Matt Moneymaker At The Bigfoot Discovery Museum Yesterday Sounds Super Smart When He Talks Bigfoot


For those of you who could not make it to Felton, CA to meet the Finding Bigfoot crew, here's an awesome video by the Bigfoot Discovery Museum recapping what went on at the BBQ:



Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Boom! Rodfather with the go ahead!

      Delete
    2. The clown who calls himself the 'rodfather'...

      Don't make me laugh... I think we have established that the only thing you want to rod is a ex-UFC commentator. Man up and shut up you little pussy, it's easy to abuse some one anonymously you scared little girl.

      Peace.

      Delete
    3. Guise joes mad i think

      Delete
    4. u ignant daw, joe dont get mad bra

      Delete
  2. hos hair gets worse amd worse. can I chop it off???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It does look ridiculous.

      Delete
    2. It's right in line with the ridiculousness that is the BFRO. I mean come on, the man talks like he actually believes there's Bigfoot ape families living out there but we somehow can't find them. LOL

      Delete
    3. He can't find them because he's looking for a dumb bipedal gorilla that isn't there.

      Peace.

      Delete
    4. I think that he and his film crew make to much noise for a hunt. I think I hear them now from here hundreds of miles away. As for his hair,it's awesome. It has a Moe Howard feel to it.

      Delete
  3. He looks high as a kite. Bobo must have got the sticky icky.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't they look for bigfoot in Washington state and Colorado? That would explain it.

      Delete
    2. u tink da sas dun no wut dat kronik is? iz from da earf nicca

      Delete
    3. Bobo is from Humboldt county, CA. THAT would explain it

      Delete
  4. Has Moneymaker not yet realised his retarded? Somebody should let this guy finally know, shame. It is amusing though, maybe we should leave it be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's a living for him spouting bullshit, it's like the circus clown everybody laughs at that guy too.

      Delete
    2. He may be spouting bullshit, but he spouts it well...That guy is an excellent public speaker...

      Delete
  5. Matt says he believes Matilda is real.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think "Hank" is real too. Patty well, not so much.

      Delete
    2. Moneymaker is a clown and has been hoaxed about the footage in the same way Adrian Erickson has.

      Peace.

      Delete
    3. yall ignant up hur need to get off joes dik cryin azz babeez sowndin ignant as fug

      Delete
    4. My guess is he has to vouch for the homeowner footage(the one with the idiot in a wookie mask): The BFRO pointed Erickson towards those hoaxing hillbillies....I think the living carpet was hoaxed by Erickson's own team(probably unbeknownst to him) after he took over the site...

      Delete
    5. You mean, Matilda is fake? I have everything riding on that film's authenticity!

      Delete
    6. lol..Don't worry.. No one will be able to prove that from the films themselves no matter how many wookie masks Bill Munns shows us. Some will argue George Lucas based wookie on a bigfoot, no one cares about back stories and Phol's will pass a lie detector test after burning the rug ...you are good...

      Delete
  6. He's laughing all the way to the bank. You go to work, and he goes into the woods and makes squatch calls.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeep. There's no way he actually thinks there is an undiscovered primate out there. Not a chance. Cashing in while the going is good.

      Delete
    2. Maybe now 4:46, but at one time he HAD to believe. I think this subject's popularity was at a nadir in the early to mid 90's. Who could have foreseen that both basic cable and the net would take off and bring a new era in bigfooting? He was a believer intent on discovery when he was setting up his server and forming his organization, for sure...

      Delete
  7. Matilda is the real deal backed up by dna evidence that confirms the species and matching hair colour of the individual.

    Joe can not produce a suit that matches. He claims its a 70s rug but please show me a 70s rug that matches the muscle tone, fluidity, uniform hair, and has the ability to perform a natural breathing motion at 6 breaths per minute. You cant.

    Give it up joe.

