A Year Later And The Yeti Debate Rages On


When Dr. Bryan Sykes announced he was taking on a huge Yeti/Bigfoot DNA study, we were all stoked. When he said he had some amazing results, we were excited. When he said the results were that he didn't find yeti DNA, but that he did find some prehistoric bear DNA, we were sad, but still, that's pretty cool. Then other scientists got a hold of his work and said no, this is probably just a bear. Well, it's a year later, and the debate still rages on.


Comments

  1. It's impossible to have a discussion here because of the trolls, and I don't mean the sceptics.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are no skeptics that post here or anywhere else about Bigfoot. They would not waste their time. The simpletons that post about it daily on the old JREF are every bit the footer Creekfreak was.

      Delete
    2. Then why are you here?

      Go to BFF were the trolls are not allowed and you can have a bigfoot circle jerk with all the other freaks

      Delete
  2. Then just listen:

    http://www.stancourtney.com/sounds/Jemez%20Mtns.%20New%20Mexico,%20August%2012,%202005.mp3

    ReplyDelete
  3. It only rages on with footers.

    The rest of us heard it corectly the first time, he didnt find what you were looking for.

    Carry on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ^
      Look at this asshole. A footer calling footers, footers. Do you pretend to be a skeptic because you think it makes you look like less of asshole for being obsessed with a mythical creature ?

      Delete
    2. HA HA HA HA A HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

      BITCH SLAP THAT BIGMOUTH.

      Delete
    3. I guess the reason I keep coming back is for the sense of community and warmth in the bigfoot scene

      Delete
  4. either a brown bear or an (ancient?) polar bear in a subtropical jungle in Bhutan (where one of the two samples came from)! Both "solutions" do not fit...this makes it even more mysterious...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not really a mystery. Sykes has shown himself to be a bit of an idiot. Other scientists examining the work, because it would certainly be revolutionary, determined it was from a known common brown bear. There really is not much of a debate.

      Sykes is also the most vocal opponent to attack Dr. Ketchum's work, claiming any sample that shows a mixture of human and unknown hominid DNA is contaminated, even though all her samples are analyzed in university labs that use thorough washing techniques to remove any contaminants. He's a joke.

      Delete
    2. If a "Real" Bigfoot hair was presented to Dr. Sykes, it would come as Bear D.N.A. every time.
      These "super smart" academias will never they were wrong.

      Delete
  5. Remember when Joe was all like wait for Sykes? He kept telling skeptics to wait for Sykes.
    Sykes has nothing supporting the existence of bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?