The Chronicles of Bigfoot


Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Damian Bravo, a researcher of the unexplained. Check out this teaser for his new podcast, Fantastical Universe The Podcast.

The forest of North America is a vast environment filled with critters of all types and sizes, with the majority of scientist agreeing all species of animals found on the North American continent are already documented and cataloged. Yet the thousands of strange reports and sightings of a possible bipedal creature half man half primate are giving life to a legend waiting to possibly become a scientific fact. Is Sasquatch a relic which existed prior to Homo sapiens arriving in North America?


If the theory of the Bering Land Bridge were early man crossed from the Eastern Asian continent to Western North America is even remotely correct, did Sasquatch migrate as some theorize -- like early humans? Or did our ancestors encroach into a world already populated by the supposed Sasquatch species? Could our early ancestor be responsible just like some scientist theorize Homo sapiens were the cause of the downfall of Neanderthal man, did they also cause the Sasquatch species to dwindle trough out the thousands of years of human development?

The first Nation tribes of North America have passed down stories of the existence of such a creature, at times with supernatural powers giving Sasquatch the ability to travel supposedly from one dimension to another. The first aboriginal people arrived in North America around 10,000 years ago and evidence of their early existence has been depicted in sculptures, carvings, wall paintings and petroglyphs.


One important factor in the connection of Sasquatch with the early ancestors of the First Nation tribes is the depiction of the creature in their folklore, art and sculptures. In one of the many Native American stories on the possible existence of Sasquatch it explains the creatures were already in North America long before the first nation tribes early ancestors arrived. No known reference or evidence exist to confirm the supposed Sasquatch species came across the Bering Land Bridge as some scientist believe humans also did.

Other scientist have theorized that at some point in about the last 100,000 years the oceans could have also been low enough to allow different types of species including our early ancestor to migrate from one continent to another and not just an ice bridge was the contributor to early species migrations in the last ice age.


Some are still holding on to the Giganto primate theory, yet the gap between the demise of Giganto which places the species disappearance at about 300 thousand years ago, does not give a good chance of the species evolving into the Sasquatch creatures we here sightings and reports of today. Yet nature has proven that some species can evolve and mutate to adapt to their environments. Giganto would had to adapt to the North American forest which by the evidence we see today has not had any primate species develop on its own except for the last 80 years, a hardy population of Rhesus monkeys has been flourishing in Florida’s Everglades. Sure makes you wonder if the Rhesus monkeys have survived for so long why could not a Sasquatch like primate species do the same.

In the end, the quest for answers on why so many people are reporting sightings of a bipedal primate so dubbed Sasquatch still continues. Could it be the thousands of people that have seen the elusive creature are just seeing things or something is really out there? Come to think of it, the forest of North America covers about 70% of the continent and surprisingly theirs still forested areas of North America that have not been explored by man.

So get your hiking boots on, Sasquatch evidence collection kits, video and digital cameras and see if you could find some amazing evidence on the elusive creature known as Sasquatch.

Comments

  1. You've got your dates a bit wrong there, think you possibly got 10,000 and 100,000 years mixed up a little? We'll call it a typo lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a lot of bad grammar and typos posted by BFE...

      Delete
    2. You are correct, many times we miss corrections due to the limited time Shawn and many of the other contributors give to this blog. Sometimes our readers do not realize we do not work on the BF subject 24/7 becuase we have personal lives beyond this blog. Sorry for the bad grammar and typo's from the past and the ones we will make in the near future.

      Delete
    3. Not 24/7? Let's look at the subtitle of this blog:

      "World's Only 24/7 Bigfoot News Blog".

      False advertising, or D8's comment in error?

      That's a slip into near-skeptardary.

      Delete
    4. Don't worry about a few little mistakes-we know what you meant...Welcome back and good luck with the new show...

      Delete
    5. ^ Ro Sahebi. Bragging how he exploits bigfoot (Smeja + Cutino) to get his foot in the door of (failed) film-making.

      Delete
    6. ACHTUNG!
      I'll be watching you.

      Delete
    7. Not Ro 5:48, just an anonymous Evidence fan..I appreciate the people that bring us bigfoot related content...

      Delete
  2. You are correct it is a typo which will be corrected as soon as possible, thank you for taking the time to read my article.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's ok, nice to see a new podcast coming up too

      Delete
    2. Thanks and the new Podcast will be epic ;)

      Delete
    3. Nice article DB. Will check out the podcast when it's available.

      Keep up the good work.

      MMG

      Delete
    4. WELCOME BACK DAMIAN!!!!!

      I was watching some of your videos recently and was wondering where the hell you were.

      Delete
    5. Lol my little brothers initials are D.B. and his name is Damian as well

      Delete
  3. " with the majority of scientist agreeing all species of animals found on the North American continent are already documented and cataloged"

    Yeah no, the majority of scientists don't agree to that at all because the majority of scientists are well aware that new animal species are being found on the NA continent all the time. A new species of butterfly was discovered in Texas earlier this year, a new type of desert shrew was discovered in Arizona in 2004, a new deer mouse was described in Mexico also in 2004, up to 1000 new species of gastropod described every year and a bunch of them are from continental NA, there's new bugs being found all the time (the number of known NA Acomoptera jumped significantly in the last few years, to give an example), etc etc..

    Did your "the majority of scientists agree" factoid have a source or did you just pull it out of thin air?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ummm...what do all these discovered beasts have in common? They are small, easy to overlook. I think if you asked any biologist if there were any large mammals yet to be discovered in NA, the response would be...no.

      Delete
    2. Excluding arthropods, especially insects, I'd be surprised if a new genus of anything else has been discovered in North America in the last 25 years or so....All the examples I think are new species of established genus...

      Delete
    3. Damian doesn't get it, Meldrum pretends he doesn't get it either and it's the same with all the skeptards here. This species would be cataloged already if this were allowed to happen, it's not so the public is still kept in the dark on the origins. Ketchum found it and the authority machine went in full swing laying in wait all along for just that. Why you ask because there's obviously more to this species than meets the eye, it's not some big dumb hairy ape it's some being a lot more human than we can presently be told apparently. I doub't Sykes will either he was probably handed some phony or contaminated stuff, who knows where it originated perhaps not even Earth hence the cover-up.

      Delete
    4. The current evidence for Bigfoot does not meet the taxonomic criteria for being formally identified as a species. A type specimen is required (fragmentary specimens are sometimes used, a complete body isn't absolutely necessary) and a complete formal description must be published in a scientific journal. Ketchum's paper was insufficient in this regard as it wasn't accepted into a genuine journal and many of her conclusions were speculative and not evidence based.

      I'll wait and see what Sykes has to say in his report.

      Delete
  4. This PLACE smells like it pooped it's own loincloth.

    Bob Wire

    ReplyDelete
  5. Uh, Damien ... you are aware that one of the standard definitions of 'fantastical' is 'fictional', right? If the aim of the podcast is to debunk all this stuff as being made up hogwash it's a great title but if you're going to try and argue the possible validity of some of those topics then you might want to pick a different word.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. DB like most others bigfoot "researchers" actually believe they are smarter than everyone else. You should know that.

      Delete
    2. ^^ And you can quantify this claim by listing the 'researchers' you personally know or had a discussions with?

      I wouldn't believe for a second you would be making a knee jerk judgements on individuals based on non personal experience right.

      But you know better than everyone else right?

      You can see the issue here...

      Thanks for your input.

      MMG

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story