief Joe, give it up man. This is just embarrassing.

      Delete
    7. Go and do something else then bro... You 'proved Bigfoot is fake', go and visit some ghost blog or something.

      Delete
    8. Ghosts blog? Pity bigfoot didn't, as then it would be easier to find him.

      Delete
    9. Take a look at Patty and Leaping Yeti and get scared of the woods numpty.

      Delete
  4. There are no bigfoots living south of the north pole. I hope this helps you narrow down you're seach.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Patty and Leaping Russian Yeti...

      Glad I could help.

      Peace.

      Delete
    2. There no trees or forests in America anymore. It's been all developed. One giant concrete parking lot with homes, Malls factories. there is no place left for these creatures to roam!

      Delete
  5. Wood knocks. Tree howls. Dermal ridges. Anal fissures.

    Schooled!

    Jofe

    ReplyDelete
  6. The so called witnesses are all either mistaken, lying , or deluded. Or any combination of the above.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For anon, 4;25: You are mistaken,are lying and very deluded this is not a child porn site STUPID!

      Delete
  7. Joe fits u were asking about the bfs before its Canada guy and and the whole reason we have to stay 600 to 800 yards away like I was saying before is cause they will turn u around and send u back home without charging u if u now what I'm talking about if your to close with a gun you never find them and u wont now why your going home till later that day or the next ! Have a good day

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You never find them because they don't exist

      Delete
  8. Joe fits u were asking about the bfs before its Canada guy and and the whole reason we have to stay 600 to 800 yards away like I was saying before is cause they will turn u around and send u back home without charging u if u now what I'm talking about if your to close with a gun you never find them and u wont now why your going home till later that day or the next ! Have a good day

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for that. Did you manage to see the question I posted you? Have you killed other animals in that area before??

      Peace.

      Delete
    2. Joe Fitz this area is 100 miles we're we hunt is seperated from them but they do hang out near some of the cut lines mostly near large thick forested hills or mountains were they can watch but not be seen unless we're sitting a mile away with a spotting scope watching them watching one of r guys as a decoy. Have a good day joe

      Delete
    3. Joe u can be walking in certain areas and u now that there right there beside u and u can't see them but if they want the bf will make a sound and it sends chills but that's all u will get in that situation it's still fun there more or less playing with u as long as u now how to react! Ttl

      Delete
    4. Wow!

      Thanks TTL. In really need to speak to you bro, but brilliant. Thank you for your posts, very much appreciated.

      Peace.

      Delete
  9. Who the hell are they to tell someone what they did & didn't see? They claim we should go out and find them evidence of a 'monkey', then condemn the people who have come back with information. It's the cheapest trick in the book to claim that people who go and to look for this creature, who turn out successful, are then just hoaxers or seeing things. It can just as easily be said that skeptics are simply scared of the truth... why else would they deny something so desperately without any facts except their version of what happened? Anyone can see what their problem is; they are simply scared and expressing themselves like this are the best means of bypassing waiting for that reassurance from someone else and getting a little bit of that on their own accord that they require so badly to explain the unknown. We require closure as a human race, even if it means denying something is there when the answers are that little bit more difficult to attain. These people regularly avoid explaining any of the sources of evidence enthusiasts provide and resort to bullying and claiming people are being made fools of; they are the fools, thinking that for the last ten thousand years people have been part of some secret society dressing in gorilla suits (when these cultures had no idea what monkeys or gorilla's looked like) and jumped out at people and said boo... Ha! I can easily claim they are nuts... Why else would these people prioritize their time in such a way with such claims? Nuts with fear and hell bent on censorship.

    How easy is it for you to label eye witnesses as mentally ill? Explain multiple person sightings? Footers are liars? I have friends that have seen Bigfoot square on for a number of minutes, am I to take your anonymous opinion over theirs? You are simply as believable as the people who claim to have sightings, less in fact.

    Who has the bigger claim to mental illness? A group of people who consist of wildlife biologists, costume experts, forensic experts, forensic artists, forestry officers, doctors, lawyers, police officers, teachers, psychologists, historians...

    ... or the people trying to deny those sources with nothing except mental illness claims?

    Hhhhhmmmmmmmmm... tough one that.

    Schooled.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Watch the last episode of bigfoot files.

      Sykes proves bigfoot doesn't exist.

      Schooled.

      Delete
    2. Let's just say that in Sykes' long term study, he was to have some results that could be interpreted as being possible evidnece for Bigfoot being a real creature... Would you still be taking his word as gospel?

      I would very much like an answer to this.

      Peace.

      Delete
    3. 'could be interpreted as being possible'

      Possible, but increasingly improbable with each breath.

      Let it go, efore it destroys you. It's not worth it.

