Comments from a female peer reviewer on Ketchum’s paper
Robert Lindsay has a bunch of Ketchum news for us today. Here's one piece that's pretty interesting. According Lindsay, one woman who's on the peer review team is apparently holding up Ketchum's paper due to the conflicting notion that Bigfoot was created during the Ice Age. Here's a snippet from Lindsay's Bigfoot News December 18th:
Comments from a female peer reviewer on Ketchum’s paper. One of my commenters is friends with a man who knows a woman who is on the peer review team that is looking at Ketchum’s paper. According to the man, the woman was holding up the paper because she refused to believe that if Bigfoots were created in Ice Age SW Europe 15,000, then they could have somehow ended up in North America possibly soon afterwards.
The birth of Bigfoot would have to be somewhere in Asia, possibly Siberia or the Far East, for the Bigfoots to follow the Amerindians into the Americas. This is all based on the assumption that Bigfoots followed the Amerindians across the Bering Straight into the Americas. The Bigfoots would have had to have been in Siberia to do that. So how to the Bigfoots get from SW Europe to Siberia? To the reviewer, this made no sense, and Ketchum had no explanation for it either.
However, a recent study confirming what I had always suspected – that Europeans from 15-20,000 YBP are genetically close to Amerindians, apparently strengthens Ketchum’s case. Apparently the ancient Europeans and paleo Amerindians share a common ancestor in ancient Europe and ancient Siberia. As you can see, there is nothing wrong with the paper’s science itself apparently; instead it is questions like this that is holding up the paper.
First.
ReplyDeleteBREAKING NEWS JUST IN...........
DeleteBigfoot has been found
http://mebigfoot.com/
I see three possibilities here, pure fiction, Lindsays been reading this blog and read what Caz posted a couple of days ago or it's true as we have two supporting stories from different sources.
DeleteCaz posted a link to the paper that connected the dots and because his info predates Lindsays I am more inclined to believe this is plagiarism rather then scoop.
Its all bullshit anyway because the reviewers dont care about supposition or guesswork to form a hypothesis. The science of the paper is the DNA ID, genes, RNA and proteins tested, how they were ID'ed, etc.
DeleteLike all things in this field, total bullshit.
I bet you mommy told you there was no santaclaus at a very young age and ever since then you just have to rain on everybody else's parade
DeleteParty pooper
My mommy was a crack whore, and died when I was 54. Then I was sold to a circus. So the last 3 days have been hard for me.
DeleteHave you thought about going back to school?
DeleteI'm too fat, ugly and stupid. So I thought I'd fit just right in as a bigfoot researcher.
DeleteI seen one two days ago, next to my cage.
Maybe you should consult your obgyn about post menapause irritability and or depression
DeleteSorry but I'm not going into a private medical consulation on a public forum.
DeleteYou have already aired a lot of laundry. What's a little more?
Deletesecond......bitches!!!!
ReplyDeleteMy sisters brothers girlfriend is second cousins with the guy that knows someone that talked to a lady on the peer review panel...
ReplyDeleteNothing like reliable information! :D
^lol
DeleteSo true, just tabloid trash.
Deletehaha
DeleteOh yeah my cousins uncles sisters mothers brother is a Bigfoot and he said they were here in the 70's but they just recently left. The reason for this is not the end of the world but because they were watching tv a few months back in their stick hut and had seen that their secret was discovered by the show ancient aliens. Since the secret was discovered that they are "watcher" beings they had their cover blown. Hence they went back to their regular life's and suggested we stop looking for them because if they even do come back they are in a completely different dimension. So all photographing is futile because they can camouflage themselves as owls, deer, or just a giant blob because they are crafty and can wear deer heads with their right eye looking out the left eyehole and even talk out of their anus. Thank you sincerely, hider of the furry people
DeleteThey don't do any of that they are real creatures with real feelings who just want to be loved and accepted and appreciated for the diversity and joy that they bring to nature. I am so sick and tired of the skeptics making fun of these beloved creatures! We can learn so much from them if we only give them a chance! Stop hunting them down let them come to us in THEIR own time and in their own way! If they feel threatened they won't! Everybody is screaming for a body!??? How would you like it if people were making fun of your family members and hunting them down??? Lol I can't stop laughing because there are people who are reading this and probably agreeing with me
Deletelol^^^ is the only thing i agree with about that!@ haha
DeleteDude, if you're that delusional... please seek some help.
