Ontario Audio Breakdown: Are These Sounds Really From Bigfoot?


YouTube user Sasquatch Ontario recently uploaded some very compelling audio of alleged Sasquatch communication captured on a private property in Canada. The audio clips contained several minutes of "Samurai Chatter", a type of vocalization some experts interpret as language. The extremely rare audio was recorded May 3, 2013 after several months of interaction.

In this breakdown video, Bigfoot enthusiast David Batdorf shared some interesting clues about the authenticity of the Ontario sounds. During his analysis, David noticed several sounds that were used multiple times. He alleges that each instance of the same sound appeared to be modified in either volume, or pitch/time. "The footfalls appear to be percussive, like a hiking/work boot... and at one point, you hear a guitar fall or being stuck by an object. I feel the audio has been tampered with," he explains.

Here's his analysis of the audio:



"This is my take on the Ontario Sounds, as they were presented. Aside from my enthusiasm for Sasquatch-related topics, I also play, write and record music... so, audio is my favorite medium. There are some interesting points to consider, when it comes to authenticating audio... the most important of which, is the fact that you can literally SEE what has been done to the waveforms, if you know what you're looking for. This video is meant to share my opinion and nobody should consider me an expert... just look, listen and make up your own mind." - David Batdorf

Here's the original recording from Sasquatch Ontario:

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. These guys are f*cking hoaxers.

      Watch, now that the truth is coming out, they will close up shop and say: "Whhaaa, there is too many haters" OR "we are not sharing anymore, how dare you to doubt us"

      These guys have an "event" at least once a week or more. Most researchers spend their entire lives investigating and get MAYBE one experience if they are lucky.....these guys, once, twice a week no problem.

      Delete
    2. I wonder if Robert Lindsay feels sorry that his bretherin in Cleveland got their little girl dungeon taken away from them.

      Delete
    3. The fact that anyone gives this kind of "evidence" more than one glance is why the BF community gets hoaxed so much. Lets use some critical thinking, the handprint is clearly drawn by someones index finger, you can see the lines for crying out loud. The vocalizations are clearly a human. I think that sasquatch might be out there but I will not get hoaxed by every idiot with a youtube channel in pursuit of finding out.

      Delete
    4. I'm sorry I can't get past that hilarious burp! Fake!!

      Delete
  2. I get up to grab a beer and miss my opportunity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As a consolation, there was an old stones concert on tv , and Mick Jagger was poking a 30 foot tall inflatable dog in the balls with a giant stick during "sympathy for the devil". That was hilarious

      Delete
    2. Pwned like a failing model who has had to resort to being hired by bill munns.

      Delete
    3. Pawn Shop? What are you pawning?

      Delete
    4. Pwned? what the heck is that???

      Delete
    5. Prawned? You shrimped me?

      Delete
    6. "pwned" is the way dipshit kids write "owned" these days. They think they are being clever, huh?

      Delete
    7. Pwned is the very definition of the day to day life of someone that believes in magic monkey men

      Delete
    8. these damn kids with their interwebs and video game, in my day we had to leave comments on the bathroom wall

      Delete
    9. Bathroom wall.That was the best and only way to do it!!!!!! Thanks for bringing back the Golden Days of Trolling!!!

      Delete
    10. He who writes on bathroom walls rolls his shit into little balls. He who reads those words of wit eat thos little balls of shit. Huh?

      Delete
    11. Pwned:

      http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=pwned

      For a more in depth study:

      http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/owned-pwned

      Delete
    12. Yeah, I know the history of "pwned" because I have the Internets to look up stupid shit like that. People who think it's clever are still short a chromosome, huh?

      Delete
    13. But thank you for the link.

      Delete
    14. Morons who use "pwned" are the same dipshits who take vertical videos. YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG, DUMMY!

      Delete
    15. I thought it was morons that took inverted shits so they could eat it.