      Delete
    4. You didn't as need the question though did you? If Sykes was to drop a bomb on your perfect little world... Would you still find him credible??

      Delete
  10. Mere thoughts pass as legit evidence for bigfoot believers. They believe any story made up. They are stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  11. We see um forest brothers real good when we drink um fire water.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This guy looks pretty blurry....pretty sure M.K. is interviewing a Sasquatch here, guys. I can't prove that it's not, so therefore it is.

    He should have shaved off a little chunk of his buttcheek for DNA testing. It could go in the "human" results pile right next to the yotes, porcupines, and bears.

    ReplyDelete
  13. So if ketchum got bigfoot from justins sample and sykes got bear we can conclude that ketchums study is nonsense.

    100% no monkey anywhere ever.

    Ole toasty joe

    ReplyDelete
  14. TO TED CAMPBELL,PLEASE INVITE MIKE BROOKRESON BACK ON THIS SITE HE HAS BEEN A GOOD BOY AND DESERVES ANOTHER CHANCE....PS,SHAWN PLEASE MORE BIGFOOT AND LESS BS.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, invite Mike back to the forum. He is a worthy opponent. Pretty much he kept his end of the bargain so he is more trustworthy than the scotsman

      Delete
    2. Is that you mike turning on joe. We knew you would come back as anon.

      Delete
  15. Meldrums Phd. should be revoked. There is no mid tarsel break. No magic monkey with a Long gut. And absolutely no chance in hell that they will ever get enough money for the falcon project. People are seeing and mis identifying bears.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a big difference between seeing a bear, and a giant man. More conclusive if two people see a hairy man at the same time. If a sample that was thought to have been from a Bigfoot turns out to be a bear, then that is simply the conclusion for the sample in hand, anything else is closure desperation and to compare the very small number of bear samples in comparison to the inumerable sightings and other evidence accumulation there is; renders those samples irrelavent... A shame, but irrelevant. The samples aren't even enough per State.

      Bigfoot research will go on regardless of samples that have been determined as bear, because Bigfoot is real. People will forever see these creatures because they are real, and people like me will always be plugging away on this blog, because Bigfoot is real. The people who have seen these creatures don't care about what Sykes thinks neither have they removed themselves from their respected research locations.

      A bear sample, a dog sample, a deer sample, are just that... You need to prove Bigfoot doesn't exist before you can back up your claims, cause those samples don't achieve that, not even in the slightest.

      Peace.

      Delete
  16. Don't invite Mike back. With him gone JF has no one to talk to but himself. It will cut the number of comments in half.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HEY IF YOU WERE AS ENTERESTING AS MIKE YOU WOULD TALK ABOUT YOURSELF ALL THE TIME TOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    2. Are you fucking kidding.He's as interesting as a blurry picture.Wooo, that's all the bigfoot community needs is another crack pot to look up to. Besides we got TImmie and that's plenty of coo-coo's.

      Delete
  17. Anyone want to guess the number of days (or hours) go by before Mikey slinks back in here? I'm going with three--by Friday I'm guessing.

    ReplyDelete
  18. COME ON HAVE A HEART ITS SO CLOSE TO THE HOLIDAYS!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Joe fitz I really think people would have to harvest one of these bfs that would be the only thing left to do I now it sounds bad but it would be so amazing if the world could see these creatures in there element and to get one it would have to be in a way almost a witch hunt, and it sounds terrible but it be way more interesting learning about these animals than anything else that's going on in the world !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If a dead Bigfoot was brought in, it would just be 'a deformed homeless person' and we would require another type specimen to back it up... You would then have every fun slinger in the wilderness trying to bag one.

      Who's to say that these creatures have not been brought in multiple times already? There are many accounts of this very thing happening and then the powers that be 'taking charge'. Stacy Brown had a video up on here not log ago with a guy that wanted his voice changed in telling his story.

      Peace.

      Delete
    2. Modern communication makes your scenario impossible. It would be around the globe before the MIB got their pants on.

      It's really not that difficult. Put it in the trunk and drive to your local news outlet. They;re on your side.

      Delete
    3. Has that been the case with UFO's?

      Peace.

      Delete
  20. Hello Joe,do you know what happened to the Minnesota iceman,that might have been good for Sykes to test xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not sure? To be honest, I thought it fake until I saw an interview with Mike Rugg (who I love to bits), now I'm undecided.

      You ok Eva?

      Trolls are out after Bigfoot Files, I'm prepared for some closure desperation though and here to haunt them.

      Peace.

      Delete
  21. I'm ok thanks Joe,i think your going to be busy for while,it might take a lot of haunting xx

    ReplyDelete
  22. Has MK exhausted his supply of grainy VHS videos?

    Love most of his work on the PGF, but the massacre theory and the Sells scandal has ruined his rep.

    MMG

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia