Breaking: Erickson Project "Matilda" To Be Shown on TV News For The First Time (Updated)


Big, big news everyone. "Matilda" the sleeping Bigfoot will be shown on TV for the first time ever. Local TV station WFAA, Channel 8 Dallas/Fort Worth will be broadcasting a still from the controversial Matilda footage. While many believe it to be a real Bigfoot, skeptics argue that it looks too much like a Wookie costume from Star Wars. The photographs have been circulating the internet for years, but this time it's being televised and finally hitting the mainstream.



Here's a still from the footage of an apparent Bigfoot/Sasquatch that News 8's Marcus Moore saw during a press conference today. What do you think? Is it a Sasquatch? A Wookie? A hoax? We need theories! Share with your friends and watch Marcus' story at 4 p.m.. We'll post the footage soon after.

(image: Adrian Erickson)



[Update] Watch the news broadcast video here: bigfootevidence.blogspot.com

Comments

  1. Timber giant had parabreakdown removed from youtube!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These hoaxers are just like Obama, "Every thing is OK, Just don't ask me ANY questions!

      Delete
    2. BIGFOOT EVIDENCE: MATT MONEYMAKER CONFIRMS MATILDA BIGFOOT FOOTAGE IS REAL, SAYS THERE’S TWO OF ‘EM

      Delete
    3. aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahBATSHIT!aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!

      Delete
    4. Think the only people who don't like Phill are the hoaxers and blobsquatchers

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. BIGFOOT EVIDENCE: MATT MONEYMAKER CONFIRMS MATILDA BIGFOOT FOOTAGE IS REAL, SAYS THERE’S TWO OF ‘EM

      Delete





    2. BIGFOOT EVIDENCE: MATT MONEYMAKER CONFIRMS MATILDA BIGFOOT FOOTAGE IS REAL, SAYS THERE’S TWO OF ‘EM






      Delete
    3. And nowhere for an owl to perch on

      Delete
  3. maybe they will show joe fitz's recreation as well... oh yes that's right he couldn't do it.

    therefore by joe's logic, because he could not replicate it, means matilda is the real deal.


    smoked.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You have been told many times.

      You cannot compare Matilda to Patty.

      It is your logic that is deeply flawed.

      Trolling the abyss again my friend...

      MMG

      Delete
    2. well actually you can, Mr know-it-all.

      its a bloke in a monkey suit... don't you see?

      clear as day

      and THEN theres a 2 second look at the people involved... LOL

      people are so gullible

      Delete
    3. ^^^#tooneytard approved 'clear as day'

      The gullible bloke in suit one.

      No suits visible in PGF, worn or otherwise, business or ape, armour or diving, jump or bunny.

      Delete
    4. Clear as day?

      You don't listen very well do you?

      If it's a simple suit then we would have been able to recreate one. We have the issue of the limb measurements and the toe/finger curls.

      Granted P&G were far from saints but this does not automatically make them hoaxers.

      The actual PGF footage speaks for itself. Even after all these years. This is why sceptics spend so much time trying to discredit Roger and Bob. There is little in the actual film to challenge.

      Not bad for two 'crooked clueless cowboys'....

      MMG

      Delete
    5. fuckign hell MMG I refuse to accept that there are people as dumb as you on this planet

      unbelievable

      just look at the fucking film its a bloke in a crappy monkey suit walking along an open sand bar

      jesus fucking christ get a grip

      Delete
    6. Convince me it's a 'its a bloke in a crappy monkey suit walking along an open sand bar'?

      With all due respect, but it appears it may be you that needs to 'get a grip'.

      I do envy your simplistic view on things. Life must be a breeze when you are incapable of digesting data and information in a rational way.

      MMG

      Delete
    7. convince you?

      people like you cant be convinced.

      you have made up your mind about a fantasy magic ape

      Delete
    8. ^^^2:46 so says deluded bewildered Fool School dropout whose mind can't be changed about a fantasy magic man in a magic monkey suit.

      That's what we call:

      #tooneytard approved

      And also, AMI (Actually Mentally Ill).

      Delete
    9. Patty is fat and gross. I want my bigfeets to be lean and muscular or look like wookies.

      I'll hang up now and listen to your reply.

      Delete
    10. Bloke-in-suit-obsessed commentator, jealous non-achiever vying for jealous under-achiever status, bleeves in fantasy men in fantasy magic monkey suits, continues to delude self re PGF, bleevs illusions imagined in PGF, dreams of one day becoming a real boy.

      Delete
    11. Clearly 2:34 doesn't believe his own tripe or he's mentally ill.

      Delete
  4. When is the bull shit finally going to end?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Apparently bigfoot lives in the blurry section of the forest. You would think that if your intent was to shoot video of bigfoot getting someone who knows how to use the camera would be a good idea. I wonder if this could be, oh I don't know, maybe a hoax? Imagine that, a bigfoot hoax, who'da thunk it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Someone hoaxed all over my taterhole.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Matt Moneymaker said Matilda is a real Bigfoot!

