Strange Wild Animal Kills 63 People


Editor’s Note: This is a guest post by Bigfoot Chicks, Melissa Adair. As serious researchers, the Bigfoot Chicks are commited to seeking the truth regarding the Bigfoot mystery. Assuming that Bigfoots exist, they want to help ensure their surival and hope for an opportunity to observe them in their natural habitat. You can visit their blog at bigfootchicks.blogspot.com.

Interesting article that dates back to 1765, France. It is the tale of the Beast of Gevaudan. An aggressive creature that terrorized the country side for nine months and was allegedly responsible for the deaths of 63 men, women and children. The description of the creature calls to mind images of the dogman or werewolf, but what I found interesting was an eyewitness saying it had the head of a man. Could it be an aggressive primate?? Or is it the legendary "Dogman"??

See article below.

THE CONSTITUTION: ATLANTA, GA
SUNDAY. JUNE 22, 1890-
A TERROR. A Strange Wild Animal That Killed Sixty Three Persons Within Nine Months-

From The St. Louie Republic. In March,1764, a frightful creature, which Pierre Despire says was a mixture of man, bear and wild boar, made its appearance near Gevaudan, in France. During the summer several provinces were terrorired by the awful deeds of the uncanny creature, which, notwithstanding its many depredations, managed to keep out of sight until about the middle of the December following, when a peasant woman claimed to have met a monstrosity of the most frightful kind, having the body of an alligator, the tail of a lion, the claws of a wolf and the horrid, mocking laugh of a famishing hyena.

According to this woman's story the beast had the head of a man with the skin so tightly drawn over it as to give it the appearance of a death head, the eyes being so deeply sunk in their sockets as to be invisible, although the creature stood directly in front of her. The woman told her story in the village but was disbelieved until the following morning, when it was ascertained that two little girls and a boy, who had gone to a pasture with some goats, were missing. In the afternoon of the following day the head of the boy was found in a ravine. No other trace of their whereabouts was ever discovered.

The people were now completely panic-stricken; they would search for the creature only in squads of twelve or more, fearing to separate lest the brute would devour them. The legislature of Languedoc offered 3,000 livres for the animal's head, actually sending out a detachment of mounted soldiers in search of it. In January, 1765, only about three weeks after the boy and the little girls were killed by the thing, it attacked. some children who were herding sheep in the mountains, but all escaped, perhaps by the brute taking a feast of mutton instead.

The day but one following it appeared again, this time carrying off one of the children. It was next heard of in the vicinity of Mezel, where it carried off one woman and several children, besides as an old account says, "taking the head clean off of a man." The Gazette de France published a full account of these ravages in February,17651, and the, king offered 6,000 livres to the person or persons that would capture it. Captain Duhamel, of the dragoons, organized a general hunt, dressed his men as women, and had them attended by children. The hunt was a failure, and the desolater kept up his ravages during the spring and summer of 1765, until September 20th of that year, when it was killed by Sieur Reinhardt.

No one was allowed to see the creature except the mounted guards under the duke of Orleans. It is believed even to this day that it was a creature unknown and unheard of, notwithstanding two reports, one of which said it was a black lion, the other that it was a Russian wolf, neither of which seem likely when it is known that it killed and carried off no less than sixtythree men, women and children, from December, 1764 to September, 1765.

Comments

  1. I think they figured out it was a lion being kept by a local lord or something and releasing it to instill fear .and thus control, over the local populace.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. noooo, dont ruin the fantasy, its bigfoot!!!!!!!!

      Delete
    2. ManBearPig strikes again!

      Delete
    3. NickB, That was Brotherhood of the Wolf lol. Based on this event, but not a true story lol

      Delete
  2. 'Brotherhood of the Wolf' go buy it on DVD...Yes it was purported to be a lion.

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0237534/

    ReplyDelete
  3. iiit wes de chipacaubra mann

    ReplyDelete
  4. I thought it was a person and there pet hyiena that was suspects.If i remember right i think there was a mounted hyiena in a museum that was possibly responsible for the killings.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Check any credible source and you will find that they were wolves, perhaps wolf-dog hybrids

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yeah, "Brotherhood of the Wolf" actually touches on most of the main points of the story though sensationalizes it a bit. Good action and Monica Belucci adds her special "flair" to it.