      Delete
    16. A mathematician named Hall
      Had a hexihydronical ball
      The cube of its weight
      Plus his pecker x 8
      Is his phone number
      Give him a call

      Delete
    17. Keep pressing refresh! Dont go anywhere! You have nothing better to do!!

      Delete
  3. After a full listen all I can say to Squach Ontario is "Lucy you have some 'splainin to do!".

    ReplyDelete
  4. That print is hilarious looking with the double finger smears.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Paul Freeman allegedly did something similar with his footprint discoveries.

      But I feel the Freeman footage is legit, go figure.

      Delete
    2. Sound like really bad bowel movement noises.

      Delete
    3. yep could be

      or it could be another Squatch with one of those oversized kidney stones trying to pass it

      and he is banging his junk against the tree and shitting himself in the process

      or it could be 2 drunk squatches that got into the shine jug and are having mad drunk sex

      but compelling sounds for sure

      Delete
    4. listen to this shorter version:
      http://www.last.fm/music/A/_/Nothing

      Delete
  5. It's amazing for me to have a web page, which is good in favor of my knowledge. thanks admin

    Here is my website :: beachbody Derm Exclusive advantages

    ReplyDelete
  6. thats how u do a breakdown.nice

    ReplyDelete
  7. I couldn't refrain from commenting. Perfectly written!

    Here is my web-site; Authentic Kris Letang Jersey

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^^^Mr. Evidence...... Why is there so much spam on this site? A year ago there was nothing!

      Delete
    2. I like fried spam in a tortilla

      Delete
    3. and now there is more nothing. and you like it.

      Delete
  8. These Ontario "habituators" are looking to attract the Finding Bigfoot crew. They wanna make a quick buck, that's all.
    And yes, this is my third comment on this post. But these hoaxers really bug me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hes very good
      At making squatch vocals
      Even burpps
      Idiots

      Delete
    2. Actually- he doesn't. I know him personally. The LAST thing he wants is that stupid crew of nerds in the woods.

      ...but the SAS like trolls...specially web trolls, they make great snacks. They sneak up on you at night in the woods, be careful out there....very careful...

      Delete
    3. The last thing YouTube hoaxers like Timbergiantbigfoot and The Squatchmaster want is anybody coming around with real Bigfoot smarts. They are ONLY searching for YouTube subscribers and views, no any unknown animal lurking in the woods. The dumber and further away their idiot minions are, the better.

      Delete
    4. real Bigfoot smarts? means "puts blueberry bagel on a stump and is afraid to walk in the woods?"

      Delete
  9. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8pD-8HAeOE

    A NEW Bigfoot eyewitness account!

    Check this out! Posted on youtube less than an hour ago! Very Interesting!

    From ME! Johnnie Lindsey!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. My taterhole alarm is going off like a buck during rutting season.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Pwned like a pgf bleever on a daily basis.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This guy is pretty good! Confirmed hoax as far as I'm concerned.

    ReplyDelete
  13. You Sir are a genius. You should try this with the Sierra Sounds. This is how real debunking is done. Fuckin bravo dude, bravo. I will watch this again when I get home from work.

    Peace ninjas!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. too many hoaxers. Need a body now or it can't be proved. Period. (or bones at least or HD films in habitation area) let me call my spokesperson Miss roybn lynn forestpeople.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Ok, She told me to call my shrink (Dr. Johnson) and he'ed set me up in a habitation area

    ReplyDelete
  16. Excellent breakdown.

    The belch is the most amazing thing about this audio, bigfoot or not.

    ReplyDelete
  17. A lot of you seem to be so fixated on finding this monkey man that you are ignoring the real questions that we should be asking and looking for answers for:

    What happened to mulder on the fateful night?

    And

    Was steven streufert and bill munns the security team for the shooting bigfoot premiere?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. mulder fell into a sarchasm.

      Munns was, but the women objected to having their tits filmed.

      Delete
  18. It makes the hunter crowd so angry when Sasquatch talk to habituators

    ReplyDelete
  19. Impressive belch at 8:35. Overall impression? These are Muppet sounds.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Looney Toons all of us!! Hah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha h aha ha ha ha ha ha h aha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha h ah...

