Is This a Baby Bigfoot or Something Else?
In 2009 FB/FB confirmed this as a baby Bigfoot. After seeing this breakdown, Phil believes it's something other than the legendary woodape.
M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
Something else
ReplyDeleteYou'll get something else and like it.
ReplyDeleteBaby Big foots don't get to be Born. They're aborted by Obama's people! (Plan Parenthood)!
ReplyDeleteI agree with you on the whole baby killing thing, but do you really think the republicans would be any different?, bush was in power for eight years and wasn't going near this topic as it's political suicide. You talk as if it was oboma who legalized baby killing
DeleteLet's use the correct biological terminology.
ReplyDeleteThey are not 'baby' bigfoots, they are 'fun sized' bigfoots.
Thats good!
DeleteThe complaint is in. I repeat the complaint is in.
ReplyDeleteJoe Fitz
It's the rare sleeveless tree dwelling Platypus.
ReplyDeleteby golly I do believe you are correct
Deleteit's a baby bigfoot owl !
ReplyDeleteBigfoots don't have the physical make up to clime trees so fluidly like a monkey, could they are simply built far different !
ReplyDelete