M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
Anyone see the feature in the Guardian regarding the failure of "footers" to produce evidence of "bigfoot" ? ...seems that all the "evidence" and "samples" of sasquatch/yeti/bigfoot hair was no more than mistaken identity and turned out YET AGAIN to be from "bears" and the like.
ReplyDeleteOh yeah...also a dog was included in the "samples" of bigfoot...sheesh,a dog ? ...really ? ...how stoopit does a person need to be to mistake a dog for a huge scary "monster" ? ...hilarious !
Did you see all that Joe ? ...another hard day today eh ?
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/nov/29/dna-sampling-exposes-nine-yeti-specimens-as-eight-bears-and-a-dog
I am busy denying to myself the news from scientific studies and prefer to let some random bloke pummel my "brown mind" and drive me into a world of escape..reality becomes harder to "bear" (ha ha haha) at every passing dna study.
DeleteJoe
My word !
DeleteNo way am I reading about yet another embarrassing "footer`s failure" on a scientific scale that is HUGE news - I`m not reading anything about it at all.
Joe
S n i g g er
Deletec h o r t l e
g u f f a w