Twelve Years Ago The Story Was Exactly The Same As It Is Today
Bob Gimlin at the International Bigfoot Symposium in 2003 recounts the events of that famous day when he and Roger Patterson captured the most famous piece of bigfoot evidence.
M.K. Davis Discusses The Bloody Dog Print at Bluff Creek [Massacre]
Uh Oh. Here we go again, folks. M.K. Davis originally brought up this theory called the "Bluff Creek massacre" theory back in 2008 at a conference. The controversial theory was immediately rejected by the Bigfoot community and Davis was shunned from ever speaking about it again. According to Davis, based on his expert film analysis and color enhancements of frame 352 of the PG film, he theorizes that the Patterson party had been to the Bluff Creek site at least once before returning to capture their famous Bigfoot video. His theory also suggests that the party probably murdered a family of Bigfoots and buried their bodies. Davis points to an enhanced anomaly resembling a bloody dog print and a pool of blood as proof of his theory.
I like that boom boom pow
ReplyDeleteThem chickens jackin' my style
They try to copy my swagger
I'm on that next sh@t now
I'm so 3008
You so 2000 and late
I got that boom boom boom
That future boom boom boom
Let me get it now
They applaud someone who has been hoaxing them for 45 years. Such morons.
DeleteHere and unwanted 24x7. Even bigger moron.
DeleteTroll killer is Big Doris!
DeleteI like eggs
ReplyDeleteThe story is the same... no bigfoot, only crappy "evidence".
ReplyDeleteIf Bob Gimlin were to ever admit that the PGF was a hoax, the multi-million dollar bigfoot industry would collapse.
ReplyDeleteEvery one of you trolls who come onto this site every day, INFECTING us with your lies and pessimistic talk, just know one thing; NOTHING you say or no matter how many times you say it or write it, will ever make us change our minds into being like you.
ReplyDelete