This Bigfoot Story About An Injured Sasquatch In British Columbia Is Incredible
It has been a while since someone left a very incredible Bigfoot story on our website. We're not really sure if this happened, so we're not going to discredit it right away. Who knows -- perhaps this person will come forward and tell us the whole story if it's true. This was posted in the comments section.
Kokanee
Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 11:58:00 PM PST
A co worker told me a story about a friend of his who was out hunting alone one wknd in Northern B.C and stumbled onto an screaming and injured female Sasquatch who was lying in some bushes
Apparently her arm was broken and she was screaming in agony. He said the creature had no fear of him as he laid his rifle down to look at her injured arm. He also said it's scream was so loud it made his body vibrate and almost deafened him.
He said she smelled like a dead skunk while he was making a makeshift splint for her arm. So after wrapping her arm she gave him a big smile as a gesture of thxs.
While walking away from her he said a big 9 foot tall male was hiding behind a tree close by with a 5 foot long club or tree branch in it's hand! He said he figures the male was just standing by in case he tried to hurt her however the male gave him a look of gratitude as he walked away.
[Thanks to Joe Fitz sending this in]
Great Story!
ReplyDeleteNever happened.
Delete... Don't worry, there's someone out there for everyone. You're never too old to lose your virginity.
Delete^ that's trolling!
DeleteI keep my virginity in a jar. Right next my poop.
DeleteDid Joe really send this in. I think someone is playing games around here and this should not have seen the light of day.
DeleteChuck
What do you expect Chuck? This is a blog that pays trolls just to get hits in order to get sponsors. Did you expect something different?
DeleteWHAT THE!?!?!? I haven't been paid one cent. I'm going to cease my trolling activities until I get paid my fair share of ad revenue. You better pay what you owe Shawn.
Deleteits a BATSQUATCH or iam a FOOL !!!
DeleteJoe loves to suck caulk. Just like his momma.
ReplyDeleteThe above link applies to Joe as well. Thanks Iktomi!!
DeleteI read that article right after I shagged Joe's slag mum.
Delete"No I'm not, you are!"
DeleteWe're not addressing geniuses remember.
I heard Chick likes her dad's caulk.
DeleteI don't know anything about Chick. I just know about Joe and his sloot mum. They love the caulk.
DeleteChick definitely likes her dad's caulk. Not as much as Joe but still.
DeleteI thought Joe's mum had zapped me with infrasound but it was gonorrhea.
DeleteI thought Joe's mum died of AIDS!
DeleteThere's trolling and then there is downright bullying.
DeletePorter... He would have to intimidate or dominate for bullying to be the case... This psycho who probably walks head down to the shops achieves none of it.
DeleteBe descent and leave Chick alone
DeleteHi Joe
MMC
Little does he know Chick could actually pound him into the sand and leave him for her bulls to eat. Except they do not eat rancid worthless meat, they could just continue the stomping.
DeleteChuck
Correctomundo Chuck
DeleteMMC
^racist arsehole
DeleteI pounded Joe's mum into the sand. Left imprints deeper than horsetracks.
DeleteChirpee says Chick is actually a big fat cow she-beast. That's not very nice.
DeleteI'm pretty sure Chick is just a dirty wh ore.
DeleteYes,Joe, we know.
DeleteThis coming from someone who's had the evidence pointed out every day of his life for the past three years? Forgive me if I'm not convinced.
DeleteRecap = you're a psycho,
Whatever you say, Joe.
DeleteDon't take my word it mind you... Listen to the experts.
DeleteI'll give it a try, Joe.
DeleteLOL! Joe actually believes this story? Well, that does explain an awful lot..wow..
DeleteOf course he does. You should know him well enough by now!
DeleteJust a cool story kids! If clarifying information comes forward as a result of the post, or even some interesting disussion, then it's productive considering the subject matter of the blog.
DeleteKnower Here:
ReplyDeleteRoger Patterson's confession diary is authentic. A team of analysts compared the handwriting in the journal to various documents signed by Patterson. They found enough matches to conclude the diary is real and the PGF was a hoax for profit scenario.
