Watch: Newest Loch Ness Monster Picture, Bigfoot Baiting with the SierraSiteProject.com
Join Rev. Jeff as we take a look at the latest Loch Ness Monster Picture, and in the field updates with the sierrasiteproject.com for the 1 year anniversary of the now famous Thermal Footage.
First!
ReplyDeleteThe "unexplained wave" is probably a standing wave or seiche.
Deletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seiche
They occur in bounded bodies of water (like lakes or lochs) pretty much constantly but they're really only visible when the water is dead calm, as it clearly is in this latest photo.
The Rev Jeff has a soothing bed time story voice xx
ReplyDeleteIs there supposed to be something in those red circles?
ReplyDeleteThe spirit of Mankind's past.
DeleteYes,trees.xx
ReplyDeleteHope all the hard work pays off. Sounds like its getting right. I hope you get some good footage. M
ReplyDeleteHey Mike!
DeleteAny updates my friend?
Peace.
The hard work will never "pay off" when looking for an imaginary creature.
DeleteI wonder if Oxford University would waste their time on an 'imaginary creature'?
DeletePeace.
The hard work does pay off--eventually you will be leaving out gift baskets for a whole family of Bigfoot in your backyard.
DeleteThe oxford study isnt what you dream it to be joe. Sorry buddy.
DeleteI on the other hand am far more optimistic bro.
Deletehttp://youtu.be/VApv_wyANuo
... Fast forward to 29 minutes.
Peace.
The "famous" thermal footage. lol The famous BEAR footage. All that bait will attract MORE BEARS, they are everywhere up there that's what redneck was hunting for to begin with. Yep these guys Smegma, Smashebi, Curtaino and wasn't that you Shawn on the new equipment? Careful that driver might set you all up but now that Smegma's a true bigfooter, you all will be safe.
DeleteDo you know something Phil Polling doesn't? Cause those were pretty tall bears in that thermal.
Delete(Sigh)
Uh, bears can get pretty "tall" Joe. What, you believe everything you hear or watch?
DeleteTwo almost ten foot bears standing upright for a good number of minutes, against trees watching them in the wilderness...
DeleteHmmmmm, I find THAT hard to believe.
(Sigh)
Bears? Seriously?
DeleteMust have been those pesky circus bears standing around shooting the breeze...
Bart went to A LOT of trouble with this analysis breakdown. You really should have paid it some attention.
MMG
This Fringe News schtick is getting more boring with each new episode.
ReplyDeleteJeffrey Kelly...another flash in the pan bigfooter.
What?? The guy couldn't possibly be more down to earth, knowledgable and honest??
DeleteThere are way too many people to counter your opinion, which you are entitled to of course, but on a discussion blog like this; expect disagreement.
Peace.
Let me get this straight, Justin claims to have shot and killed 2 Big foots(Poor Rick Dyer, he claims he only killed one) and now Justin is the "Man" the newest bad-ass out there!
ReplyDeleteOf course, he offers no proof, at all and of course he is now a Big foot expert! Didn't I read in his first interview after his claim, that he knew nothing about Big foots, or never gave those stories any thought, something along those lines.
So now he is producing Videos, probably a book on his experiences and people will believe this Guy! Serious Big foot researching has now sunk to a "newer" low.
And Justin, Let me give you a piece of advice:"They don't eat meat"!
My name is John W. Jones, my Email address is:
healthyhappylawns@reagan.com
Did you watch the video?? He put a deer leg inside a fallen tree trunk! He knows what he is doing...
DeleteHey John!
DeleteWhat did you think of the Mike Wooley video yesterday??
Peace buddy.
The guy posted on a taxidermy forum that he shot a couple of wierd looking bears. Footers got a hold of this and jumped all over it. They convinced him he saw a bigfoot. Hell even one of them flew out to visit the site. The dna results came back bear and footers (especially joe) remain as pwned as ever.
DeleteThe hound he had to go back to the kill site was trained to find bear. He went back a number of weeks later by which time there were several feet of snow on the ground.
DeleteThe DNA results came back 'bear' because that's what the hound found.
I think you'll find that in his account, he was pretty clear about the juvenile Bigfoot, not a bear.
Corrected.
Peace.
There's always excuses with footers and never ever ever a monkey. Ever.
DeleteI think you must be confused. Attenborough can help you with your monkeys, this blog is about giant hairy people.
DeleteAs for giant hairy people... There is plenty of evidence for them, would you like me to reference you some sources?
Peace.
Wow those spambots are getting smart!
DeleteWhat's a spambot?
DeleteIt's an higher-form of Skeptard.
DeleteMMG
Got monkey?
ReplyDeleteNo monkeys, just giant hairy people.
DeletePeace.
Wow 'Got Monkey' makes a reappearance huh?
DeleteThe barrel has been well and truly scraped.
MMG
SweatyYeti or Bill Munns would be my vote for looking at this - BFSleuth @ BFF
ReplyDelete