    Got magic monkey suit with air pump?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anyone with half a brain can see that Matilda is a rubber mask, it's teeth are made of rubber and move and like it was stated previously; the land owners of the Erickson project habituation area had hoaxed Adrian with the footage in an effort to make money, to which had a baring on the real DNA sample story handed to Melba. She would not know any different and red hair is what is commonly attained as Bigfoot hair samples. Patty has full motion that doesn't fit human proportions, a head shot that does not fit human proportions, arm and leg length that doesn't fit human proportions, extended toes and foot shape that doesn't and muscle and skin fold detail you cannot replicate. To compare this to Matilda is so desperate and laughable I'm sorry; it really outlines how desperate you have come doesn't it? And, in your effort to try and dismiss my logic, you forget that I can actually show you a thousand Chewie masks and 70's bath rugs and you cannot bring me a Patty suit... (Sigh, this is getting too easy) The six breathes a minute can easily be explained with a foot pump and the way it bloats, would outline this further.

      "He claims its a 70s rug but please show me a 70s rug that matches the muscle tone, fluidity, uniform hair..."

      A false statement; there are non of those in the Matilda footage.

      Now... Your turn with Patty...

      Got monkey suit?

      HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!

      Delete
    2. http://www.wayfair.com/red-flokati-rug-th.html

      Here's a link for your bath rugs that you require as replicates for Matilda's red hair. Now, go on Amazon and buy a Chewie mask, save up your semen you protrude for your bookmarks on BBW porn; splash that all over it, hide under it in the woods like a pervert and hey presto; Matilda!

      Your turn with Patty... Got monkey suit?

      Peace.

      Delete
    3. Posted yesterday by an anonymous source..

      "Matilda was filmed by a habituator that sold the footage to Erickson. He was fooled and thats how this all started. He wont admit it, but that is what happened. You all will never hear from him again, mostly because he was hoaxed and made into a liar and then basically robbed of his money for fake footage. He could legitimately sue them if there is a good contract for the sale of this item, which there probably isnt."

      Peace.

      Delete
    4. Comments posted last week regarding Matilda hoax video...

      "Joe, I live in the county adjacent to the south of Crittenden, Ky, where Matilda was said to be filmed. After researching everything I could find on the matter, I've come to the conclusion that Erickson was hoaxed for financial gain by the original owners of the Mann Road habituation site." - Anon

      "4:19, I think 4:29 is right and answers your question..I believe that Erickson made a sincere effort to prove existence and document the discovery..Unfortunately, he was defrauded by hoaxers(the homeowners), betrayed by people he drafted for the project(Phols, Brisson and\or Standing probably hoaxed Matilda) and robbed blind by Ketchum" - Anon

      "Joe, at one point the photos of Matilda were attributed to Dr. Leila Hadj-Chikh Phd. evolutionary biology. Princeton University. I believe she works with the Erickson progect. Check their website and see if you can contact her regarding this. In other words I'm too lazy so please run the trapline." - Anon

      "Could it be that the samples she attained were accurate but the video was a hoax? (which is clearly is)" - Me

      "If Melba was told by Adrian Erickson (who believed the video to be authentic at the time),that the samples came from Matilda; would she have any reason to doubt him?" - Me

      ... Matilda is a bath rug and Chewie mask. Patty is a walking biped you cannot explain in 46 years of technological advances... to compare the two is at best laughable.

      Schooled.

      Peace.

      Delete
    5. matilda might just be a full wookie costume to go wit that mask

      Delete
  8. Now, to the clown that keeps on at Bronson who can't debate me and avoids me like the plague...

    Like I have stated above; laughably, you do not have to be a linguistics expert to listen to what is in front, you do however have to be a cryptolinguist to have the necessary tools to transcribe it. Out of the tens of thousands, MAYBE MILLIONS of people to have heard these sounds, it would have taken someone with the equivalent expertise as Scott, seconds to come to a counter claim if it was the case. Though I agree that in an ideal world all sources of Bigfoot evidence should be peer reviewed and backed up with a second opinion, it is not realistic to the few people willing to put their reputations on the line; hence the reason why so many researchers apply their expertise after their retirements. With the dogma surrounding this subject, along with the wider negative agendas (like you have sir) you cannot perceive Scott as a pioneer as opposed to a loan theorist. You obviously have not listened to his work, but I don't expect you to and even if you did, I wouldn't expect you to deliver an honest evaluation of it because you are more concerned with having the last work with me.