Surviving principals of the film will be notified and given the option of participating in the announcement of the hoax. Should they choose this option an agreement will be in place to compensate them financially, as well as a guarantee to portray their character and reputation in a positive light.
Co-ordinations are underway between media and counsel. A full confession, display of the original hoax suit, and various media appearances will follow. Any resistance to the notion that the film was a hoax will be laid to rest somewhere between August and November 2015, with Oct 20 being the most likely outcome. You read it here first.
Knower
Got monkey suit?
DeleteHey knower! You are the Man!! Hell to tha yeah.
DeleteOh god... And you folk think enthusiasts believe everything? There's a reason why people have to resort to disinformation.. And it's not pretty, nor is it conducive for your reassurance.
DeleteYes.
Delete^shh!!
Delete"Knower"... At least you're creative.
Delete"Got monkey suit?" Bwahahahaha!
DeleteHaven't we been through this? Ladies and Gentleman: I present to you, Iktomi!
Joe's little sister!!
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI'm sure you've been through it, you're no closer showing it though.
DeleteGet busy...
Google monkey suit. It's easy enough for even someone like you to do, Uno.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteNo? Didn't think so... Oh well, you at least have the promise of a diary that will never materialise.
Delete: (
Keep up the good work folks!
Do you honestly not know how to Google monkey suit? You poor thing.
DeleteAnyone can Google "monkey suit"... It's your claim to a magic one, so go get busy! Should be easy right?
DeleteIt's you that says it's real and not a guy in a suit. It's on you to prove your claims sir, not on the rest of the world who believes it's a guy in a suit because that's what it clearly looks like. Prove it's real! No? Pwned.
DeleteIt's me that says it's real and not a guy in a suit... But I have a primatologist, an anthropologist, a wildlife biologist and a pioneering plastic surgeon supporting me in that premise... A premise that's waiting to be tested in fact.
DeleteHow do you test the premise that the subject is organic? Think now... You can do this!
For every creditable source that says it's real, there are 20 more that says it's not. Game. Set. Match.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Delete20 more who have offered a lazy, cynical opinion based on the preconception that the subject is not real to start with, without analysing the data... I was one of them. Look at the facts and let go of the fear... It might help.
DeleteNo monkey suit? Some tennis reference??
Good story. I just read a story today about a stack of logs that rolled on top of a young sasquatch. And a man got the logs off, it was injured and crawled into the woods, and brought it food every day for a while until it apparently got healthy enough to move on. I think this was in the state of Vermont.
DeleteHey...wait a minute.
DeleteWhy are you stealing all of Joe's posts, guy?
Or could you be Joe himself?
Joe, why such a hypocritical move to make? So you had some issues with being banned so you made a new account?
Sounds fruitful!
I delved into the remarkable archive that is Bigfoot Evidence and lifted some very intriguing material. Try it sometime, it might prevent you from spouting ignorance in the face of facts for once. Such a fascinating chap this "Joe" character!
DeleteBanned? I don't think so... Not according to the admins any how.
Daniel and Joe sitting in a tree K..I..S..S..I..N..G lol
DeleteI bet "Joe" never even dreamed he'd bite so wonderfully.
DeleteJoe, do you dress up in women's clothes and role play in the mirror at home too?
DeleteYou sure have taken this role playing stuff to the next level.
I banter here, you posture there...in the end you have mud all over your face and a handful of people have seen my testes.
You're a complete buffoon.
Daniel, but aren't you supposed to be someone totally different to your current name of "Daniel Campbell"?
DeleteFor every fictitious scenario about Joe being in the mirror, one can easily imagine you screaming his name naked in one.
And please... I don't think anyone wants to imagine your testes this close to breakfast...
Daniel has a crush for Joe which we can all see.
