Possible Juvenile Bigfoot Caught On Video In Utah
Utah Sasquatch on youtube points out the possible juvenile bigfoot he captured while in the woods. He claims to have seen the creature with his own eyes at the time of the event. Check it out:
M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
Idiotic.
ReplyDeleteWhat is "Idiotic" is Jotomi Squeling like a Dimbulb that sasquatch DNA is Homo Sapien Sapien,, YET IF THAT WAS TRUE , we would know the Race,eye color,disease susceptibility,% of neanderthal genes 0-4% ,ect,ect.. Lame excuses below.
DeleteJust because Sykes didn't reveal those details, doesn't mean they don't exist. Shall I reel off some of your wackiest theories, Acute Collins?
DeleteBigfoot does not exist
DeleteJust because we don't have a monkey suit doesn't mean it didn't exist. Shall we reel off some of your wacky theories, iktomi?
DeleteThe only thing that doesn't exist is an explanation on your part for hundreds of years of reports that have physical evidence in support.
DeleteReports = misidentifications, paradolia, lying, hullicinations etc
DeletePhysical evidence - casts (proven hoaxes), DNA (all come back as known animals)
Oh but please keep telling us how there are a species of 9 foot apes out there...
If Bigfoot was real, there would be many more reports and much better physical evidence. The quantity and quality is insufficient and fall well within the range of mistakes and hoaxes.
DeleteI would agree if they were just animals but they're smarter than that xx
DeleteReports = unfortunately, or so many different cultures to be reporting the same thing and instances of multiple eyewitnesses, your nonsense cannot apply.
DeletePhysical evidence = To hoax convincing biological dermals that are primate in origin but different enough to have species traits across samples, one would have to have a knowledge of all human primate and non-human primate dermals (that not many people on the planet do), and then have less than a lottery win's chance of faking the exact same biological idea, place these impressions in the middle of nowhere and somehow predict to the exact yard out of miles and miles of wilderness that they'll be found, and THEN fool multiple forensic experts.
Sorry... The reports and physical evidence are what one would expect from a rare creature that's evades in social groups.
2:44 Since you mention statistics, who has done the statistical analysis on this?
Delete2:36, how do we know they are smart when we don't even know they exist?
DeleteEven if they do exist and if they were smart and social, how do we know they would beat the odds of being proven?
DeleteFor something as large as this we have a level of evidence (more so at this stage than the Bili Ape had), and if this creature does exist (and in my opinion it most certainly does), then it would naturally have to have evaded classification for hundreds of years... So what is 50 without a major consorted professional effort at getting to the bottom of this "mystery"?
DeleteHere is an example of a phd who was once impressed by the evidence for bigfoot, but has since become more skeptical:
Delete"More importantly, work done since 2006 on dermal ridges and the Skookum cast has shown that they cannot be used as evidence in support of sasquatch’s existence, while new reviews of the Patterson-Gimlin film have done a lot to damage its credibility (Conway et al. 2013, Loxton & Prothero 2013)."
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/some-of-the-things-i-have-gotten-wrong/
From the same article:
Delete"My current take on sasquatch – enunciated in several Tet Zoo ver 3 articles as well as in print (Naish 2012, Conway et al. 2013) – is that it’s a sociological phenomenon, not a zoological one. Evidence that sasquatch might be real has not been put forward. 2006 Darren wasn’t a total idiot: rather, he was impressed by evidence that hadn’t been subjected to sufficient, or the right sort, of scrutiny. There’s a cautionary tale there that I try to keep in mind all the time."
Cool, how does this prove that the evidence for Sasquatch is bunk? Opinions are like assholes. It's hard data, scienific absolutes we need, remember Donald?
DeleteLet me guess, he cites Crowley, yes? Ha ha ha ha!!
DeleteLet it begin, the rise and fall of Utah Bigfoot.
ReplyDeletebigmouth
DeleteNice self portriat vegas duh dog
DeleteSomeone NEEDS to be noticed in their life.
Deletepay not attention to vegas, he is anti christian filth
DeleteHow do you believe in God, but not Bigfoot. There is more evidence of Bigfoot existing.
DeleteShut your luciferian mouth, you pagan
DeleteLOL, dance puppet.
DeleteGod bless our American Troops!
ReplyDeleteAC collins
I agree, may God keep them safe and bring them home, and to our many veterans, thank you for your service!
DeleteI like his style and the way how he does reasearch. And i watched his video in slow motion and zoom...and i did see that "little kid"...great footage.
ReplyDeleteHis dog was less than 5ft away...red flags? or is the dogs afraid of bigfoot just bullshit?
DeleteKEEP UP THE ZERO BIGFOOTS KELLY SHAW!!!
ReplyDeleteKeep up the good work Iktomi...Knowers know, cement heads are just that...cement heads.
ReplyDelete"it’s a sociological phenomenon, not a zoological one"
ReplyDeleteReports = misidentifications, paradolia, lying, hullicinations etc
DeletePhysical evidence - casts (proven hoaxes), DNA (all come back as known animals)
Oh but please keep telling us how there are a species of 9 foot apes out there...
Ok, I will!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LedtIJiFY5o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Us8gVSs6aw
An enhanced version of this video has been made where you can now see the "Little Kid" in action. Thanks be to SnowWalkerPrime, on his channel. It's nice to see the good guys helping each other out.
ReplyDelete