No proof will ever come from Fraudson! After 4,000 video's you think I can't tell what's a Bigfoot, and what isn't? If you dont research, how in the world can you possibly have any knowledge about these creatures? You can't! Why do you think I challenge people to prove me wrong, and no one has? Because only a fool would attempt to challenge something they have no clue about!
DS, why don't any of your Bigfoot pictures show a large penis or testicles, do you only photograph female bigfoot and if so why no large breasts like Patterson Gimlin film. I think I've just proven your pictures fraudulent, show testicles or you are a fraud
Well gee, if we ask ignorant Iktomi that question, he/she thinks only the camera does. My first sighting was deer hunting, and did not own a camera at the time.
Go on my channel, look under naked Bigfoot. I have I think 5 penis pics, but not all are in playlist. I'll give you credit for the first person who thought out of the box, and also credit for posting a name. So since I have penis pics, I'm Legit now, huh.
I saw it's back toward me, down by the creek, at 80 yards. It looked like a big black guy in a hoodie. I got out my $400 Binoculars, and he was beyond blurry, i could not focus the binoculars at all, and wondered at the time, why i could see it with plain eyes, better than my binoculars, which at extremely good. I now know why that was.
Here's a couple Penis pics (easy Vegas) and yes, they are Blurry, because it's how these creatures camouflage themselves. Any jokes or riddle, save it, shows you don't have a clue about what these creatures are capable of. I can prove Bigfoot, just on the tree carving that they do! No way in the world people are climbing up trees, and carving Bigfoot's & Dogmen on the tree's! This carving is total skeptic destruction...found this on a walking trail Ikdummy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3QgsiPuQBE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9EcE43Wg78 ( one of my best pics, and red penis!)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MoChEv2Nxk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t77vleUQx4U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvjEOQxArBE
MASSIVE BLACK BIGFOOT! KABOOM! PROVE THIS ISN'T A BIGFOOT!
I have the best evidence ! if you can't see it with your own two eyes then I suggest you go for an eye exam. No , my son did not draw them you douchebag so puss, did you get turned on by my penis pics ? I have way more if you want to see them , better ones, bigger ones, hairier ones that you'd love !
Vegas, what's there to be ashamed of? all men have one. Do you have a teenie weenie ? is that why you don't like talking about it? Such a douchebag, so hilarious !
I rarely get on this site now because it has truly became a playground for idiots but I was interested in looking at the guy calling himself DS because of the confidence he has displayed regarding his "evidence." I have to inform you that you have no evidence. Even if you actually saw something with your eyes and then photographed it, to the average person who wasn't there and is now simply looking at your pictures, it looks to me like you photographed trees, and rocks with odd shapes while intentionally making your camera be out of focus. You then went back and superimposed red dots for eyes, etc. onto blurry rock outcroppings or out of focus forest scenery. By the lowest standard, definitely not considered evidence.
I have to inform you, you've never been in the woods researching Bigfoot, this is a FACT! I have the best camera you can get, and if you watch my video's, I'm manually focusing the camera for the clearest possible picture! You have no idea what you're talking about Sir. Forests do not have symmetry, do not blink, AND DO NOT BLUR MY CAMERA!
I agree, I have never been in the woods researching sasquatch. I do know that they are real because I had an encounter that was clearly visible. I actually watched your videos on youtube and clearly you have a passion for investigating bigfoot and no one could ever deny that. But, I cant, for the life of me see anything but blurs, rocks, trees, anomalies, etc. If you are claiming that these creatures can blur your camera and make the pics look like out of focus rocks and foliage, that you see with your eyes but the camera isn't picking up, well...that is a different explanation but it would never be considered even circumstantial evidence to a skeptic. To the contrary, this type of "evidence" simply enhances their argument.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from
Rumors abound on whether or not Finding Bigfoot will continue, but hopeful news is on the horizon. Snake Oil Productions, the production company responsible for Finding Bigfoot, is seeking a permit for filming in the Monterey, Virginia area. Monterey lies between the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests. Definitely a good place to look for bigfoot. We can only speculate if this means Finding Bigfoot has been signed on for additional seasons, or if perhaps a new bigfoot show is in the works. We'll keep you updated on any further announcements for sure.
Editor's Note: This is a guest post by Suzie M., a sasquatch enthusiast. Crypto-linguists believe that the species known Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti/Yowie ect speak and understand a complex language, which by all accounts seems to stem from Asia. When one listens to it there is definitely a sense of it being Chinese or Japanese. It is a very odd mix of sounds, clicks and what could be actual words. This is the reason some experts are looking into the Asian dialect theory, some have said it could be a lost dialect, which was carried from Asia by the Bigfoot species that colonised America.
Most bigfooters love these BS channels where they string you along wandering in the woods with nothing.
ReplyDeleteMost bigfooters hate channels like Dr Squatch and others where they say, okay, here's bigfoot. Here's a photo. That's bigfoot. There you go.
No proof will ever come from Fraudson!