DeleteLOL, Joe up to the usual. Proclaiming his genius while the rest of the normal population is a bunch of ignoramuses. Except he has to do it now under his drag queen stage name of Iktomi, because he tries to play nice under his real name. Doesn't matter the name Joemosexual. People are going to hate you no matter what handle you try to hide behind. Im guessing real life is more of the same for you, there's probably a long list of people who would like to hit you with a rock in person. Still, though, I called it out months ago that if the diary proved to be real you and the rest of your lying Bigfoot community would formulate more lies to discredit it, which I see that you've allready started to come up with some damage control. For being as smart as you think you are you are mind numbingly predictable. Everytime I watch finding Bigfoot and I see all your "credible" witnesses which are mostly rednecks that can barely speak the english language. I have to remind myself thats what Im trying to argue with. Dimwits who believe every conspiracy theory and monster story out there because the world must be a scary place full of ghosts, monsters, aliens and the men in black when you aren't intelligent enough to realize its all a bunch of fairy tales. Who in the hell needs a monkey suit prove what the vast majority of people allready know, its a guy in a monkey suit. When this diary news goes mainstream you will be looked upon as even more ridiculous. Which is an accomplishment in itself. Whatcha gonan do when even more people flock here to make fun of you nutjobs. Besides your usual copy and paste routine, which noone pays attention to anymore. I only have to read the first line of one of your posts to see its the same old lies, copied and pasted billion times. Now off to go talk to some intelligent people. Plus I have to go get my check from the government, they are going to give me a NICE check for this post. Oh wait.. I forgot you changed your mind. I meant I have to drive to Canada so they can do a psych evaluation.
DeleteYou have no idea what it is like being the daughter of Draco the Conqueror with 29 sisters nipping at your neels.
DeleteHit a nerve did I buddy? Where's the diary confession?? "Still, though, I called it out months ago..." Still nothing it seems, don't get angry because your disinformation isn't appearing to work. "Lying", "discrediting"; the only comparison we can draw from is from the likes of people like Greg Long, who contradictingly has more holes in his nonsense than anything you can point to in an enthusiastic sense... There's money in helping children sleep better at night from the boogeyman; here is the theory group more preoccupied with ghosts and gouls. These who needed an extra hug as babies; opium for the masses, and there is most certainly money to be made hoaxing a hoax.
DeleteAlso... I don't watch Finding Bigfoot sorry, and when "fairy tales" manifest in physical evidence, you're left with the awkward realisation that you need a braincell to counter it. Who in the hell needs a monkey suit? You do son, it's pretty much required for any field of scientific debate/study to test the premises put forward... If you can't then it is a suppression of evidence fallacy to suggest that it should not be considered due to your unsubstantiated claims. Bearing in mind, we're talking to a disinformationist, these things don't come natural at all to you. For all your people who "know" it's a monkey suit, none of them can provide a conclusive means to show it, which is the root of your reasons to find any other angle than man up, grow a pair and confront the data. Attacking the characters of the source as opposed to the data is the oldest technique in the book; now that's predictable, dear boy.
"Damage control"? Let's see the diary, it's as simple as that... And I'm not cleverer than most of population, just people like you... Liar, liar pants on fire... And please remember, for all your "nutjob" comments, people like you in fact have a very real personality disorder diagnosis by very real psychologists.
We would be rulers of earth now if you hadn't let Buck Rodgers on board.
Delete3:33... Oh, and you've never been considered intelligent enough to be a paid government operative, a psycho that's needs to make things up; all day long.
DeleteI post under the pseudonym Daniel Campbell, yes. Been that way for 2 years I'd say now.
DeleteDuring that time, and before, you've always been adamant that you are truly and legally named Joe F.
Now instead of being a normal person and saying you just lost the ability to see some comments, you just created a fake persona and will not recognize that you're just Joe F.
You are hypocritical and deceitful as usual.
Bond, James Bond.
DeletePond, James Pond. ;)
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSFOcTtYPrA
But... But you're here admitting ii is your real name??
Deletehttp://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/what-does-it-take-to-be-bigfoot.html?m=0
... Someone please get this "Joe" character back and give Daniel a big kiss! It's starting to get creepy!
Kelly ShawThursday, July 24, 2014 at 2:50:00 PM PDT
DeleteYou cant ever take seriously anyone who wont put their name behind their comments. Anonymous trolls are mere nats and could never be taken seriously. Thick skin is the only thing anyone needs in life to succeed. You listen to the whiners and no can doers that is when you become an anonymous internet troll. Someone with no name and their opinions fall on deaf ears.