^ that was hilarious, i think a little pee came out.
DeleteWell...MY sisters brothers girlfriend has one titty that hangs lower than the other....guess she is evolving.
ReplyDeleteor de-evolving
Deletenothing wrong with a little lopsided lovin! lol
DeleteIt's like one of them is winking at you
Delete"So how to the Bigfoots get from SW Europe to Siberia?"
ReplyDeletewait for it! The Alien connection.
it would probably be more likely for them to walk than to wait for alien transport, but who knows. hey, pull my finger...
Deletekinky!
DeleteThey hopped a train I'm sure
DeleteThey didn't have trains back in 'em days silly.
DeleteI learned something me today
DeleteThey took a ride in Fatsano's taxi cab.
DeleteTHIS JUST IN!
ReplyDeleteKetchum reveals the truth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2WqYidC_0Y
But, psilobin shrooms don't generally grow in Texas area, there a Pacific Northwest delacacy.
DeleteThis just in.,, River just found out he has a penis!^
Delete"But, psilobin shrooms don't generally grow in Texas area, there a Pacific Northwest delacacy.
DeleteDude,I guess you've never partied in Texas cause they are EVERYWHERE in Texas.
You must be on them now.
@5:47:00
DeleteSo did your sister :)
┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐
the knower here:
ReplyDeleteanyone wish to park their man marbles on my chin?
thank you, sirs and madams, for your time.
You said Ketchum went dark and here we are 8 posts and 45,052 comments later. Bet you don't even have a chin-liar.
DeleteI WOULD!!! IF I COULD UNLOAD MILK!!
ReplyDeleteWhen Melba's paper publishes, we'll all be "bleevers" ;0)
ReplyDeleteThis is strange, the weedeater sound is a new one:
ReplyDeletehttp://bfro.net/GDB/show_report.asp?id=36571
I am skeptical of my own existence.
ReplyDeleteI'm skeptical that you're not sitting on a butt plug right now.
DeleteAt least this time you had the decency to wait 14 minutes before replying to your own comment.
DeleteVery observant 10:59
DeleteMe to. I mean I see myself in the mirror but I wonder if I am really me or just Bigfoot in a human suit. I often have dreams that I am walking around in this costume in the woods trying to freak out the other Bigfoots in the.. But I'm not sure if it's a dream or not.
DeleteI'm skeptical that I'm awake I think my reality is a dream inside a dream inside a dream inside a nightmare. This also answers why people still find clowns to be acceptable.
DeleteYou guys are making me dizzy
DeleteIt's a debated issue at present between theorectical physists that 'WE' may be living inside of a simulation.
DeleteEnter the Solutreans...
ReplyDeleteHey Shawn,
ReplyDeleteI don't know if maybe it has to do with being Laotian or it's just your own little idiosyncrasy but I have noticed that you have a tendency to note someones gender if that someone is female.
Consider some recent things that you wrote:
“Comments from a FEMALE peer reviewer on Ketchum's paper”
“The Ketchum camp's public relations GIRL, Robin Lynne Forestpeople”
“FEMALE president Dilma Ok's construction of damn and hydroelectric plant”
I don't know why you're doing that, but you're giving that bitch who complains about “sexism” a shit ton of ammunition.
Now you and I know that Ketchum receives a lot of criticism because she's an unqualified, cat vet, who thinks that bigfoot braids her horses hair, but, like all female failures, she (and her supporters) will undoubtedly try to falsely accuse her critics of “sexism”.
I would like to suggest that if you are Merchant's buddy and are a member of his “school of thought” (specifically the “Melba's a bozo” school of thought) that it might be wise to refer to “female peer reviewers”, “public relations girls”, and “female presidents” as peer reviewers, publicists, and presidents until this whole Ketchum debacle blows over.
Alternately you could start noting everyone’s gender by saying things like “male gossip columnist Robert Lindsay” because, you know, that would be fucking hysterical.
People like girls. They click on it. You did.
DeleteRictor doesn't
DeleteGo easy on Shawn. After all, in his native country of Laos, women are treated as chattel (meaning husbands own their wives in the same way they might own cows or horses) and women have absolutely no rights. In Laotian (and other Southeastern Asian)cultures, it is actually illegal for a woman to address a man without the man speaking first and initiating a conversation. The penalty for violating that particular law is capital punishment (death) or, in some lesser cases with mitigating circumstances, slicing off the woman's hands at the wrists. In Laos, it is also common for females to be subjected to a type of procedure known as "vaginal circumcision" (I will spare you the gory details of that monstrous kind of surgery). Given this situation, I would not judge Shawn harshly for occasionally using a double standard in referring to women in the headlines to his posts. Compared to most Laotian men, he is a regular Alan Alda for shit’s sake.
