This Kitakaze JREFing character posted that Bob H's proportions are an exact match to Patty's. He rejected of course certain photo image comparisons and then cherry picked the one which force-fit to his satisfaction.
This is a huge Kitakaze blunder, because for Bob H's stop-motion twerk dance recreation attempt of Patty, he wore arm extensions. You see, Kitakaze is claiming that Bob H's proportions fit Patty perfectly, including arm length.
OK, if Bob H's arms are miraculously the same length as Patty's, why the devil did he wear arm extensions in the twerk dance recreation?
Note also that in this post Kitakaze attacked another for cherry picking data, then turned around and cherry picked his own data in the form only particular representations of Bob H. and Patty.
This is the downfall of the JREFing skeptards: hypocrisy, performing the identical act which they are simultaneously attacking another of performing. The hypocrisy could not be louder, bigger, or more obvious.
The fact that Bob H. himself disagrees with Kitakze about Patty's arm length, by wearing arm extensions in his delightful twerk dance montage, reveals a gross error on Kitakaze's part.
Kitakaze seemed to be unaware that Bob H. wore arm extensions in efforts to duplicate Patty. If Bob H's. and Patty's proportions were identical as Kitakaze oddly claims, Bob H. would not have worn arm extensions; they wouldn't have been thought of; his proportions would have been perfect and this method of disguise and enhancement would only have detracted from his Patty redux attempt.
JREFers often use the attack of logical fallacy, meaning a flaw in an argument which renders every point of the argument wrong.
Take a look at Kitakaze's claim, arguing that Bob H's proportions are a "perfect" match to Patty's, while ignoring that Bob H. disagrees with him (the latter demonstrated by Bob wearing arm extensions in his twerk dance Patty attempt). In other words, Kitakaze is claiming that Patty is Bob H in drag because the proportions are exact, but since the proportions are not exact as everyone including Bob H. knows (and Bob H. demonstrated by wearing arm extensions etc.), then Kitakaze's argument is a logical fallacy.
Since his argument is based on Bob's and Patty's proportions being the same, and they aren't the same, then every claim and point made downstream from the establishment of that declaration about proportions, is wrong.
The claim that the proportions are the same is the spring head; the argument and points issuing from it are the stream as it flows from the spring head downstream. Obviously anything downstream from the erroneously established springhead, will also be erroneous.
If the spring head is poisoned, the water flowing downstream from it is poisoned.
It's important to study Chris Murphy's Patty/Bob H. proportion comparisons:
*An image of Bob adjusted to Patty's height puts Bob's pelvis above Patty's, and makes his legs longer than hers.
*An image of Bob adjusted so that his pelvis and waist are at the same level of Patty's, has the top of Bob's head only reaching reaching Patty's shoulder; she is at least a head taller than him in this comparison.
In other words, match the height, and the pelvis and legs don't match; match the pelvis, and the height doesn't match.
In both scenarious, Bob's arms are far too short. In neither scenario do the locations of the knees match. Patty's arms show to be 6 to 12 inches longer than Bob's. This is what Kitakaze considers a "perfect match."
Kitakaze is held up as a great JREFing Take Action Warrior by commenters here.
With this humilating public display/blunder/declaration of Patty's and Bob H's proportions, they surely need to clear the decks and hire some new JREFing soldiers.
This was a most embarrassing and poorly executed JREFing flunk-out-fail.
Though since the JREF is itself based on a logical fallacy, it is expected that what issues from it is all in error. They have created the religion skepscience, and every day try to force fit data to their pre-conceived conclusions and beliefs and make them work.
That is of course what they accuse everyone else of doing. Whatever crimes of logic and reason they constantly commit, they just as constantly claim that only everyone else is commiting these mistakes. They are bitten by the bug of hypocrisy daily.
I don't know about the spring head being poisoned but one time I took a dump in a creek and scrubbed my ass clean in it. A little later this guy comes up the trail and starts filling his canteen in the creek. I told him it was not safe to drink the water. He laughed at me and ridiculed me as a city slicker, then took a huge gulp of water right out of the stream. As he was doing so I said "what kind of rock is that right next to your mouth under the water"? He deserved it.
Tonight on Coast To Coast AM, Bigfootology's Rhettman Mullis will talk about Bigfoot sightings, and give us an update on the Oxford Bigfoot DNA project.
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
suit
ReplyDeleteStill a first
DeleteTravisssss!!!
DeleteLong time no see buddy.
MMG
How are ya, pal? Been overseas at all?
DeleteMMG, what's the latest Sykes update from Robert Lindsay?
DeleteTEAM HOMOS!
DeleteThis Video was shown on the Finding Big foot show, and was deemed a HOAX!
ReplyDelete^ buttplugging skeptard
DeleteLooks a bit dubious to me,what's an ATV?xx
ReplyDeleteYou don't know what a ATV is?????
DeleteNo,that's why i asked xx
Deletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-terrain_vehicle
DeleteOhhh,one of those,thanks xx
DeleteIt's kind of like ATM
DeleteAn ATM ?you mean a hole in the wall?xx
DeleteDo the ATF use ATV's to get to the ATM
DeleteOk,what's an ATF?xx
Deletehttp://www.atf.gov/careers/special-agents/index.html
DeleteWhy are the ATF,CIA and the FBI all separate?don't they all do the same sort of thing?xx
DeleteCIA are international. FBI is national.