Daniel CampbellThursday, July 24, 2014 at 4:51:00 PM PDT
I think you're chasing the wind and even fabricating your own "evidence."
How's that for anonymous?
... something about "hypocritical and deceitful"? Where's that Hazlitt quote when I need it... ???
1975--I had just left the Winterland Ballroom, in San Francisco where I had been backstage for a release party for Led Zepplin's "Physical Graffitti" tour thrown by Rolling Stone's Ben Fong Torres and Jan Wenner. I was tired. I drove up the Coastal Highway north just trying to relax when my tire blew. I got out and tried to fix the wheel but my foot got caught in my bell bottoms and I fell down a hill. Dizzy from bad blotter and traumatized, I laid in the grass thinking I was a goner. Who would save me now. I awoke in the parlor of Iktomi, he was brewing his "special tea" and playing the spirit flute surrounded by members of Jefferson Airplane. "It's ok man, he said, you'd have done it for me." He's that kinda dude. A hero, literally.
DeleteThe Texan never flails to bring a smile to my face.
DeleteWhy aren't there any Negroes in bigfootery?
Deletethey have more sense
DeleteHello Mike. Hello Joe.
DeleteMMG
Whos Joe?
DeleteThe comedy genius strikes again.
DeleteI do believe that is MMG!!
Delete^ never got old. MMG. Good Morning. Im certain wherever Fitzie is he's happy to know you said that. I got your memo on your boy heading out to the field and he's in good hands. And by that, of course, I mean the other guys. ;)
Delete"Oh let the sun beat down upon my face, stars fill up my dream, I am a traveler of both time and space, to be where I have been, to sit with Elders of the Gentle Race, this world has seldom seen, they talk of days for which they sit and wait........and all will be revealed "
Delete...Dan, I addressed Iktomi as Joe several times and he responded: He is not hiding anything..he is just playing around with you..also, I and a few others have had trouble seeing the comments in the past, so he is telling the truth about that....
DeleteDan, I feel I can confide in you know. You left your copy of "Are You There God, it's Me Margaret" by Judy Blume in my chiffarobe. And I'm telling the truth about that. ". Dan. This Joe guy haunts you like creditors on Haints' answering machine. I'm scared Dan. Make the bad man go bye bye. ;)
DeleteGuess what, Joe...little secret... I lied.
Delete541. I don't know what to say. I am sitting here screaming at my computer screen in laughter. Are you telling secrets to Dan on BFE? Are you like the Bill Hader character "Stefon" ? Do you use your hands to make a TP for your secrets? I'm not the funniest person to ever grace this blog. You are. Your "Dear Dan" diaries are now officially all the rage and I for one do love it.
DeleteDaniel... Not that anyone is remotely interested in who you are, why would anyone take YOUR word for it? And here we come full circle to the point in hand of integrity and hypocrisy. Next time you're screaming Joe's name in the mirror, pause and allocate some time to analyse that ugly mug of yours.
DeleteDan ....(whispers)....Dan? You have a good day now. And remember. It's not polite to keep secrets.
DeleteOooooooooooooooooooooooooooh, so what did we learn today? We learned that one cannot counter science with the mere allegations of "fairy tales"...
DeleteWith mere fairy tales.
See you later everyone!
Bye Joe.
DeleteI'm honest about it. You still won't type the words "I'm Joe."
DeleteOf course I want Joe! I want to hold him against the wall, spread those country hams, and take little Leon to the Herhey Highway.
I've been telling you for a long time DC is a fake name. However, you are doing exactly what you criticize others for PJ!
You enjoying the personal mud slinging? It seems you can't sufficiently counter any argument so you take an equally personal front. Nothing convincing here!
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteSuch an infatuation with this "Joe" character... So unhealthy. Get out into the world, get a girlfriend, get a few laughs, a couple of burgers, a few beers... Anything but invest so much unhealthiness in what someone else gets up to.
DeleteIt's difficult to believe you when you're on record claiming it's your real name, and since you claim that now it's not your real name (up and down claims like a yo-yo), doesn't this suddenly mean that the basis for past bet's are now void? You'll contradict yourself just as much as dig that hole a little deeper, Daniel.
