New Photo: Photograph taken of Bigfoot sitting by a creek outside Red Lodge


The photograph above was recently submitted to the BFRO. It was taken back in June near Red Lodge, Montana. It is clear something large and black is in the photo. According to the BFRO investigator who received the photographs, the figure in picture does not appear to have black bear characteristics although there are definitely black bears in the area. The witness did not realize that they had inadvertently photographed a Sasquatch sitting by the creek. The comparison photograph between the father of the witness and the Sasquatch is below. First, here's the story:

I went to visit my brother who had gotten a firefighting job up in Montana recently and on one of his days off, I wanted to go up into the secluded woods on a hike. Since he was working with the forestry service, he knew of a place that was very secluded and was extremely thick forested. We hiked about a mile and a half up into the mountains and about half way up, we crossed a little creek about 4 to 5 feet wide. I stopped and pulled out my phone to take a picture of the upstream view. I got the picture and we continued on without realizing what he had just done. Later that night I was going through the pictures of that days hike, when I came across something in one of the pictures that was extremely startling. About 45-50 feet from where I took the picture, there was a black figure that seemed to be sitting near the bank of the creek looking right as us. Curious about what I had seen, a few days later when my father arrived to visit my brother, I took him to the place I had taken the picture. Sure enough, where there had so clearly been something sitting next to the creek, there was nothing. In fact there were even freshly broken branches off trees that were no where near the spot it was sitting. I took more photos with my father sitting in where we suspected it was and there is a clear and definite difference where there was a figure sitting, nothing sitting there, and my dad sitting in the same place.

Uncropped image

Father

Sasquatch before enhancement
Check out the BFRO report here: http://www.bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=36008

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Its a side view, coned head, muscular back, if its real, pretty damn cool. Huge next to pic of father too

      Delete
  2. That's one crappy cell phone. Even his dad is blurry.
    Inconclusive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed SN, makes me wonder about "According to the BFRO investigator who received the photographs, the figure in picture does not appear to have black bear characteristics". Seems like a stretch to me.

      Delete
  3. why no unambiguous photos of bigfoot?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Harry! Want to go dogging with us tonight?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Oh its Bigfoot alright! Hes taking a Big crap! You can sell Bigfoot dung on EBAY!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I've been to Red Lodge back in August 2009. It appears to be the right kind of area, but as far as the pic goes it's a blobsquatch!

    ReplyDelete
  7. If you r that close to the figure in that daylight. Shouldn't you be able to get crystal clear footage of the primate? Therefore, I have to go with Renee and say there is no good logical explanation for this.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's blurry so it must be a bigfoot. LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I have seen Bigfoot and he is blurry!". RIP Mitch Hedberg

      Delete
    2. Good one, that guy was funny.

      Delete
  9. it looks like crap sitting where crap belongs

    ReplyDelete
  10. looks like a bear clawing a tree

    ReplyDelete
  11. For every taterhole their must be a "tatermole" anybody up for digging up some taterpie?

    ReplyDelete
  12. What is this, a 1 megapixel, flip phone from'05?
    G to the A-Y.

    ReplyDelete
  13. WOW not another crappy blurry picture! Think this is the one thats gonna change the minds of the sceptics. In my opinion this puts the last nail in the coffin case closed. Think about it people if every tom dick and harry is getting these shitty pics it wouldn't be that hard to find a bf and get good footage.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Pics are 2 different scenes man and supposed bf trees and background are different

    ReplyDelete
  15. Another ambiguous photo. Ambiguous is the ONLY reason Bigfoot is relevant. There is NO proof of the existence, not even decent evidence, ANYWHERE. Bigfoot IS blurry/ambiguous photos, the end!

    ReplyDelete
  16. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  18. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Dang, I guess I ain't as smart as I thought I was.

    Shoot. Darn.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I definately see a taterhole wearing a tin-foil hat in this picture.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Fake!!! The lighting is all wrong does not match the trees.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia