M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
^ BullsheeeeeiiiiitT !!!!
ReplyDelete^ like a broken record
ReplyDeletehe has nothing else to say and is a turd-tard
DeleteIktomiMonday, November 20, 2017 at 2:48:00 PM PST
ReplyDeleteIt’s pretty much been accepted by most people enthusiastic with the idea of the Yeti, that the snowy footprints found over the decades are exactly that which is offered as an explanation in that link. However, Yeti aren’t gonna be running around the barren snowy mountain tops of the Himalayas... they’re gonna be where any primate would be, and that’s in the hot steamy tropical jungles at a far lower altitude, with more cover and more food. There are however very reliable reports from Sherpas and there is no reason to doubt that they wouldn’t use mountain passes for routes into various valleys, etc.