M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
In Britain the reservation for weirdos and scummy nutcases is known as Wales...all the sicko farm-crime types are there too in wellies - eh, Joe?
ReplyDelete^ very true
Deletehaha haha HAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
Ah, very funny mate except I'm from London and there are no reservations in wales . Maybe you should put your crack pipe down , stop playing fort nite and pick up a history book because you clearly haven't learned any bigfoot history either much less know anything about the world outside your trailer park
DeleteCREASED !
cheers
Joe
:) xx
Delete"The mythical bipedal hominid known as bigfoot does not exist" - Bryan Sykes
ReplyDelete"The mythical biped hominoid known as PS is a delusional sicko fanboy !" Tobey Styles
Deletebahahaha
cheers
Joe
(Sykes is coming)!
DeleteHahahahahahahahahahaha
Sykes has come, been, and gone. Zero north american bigfoots found. Pretty much a full obliteration of the bigfoot fantasy.
DeleteSykes was their best shot at getting any credibility and proof for Bigfoot and it actually had the opposite effect. Unless a body is produced believers have nothing for absolute confirmation and never will.
DeleteIts over. The early 2010s had a lot of hype building for ketchum, erickson, standing, bfro, smeja, sykes etc etc. Guess what? No bigfoots or even any trace of their existence. All roads lead to zero bigfoots.
DeleteWe don't need a body you fools ! A lot of court cases have been based on fewer evidence . We have the PGF, we have foot print castings, we have verified sightings by highly credible people and a vast rich history of native tribes describing the same creature for centuries
DeleteSorry boyos, you can wince and whine all you want and take the name of Randi in vain but the truth is the truth and that truth is bigfoot is real so we don't need a stinkin' body. Game, set , match
CREASED !
cheers
Joe
You know when PS’s is licking his wounds when he’s on a repetitive loony statement mode, ha ha ha!! That’ll be the Meldrum thread.
DeleteGet well soon PS.
Says the mental case ^
DeleteYou lonely PS?
Deletehttps://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/experimentations/201908/the-loneliness-the-internet-troll?amp
Behind every troll’s antisocial behaviour is a little bit of tragedy. Don’t worry, you have your plethora of YouTube channels to drown out the bad times.
Says the mental case^
DeleteOnly one of us has real psychologists writing about our behaviour and root causes, PS. And only someone who obsesses about a subject the extent you do, only to harass other people about it when you’re in need of control over your crappy emotions, can someone truly be classed as a mental case.
DeleteGet well soon Sporto.
So dr johnson has a new name for the forest people which is the "xanue". Also they can heal you via faith in jesus christ.
ReplyDeleteHow does this fit in with joes subsaharan african descendent theory?