DeleteYour a fucken idiot that thinks he's much smarter than he really is.
DeleteDon't change a think shawn
DeleteThis was obviously written by some chick.
ReplyDeleteYou mean somebody actually can write with there dick and not just in the snow?
DeleteWhat the hell does it matter where it originated from? If that's the only thing holding up the paper it's bullshit.
ReplyDeleteI seriously dislike when a "theory" is placed into factual science. The archaeologist that discovered remains on American soil older than 200,000 years was laughed away by everyone because it would mean they would have had to "re-write" their theory.
ReplyDeleteMy people never came across a land-bridge created by the ice age. We were always here and others simply can't accept that.
Europeans can accept that they come from Africa, but I will not. Especially not when other archaeologists discovered proof of humanity on the American continent that dated back long before the baring straight theory.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/11/041118104010.htm
http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/health/americas-oldest-carbon-dated-relics-could-rewrite-the-nations-history_10058086.html
So, did you just.................? Ah never mind it would be pointless anyway.
DeleteI need a drink.
BF Ojibway, All the genetics studies I've seen do not confirm what you are saying. You can track genes because they have little changes in them over time from errors (polymorphisms) that are passed to offspring. These single nucleic polymorphisms (SNPs) are like fingerprints. They don't show the source of humans eminating from Native Americans (or all humans would have SNPs in common with Native Americans + their own unique polymorphisms). They do however show some links in common between Native Americans and North Eastern Europeans. Watch some footage of the Russian Raindeer tribes that nomadically set up camp following the deer - they will look like your brothers and sisters.
DeleteOnce they sequenced Neanderthal, and found his genes in Europeans, Asians, and Native Americans, but not Africans this at least should tell you that either the original people of North America crossed the land bridge, or that subsequent people did with such density and integration that your people now carry those genes.
This is odd for the simple fact that I always tell my spouse that radiocarbon dating is speculation if there is soot, fire, or a number of other things radiocarbon dating is useless
DeleteOB whose laughing? The Bering straight theory went out the window a few years ago.
DeleteA couple anomalous results do not outweigh all the other evidence that the Americas were settled relatively recently (less than 30kya).
DeleteLol the Bering land straight? That theory is old news
ReplyDeleteLa la la circus polka dot polka dot Afro
ReplyDeleteMy cousins sister-in-laws brothers nephews housekeeper cleans the offices of one of the peer reveiwers uncles second cousins auto shop and he said JS came in to the shop to have a dent taken out of his car because he hit a Bigfoot baby that was chasing after a blueberry bagle a camper left in the street and in the back of the car was a manuscript written by Sykes but his name was crossed off and Ketchum's name was there instead
ReplyDeleteDo not question PG! The film is our best, and only, definitive proof of bigfoot. Without this film, footery would be a sham. I have not wasted thirty years of my life crawling through the forests of the Pacific north west howling like a baboon and knocking wood like a lumberjack for a damn hoax. I've seen the creatures myself. It was just for a brief moment, but I felt him reach out to me. Not with his long hairy fingers but with his mind. He told me not to be afraid. Then a warm golden halo appeared around his head and he told me his name was Raphael. Telekinetically, he warned me that bigfoots needed to remain hidden, but also told me that every bigfoot is a fourth degree blackbelt. The foot used his mind powers to braid my hair without even touching it and sent me on my way with a blueberry bagel. He also have me his cousin's business card for his contracting business. Apparently the foots are starting to turn a profit off of stick architecture.
ReplyDeleteInteresting post from George Knapp:
ReplyDeletehttp://lasvegascitylife.com/sections/opinion/knappster/george-knapp-i’m-dreaming-bigfoot-christmas.html
Why does that have to be addressed at all? Take that part out then. This is to prove a new species, so proving the lineage of the species doesn't have to be a part of that, does it? I've seen other species mentioned where they just put them in a separate classification or made them a sub-species of something close, until the scientists could figure it out. As long as they're "homo" then work on the rest later, imo.
ReplyDeleteSoon?
ReplyDelete