Whatever you say, Joe.
DeleteJOE A GRAY CLONE !!!!
DeleteCrampz - You are hilarious...funnier than DSM! The lies that comes out of your mouth are hard to keep straight, eh?
DeleteYou just wrote yesterday, or the day before, that you rarely lie, and we all laughed. Now look at you today, confessing to your lies.
You accuse Joe of the same things that you do yourself. That is the definition of a hypocrite. As someone so versed in definitions, compelling versus convincing, and such a stickler for choice of words, I'm sure you'll recognize the hypocrite if you are as bright as you pride yourself in being.
We all are getting a little worn down by your constant fascination with Joe, and in the absence of Joe, Iktomi. We understand your man crush, and it is okay. We accept you.
Give your hypocritical ways a rest for awhile. You are truly looking the fool.
Signed, the normal blog readers.
So wait a second, the person who claimed to hve searched the BFE archives to copy and paste previous Joe material but can't quite say he is actually just Joe, and has spent seemingly all day here this week (going back and posting in old threads) has the spare time to tell others to get a social life...?
DeleteDid I read that properly? What a hoot! And what is with the appearance of NOW in your superficial argument. I'm not simply NOW telling you that DC isn't my legal name, it's been told to you for nearly two years! You sure are a quick fella!
Hahahaha NOW! LOL
You really want to bring up 3 bets that you lost on? Be my guest, dream weaver, be my guest.
And now my dear sweet Anonymous lover, let me tongue your ear so softly for a moment in this fast paced life...
Do you understand there is a difference between never, rarely, and always? Allow me to go even further; there is nothing "suddenly" appearing, I've been upfront and honest about most things, including telling you for well over a year that DC is not a given name of mine.
I've told you flat out why I dislike and enjoy things. It just so happens that traits of PJ are clinically responsible for POS running around and the reject side of the footing community alive.
Thank you for loving me. I love you. Obviously not the penetrating desire for Joe's cornhole over the unstimulating Mulder's World crossposts, but I love you nonetheless.
Now, if only we could have Joe Snazzlejazzle come over to the BFF and have public discourse with me where I can't say dirty things...oh yeah, hunny boo can't quite make it.
Iktomi, come on over the the BFF friend!
So, what's the big deal? except to get some digs in.
DeleteDear Crampz - I feel like I can address you as dear now since you tongued my ear. So dear, I must tell you it wasn't anywhere as good as you dreamed it would be nor as soft as you described. Please get in some practice, precious. Women like experienced men, especially ones that profess love.
DeleteI'll keep your love on the down low for now and not tell my husband ;)
Keep on dreaming. I hope one day you find your true love, no matter the gender.
Until then.
Oh my dear California lover, somehow I knew that was you. Do you have red hair by chance or does your last name begin with S?
DeleteWith love.
Cali- you're of the paranormal bigfoot camp, correct?
DeleteHe showed us all the equipment so we understand the disappointment.
DeleteNow excuse me while I put my brain in the washing machine with tide and bleach.
5:55 - ha ha! I never looked at the link Crampz posted back then. I think I'll start a gratitude journal and have that as my first entry!
Delete@The Knower Remember Bob Gimlin, the other guy involved in the film? Bob Gimlin came to the Bigfoot Daze a few years back. He shared he's been offered thousands by the tabloids to come out, and say the Patterson film was a hoax. He said he won't say that because he would be a liar. You can say what you want about Roger Patterson, but Bob Gimlin is no liar. His story has never changed since 1967. So, good luck proving all that. Anata wa bakadesu.
DeleteDear Crampz (DC)- Sadly(?), no red hair, no S, and still a novice when it comes to bigfoot camps....though I have had some unexplainable happenings to me while backpacking and in the woods. I'm still trying to make sense of it all, yet it won't fit into one box.
DeleteLike DSM, I get escared and make my husband take the dog out to potty at night now.
You?
Cali
Has anyone else ever heard of a sasquatch smiling before? I'm not saying they don't; I am just seeking confirmation that they make that gesture.