    ReplyDelete
  21. When am Survivor man gonna go out and look for big ape? He maybe find him?

    ReplyDelete
  22. In reviewing David Batsdorf’s review, I noticed some odd things that jumped right out at me.

    1. David inadvertently proved that the Ontario sounds were authentic, because we can notice in them that the timing flows seamlessly throughout all of the recordings. On the other hand, his verbal review does not flow seamlessly at all because he in essence, hoaxed his own review by cutting it up to insert words and take out pauses. David is quick to criticize authentic recordings but even though he is an expert, he cannot duplicate authentic timing and smoothly flowing background noise in his own diatribe. Thank you David, for proving your that your review is without merit.

    2. David attempts to convince the inexperienced viewer, that our ears are a better differentiator than computer waveforms. This is blatantly FALSE. The computer waveform describes the fingerprint of the vocalization, that we can accurately use to compare to a similar sounding vocalization, and immediately see that they are in fact different vocalizations. David is attempting to cast doubt by making the false claim that our ears are the better judge. David should know better than that.

    3. David attempts to cast doubt by noticing a repetition of similar sounding vocalizations. Although the Sasquatch have supernatural abilities, they can get punch drunk when it comes to making sounds that they know humans can hear, because they do not often get to have that kind of fun without getting shot at by some gun toting morons.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The too much reading guy gets pwned a lot here

      Delete
    2. P.W.Ned here,I guess I will just over look your feeble attempt of abusing my name.

      Delete
    3. Thanks for clarifying. Excellent points.

      Delete
    4. Oh. Dear. Gawwwwwwd. You are completely clueless.

      Delete
    5. yes and all of this is absolutely meaningless, when you take into account that every single "sasquatch" vocalization heard, is well within human vocal capabilities. Look at all the waveforms you want, it's still a fuckin guy in the woods pretending to make Bigfoot noises.

      Delete
  23. Seems like a lot of work, technology and brain-power to come to the obvious conclusion that bigfoot is bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
  24. If this is fake, then these people are either complete frauds or were fooled by the property owner.

    Im not sure that this examination of the sound is taking into account that the context of these sounds was given but no real information like who was all there and where this recording device was in relation to the house/woods

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are there no new bigfoot scams? let's raise money for the blimp. we do a half-bake sale.

      Delete
  25. David is not an expert and states that very clearly.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I have to come clean............ These sounds were really made by my asshole............

    ReplyDelete
  27. like others have been saying all along, Sasquatch Ontario (Mike Patterson and Mike Smith) are hoaxers. This proves it.

    ReplyDelete
  28. To Anonymous above: You are the 69th poster. Congrats.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Better than being the 69th hoaxer like Smith and Patterson.

      Delete
  29. These boys have now been busted and hopefully that's the end of all this B.S.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Adventures in Hoaxing 2: Electric Boogaloo.
    Directed by Toejam.
    Starring Mike Smith as Belchsquatch.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Take a look at the hand print in the video. The fingers, particularly the index, look like two finger swipes together to give the impression of one large finger. Further, the nails are attached to the fingertips in the handprint. Fingernails grow on the top of the fingers. Placing your hand on a flat surface, even if one had long nails, they would not appear attacked to the fingertips in a print. There would be a space between the fingertip and the nail. This holds true for animals as well. Take a look at a bear print, for examply. The only way a nail/claw would appear attached directlty to the digit in a print on a flat surface is if it was grow on the underside of the fingertip!
    When I questioned this on the Youtube video, the filmmaker claimed that squatch have dermal ridges running down the centre of their fingers (!) which accounts for the appearance of the fingers and he failed to address my question regarding the nails. He also seemed quite defensive to what were my legitimate and even-handed questions.

    In summation: BULLSHIT.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I every time spent my half an hour to read
    this blog's articles or reviews daily along with a cup of coffee.

    Review my web page; bmi calculator women

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?