    I say bollocks to your peer reviewing. We have seen the 'peer review' of Melba's work and seen how far that got her. No mainstream science would give this subject the first bit of legitimate time so keep your peer reviews to yourself. It's a clever attempt at keeping honest research in check; you know this subject can't get recognition from dogmatic science yet you question why it is not peer reviewed? Cheap and obvious. I would rather stay in the realms of 'pseudo-science' until Sykes delivers and sticks two finger up to your dogmatic, ignorant view of the subject.

    You snaked in and out of calling Scott a hack and then avoided me schooling you until you could do no more and now sir; I have schooled you again. Please, please, please respond... I can go all year and really enjoy outlining how much of a typical contradictive, desperate skeptic you are.

    Peace.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some of this guy's comments over the past few days...

      "My nieces have their own language between each other too, but it's nothing but gibberish."

      "... the fact that we have no other Sasquatch works that sound like The language spoken in the Sierra Sounds nor the fact that it hasn't even been deemed worthy enough for any active and reputable linguists to decipher the tape."

      "It doesn't matter if you are the President, Albert Einstein, Scott Nelson, The Duke of Earle, or Joe Fitzgerald...when you look too deep into things that just isn't there you are grasping at straws..."

      "Everyone is quick to smack down Sasquatch Ontario...well the Sierra Sounds isn't much better."

      "My grandfather is a highly decorated WW2 between but that doesn't cover the fact he still hears German troops during random times of the day and has Ike speeches constantly looping in his head."

      ... And now yesterday...

      "Dude, you're a dumbass. In the entire exchange, you can't find a goddamn place where I said his work wasn't correct or he isn't/wasn't a capable person in his field."

      ... Do this guy even know what you are on about?? OH AND CHECK OUT WHAT HE SAID THE OTHER DAY TOO!

      "And Joe, this is all coming from someone who has had a prior unexplainable experience, 20 consecutive years of hunting and fishing, and wants to believe this creature exists as described."

      ... Hmmm, either he is very confused or trying his damnedest to win a debate in the most contradictory of fashions...

      Peace.

      Delete
    2. just to add to this:

      the more infants are studied the more science is leaning towards they do have language.

      the little sounds, puffs of air, inhales, everything contains a meaning to another like minded infant. This can be seen most often in twins communicating in their own language we clearly dont know

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JmA2ClUvUY

      Delete
    3. the rodfather said SO is comparable to the Sierra Sounds? Thats aint right there is a big ole difference there. NO COMPARISON! For one the guys behind the sierra sounds are not POS like tj

      Delete
    4. I like the gurgling noise they make after being shaken violently.

      Delete
    5. Circumstantial evidence is circumstantial joe

      No where did rodfather specifically say that nelsons work was wrong. i believe he just expressed doubt and extreme concern because 1 man is the only person to analyze the audio and make such a drastic claim.

      He didn't say the Sierra tapes were without a doubt fake either.
      It doesn't matter what people think who aren't qualified to analyze the audio and it takes more than 1 retired expert to actually verify something as crazy as bf language.

      i can't believe that you said to hell with science joe pseudo science is the only place ur gonna be with that attitude.

      6:21^^WTF

      Delete
    6. Guise .... joes mad i think.

      Delete
    7. Well here's one for you sonny; prove Scott Nelson is wrong... Bring me an expert to counter his work or it stands up for what it is...

      PROVE HE'S WRONG.

      No... again you have twisted my words, I never said 'to hell with science' I stated I'd rather this subject matter remain in the realms of pseudo-science until Sykes blows clown like you out of the water...

      Schooled.

      Delete
    8. Silly little cheap arss-winker; you sit there and demand I prove something as laughable as Matilda is fake; you do the same with Scott. You claim his work isn't good enough top stand on it's own with your own unqualified, contradictive dribble; prove he's wrong with something other than your opinion. You picked a fight with Bronson for avoiding what you maintained was inaccuracies; YOU sir avoid what I put to you...

      *PROVE SCOTT IS WRONG
      *ADMIT YOU ARE CONTRADICTIVE
      *ADMIT YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE HELL YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT
      *EITHER PUT UP OR SHUT UP

      ... Contradictive Arss-Winker.

