It's no wonder Bigfoot photographs are blurry...
Thanks to Stephen R. for sharing this photograph with us on Twitter. If you ever wondered why "good" Bigfoot photographs are so hard to come by, this may explain it. Stephen writes:
Oh, true dat homie, true dat. Imagine taking this picture in the wild!
No wonder there are so many "blobsquatch" pics! Zoo gorillas in a carefully focused shot.
First
ReplyDeleteHoax...
DeleteI see it .... Sitting by the cave..
ReplyDelete3rd
ReplyDeleteFourth...
ReplyDeleteya , for sure theres a big owl setting there .
ReplyDeleteGuy in a ghillie suit.
ReplyDeleteBlobgorilla
ReplyDeletei dont get the point of te post. firstly you dont get gorillas so its a pointless debate before it starts. Also its very clear to me its ,in fact, a gorilla,in a zoo!
ReplyDeleteso whether it was in the wild or zoo taken a pic of any ape isnt a najor biggie. we all watch the documentries of monkeys/apes that show us their behaviour very well.
It aooears the only "animal" that turns into a fuzzy blob is sasquatch! fcat. IE they are hoaxed and there arent 9ft giants in and around our back yards and camp sits ,SADLY. Their is no evidents. eyewiness cannot be taken,if u do then the loch ness monster,chewricabra[sp],or any other mythical crweature exists alo as people report seein them all the time
they are either misidentfying known creatures, creatures doing unsual things they never saw before or optical illusions in photos etc. A 45 year old film cannot be the only basis for people to say these ginats walk amongst our forests undeteced for centuries,and all we get is fuxxy images/bnears and hoaes[as was Patty,imo, Patterson was desoerate,and as people remind me all the time on here,he drew a female the year before to the exact proportions of the creature filmed. million-1 chance surely]
crazy
The point of the article, this was a controlled environment, where you are fairly close with a nothing blocking the view. The animal isn't trying to hide, and is right out in the open. Yet, the picture really isn't that good. Yes, you can tell it's a gorilla, but if the distance was any further back, it would start to be very difficult to tell what it was, or if there was anything in the picture at all.
DeleteFor christ sakes! If you shot the picture with a simple point and shoot, 8-10 mega pixel, camera... You would be able to enlarge the photo big enough to count the hairs on its ass! It is 2013 and we do have technology that far surpasses 8mm film. Using a cheap, shit, kids camera, will produce exactly was the common hoaxers are looking for blobby pixulated nothing. Please just use the slightest of common sense before giving crap excusses for poor images.
Delete"If you shot the picture with a simple point and shoot, 8-10 mega pixel, camera... You would be able to enlarge the photo big enough to count the hairs on its ass! It is 2013 and we do have technology that far surpasses 8mm film"
DeleteWait a minute... that makes sense and doesn't belong here.
Point well taken Stephen R. If you had not told us what the picture was, it would only be a guess that it was gorillas and there would be much argument about that. Fact is that in the wild with brush, trees, shadows, and differing lighting, it is almost impossible to get a clear photograph unless one would be standing still for you 10 feet away, and folks would still say it is a man in a ghillie suit, because these creatures are built so much like humans. The only cameras that could get the clear pictures needed (such as the ones used by TV production at sporting events, are way to expensive and cumbersome for ordinary people to carry into the wild.
ReplyDeleteChuck
If you truly believe your excuse for bad photos, you know nothing at all about todays digital imaging. The cell phone I'm typing on will shoot a pic better than the one posted for thisb artical!!!!
DeleteClassic footer excuse why there's no evidence.
ReplyDeleteI tell you what theres only 1 excuse you need and that's "there's no evidence because it doesn't exist".
You should get that broken record fixed.
DeleteHe can't, it was a internal download, lol
DeleteGood ones, 6:36 and 9:06.
Delete;)
if you think you got your bigfoot calls down go to the zoo and find the gorillas and give it a try,they do re-act ,in fact it came and watched me till the zoo keepers asked me to stop,lol but its reaction was instant and it got defensive. maybe finding bigfoot should go to the zoo and do a show on it since they aint doing so well jet setting around the backwoods of America..
ReplyDeleteWow, at first glance I thought the gorilla was a second cave. Great illustration.
ReplyDeleteThey need gifting.
ReplyDeleteFling crap at em. Beat em to the punch.
DeleteThere is a reason why all bigfoot photos or video are blurry or unclear. It is because the only place that bigfoot exists is in that illusion. Without the imagination, there would be no bigfoot. A photo of a stump that resembles a monster would be just a stump. A guy in a costume walking across Bluff Creek will be just a guy in a costume. Think about it.
ReplyDeleteOK, Thought about it and found your to be a typical skeptic moron, Case Closed!
DeleteBigfoot is the mermaid of the outdoorsy nerd.
DeleteYou described footers as nerds. You are wrong. Footers are tards.
Delete^^^ 12:12 Skeptard who not only holds the rank of supertard, but also Monarch of the Morons.
DeleteSailors imagined mermaids, hikers/hunters imagine bigfoot.
DeleteWhy do you think Patterson gave his bigfoot breasts?
Gimlin:"Anything else we can do to make the suit look better?"
Patterson:"Let's slap a pair of tits on it!"
you mean thats a gorilla , looked like a crow to me .
ReplyDeletethis is a known hoax. its not real.
ReplyDeleteOh there he go !
ReplyDeleteif you look you can see Rick Dyer in the back of cave, in his drawers, with his 30-06
ReplyDeleteGorillas are well known to lie in wait for deer and then pounce on them for the kill. They strip the bones clean then render the meat for soup and candles. I believe Bigfoot uses this same method.
ReplyDeleteHoax! Clearly a man in a suit. Definitely a hoax.
ReplyDelete