      Is Matt a cheap sell out ?

      Well soon see, if Matilda is not a real Bigfoot

      SCRATCH HIM OFF THE LIST OF TRUE RESEARCHERS


      Delete
    2. That doesn't help me find out who done hoaxed all over my taterhole.

      Delete
    3. That doesn't help me find out who done hoaxed all over my taterhole.

      Delete
  7. Matilda yo' momma. She also my wife. Yeeeah boyyyy!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Buckle up and buckle down,
    Spin your partner round and round,
    Where she stops, nobody knows,
    What is next do you suppose?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Funny how the Ketchum Krew does something like this every time there is rumor of the Sykes study coming out with something. "Look at ME. Look at ME. Don't look at the world-famous geneticist whose experience dwarfs mine. Look at ME."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I dont think the people criticising are Ketchumites, the people cheering on Sykes are the same who cheered on Ketchum before plus some others. I'd even say that everyone interested in Bigfoot is interested in what Sykes has to say except some people seem to be jumping to conclusions before it's published, again. Are there any Ketchumites left now anyhow?

      Delete
    2. Who needs Sykes, he's part of mainstream science and they're the ones actually covering this up. Ketchum cracked it which is why she's getting such a hard time, from the embedded media and press and covert operated blogs like this one. Unless the pwers that be have decided to let us know the species exists, Sykes won't reveal a damn thing instead he'll likely play ball with the academic establishement laws of secrecy.

      Delete
  10. I wish there was somebody who had shot a bigfoot and see one up close to tell us if the picture really looks like like a bigfoot. Uhmmmm.......

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ketchum is the most gullible, noobiest "scientist" I have ever come across. Who in their right minds would look at a video like this and pay millions to get the rights to it, so you can publish it along with a badly written paper about the bad science you did?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Someone who knew a group of easy marks to exploit when she saw them

      Delete
  12. So who has given WFAA this footage?

    From the WFAA Facebook page:

    Obama - 68 Comments

    Matilda - 232 Comments

    MMG

    ReplyDelete
  13. HUGE NEWS!!! coming out of Ontario guys !! stay tuned...Shawn knows

    ReplyDelete
  14. She did NOT pay millions of dollars for it. By her own admission to dozens of people, she has no money.

    ReplyDelete
  15. It ends here.

    It ends tonight.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I'm confused. It's only one still that is being shown? And where is it in this post? The quoted text refers to it...

    ReplyDelete
  17. Replies
    1. That's what you get for hoaxing all over my taterhole.

      Delete
    2. Ewwww yeah you definitely shouldn't be hoaxin all up in people's taterholes

      Delete
  18. LMAO: the station has filed the story under "Pets"

    http://www.wfaa.com/news/entertainment/pets/Bigfoot-is-real-research-teams-claim-226033481.html?c=n&fb=y&can=n

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Footage is meh. Wookie face doesn't change expression, they shouldn't have even shown that it's so bad for their case.

      Delete
    2. Correction: Pets & Animals. They have all animals under the same section. So hippos and lions and snakes and you name it will go under Pets & Animals.

      Nice try at disinformation there.

      Oopsie-fail.

      Delete
    3. The wookie footage was hoaxed by the original owners of what was to become Erickson's Kentucky habituation site years before he purchased the property and film..The sleeping Matilda was hoaxed by his team and "friends" after he bought the property. I'm pretty sure that is how this went down..
      As far as the pancake footage, that is rumored to have been shot by Moneymaker while the BFRO was investigating the homeowners claims but before erickson bought the property. He purchased that hoaxed footage as well..
      I think Erickson got screwed every which way but loose, and then walked away from the whole sordid business....

      Delete
    4. The thing is, it was Lucas who got the idea for Chewie from real squatches not the other way around, just like Hollywood got the idea of Greys from witness accounts not vice versa.

      Delete
  19. When this Video, get on main stream T.V. or cable, big foot believers will look like fucking stupid idiots! this will be the worst thing to happen to any serious researchers!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is just a valid a the PGF film. You can not prove it is a hoax or a real bigfoot. Just like Patty.

      Delete
  20. good god I thought this was an open and closed case for matida being a wookie. i guess its time to cycling the old material until the next big hoax.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Show me the wookie suit--then say it's done--
    The nose is wrong
    The slant to the upper lip is at a different angle
    The hair doesn't match- winter coat vs long hair
    The color is wrong
    The teeth don't match--

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anybody really seen one and want to back that photo up?John Jones?Anyone?

    ReplyDelete
  23. what a coincident that the wookie and matilda have some of the same features and dimensions. black nose, curvacure of jaw .. it is just to similiar with the only difference of how they colored / painted it black. looks like a dye job gone back. ricks got the real deal and it don't look nothing like this.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Bill Munn's the Supreme FX artist has decided this is NOTHING more than a Wookie Mask that has been reworked.

    What say you bleebers?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Again. It was Lucas who got the idea for Chewie from real squatches not the other way around, just like Hollywood got the idea of Greys from witness accounts not vice versa.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?