ReplyDeleteI believe there is reference to a "sinister smile" from a Sasquatch in this Mike Wooley encounter;
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFvxDMZsqDs
Sasquatch smiling is something similar to Joe being honest; it just doesn't happen that often.
DeleteMike Honcho... MMG Sr... " My name is not Daniel Campbell"... The beat goes on...
Deleteadmit Daniel, you have a thing for Joe. It is obvious.....you want to wear some wellies and put his legs into them. LOL
DeleteSomeone please bring this Joe character back... Daniel's gonna have to visit a shrink at this rate.
DeleteWhos Joe?
DeleteI'm sure if not voluntarily, it will be court ordered.
DeleteHey Dover. It is out there, not sure where.
DeleteChuck
Joe's a caulksucker that's all you need to know.
DeleteI see, Cork Soakers are funny people
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFN9Km9KFXU
DD
DeleteShowing ones teeth could possibly be misunderstood as a sign of aggression. I am not quite sure.
MMC
In the animal kingdom, yes. Smiling at other primates can be viewed as showing teeth. I was just wondering about examples of them smiling, of which I'm unaware of.
DeleteIt could be an important example of how closely they are related to man, or it could be a fabrication.
i was sitting down with the ghost of my old uncle charlie and we saw that there sasquatchery thing. i told uncle chuck to hold on to his etherial self cuz i was gonna catch to pooting thing. i shot it, but a chupacabra got it and ran off. i chased it and i couldnt catch up to it on my own, thankfully batboy swung in and helped out.
DeleteYou should take some classes in creative writing and listen to the instructor.
Deletethanks for enjoying my story as i enjoy every story about bigfoot. and i do mean story.
DeleteIs incredible....
ReplyDeleteIts also bullshit.
Bigfoot don't exist.
Wow... What were we thinking? Thanks for chiming in with your infinite wisdom.
DeleteOne does not have to be particularly wise to state that bigfoot does not exist. It is merely common sense.
DeleteIktomi is an anagram for squatch chode. True story.
DeleteOne whom states that "Bigfoot" does not exist in the face of having it's antithesis pointed out with scientific evidence daily... Is in fact far from wise. Common sense would be to find something else to do with your nerd time.
Delete"We were hypnotized by alibis, as they limbo danced in pairs, please lock that door, it don't make no sense that common sense don't make no sense no more". John Prine "Common Sense"
DeleteHas anyone else noticed the seal of Rassilon on that bloke with the beard?
Deletei agree. i once thought i saw a sasquatch, but i have been told by credible people that weren't even there, that i saw a bear on the side of the road waiting for me to pass, then crossed the road on 2 legs behind me. 10 out of 10 people told me i was wrong, no sasquatch. therefore it was a bear. that walked on 2 legs and waited patiently for me to pass.
DeleteSo Joe finally accepted that he lost his bet about Sykes and has left the blog? Fair play to the guy.
ReplyDeleteJoe left the blog to pursue a career chugging aardvark yogurt.
DeleteCome go sailing
ReplyDeleteWe've waited long enough
For Beany and Cecil Dishonest John and Captain Huffenpuff.
It's time for adventure
Hot Dog, some fun. Oh Joy
With Cecil the seasick sea serpent
And good old Beany
Boy, boy, boy, boy, boy.
Join us for fun with Beany and...
Lovable, gullible, armless, harmless, ten foot tall and wet.
Cecil the seasick serpent
Created by Bob Clampett.
So come on kids, let's flip our lids
Higher than the moon
Cause now here's Beany and Cecil in a whole half hour
Bob Clampett Cartoon.
What's the one thing all people who've had a sighting have in common? We wish we never told anyone what happened! Why?
ReplyDelete1) We are laughed at, and mocked.
2) We are liars
3) We are crazy
4) We were hallucinating, or on something.
5) Why is it never believed what people claim to see??
6) Everyone is nuts? Similar descriptions, smell, size, vocals?
7) Way more proof, than no proof!
People across the world describe another phenomenon with universality size smell and sound is it bigfoot? No its the phantom shitter
ReplyDeleteOh dear!
DeleteThe only crap out there is from the skeptics! Many reputable people have had sightings. A police officer I know told me he had a sighting, and he keeps it to himself. He saw it hunting. A few of the other officers believe, and a few don't.