      Delete
    9. matildas fake yall. u ignant if u tink she da reel deel daw

      Delete
    10. And for your information, arss-winker... my beef with Rodfather isn't to do with anything he says about Bigfootery, hell that doesn't worry me; it's the way he anonymously attacks people with that shitty effort at wit that comes out in the form of types dribble.

      Delete
    11. rodfather is a dribbler yall haha

      Delete
    12. i have a feeling Rodfather is posting here as more than one anon I wouldnt be surprised if that is the case haha

      Delete
    13. Oh... and by the way arss-winker...

      Got monkey suit?

      Delete
    14. I'm an amateur cryptolinguist. After much work, I was able to crack the bigfoot code.

      This is what the bigfoot said in the recording:

      Ah, you jackasses will never find us until you figure it out.

      I wonder what the bigfoot meant by that. That is cryptic, isn't it?

      Delete
  9. Joe? We need to talk in private. And by private of course I mean this comment section where we post openly under our own names. If everyone else agrees not to read our comment block I will trust them of course. Are u available ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. HEEEEEEEYYYYY MIKE!!!! AWESOME, I KNEW YOU COULDN'T STAY AWAY FOR LONG BRO!!!!! My attention is all yours my brother!!!

      Peace bro!

      Delete
    2. Joe. I sat my son down at the airport. I came clean. Told him everything. I admitted that the trunk full of "magazines" designated for recycling in the garage was actually my Marvel Comics collection. I told him I wasn't really going to Chicago this weekend to do charity work, but that I had sweet tickets to Lollapalooza. And finally Joe, I told him I not only read, but posted regularly on the Bigfoot Evidence blog and was convinced Dr. Sykes was going to shock the world. That's it Joe. A tremendous weight has been lifted. I'm finally free. He took it well Joe. He told me I was young, and curious. And that it was OK to explore new beliefs. And he encouraged me to always maintain a sense of wonder and never embrace cynicism. Kids. They grow up so fast!

      Delete
    3. HA HA HA HA HA HA!! I knew he'd take it well bro!! HA HA HA HA!! Amazing to have you back Mike!!! Your sense of humor was sorely missed amongst some of these arss-winkers who've been posting since the weekend.

      Peace bro.

      Delete
    4. Now Joe. I've gotten some coffee. Pulled up a chair and sat down to ask you how these pillow-biters could dare to challenge Scott and the holy grail of Samauri Chatter itself, The Sierra Sounds?

      Delete
    5. I mean seriously. That was the first recording I've ever heard that didn't sound human. And as far as Sasquatch relationships go. There's no doubt Biggie and Wahump are having problems by their conversation. You need look no further than her steadfast refusal to stop banging the toilet seat on Al and Ron's new outhouse commode Even BIGFOOTs have relationship problems Joe. But that's no reason to challenge these recordings.

      Delete
    6. There seems to be a deeper meaning to what they are saying to each other. On the one hand he is clearly stating "now look, I brought you out for a lovely evening to watch these humans at their camp site and you are making an ass of yourself, shouting obscenities and banging on the toilet seats and issuing threat snarls. Jesus. I can't take you anywhere!" Scott is so good at what he does he actually brings the subjects to life. I don't know what became of them but I certainly hope Biggie and Wahump worked it out.

      Delete
    7. HA HA HA HA!! Mike; spot on bro. He really does bring personality to those chattering voices.

      People like arss-winker must look at how much the Sierra Sounds were scrutinized prior to Scott coming along, which has only been very recently. The same level of attention & scrutiny would not diminish over the past couple of years surely? So that tells me that Scott's work stands up. The Sierra Sounds being that of some of the most profound Bigfoot Evidence enthusiasts have and therefore in the firing line more. It can be claimed that if something is not yet questioned or double opinionated; it comes down to whether your glass is half empty, or half full, or whether you have an agenda to accept it or be skeptical of it... However, with the wider scientific dogma surrounding this subject, along with the wider negative agendas (like arss-winker's) people like him cannot perceive Scott as a pioneer as opposed to a loan theorist. All research fields have started off with one person, and in recent times since the change of mindset about what this creature actually is, you will not find people who have applied their research methods and have come to any other conclusion that this creature is a reality. No mainstream science would give this subject the first bit of legitimate time so people like arss-winker use that to their advantage to claim it can't stand up without backing. Well I say you can't get anymore experienced in Scott's field so find someone to prove him wrong.