    In reality, a priest in the area set up a "hospital" in Gevaudan to tend to survivors of the attacks and there were a few. He kept meticulous notes and drawings of witness accounts. Also, as mentioned above, one of the main lords in the area had been known to be a world traveler and was thought to have brought an animal back from Africa. Witness accounts and drawings by the priest were later included in a book by a later ancester, Abbé Pierre Pourcher(you can actually see these drawings in his work) show something like a giant hyena. Wounds of the victims were also not conducive to single wolf attacks because of the extent of crushed bone and teeth marks. Also, at that time Asian hyenas were still known to be present in remote areas of Eastern Europe. Even after the purported death of the creature, surrounding townships reorted similar deaths years after. But the discriptions by Pourcher point to the extinct larger European Hyena. It's been thought that small groups of these hyenas held on in remote areas.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cave_hyena
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Striped_hyena
    http://labete.7hunters.net/index.htm
    Page 233 of Pourcher gives a good discription" the monster is of an amazing mobility..size of a year old calf..reddish hair...head big and darker than rest of body...ears short and straight...jwas always agape...black stripe 4 fingers wide down the back...chest white and very broad...tail very long and strong the tip white...back paws very big and long... those of the front shorter and covered in long hair..some resemblance to a wolf and some to a bear...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is NOTHING I would not do with, for, or to Monica Belucci.....

      Delete
    2. You could always feed her grapes

      http://www.wallpaper4me.com/images/wallpapers/monicabelucciandgrapes-79943.jpeg

      Delete
  7. sounds like grasping at straws to relate a european article to the bigfoot chicks in Ga.maybe they should investigate this first hand nearly 200yrs later or so.wow! Really wow!

    ReplyDelete
  8. hyeina and was done by other tv shows.the story is half contented and purely a waste of time to read today on this site!How about bigfoot chicks wear bikinis to lure bigfoot! now that article id read and yes include pics for us men folk to drool on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey man they young they learning.The bigfoot girls or women should be what they use.The hole chic thing just sounds to sexy.

      Delete
    2. Yes bigfoot chicks in thong bikinis. Please we need something other than fake bigfoot stuff to look at in between the rare times something of relevance is actually posted.

      Delete
    3. Yeah but not thongs pleaaazzze, a flour sack maybe.

      Delete
  9. I meant yea to sexy to be taken siriously. No offence i hope later.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The bigfoot womens research org. sounds good. bwro. hows that sound bigfoot chicks.

    ReplyDelete
  11. History 2 (H2) has a show on about this today

    ReplyDelete
  12. or wbro womens bigfoot research org.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Or Wally could fund a whole new genre.

    CID

    C*nts in Drag.

    ReplyDelete
  14. To hell with the bigfoot dykes!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Quit being so hard on the females you only call them names cause you aint getting no pussy.

    ReplyDelete
  16. So they lesbian ,dykes whatever ,if you have a daughter i hope you nicer to them. Us real men should give the ladies a little more respect.I dont care how they live, but they should be respected as much as men. Men have no patience women dont understand testosterone .These bigfoot chicks are interested with a lot other female researchers. I would see it as there peers would probably their fathers and all you go ol bibfoot researchers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What in the heck are you trying to say?

      And don't pull that "ENGRISH IS MY SECOND RANGRESH" sh1t!!

      UNBELIEVABLE!!!

      Would hate to see you trying to order a dinner at a restaurant.

      Delete
    2. me to haha iwas drunker than a nined eyed well you know.

      Delete
  17. It was Sasquatch in a wheelchair!

    ReplyDelete
  18. It was a trained hyena. Killed by it's own master so that he would look like a hero.

    It's said the clergy were involved in the whole thing and hired Jean Chastel to have his "beast" terrorize people into attending church.

    Chastel went from creepy loner to big shot. After killing the beast with a silver bullet for dramatic effect, the carcass was sent to a museum and there it sat in the basement until it was located by George Deuchar and Ken Gerhardt during the filming of the History Channel's documentary, The Real Wolf Man.

    How did they find the carcass? They went to the museum and asked an attendant.

    That documentary is clearly the accurate account, although I don't know about the clergy involvement.

    http://voices.yahoo.com/the-real-wolfman-beast-gvaudan-4106153.html?cat=37

    Scott McMan
    ghosttheory.com

    ReplyDelete
  19. Interesting story but please guys stop putting such obviously fake images at the head of stories, all that does is to dumb down the true evidence and bring ridicule into what should be serious research...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A professioal wolf hunter by the name of François Antoine killed the larger of the two wolves claimed to be the beast. The Beast was often seen the company of a smaller animal. The first was to weigh 160 pounds and was considered very large for a wolf of that time. The smaller was later killed by Chastel. Other villages suffered similar attacks for years after the Gevaudan case. The main stickler for me, is that a wolf of this size doesn't fit physical attributes and abilities witnessed by the locals. Picking up children, sheep, dogs whole and carrying them off. In one written account a shepard's dog attacked the beast and was knocked a considerable distance with the swinging blow from the beast's head. An average European Hyena was estimated to go 250 pounds. I can more easily imagine an animal of that weight being able to do the things witnessed.
      In the movie, and yes it's just a movie, but they bring out a good point in that a secret sect was responsible for the attacks by a trained animal to threaten the Kings rule through the church. In return the King sends a professional hunter to just kill any wolf and claim it is done. This is what happens in the end for real at Gevauden. So to me the animal in the museum does not truly represent the Beast. It represents a token answer by government to quell disillusionment of the people.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story