Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
Many of the photos in this clip are known hoaxes.
ReplyDeleteHeck, one of them is Leroy Blevins in his costume when he attempted to recreate the Patterson creature.
This 7 minute documentary makes bigfoot look more like folklore than a real animal. And of course, it contains the usual blurry see what you want to see bugfoot BS.
If some native Americans see the bigfoot as a real creature, is the Thunderbird also real? How about the Wendigo? And the Avanyu? And the Misi-Maskwa? Etc. etc.
Reports of Thunderbird sightings go back centuries, and the fossil record does show that giant birds (teratorns) with wingspans between 12 and 18 ft (3.7 and 5.5 m) were likely contemporary with early man.They also described beavers, coyotes, all these things that are in myth and legend that exist in reality. Natives consider the spiritual and physical one and the same.
Delete^ Gug gug slurp gug slobber slobber dribble
Deletegug gug gug
^ the usual infantile knob hard at work once again. He just can't quite wrap his head around the obvious fact bigfoot is real
Deletecheers
Joe
'Gug', wrap around the head, so good, 'Gug'
DeleteCheers
Joe
Did you ever notice that, as the Patterson creature is walking away, the right foot has toes, but the left foot does not.
ReplyDeleteWhen a still from the footage showing the raised, light colored left foot bottom pointing background is blown up, you can clearly see that the front of the left foot is entirely squared off straight across, with no toes. No foot is shaped like that, and it certainly does not conform with the shape of the many bigfoot footprint casts.
DeleteEven blown up with less resolution, the squared left foot where the toes should be is clearly visible. This points to a costume and a hoax. There is no doubt in my mind that this indicates a hoax.
Don't be talking smack about the Patterson film, even if it is true. The cut and paste wrath of Iktomi with "got monkey suit" will come down on you.
Delete^ oh please don`t start the fat fool off on a cut n` paste rant...
Deletehahahaha hahahaha hahahaha
http://bizarrezoology.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/compelling-evidence-toe-extension-of.html
Deletehttps://youtu.be/W4AnJWb2fs0
https://youtu.be/RLNMjC26Ya4
https://www.scientificexploration.org/docs/18/jse_18_1_meldrum.pdf
https://www.scientificexploration.org/docs/30/jse_30_3_Meldrum.pdf
Okay Jan
Deletehaha, Iktomi schools the fools once again. They remind me of the annoying west ham supporters on the tube after a loss. So roasted !
Deletecreased
cheers
Joe
'Gug', Fasano, like roasted ham,'Gug', so good
DeleteCheers
Joe
East End Cott Compton Rd
Come look me up mates
Patty is not a hoax. If you watch MK's extended footage you can see Patty's ass hole. No joke.
ReplyDelete