      I've kept stating it but it keeps getting ignored by these people; it took Scott seconds to recognize these sounds were a language... If any one person out of all the people to have listened to these sounds in recent times would have had something to say to counter that claim; they would have. This is Bigfoot and open to all sort's of challenges from all angles... Very few have the experience and thorough expertise as Scott though and his technique has contributed to war efforts. Retired; yes... But that's the only way these people can get there research out with out being threatened or ridiculed.

      Comparing this subject to mainstream scientific research accumulation as an example is not sufficient, because mainstream science has done everything it can to ridicule and censor this type of anthropological research up until now... But Sykes is coming.

      Peace Mike bro.

      Delete
    8. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    9. I'm not a gambler; but you've gotta play with a full deck of cards before you can play fairly, right?

      Peace.

      Delete
    10. joe, I hear ya bro!! In the Matilda case, wouldn't just holding your breath every 10 seconds give 6 breathes a minute. Seems like an easy accomplishment to perform unless you are a two pack a day smoker?
      p.s. thanx for the nice post the other day on my other excursions!

      Delete
    11. STEEEEEEEEEVVE BROOOOOOO!!!!!

      Man, you've been missed! And of course; why didn't I think of that before with regards to Matilda! It's getting pretty desperate around here for the skeptics, I'd celebrate some level of healthy skepticism on here, hell there's stuff I'm very skeptical of... but some of these people are simply too dumb and scared to too much in denial to handle the truth.

      Got your email buddy and will respond to you tonight.

      Much respect buddy, you are a complete star!!

      Peace bro.

      Delete
    12. I'd say it diminished because of a massive influx of circumstantial evidence and hoaxes. Before the surge from FB, Ketchum, Monsterquest, and YouTube it was once in a blue moon that you'd get any evidence at all.

      Delete
  10. Replies
    1. can we have an exclusive convo anon?


      How have you been? whats your real name? where do you live lets hang out in person sometime give me your address

      Delete
  11. sounds like I have to open up a can of whip-ass on the real arss-winker!

    ReplyDelete
  12. If you look at photos of Bob Gimlin from 1967 it looks like some type of junior mafioso rookie card.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Show me some bones. Otherwise, this is just pure bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Check out some Jim Vieira, he'll explain where all the bones are.

      Peace.

      Delete
  14. Man...I used to be caught up in the myth as bad as Joe.

    45 years after Patty and no quality evidence has been discovered. Oh, we have plenty of trace evidence such as hair samples and footprints, but we don't have any viable tissue or clear footage.

    Technology has advanced by leaps and bounds since the 60's and still we have no better footage of Patty?

    There are hundreds of people in the woods of North America searching for Bigfoot on a daily basis and still no evidence?

    Stick structures? Gifting? C'mon...

    The lack of new evidence makes you look at the original source (PG). After all these years it probably was Bob Heironimus in a monkey suit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No quality evidence? Jesus, I can't even begin to list those various sources right now with my tired head... Those hair samples have contributed to DNA being successfully sequenced. wildlife biologists conduct much of their research on footprints but there is scientific dogma associated with Bigfoot casts, and go and check out 'Russian Leaping Yeti' on YouTube, the MK Davis version.

      Technology has advanced leaps and bounds since Patty, yet science is nowhere closer to debunking Bigfoot... why is that? In the last 15 years, with the rise of the Internet and the linking of research groups and experiences, the understanding has switched from a dumb bipedal gorilla into the general understanding that this creature is closer to us with the evasion techniques expected of a calculative, highly intelligent creature with all the sensory perception of the most cunning of apex predators. This is why you have given up sir; because since Patty, the research field, though important, has been wrong.

      There are hundreds of people in the woods of the States yes, but these people are starting to have interactions with these creatures as opposed to trying to catch them out with technology; respecting them as intelligent people as opposed to dumb animals.

      Stick structures; well, many top researchers will tell you there's nothing behind them.

      The 'lack of evidence' is just that when you are negative having been let down and given up after the research field has been wrong for far too long... whereas the evidence is there, plain to see if you choose not to ignore it or dismiss it.

