Watch this: Matt Moneymaker Corrects Reporter On The Plural Use of Bigfoot


Let's settle this once and for all: The plural for Bigfoot isn't Bigfoot or Bigfeet. Using Bigfoot as a plural suggest that there's only one Bigfoot-- a mythical creature. Saying Bigfeet just sounds really dumb. Sure, we can debate all day long about other animals that have the same singular and plural forms, but until we actually have a live specimen, let's just stick to saying Bigfoots, or Sasquatches if you prefer to call them that.

BFRO president Matt Moneymaker, agrees with us that it should be Bigfoots or Sasquatches and we've seen a couple of occasions where he actually blew up on a TV show host for saying "Bigfeet" as a plural or "Bigfoot" as if there's only one creature. On ABC News today, watch Moneymaker correct a reporter about this:

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Matt Moneymaker got together with Thom Powell and decided that abomination of the English language. Matt and Thom were wrong then and remain wrong to this day.

      The use of Bigfoot for both singular and plural, implies respect. Not that there is just one of even 6000 of them.

      Nor is the plural of sasquatch, sasquatches.

      The plural of Elk is not Elks. The plural of deer is not deers.

      I will never use BIGFOOTS to describe more than one BIGFOOT. It sounds exactly like running ones fingernails down a chalk board.

      Delete
    2. It's correct or at least okay to say Bigfoots when you mean more than one.

      Delete
    3. you guys are arguing over mythical creatures lul

      Delete
    4. Wow look at all those sheeps next to the bigfeets

      Delete
    5. Them bigfeet are trying to catch some salmons

      Delete
    6. Bigfoot rubber boots, Bigfoot's galoshes, galoshes for Bigfoot or galoshes for bigfeet, or Bigfoot's galoshes or Bigfeets galoshes.....ahhhh screw it.

      Delete
    7. If were were tying to describe more than one moose, it would not be mooses. Moneymaker and the gang drive me freakin nuts every week when I hear bigfoots. Whether you believe in them or not, use the correct plural you chowder heads. Look at that bigfoot, look at that, there are two bigfoot. I just saw 27 sasquatch....etc.

      Delete
    8. I personally like bigfeet and when I say it I use it in singular or plural I just like the word better besides that who made moneymaker lord and master of Bigfoot terminology

      Delete
    9. Bigfoots like to eat deers. So sayeth the blowhard.

      Delete
    10. Fatt Monkeyfaker is a lying bitchSunday, January 27, 2013 at 3:05:00 PM PST

      you believers are fools there is no Bigfoot. Its over.

      Delete
    11. Says the fool coming to a Bigfoot site to tell us. This doesn't make you a genius but also a fool or tool. I hope you brag and one of your friends punch you in your big head.

      Delete
    12. No we don't say "deers", "elks", or "mooses"... But we do say coyotes, wolves, and Mountain Lions, Cougars, Panthers.

      But saying "Bigfoot" for a plural implies you are talking about one specific creature. "Bigfoot" has become a generic term for what could be at least three different things. PNW Sasquatch, Skunk-apes, Southern Sasquatch, and Mid-West "Momo" are all reported having different behavior, screams, and physical discriptions. Thats why I say "Bigfoots"

      Delete
  2. Something that doesn't exist can neither be singular or plural.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Which naturally then leads to the question of sanity on this board. Since sanity does not exist here, is the plural of sanity, sanities?

      Delete
    2. Funny to see so many people flock to a blog about something if it doesn't exist the trolls are behaving much like religious people flocking to God blogs.

      Delete
    3. bigfoot dont exist, no trollling here just facts, sorry buddy

      Delete
    4. Ah, care to positively prove what you say is true.

      Delete
    5. So there's no plural form for dinosaur cause they don't exist anymore? Being real of mythical has nothing to do with proper English, spelling and grammar, ya twatwaffle.

      Delete
    6. Hahahaha twatwaffle I love it cockmeat sandwhich approved lol

      Delete
    7. Besides, regardless of Matt's views on the word and at least it's one thing he's right about, these big ones aren't even animals but people and the plural form for nationalities does have an s at the end of the name last time I checked.

