NewsFeed Explains Why It's In Finding Bigfoot's Best Interest To Not Find Bigfoot, Ever
If these latest stats don't tell you anything, perhaps it can still give you a clue into the popularity of the Animal Planet show: Finding Bigfoot. According to NewsFeed, the show averages more than 1.4 million viewers a week, beating out other reality-TV favorites like TLC's Hoarding: Buried Alive and HGTV’s "Holmes Inspection."
The real question NewsFeed is pondering: does anyone really want to find Bigfoot? Proving Bigfoot’s existence puts an end to all of the fun, and in the case of Animal Planet, some serious ratings. The season-two premiere of Finding Bigfoot had 1.6 million viewers, making it the most watched episode of the program and the second-best season debut of any show on the network.
Four episodes into season two, Finding Bigfoot is still going strong. The show averages more than 1.4 million viewers a week, beating out other reality-TV favorites like TLC’s Hoarding: Buried Alive and HGTV’s “Holmes Inspection.” Not Kardashian numbers, but pretty respectable for basic cable.
Hunting Bigfoot poses potential ethical, legal and permitting issues, not to mention putting an end to profitable TV franchises. “Finding Bigfoot” has six more episodes before it’s season finale.
[via newsfeed.time.com]
you are not a dummy shawn
ReplyDeleteWhen is the 2nd season set to end? Maybe the DNA proof will beat them to it, and make any such TV shows obsolete in the future and relics themselves. Why, I hope so.
ReplyDeleteOne thing is for sure: during that show they did in Minnesota, there was a lot of screwing around done by the team, and it seemed to me that Mr. Moneymaker was ignoring it.
ReplyDeleteMaybe Matt said something about it later on off camera, and if so that's great.
Example: Bobo calling out to Bigfoot, saying: "Come on you hairy sonof%*$#*." And later on he pretended to be Renae over the radio.
If you take this research as a joke than that's how it is going to be treated by the public watching it.
I'm all for a sense of humor, such as a light moment during the daytime while talking to a witness for example, but even that should be kept to a minimum.
Anyways, it is a good show. I haven't missed an episode yet.
Excellent read. I just passed this onto a buddy who was doing some research on that. He actually bought me lunch since I found it for him! So let me rephrase: Thank you for lunch!
ReplyDeleteYOU JUST WANT TO SEE BF ONCE ? NOT ME BRING HIM BACK FOR THE NEXT 5 YEARS I'LL WATCH THEM FIND HIM OR HER.
ReplyDeleteExactly to anonymous above me. If they find Bigfoot imagine the discovery shows or animal planet shows trying to observe them. I say find Bigfoot ASAP and let animal planet change the name to goin Bigfoot and they can travel around north America and determine which areas are " squatchy" and what not
ReplyDeleteAuto correct is evil. The above post was suppose to say change te name to found Bigfoot not goin Bigfoot. I'll have my son proof read all comments in the future.
ReplyDeleteThey don't want to find Bigfoot anymore than Scotland wants to admit there really is no Nessie. Even if after all the sonar scans over the lock, They show nothing large living there, but to admit it doesn't exist will cost them tourist, so they will never admit it
ReplyDeleteLOL about auto correct. It can sure cause some funny semantics.
ReplyDelete