      Science has evolved and we are no closer to disproving this species, yet have a recognition in science in Dr Sykes... Come on bro, chin up eh?

      Sykes will deliver.

      Peace.

      Delete
  15. joe fitzgerald, chin is up on the king's balls!! fucking orange-men...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you an oppressed Catholic or something? Why are you calling me an orange-men, especially when I have a name like Fitzgerald; you stupid little nobody? I'm a Welshman; so I don't care about the Queen, the King, any of them; you on the other hand are a typical glossy magazine lover and love talking about them, obviously... So, let's see; you assume I am a Protestant with a name like Fitzgerald, and you assume further I care about the Royal family though I am Welsh?

      Oh dear... You need to put down those glossy mags and pick up a history book I think pal... (Duh?)

      Do you even know what you're on about? Clown...

      Delete
    2. What kind of Welsh name is Fitzgerald? Shouldn't your last name have a bunch of consonants with not many vowels?

      Delete
    3. It's Irish... Like the many Irish surnames across the Western world; it doesn't necessarily mean they are still Irish people; just that they come from a predominantly Catholic background... Not that I am a practicing Catholic; I was trying to prove a point about assumption, which you helped me prove even further.

      Peace.

      Delete
  16. Moneymaker just talks bullshit. Like bigfoot: all bullshit. Bullshit for the stupid.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For Moneymaker, bigfoot BS = $$cha-ching$$

      Delete
  17. Saying MM sounds smart is like saying Rosie O'donnal is cute and all public figures are honest.

    ReplyDelete
  18. HEY, ITS SHEMP HOWARD!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Yo bro Joe! You're an arrogant ignorant prick.

    War.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Hey joe I know more then you think! let me let you in on a little secret, I know what you look like, I know were you live,i know who you hang out with, I know were you went to school,considering you don't know shit about me,you soon will! see you this weekend..