DeletePolice officers with sightings are a plenty too.
DeleteGood bigfoot movie!
DeleteHunting the legend
http://www.solarmovie.is/link/play/3088230/
Police officers beating n*ggers in the street a plenty too.
DeleteSo, then you're using a positive example for police officers, in that if one is true the other is positively true.
DeleteDC is handicapped. We just shake our heads.
DeleteThe point is majority of police officers were high school jocks that aren't properly trained for the equipment issued to them.
DeleteI don't know; they can swing that club good if they want to. This real issue is the credibility of the witness. People of all walks have claimed to see bigfoot, including law enforcement and park rangers whom you would expect to be credible.
DeleteI have to believe that you must wonder if bigfoot could be real whether you publicly admit it or not in the face of thousands of reports.
DC is too afraid to publicly admit it.
DeleteHow many times must these words be typed?
DeleteI WANT bigfoot to be real. I've got a lifetime in the woods across the northeast and mid-south, and I want it to be real.
I will NOT curb my skepticism or simply believe without clearly convincing evidence.
So far, 60 years have provided some compelling stuff but nothing remotely convincing.
Fair enough. You view the compelling stuff as a glass half empty.
Delete***Does it exist (Sasquatch) or does it not and will we ever find out............
ReplyDeleteScience is founded on the premise that we exist in a rational reality and from this premise it follows that every scientific belief can and should be based on evidence, otherwise it is not science. To be completely clear as to what is science it can be defined in one simple sentence;
Delete"Science is the unbiased effort to understand reality based on the observable physical evidence."
Considering we don't have proof but do have physical evidence, from here one SHOULD be better equipped to make a logical conclusion.
You watch, when a body does come out, the skeptards are going to say it was man-made in a lab, and there aren't anymore of them in the woods.
DeleteThat's because they watched that 6 Million Dollar Man episode where scientists created a bionic bigfoot and pitted him against Steve Austin in a knockdown drag out. Steve sent him scurrying into the forest after ripping his robotic arm off. I had one of those action figures as a kid,with removable chest plate revealing bionic innards, but it's gone now. Them sumbitches go for at least a hundred bucks on ebay now.
DeleteScience is based on repeatable experiments to come to the same conclusion.
Delete... And we have exactly that.
DeleteYou mean like the dermal ridge cast that were shown under controlled conditions could be reproduced to show what only appears to be dermal ridges.
DeleteI see your point, carry on.
(Cringe)
DeleteOk... Let me enlighten you to the reality of that. Chulcutt is very adamant about the three casts he uses as examples of biological samples (though the actual prints are different they still have the same texture and ridge flow pattern, like a humans however twice the size), whilst he's stated as plain that even Crowley (who's far more enthusiastic than what people would prefer) has stated that even he feels that Walla Walla casts are genuine (25mins in the link below). The tile that Crowley sent Chilcutt was covered in artificial ridge artefacts from the pouring process. The three casts in question that Chilcutt examined; they didn't have this... This is because when you are walking barefoot on the forest floor, the foot comes in contact with both fallen leaves and the soil in making an impression. Therefore, these artefacts would be present in consistency right across the different soil areas of the foot fall, and they're not. The delta ridges on prints change directions over 45 degrees; they converge and deviate. This is a major indicator that the dermals are biological and as Chulcutt states, these do not appear on any of the artefacts.
http://www.skeptic.com/podcasts/monstertalk/10/02/03/
... Oh, and even though Crowley's artificial don't follow biological traits, "controlled conditions" is in fact a euphemism for laboratory suitations; and they're available to the average nonody hoaxer, right?
Repeatable evidence? The Elk Wallow castings that have been verified by a line of forensic specialists to again be biological traits of an unknown primate... Let me know if you want those quoted.
There is no doubt in my mind you could quote it, im sure from seeing your links cut and pasted here that you have them well prepared by category on microsoft word documents for such ocations.
DeleteRhe fact remains two of the dermal ridge casting could be and were reproduced and another was proven to be a hoax.
Wishing and posting links that fit only your agenda does not prove anything.