DeleteOnly thing the same is who the bossman answers to.
DeleteATF - Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms.
DeleteCIA - Central Intelligence Agency.
FBI - Federal Bureau of Investigation.
This is the real deal folks.
ReplyDeleteWhat's a Wikipedia??
ReplyDeleteIt's a basket you put your feet in.
DeleteMMG
Can I put gifts and lovely pastries in this basket for forest people?
DeleteNo cuz Timmie will come and get em.
DeleteThis Kitakaze JREFing character posted that Bob H's proportions are an exact match to Patty's. He rejected of course certain photo image comparisons and then cherry picked the one which force-fit to his satisfaction.
ReplyDeleteThis is a huge Kitakaze blunder, because for Bob H's stop-motion twerk dance recreation attempt of Patty, he wore arm extensions. You see, Kitakaze is claiming that Bob H's proportions fit Patty perfectly, including arm length.
OK, if Bob H's arms are miraculously the same length as Patty's, why the devil did he wear arm extensions in the twerk dance recreation?
Note also that in this post Kitakaze attacked another for cherry picking data, then turned around and cherry picked his own data in the form only particular representations of Bob H. and Patty.
This is the downfall of the JREFing skeptards: hypocrisy, performing the identical act which they are simultaneously attacking another of performing. The hypocrisy could not be louder, bigger, or more obvious.
The fact that Bob H. himself disagrees with Kitakze about Patty's arm length, by wearing arm extensions in his delightful twerk dance montage, reveals a gross error on Kitakaze's part.
Kitakaze seemed to be unaware that Bob H. wore arm extensions in efforts to duplicate Patty. If Bob H's. and Patty's proportions were identical as Kitakaze oddly claims, Bob H. would not have worn arm extensions; they wouldn't have been thought of; his proportions would have been perfect and this method of disguise and enhancement would only have detracted from his Patty redux attempt.
JREFers often use the attack of logical fallacy, meaning a flaw in an argument which renders every point of the argument wrong.
Take a look at Kitakaze's claim, arguing that Bob H's proportions are a "perfect" match to Patty's, while ignoring that Bob H. disagrees with him (the latter demonstrated by Bob wearing arm extensions in his twerk dance Patty attempt). In other words, Kitakaze is claiming that Patty is Bob H in drag because the proportions are exact, but since the proportions are not exact as everyone including Bob H. knows (and Bob H. demonstrated by wearing arm extensions etc.), then Kitakaze's argument is a logical fallacy.
Since his argument is based on Bob's and Patty's proportions being the same, and they aren't the same, then every claim and point made downstream from the establishment of that declaration about proportions, is wrong.
The claim that the proportions are the same is the spring head; the argument and points issuing from it are the stream as it flows from the spring head downstream. Obviously anything downstream from the erroneously established springhead, will also be erroneous.
If the spring head is poisoned, the water flowing downstream from it is poisoned.
It's important to study Chris Murphy's Patty/Bob H. proportion comparisons:
Delete*An image of Bob adjusted to Patty's height puts Bob's pelvis above Patty's, and makes his legs longer than hers.
*An image of Bob adjusted so that his pelvis and waist are at the same level of Patty's, has the top of Bob's head only reaching reaching Patty's shoulder; she is at least a head taller than him in this comparison.
In other words, match the height, and the pelvis and legs don't match; match the pelvis, and the height doesn't match.
In both scenarious, Bob's arms are far too short. In neither scenario do the locations of the knees match. Patty's arms show to be 6 to 12 inches longer than Bob's. This is what Kitakaze considers a "perfect match."
Kitakaze is held up as a great JREFing Take Action Warrior by commenters here.
With this humilating public display/blunder/declaration of Patty's and Bob H's proportions, they surely need to clear the decks and hire some new JREFing soldiers.
This was a most embarrassing and poorly executed JREFing flunk-out-fail.
Though since the JREF is itself based on a logical fallacy, it is expected that what issues from it is all in error. They have created the religion skepscience, and every day try to force fit data to their pre-conceived conclusions and beliefs and make them work.
That is of course what they accuse everyone else of doing. Whatever crimes of logic and reason they constantly commit, they just as constantly claim that only everyone else is commiting these mistakes. They are bitten by the bug of hypocrisy daily.
Please seek medical help^
DeleteYAWN. way way way to much reading retard
DeleteI thought that was really good, well written and very informative xx
DeleteEva don't you have a bunch of girlfriends that can blog with us. We are such depraved old men. Throw us a bone.
DeleteI don't know about the spring head being poisoned but one time I took a dump in a creek and scrubbed my ass clean in it. A little later this guy comes up the trail and starts filling his canteen in the creek. I told him it was not safe to drink the water. He laughed at me and ridiculed me as a city slicker, then took a huge gulp of water right out of the stream. As he was doing so I said "what kind of rock is that right next to your mouth under the water"? He deserved it.
Delete^^Nice. You fit right in here.
DeleteLooks a bit dubious to me what's an EVA??xx
ReplyDeleteA name.
DeleteYou need a slap!!!xx
ReplyDeleteRick Dyer is going to Kill That beast live on the internet, St Patrick's Day 2014
ReplyDeleteThe breakdown is that it's fake.
ReplyDeleteso fake it's not even funny you fukin idiots that run this site are morons!!
ReplyDelete