Cathiee McMillan is a fat dude named John Preston. He still lives in his dead mothers basement while his mother sucks the devils filthy pig cock in hell.
April Fools Day is on the Horizon. I wonder what kind of Big Juicy Turd Burger is cookin on the grill for the big day. Maybe a School of Lemurs Back Paddling across the Nile or if we're lucky more of those Phallic looking Amazon Salamanders.
(ken)..I ain't Bitching, but you'd think these younger quicker posters would show some respect, and allow my old, wrinkled, grey, slow, sorry ass, to get a damn first once in a great while, wouldn't you. I feel like Rodney Dangerfield with Arthritic fingers. Sasquatch is so quick, he doesn't cast a shadow, I'll never catch Him.
Bullshit Ken, I know the man, he is on record at the TN sportsman shop with a running 427 yard one shot kill of a rabid coyote. He walks 20 miles through the woods in a night. And if he hits a man and that man doesn't fall, he's being propped up and asleep on his feet. He's a legend in these parts and his nickname is white lightening. His wife and kids like him too. He doesn't deserve any pity or slack. If Bigfoot exists, he in deep shit with Ken on his trail.
When is Melba going to say or do something stupid again? Clearly, we are out of lame bigfoot hoax videos. We need some fresh retarded bullshit to mock and troll...
FACT: Skeptics are not required to respond to childish challenges of proving a negative. No one can prove something does not exist, nor can we rise to the false-positive challenge. It's impossible to prove that someone who filed a report hallucinated. It can't be done, but people hallucinate and make mistaken identifications all the time. But no one can prove that on a case by case basis.
FACT: Skeptics always say that so they do not have to engage the evidence. If you want to hold that the body of the evidence is 100% the result of hoaxes, misidentifications, etc, that is YOUR claim to prove. You cannot turn the "negative claims" meme around on proponents and demand we prove the evidence is NOT false.
It is your positive claim that all the evidence is invalid. Prove your claim. Not that it might be invalid, but that it is invalid.
Skeptics have to be right 100% of the time for there to be no BF.
Proponents only have to be right one single time.
Quote
TRUTH:People (like you Mulder) hold a belief that BF exists. It is in no way a fact yet.
1) It is not a belief. It is knowledge. I saw it, at close range in good light for sufficient time to get a good look at it.
2) That fact is in no way dependent on your "acceptance". It exists no matter how badly you desire to deny it.
Squatchy McSquatch, on 04 March 2013 - 11:23 AM, said:
So where's the monkey?
Running around out in the wild parts of the continent where it belongs.
Wow, tall order. But ok.. 1) Crew Tracks: Hoaxed by Wallace 2)PGF: Hoaxed by Patterson 3) Bossburg Tracks: Hoaxed by Marx 4)Ostman Story: He is a zany old yarn spinner . . . 5,567) Mulders Sighting: He is a nut...lol...
(Ken).. Great points brother, However if basic logic, like this is used, should not one use the same logic before totally discounting the possibility of such creatures possibly existing? Are there any undiscovered biological creatures still out there? if so, How do we class what is and is not possible? So logically how do we make an iron clad denouncement or announcement of such. Things we can't honestly prove for, or against at this point, are still just opinions aren't they? It's hard for me to believe in Sasquatch since I haven't seen one, but who am I to tell someone else what they have, or have not seen. I understand both sides of the serious argument for and against, but I sure wish I could be blessed to see one. How could a person not understand a skeptics point of view with all that is and is not going on with the sasquatch evidence right now. Your points made allot of sense to me Mr. Moulder Rage, I hope you see some understanding in mine friend.
Proponents do NOT have to be right one single time. If that one time was the PG film, 45 years ago, chances are that thing dropped dead. Or it was simply a mutation. This guy is a total dick.
Your Dead on Ken, No one knows every animal out there. We haven't scratched the surface of discovery. How could an individual be so arrogant as to believe they have all the knowledge of species in existence.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
First.
ReplyDeleteWOOHOO,living the dream!!!
DeleteI know I said I would retire from firsting but I just couldn't help myself.I don't know what came over me.
DeleteSo close. So damn close.
DeleteMMG
Sorry Ken and MMG,I promise to retire from now own.
DeleteNo way you will be able to walk away from this noble sport so easily Bigdad.
DeleteOnce firsting is in the blood retirement is not an option.
I look forward to our jousts in the future my friend.
MMG
Oh god this is turning into a paranormal alien site!
Delete(Ken).. Dang it, to slow again.
ReplyDeletewheres barts thermal footage?
ReplyDeleteIf it was all up in your taterhole you'd know where it was.
DeleteBart's thermal footage will show nothing and you will like it.
DeleteCathiee McMillan is a fat dude named John Preston. He still lives in his dead mothers basement while his mother sucks the devils filthy pig cock in hell.
ReplyDeleteI am a troll trapped in a skeptics body. I feel his pain....
DeleteOh yeah? Well you fooled me. I would've guessed raging homo...
DeletePU. Nothing takes the funk off a strenuous firsting battle like a potty mouth.
ReplyDeleteShawn- whack his peepee!
?