      Delete
  3. Thanks a lot for sharing this with all of us you really recognise what you are talking about!
    Bookmarked. Kindly additionally visit my site
    =). We could have a link alternate agreement among us
    Feel free to visit my homepage : soccer transfer news arsenal

    ReplyDelete
  4. Does Matt smell like Teen Spirit?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He's trying to channel Kurt Cobain lately.

      Delete
  5. MM is great, the man has done so much for bigfooting, what a great guy! you clowns can bad mouth him all you want , you'll never have the impact he has had on the BF scene.YES they are real..GO MATT!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Please explain and elaborate on what broken branches, natural animal deaths, and constantly saying "squatches do that!" Or when MM says "oh yeah, that's not a coyote, it's a Squatch pretending to be a coyote to trick us!" Matt Moneymaker is why so many people stopped or don't take the hunt for Bigfoot seriously anymore. Every dead animal he comes across is a "Squatch kill" every broken branch is a "Squatch sign". With all the stuff M.M. says is Squatch stuff on the finding bigfoot show, he's either a complete moron for not actually finding one by now, or a jack ass set free in public to destroy any idea that the search for Bigfoot is done by intelligent people.

      Delete
    2. Yeah. and he taking it all to the bank dude.

      Delete
  6. I have never really cared for the use of 'Bigfoots' to describe them in plural form, I much prefer 'Bigfoot'. Matt is entitled to his opinion though, even if I think he's incorrect.

    From Wiki:

    "Some nouns have identical singular and plural. Many of these are the names of animals:

    bison
    buffalo
    deer
    fish
    moose
    pike
    sheep
    salmon
    trout
    swine
    plankton

    The plural deers is listed in some dictionaries.[6] As a general rule, game or other animals are often referred to in the singular for the plural in a sporting context: "He shot six brace of pheasant", "Carruthers bagged a dozen tiger last year", whereas in another context such as zoology or tourism the regular plural would be used. Eric Partridge refers to these sporting terms as "snob plurals" and conjectures that they may have developed by analogy with the common English irregular plural animal words "deer", "sheep" and "trout".[7] Similarly, nearly all kinds of fish have no separate plural form (though there are exceptions—such as rays, sharks or lampreys). As to the word fish itself, the plural is usually identical to the singular, although fishes is sometimes used, especially when meaning "species of fish"."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. More troubling than spelling is the fact that the media quite obviously sleeps with enemy here, we know anchors are brainless robotic morons most of them like those three idiots (infiltrated by the cover-uppers' agenda just like mainstream science) meaning there is no actual free press anymore. Remember Roswell. Hence we get crap reports like these, I bet the government's influences hinted at them oh fellas listen it's time for more ridiculing stories. Notice how they've been especially foolish since the Ketchum news broke it's been heavy ridicule time gonzo.

      Delete
    2. Anon 1:18. And they wonder why their ratings keep dropping year after year to the point they are soon to become irrelevant.

      Chuck

      Delete
  7. Whats up with Moneymakers emo hairdo?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. His emo comb-over wig is one of the biggest secrets in bigfootery still left today.

      Delete
    2. Reverse mullet. Party in the front, all business in the back.

      Delete
    3. Explaining his odd haircut, MM landed a role in the next "Twilight" movie as Edward's Uncle Efensteiner.

      Delete
    4. Well "TELLUM" his hair looks stupid

      Delete
    5. Getting his styling tips from Kate Gosselin.

      Delete
    6. ah got it mullet backwards is a tellum whatever it looks stupid

      Delete
  8. Piss poor reporting from the mainstream media and everyone on this one.

    That swamp is not in the Blue Mountains. Down in the desert near Wildhorse Casino. No BF way down there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agendas remember agendas. They're only reporting the views they're told to report on this it's all about not upsetting their housewife viewers.

      Delete
    2. Mainstream media? Not sure 60 minutes and CNN is interested in this one.

      Delete
  9. The Knower here.

    The PGF suit is located in Al DeAtleys place. Patricia Patterson made the suit along with Roger. Gimlin will come clean as well.

    Big news coming.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The knower knows jack shit.

      Delete
    2. well he has stated some facts above so it looks like he does know something

      Delete
    3. What facts ? He's interrupting threads that have nothing to do with his bullshit besides there clearly is no pgf suit anywhere ever you friggin' dummies. l o l

      Delete
    4. Buddy of mine did the HVAC out @ DeAtleys when it was built - said there was a trap door to some other level below the basement. Didn't show up on the plans:

      http://demetriouarchitects.com/showing_12.asp

      Delete
    5. Oh yes, "suits" are filled with massive trapezius and shoulder muscle bulk.