DeleteAfter 4,000 video's you think I can't tell what's a Bigfoot, and what isn't?
If you dont research, how in the world can you possibly have any knowledge about these creatures? You can't!
Why do you think I challenge people to prove me wrong, and no one has? Because only a fool would attempt to challenge something they have no clue about!
Can bigfoot be seen with your eyes or is it only with a camera? xx
Delete^ I am sure it does exist and much more is known than we mere humble folk are told...thing is ,we`ll possibly never find out.
Deletexx
And then there are people like you who watch it all, and secretly dream about being them.
ReplyDeleteDS, why don't any of your Bigfoot pictures show a large penis or testicles, do you only photograph female bigfoot and if so why no large breasts like Patterson Gimlin film. I think I've just proven your pictures fraudulent, show testicles or you are a fraud
ReplyDeleteOh yes, please show testicles
DeleteGuess what Douchebag, I have pics of those!
DeleteProve it or you are a fraud
DeleteWell gee, if we ask ignorant Iktomi that question, he/she thinks only the camera does.
DeleteMy first sighting was deer hunting, and did not own a camera at the time.
Oh yes, show us testicles
DeleteJoe
Go on my channel, look under naked Bigfoot.
DeleteI have I think 5 penis pics, but not all are in playlist.
I'll give you credit for the first person who thought out of the box, and also credit for posting a name.
So since I have penis pics, I'm Legit now, huh.
Link? xx
DeleteWhen you saw a bigfoot with your eyes was it blurry? xx
DeleteI saw it's back toward me, down by the creek, at 80 yards. It looked like a big black guy in a hoodie. I got out my $400 Binoculars, and he was beyond blurry, i could not focus the binoculars at all, and wondered at the time, why i could see it with plain eyes, better than my binoculars, which at extremely good.
DeleteI now know why that was.
Here's a couple Penis pics (easy Vegas) and yes, they are Blurry, because it's how these creatures camouflage themselves. Any jokes or riddle, save it, shows you don't have a clue about what these creatures are capable of.
ReplyDeleteI can prove Bigfoot, just on the tree carving that they do! No way in the world people are climbing up trees, and carving Bigfoot's & Dogmen on the tree's! This carving is total skeptic destruction...found this on a walking trail Ikdummy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3QgsiPuQBE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9EcE43Wg78
( one of my best pics, and red penis!)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MoChEv2Nxk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t77vleUQx4U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvjEOQxArBE
MASSIVE BLACK BIGFOOT!
KABOOM! PROVE THIS ISN'T A BIGFOOT!
\https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fSrnE-5Cjc
lol xx
DeleteOh my god !
DeleteThat's the worst evidence I've ever seen !
Did you get your kid to draw those ?
Not much of an artist btw
I have the best evidence !
Deleteif you can't see it with your own two eyes then I suggest you go for an eye exam.
No , my son did not draw them you douchebag
so puss, did you get turned on by my penis pics ?
I have way more if you want to see them , better ones, bigger ones, hairier ones that you'd love !
Yes, we are the perverts, not the weirdo who sees and draws penises on everything. Wonderful point.
DeleteHe likes me, he says so all the time ^
Delete^ attention seeker
DeleteVegas, what's there to be ashamed of? all men have one. Do you have a teenie weenie ? is that why you don't like talking about it?
DeleteSuch a douchebag, so hilarious !
He's a pipsqueak in real life DS, that's why he plays tough guy here
DeleteI rarely get on this site now because it has truly became a playground for idiots but I was interested in looking at the guy calling himself DS because of the confidence he has displayed regarding his "evidence." I have to inform you that you have no evidence. Even if you actually saw something with your eyes and then photographed it, to the average person who wasn't there and is now simply looking at your pictures, it looks to me like you photographed trees, and rocks with odd shapes while intentionally making your camera be out of focus. You then went back and superimposed red dots for eyes, etc. onto blurry rock outcroppings or out of focus forest scenery. By the lowest standard, definitely not considered evidence.
DeleteThose weren't eyes,those were testicles you fool
DeleteI have to inform you, you've never been in the woods researching Bigfoot, this is a FACT!
DeleteI have the best camera you can get, and if you watch my video's, I'm manually focusing the camera for the clearest possible picture! You have no idea what you're talking about Sir.
Forests do not have symmetry, do not blink, AND DO NOT BLUR MY CAMERA!
I agree, I have never been in the woods researching sasquatch. I do know that they are real because I had an encounter that was clearly visible. I actually watched your videos on youtube and clearly you have a passion for investigating bigfoot and no one could ever deny that. But, I cant, for the life of me see anything but blurs, rocks, trees, anomalies, etc. If you are claiming that these creatures can blur your camera and make the pics look like out of focus rocks and foliage, that you see with your eyes but the camera isn't picking up, well...that is a different explanation but it would never be considered even circumstantial evidence to a skeptic. To the contrary, this type of "evidence" simply enhances their argument.
Delete