M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
All this talk about coprophagic photographs being a motive. I mean, I'm sure it's embarrassing to have your son find photographs of you exhibiting your kink, but is that really enough to commit murder? Without evidentiary proof, the father could have just said "he's making it up" or something along those lines. I guess there's no reasoning with insanity.
ReplyDeleteChick Chick, Hi :)
ReplyDeletevegasthedog,Hi :)
Iktomi ,Hi :)
MMC ,Hi :)
PIB Suk muh dik :)XX !!
^ On your knees and grubby around in futility.
Delete