Arkansas Bigfoot Leaves Its Mark
Arkansas seems like the perfect habitat for a big, hairy creature that wants to stay hidden from man. Check out this track that someone found in Northwest Arkansas.
M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
He didn't just find a track, he found a whole bloody treasure trove of them !
ReplyDeleteoutstanding evidence ! This will make the skeptics surely double over with pain !
carry on and cheers
Joe
^ You`re right - he found a great long skid-mark in his panties...with a piss stain patch on the front.
Delete^quit bragging about your discoveries like a wankering top lad
Deletecarry on and cheers
Joe
^ I thought you liked me on top of you wanking onto your face and lips.
DeleteShame it was unable to leave any unambiguous scientifically acceptable evidence. Must just be bad luck that this has been the case with 100% of reported bigfooted bigfoots to date.
ReplyDeleteSo what’s you point Stuey?
DeleteThe only point that the troll has is the one he can’t cover up, no matter how he parts his hair
Delete^ Always leaving skid-marks in his underpants - from his loose sagging ring-piece that has been shafted so many times.
DeleteI .think those tracks are from a Sonn.It is a trickster spirit that makes peoples money disappear. Its call is a like child whining. It is hideously ugly and unlike other cryptid hominids it has no fear of man.
ReplyDeleteThose are human tracks. Look at the narrow heel. Look at the well defined arch. Look at the compact, single ball. Look at the curve of reducing toes. Supposed bigfoot tracks are distinguished from human tracks by having none of those traits.
ReplyDeleteThis is evidence of barefoot hippies, not bigfoot.