    ReplyDelete
  21. HI, AND HELLO. MATT MONEY MAKER. RENEY, BO BO. AND CLIFF. AFTER WATCHING YOUR EPISODE S. IM CONVICED. THAT BIG FOOT EXHIST. IM ORIGINALLY FROM NJ. NEVER SAW, OR HEARD OF BIG FOOT ROAMIMG THEIR. SPENT MOST OF MY KID LIFE AS A BOYSCOUT. WE NEVER SAW OR HEARD. BUT I ALLWAY,S BELIVED IN BIG FOOT. I MOVED TO WASHINGTON STATE WITH MY MOM. NOV 2005. BOUGHT A HOUSE TO CARE FOR MY MOM. HAD TO SELL MY HOUSE DO TO MORTGAGE. THE HOUSE WAS IN TACOMA WA. I MOVED TO A LITTLE OUT OF THE WAY NEIGHBORHOOD. SPRINGBROOK , IN LAKEWOOD WA. BY FORT MCCORD LEWIS. THIS WAS IN AROUND 2014. SOME TIME IN 2015. I MET A GIRL. WORKING AT THE TEXICO GAS STATION. I GO IN. AND WALK HER HOME. ONE NIGHT. AROUND 12:45AM. WE WALK HOME TOGETHER. HER HOME ON THE CORNER OF 47TH SW
    ME 2 APARTMENT,S DOWN. WE WALK HOME. A HUGE PARK WAS THEIR. THE CITY OF LAKEWOOD. AND RESIDENCE PUSHED TO GET A GRANT. WHICH THEY DID. DID THE WHOLE ALL OVER. PUT IN A BRIDGE. THAT A CREEK SEPERATED THE PACIFIC HWY SECTION OF 47TH ST SW. TO THE INNER PART OF 47TH ST. SW OFF BRIDGE PORT. ANY WAY. ELLIE, WAS THE GIRL. WHO WALK HOME ONE NIGHT. IT WAS A USUAL WALK. AND CHAT. TAKE HER TO HER HOME. WE CHAT A BIT. THEN SAY GOOD NIGHT. BUT THIS ONE PATICULAR NIGHT. WE WALK HOME. GOING BY THE PARK. A HOUSE WAS 9N THE PROPPERTY. BUT KNOCKED DOWN. BEFOR THE REBUILDING OF THE PARK. ELLIE AND I. HEARD WHAT YOU CALL, A LOUD BIGFOOT YELLP. NOT ONCE. BUT 4 TIME,S. IT STARTLED ELLIE AND I. WE STOP. QUICKLY LOOKED OUT INTO THE NIGHT
    WE LOOKED AT EACH OTHER. THEN AT THE PARK OUTER DARKNESS. THE LAST SQUEECH. JUST SANK INTO OUR BONE S. WE WUICKLY LOOK INTO TJE NIGHT. THEN AT EACH OTHER. THEN AT EACH OTHER AGAIN. AND BOOK TO WLLIE S HOUSE. I STAYED THEIR UNTILL HER ROOM MATE CAME HOME. I GOOGLED BIGFOOT SIGHTING,S OF THAT AREA. FORT MCCORD LEWIS. ACORDING TO MY FIND. SOME TIME IN THE 1960,S. A MAN, WHO OWNED A WATER PERRIFYEING CO. WAS WORKING ON THE FORT, WITH HIS CREW. AT THE SOUTH END OF THE AIR FIELD. WELL. THE PACIFIC HWY 47TH ST. SW. WAS AT THE NORTH END OF THE HWY. ACORDING TO REPORTS. THE WATER PERREFYEING MAN AND HIS CREW DOING WORK AT THE SOUTH END OF THE AIRFIELD. HEARD A YELPING SOUND. AT THE DIRECTION OF THE NORTH END OF AIR FIELD. THEN AGAIN THE NEXT DAY. BUT GUN FIRE BROKE OUT. THE WATER MAN HEARD ON THE RADIO. THAT PLATTOON OF SOLDIER S WERE ON FIELD TRAINING. WHEN ENCOUNTERED BY A 9 FT APE LIKE MAN. WALKING TO THEM. THEY FIRED WARNING SHOT,S TO STOO THE INTRUDER. BUT ENDED UP WOUNDING THE CRESTURE THAT WAS UNKNOWN. NOW, I SEE ON LINE. WATCHING YOUR VIDEO. OF THE GEAROGIA BIG FOOT..I SEE A NOTE. THAT BIG FOOT FOOT WAS SIGHTED IN LACEY. WHICH IS CLOSE TO. OLYMPIA. WHICH ALLSO REPORTED A BIGFOOT SIGHTING. THAT WHOLE AREA OS DENSELY FULLED WITH TREES AND BRUSH.. AND DEER, AS WELL. DENSELY POPULATED WIRH DEER. SO IM THINKING. THE FORT INCEDENT REPORTED THAT THEY CAPTURED A WOUNDED BIGFOOT. BY SHOOTING IT. WHEN I MOVED OUT OF THE AREA. I TRYED TO POP IT BACK UP AGAIN. AND NOTHING. A COUPLE OF TIME,S. I WAS IN.MY APARTMENT. AND THOUGHT ID SEE A LARGE FIGURE WALKING BY MY WINDOW. JUST WALKING BY. NO TRYING TO OPEN THE DOOR, OR ANYTHING. BUT WE FIND BROKEN PART,S OF THE BOUCONWY. WHICH WAS NOT THEIR BEFOR. BUT NOW IT WAS. IT HAPOEN 3 TIME S WHEN I LIVED THEIR. EACH TIME. A FOUL ODORE WAS PRESSENT. THE SAME AS ELLIE AND I, WHEN WE WALK HOME BY THE PARK. YOU SMELL THIS FOUL ODER.. I BELIVE IT TO BE A BIG FOOT. THIS AREA IS FILLED WITH DENSE TREES AND BRUSH. A CREEK. AND ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE AIRFIELD. LAKE AMERICA. AGAIN, LOT,S OF TREES AND BRUSH. THEIR HAS TO BE A BIGFOOT OUT THEIR. SOMETHING IS OUT THEIR. ITS MOSTLY A FENCED IN AREA ON A FORT. BUT WOODS ON BOTH SIDE S OFF THE FORT AS WELL. SOMETHING TO LOOK INTO. TO INVESTIGATE. GOOD LUCK. BRETT LOPEZ.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia