Possible Bigfoot Tracks Found In Saskatchewan
The person who found these tracks isn't quite sure what to make of them, and neither am I. During a hiking trip to Pike Lake in Saskatchewan, Youtuber Ernie Werezak recorded these images of some strange tracks he found at a camp site. Whatever made them was barefooted and sunk way down into the soft ground.
First for Chick!!!
ReplyDelete<3 <3 <3 Thank you IK!
DeleteHEY HEY HEY!! Mikey B's show is UP! Here it is y'all:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.sasquatchchronicles.com/sc-friday-nights-show/
I'm gonna watch this now. Go Mikey go Mikey!
~Chick
;( Sorry false alarm. Its only a 4 minute teaser.
Delete~ Chick
Enjoy:
Deletehttps://www.sasquatchchronicles.com/sc-ep131-the-sasquatch-property/
Fact is, the prints fall within range of humans, and the depth is a non-factor (the ground is obviously saturated and the mud is fairly deep). Even given that the location is off the beaten-path, there is nothing...zero, that could be used as potential evidence therefore, the Law of Economy says the prints are human.
ReplyDeleteIT DOES NOT LOOK HUMAN.
DeleteIT ALSO DOES NOT LOOK LIKE A B-FOOT!
YOUR IN SUCH A DAMN HURRY TO SPOUT OFF, YOU DIDN'T EVEN LOOK AT THE PHOTO.
IF THERE WAS EVER A CASE FOR A DOUBLE BEAR PRINT ------- THIS IS TEXT BOOK!
IDIOT!
double bear print? whos the moron? agree with OP. its human.
DeleteI can't believe that's even an argument... obvious double bear. christ.
DeleteThis is one of those shoes with the toes.
DeleteTo quote Bugs Bunny, you people are gulli-bull. What nin-cowpoops.
that's not a bear print it could be a juvenile bigfoot or just a fat man that weighs 800 lbs
DeleteHere, for the first time, is everything we have learned about Bigfoot since the 1967 Patterson Gimlin film. Enjoy:
ReplyDelete.