DeleteApril Fools Day is on the Horizon. I wonder what kind of Big Juicy Turd Burger is cookin on the grill for the big day. Maybe a School of Lemurs Back Paddling across the Nile or if we're lucky more of those Phallic looking Amazon Salamanders.
ReplyDeleteI like the sasquatch crabwalking across the highway while farting the national anthem. I want it to be real.
DeleteOr maybe Monkeyfaker will find nothing on the Finding Nothing unreality show which we all anxiously await every Sunday night.
ReplyDelete(ken)..I ain't Bitching, but you'd think these younger quicker posters would show some respect, and allow my old, wrinkled, grey, slow, sorry ass, to get a damn first once in a great while, wouldn't you. I feel like Rodney Dangerfield with Arthritic fingers. Sasquatch is so quick, he doesn't cast a shadow, I'll never catch Him.
ReplyDeleteKen,I'm 52 years young.But I do know how you feel.
Delete(Ken).. Yep no future in getting old BIGdad. 50 starts slowing down, ain't it so brother.
DeleteBullshit Ken, I know the man, he is on record at the TN sportsman shop with a running 427 yard one shot kill of a rabid coyote. He walks 20 miles through the woods in a night. And if he hits a man and that man doesn't fall, he's being propped up and asleep on his feet. He's a legend in these parts and his nickname is white lightening. His wife and kids like him too. He doesn't deserve any pity or slack. If Bigfoot exists, he in deep shit with Ken on his trail.
DeleteBrother Ken, are you related to David Crickett?
DeleteYou mean Davey Crockette?
Deleteweirdness just follows me. I remember four past lives, have talked to my guardian angels and now bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteFirst!
ReplyDeleteWeb trsffic down?
ReplyDeleteVisit my site: Hot Hairy Women.org
I love me some big ass hairy titties.
DeleteWhen is Melba going to say or do something stupid again? Clearly, we are out of lame bigfoot hoax videos. We need some fresh retarded bullshit to mock and troll...
ReplyDeleteFIRST!!...just practicing....
First.
ReplyDeletedmaker, on 04 March 2013 - 12:09 PM, said:
ReplyDeleteFACT: Skeptics are not required to respond to childish challenges of proving a negative. No one can prove something does not exist, nor can we rise to the false-positive challenge. It's impossible to prove that someone who filed a report hallucinated. It can't be done, but people hallucinate and make mistaken identifications all the time. But no one can prove that on a case by case basis.
FACT: Skeptics always say that so they do not have to engage the evidence. If you want to hold that the body of the evidence is 100% the result of hoaxes, misidentifications, etc, that is YOUR claim to prove. You cannot turn the "negative claims" meme around on proponents and demand we prove the evidence is NOT false.
It is your positive claim that all the evidence is invalid. Prove your claim. Not that it might be invalid, but that it is invalid.
Skeptics have to be right 100% of the time for there to be no BF.
Proponents only have to be right one single time.
Quote
TRUTH:People (like you Mulder) hold a belief that BF exists. It is in no way a fact yet.
1) It is not a belief. It is knowledge. I saw it, at close range in good light for sufficient time to get a good look at it.
2) That fact is in no way dependent on your "acceptance". It exists no matter how badly you desire to deny it.
Squatchy McSquatch, on 04 March 2013 - 11:23 AM, said:
So where's the monkey?
Running around out in the wild parts of the continent where it belongs.
Wow, tall order. But ok..
Delete1) Crew Tracks: Hoaxed by Wallace
2)PGF: Hoaxed by Patterson
3) Bossburg Tracks: Hoaxed by Marx
4)Ostman Story: He is a zany old yarn spinner
.
.
.
5,567) Mulders Sighting: He is a nut...lol...
(Ken).. Great points brother, However if basic logic, like this is used, should not one use the same logic before totally discounting the possibility of such creatures possibly existing? Are there any undiscovered biological creatures still out there? if so, How do we class what is and is not possible? So logically how do we make an iron clad denouncement or announcement of such. Things we can't honestly prove for, or against at this point, are still just opinions aren't they? It's hard for me to believe in Sasquatch since I haven't seen one, but who am I to tell someone else what they have, or have not seen. I understand both sides of the serious argument for and against, but I sure wish I could be blessed to see one. How could a person not understand a skeptics point of view with all that is and is not going on with the sasquatch evidence right now. Your points made allot of sense to me Mr. Moulder Rage, I hope you see some understanding in mine friend.
DeleteProponents do NOT have to be right one single time. If that one time was the PG film, 45 years ago, chances are that thing dropped dead. Or it was simply a mutation. This guy is a total dick.
DeleteWho's the dick anon5:58?
DeleteYour Dead on Ken, No one knows every animal out there. We haven't scratched the surface of discovery. How could an individual be so arrogant as to believe they have all the knowledge of species in existence.
DeleteFirst.
ReplyDeleteFirst.
ReplyDeleteWhether or not it is an alien i do not know but it appears to have a nice pert butt. Taterable I would think.
ReplyDeleteFirst
ReplyDeleteFOX NEWS said this was a real Alien! Lol
ReplyDeleteThe woods are full of giant apes, forest people, giant sloths, hugh Lemurs, and we can't get one in a box? Come on!! Jeeze..oh, and aliens..
ReplyDelete