      Come on, the suit ship sailed 40 years ago. Wake up.

      Watch the shoulders and trapezius and thighs of this thing.

      Delete
  10. Ahh, Melba and Matt, they went to the two biggest Bullshiters in the business. Way to go abc GMA, you bunch of morons.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here.
    The sketch is tasteful, your authored subject
    matter stylish. nonetheless, you command get
    bought an edginess over that you wish be delivering the following.
    unwell unquestionably come more formerly again since exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield
    this increase.
    Also see my web page > arsenal transfer news cavani

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'm thinking that the plural form of "bigfoot" should be the same as the singular, UNLESS followed by a verb... In that case adding an "s" to the end would be proper. Watch how the following words work in sentences..... "Basket weaving bigfoots!!!" VS "Lokk at all those bigfoot weaving baskets!" .... And on second thought... Maybe not...

    ReplyDelete
  13. Reporters like "bitch get a hair cut"

    ReplyDelete
  14. The plural of Bigfoot/Sasquatch is "Hairy Bastards" Keep it simple, stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  15. BIGFEET. It's that simple


    MId Michigan Calling

    ReplyDelete
  16. BF is a relatively new term.

    Prefer Sasquatch or even Wendigo if you want to include other beasts that go bump in the night

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bigfoot is a silly press name and once found it'll be Sasquatch officially unless they have another name for themselves they prefer instead. Maybe Sasquatch is what they call themselves and only told the Indians.

      Delete
  17. i dont like matt moneymaker at all , never have , hes a hot head and hes all hollywood, can anyone tell me why he is orange ??

    ReplyDelete
  18. I'm sorry but was anyone under the misconception that they've been running around the U.S. and Australia looking for just a single individual creature why would he feel the need to assume everyone is that dumb

    ReplyDelete
  19. Bigfoot sounds like a kid's term and "Bigfoots/Bigfeet" just sounds stupid. Sasquatch or Squatches sounds better.

    ReplyDelete
  20. the plural of retard is retards

    ReplyDelete
  21. CAN SOMEONE PLEASE ANSWER THIS QUESTION FOR ME, " IS STEVEN STREUFERT A HOMOSEXUAL?" I GOT THE IMPRESSION HE WAS... I'D REALLY APPRECIATE IF SOMEONE WOULD BE KIND ENOUGH TO ANSWER THAT FOR ME!

    ReplyDelete
  22. ronn1, on 26 January 2013 - 07:57 PM, said:


    Mulder, I have a question for you..

    Is it *possible* that BF does NOT exist? Just give me a simple yes or no.
    Thanks...


    "Seeing as how I've seen one in good light at close range and seeing as how I am neither crazy, stupid, or under the influence of mind-altering "pharmaceuticals" that answer would be a resounding "NO"." - Mulder

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah and no it is not possible that Bigfoot does not exist. What's the problem?

      Delete
    2. "I am neither crazy, stupid, or under the influence of mind-altering pharmaceuticals."

      Mulder

      I await your proffer of proof for that claim as I find it highly debatable. By the way, you are getting your ass kicked over at the BFF site.



      Delete
  23. This is all wrong.

    Goose. Geese. Bigfoot. Bigfeet. Not bigfoots. That's illiterate.

    ReplyDelete
  24. How about Bigfi, pronounced BIG-FIGH, as in a A PACK OF BIGFI

    ReplyDelete
  25. ... or my personal fave, a GAGGLE OF BIGFI

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think it should be a TRAMPLE of Bigfoot or Bigfi if you prefer.

      Delete
    2. Bo Bo to Rene... I think we have a gaggle of bigfi out here tonight.

      Delete
  26. If a scentence is structured right, "Bigfoot" can be plural.

    Ex: The Bigfoot were roaming around the campsite. "Were" indicates more than one.

    ReplyDelete
  27. What in the Christ has he done to his hair?

    ReplyDelete
  28. that bigfeet stole my ham sandmich

    ReplyDelete
  29. Moneymaker is an idiot. It's Sasquatch, both singular and plural.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story