Baby Bigfoot Sighting In Spokane Washington?

By -

This baby Bigfoot video is one of the most ridiculous videos we've seen in a while. There's no reason for the footage to be black-and-white unless it was filmed in the 1940s. This "Bigfoot infant" was allegedly filmed on October 5th 2013:



Comments

  1. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 7:03:00 PM PDT

    Firsty first first!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 7:04:00 PM PDT

    No Way!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 7:04:00 PM PDT

    YGNALI

    ReplyDelete
  4. WolfSunday, October 6, 2013 at 7:05:00 PM PDT

    FIRST!
    Wolf

    ReplyDelete
  5. WolfSunday, October 6, 2013 at 7:07:00 PM PDT

    Damn, slow DSL!
    Wolf

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 7:07:00 PM PDT

    Man, with Academy Award winning video like this, the proof just keeps getting better and better. Probably CGI....either way, it's a Turd. Next.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 10:03:00 PM PDT

      Is this from the Erickson Project?

      Delete
    2. AnonymousMonday, October 7, 2013 at 10:52:00 AM PDT

      Yes, it is an image of Matildas firstborn squatchling learning to walk. Enjoy.

      Delete
  7. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 7:24:00 PM PDT

    oh yes. Thalidomide baby bigfoot. So sad.

    ReplyDelete
  8. UnknownSunday, October 6, 2013 at 7:35:00 PM PDT

    Why are these obvious hoaxes being posted? Time to end giving any attention or notoriety to these pathetic attention seeking simpletons.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 7:40:00 PM PDT

      ^top nothing.

      Delete
    2. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 7:42:00 PM PDT

      Who do you think you are?

      Joe Fitzgerald?

      Delete
    3. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 7:51:00 PM PDT

      So much nothing in the Sasquatch world today...takes everything you got.,,,

      Cheers

      Delete
    4. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 7:57:00 PM PDT

      If they only posted legitimate "proof" videos of Sasquatch, there would be no BFE blog. Now, take your nothing and like it.

      Delete
    5. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 8:39:00 PM PDT

      #Tooneytard approved^

      Officially.

      Keep on tardin'.

      We're pulling for you little champ.

      Delete
    6. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 10:06:00 PM PDT

      What the h@!! are you talking about, obvious hoaxes? This is not an obvious hoax. You can clearly see muscle tone and definition. Skeptard jackass.

      Delete
    7. muirMonday, October 7, 2013 at 12:05:00 AM PDT

      PGF 2 Electric Boogaloo!!

      Delete
  9. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 8:11:00 PM PDT

    HOAX!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 8:41:00 PM PDT

    The little one seems more fairy-like, but what about the two behind the log? The one which ducks down has a huge brow ridge. Why is this shot in negative format?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 9:15:00 PM PDT

      So it can receive plenty of negative comments duh

      Delete
  11. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 8:43:00 PM PDT

    Thats it, I'm convinced!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousMonday, October 7, 2013 at 12:07:00 AM PDT

      With evidence like this how can SCIENCE possibly deny the big guy now?

      Delete
  12. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 8:55:00 PM PDT

    This is the real deal folks!

    ReplyDelete
  13. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 9:00:00 PM PDT

    This just goes to show.
    Never, Ever, Ever
    get between nothing and it's mother.
    It's a divide by zero for you my friend.

    ReplyDelete
  14. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 9:08:00 PM PDT

    Don't worry lowly footards Joe and his pedestal club will be here to discuss this and not include you LOLZ

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 9:13:00 PM PDT

      An ensemble of silly personas. Enough to make Dr M Johnson run for the woods in search of a fantastical creature.

      Delete
    2. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 9:18:00 PM PDT

      But he would have to get of his own pedestal to do that

      Delete
  15. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 9:50:00 PM PDT

    This is the best footage since the Patterson film.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 10:02:00 PM PDT

      Yup. There is no way that these dumb yokels could have made such a complicated and convincing costume. This is the real deal.

      Delete
  16. TravisSunday, October 6, 2013 at 10:24:00 PM PDT

    Great false squatch, congrats!

    ReplyDelete
  17. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 10:44:00 PM PDT

    Hey, it reminds me of that rubber-band guy Fred from Captain Kangaroo:
    http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k64/AprilFox58/CaptainMrGreenJeansFred.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  18. AnonymousSunday, October 6, 2013 at 11:27:00 PM PDT

    A portion of the article reads, "This baby Bigfoot video is one of the most ridiculous videos we've seen in a while."

    What bigfoot video have we seen that isn't ridiculous?

    ReplyDelete
  19. AnonymousMonday, October 7, 2013 at 12:57:00 AM PDT

    Such a shame he was down to his last megabyte of camera storage and could only film it for 3 seconds.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Fozzie Monday, October 7, 2013 at 6:15:00 AM PDT

    THAT'S A SQUATCH!

    ReplyDelete
  21. AnonymousMonday, October 7, 2013 at 6:58:00 AM PDT

    Reminds me of that little wiggly monkey thing from the Outer Limits:

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/__P1bz4ZkkRA/TR7Tle9gapI/AAAAAAAACHM/958_0Ea7i34/s1600/screen-capture-4.png

    ReplyDelete
  22. AnonymousMonday, October 7, 2013 at 7:47:00 AM PDT

    THERE BE SQUATCHES ON THEM THERE HILLS!

    ReplyDelete
  23. AnonymousMonday, October 7, 2013 at 11:04:00 AM PDT

    puppet hangin from a string,, come on now...

    ReplyDelete
  24. AnonymousFriday, November 29, 2013 at 3:26:00 PM PST

    Looks like a feckin` teddy bear.

    ReplyDelete
  25. AnonymousWednesday, December 4, 2013 at 6:13:00 AM PST

    thats why bigfoot is so hard to film. its not 8foot tall its 8"

    makes sense

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

By -
Image
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure. 
Read more

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

By -
Image
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Read more

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

By -
Image
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Read more