But please, carry on.
No, no, no, dear boy... This is where experts come into play, see? Artificial desiccation has it's own uniform style that does not match one school of alleged Sasquatch traits;
Deletehttp://bigfootforums.com/index.php?/topic/2490-dermatoglyphics-casting-artifacts/
... And no, nothing was proven to be a hoax, I'm sorry... I know you like to THINK you know what you're talking about. The talk of "agendas" is rich coming from someone who needed pointing out the facts via a sceptical radio show programme.
Let me know if you want those quotes, I'll be happy to bend that brain a little more.
I'd like to also state here, that should things go the way they have done of late, and should I not be able to access the comment sections... I'll be right along at a later time, at the first opportunity to respond.
DeleteHalf way down this link you'll notice a comparison between artificial and biological traits;
Deletehttp://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/36334-suit-possibly-key-to-final-hoax-proof/page-5
... Glad I could help.
Oh, do please come back and comment. As if anybody gives a warm fart.. What a deluded bastard.
DeleteHmm, could you perhaps provide some links to sources that are not bigfoot enthusiast havens? Perhaps something like Nature?
Deletebetter still a peer reviewed journal
DeleteI think you'll find the BFF a platform for any stance to comment. To publish anything of the sort you would need the primate to go with the unknown primate dermals...
DeleteStill don't make the dermals go away though.
Just a quick post not going to go into much but a quick rebuttle on you 9:33 post joe.
Delete"This is where experts come into play"
I know mellisa hovey and while a very nice person and knowlegble in whats shes read online, she is far from an expert on anything.
She is an expert at sucking c*ck and I hear likes a tent or two.
Delete10:58... You missundertand. The reference to "experts" was the forensic specialists who apart from Chilcutt, I haven't even started to quote yet. The BFF link was the source of long reading I offered to anyone who was interested.
DeleteHope I cleared that up.
DSA 7:50. That's Colonel Steve Austin to you. Our country did not spend 6 million dollars in taxpayer money to make him "better than he was before, stronger and faster " for you to skip his credentials. Show some respect please.
DeleteThats the sad thing Joe, we all know you havent begun to quote.
DeleteIm sure you have hundreds of links to cut and paste.
Sad for your self esteem, yes.
Deleteok Joe
DeleteHahaha! I apologize Mike. Colonel Steve Austin.
Delete^^^I'm assuming ya going to Mike B's,Joe, if so bring us back at least one "clear" facial/body photo of it. That is ALL I ask...........
ReplyDeleteInteresting you point that out 9:57. I made a post yesterday under the Sasquatch tool thread which got buried/overlooked/ignored so I will repost some of it here. I skipped my lunch break to write it and would appreciate an answer from Mike Brookreson and Joe/lktomi or whatever he wants to call himself. For the record this is my FIRST post on this particular thread so I have nothing to do with the flame wars above.
DeleteI'm probably even beyond claiming to be a skeptic, I now flat out do not believe it exists. So I'm a tough crowd to convince. I think we can all agree on this - what is presented as evidence is not proof of it's existence. It may certainly be evidence in the eyes of some but is not conclusive proof. Let's review:
Witnesses: Not conclusive. People make mistakes, People lie. Some just like attention.
Video/Pictures: Not conclusive. Video and pictures have and can be faked. Technological advances and savvy hoaxers can manipulate visuals.
Footprints: Disputed. Dermal ridges have been seriously questioned. Footprints can be made and hoaxed.
Hair: Disputed. To my knowledge nothing conclusive and without question has come from what is offered as sasquatch hair.
Scat: Disputed. Same as above.
DNA: Inconclusive and disputed. Everyone had high hopes for Ketchum and Sykes study. In the end everyone was disappointed. Even among some of the most avid supporters.
So you have this evidence and yet we are no further along then we were since the PGF in proving to the world it exists. I hope we can all agree we need a body live or dead. I agree with you guys about not shooting one. Since I do not believe they exist, I am more afraid of a mistaken shooting of a vagrant, hiker, hoaxer or someone just out for a stroll enjoying nature. I am also not for the unnecessary killing of anything. But we do need that body.
Now Mike interests me and I hope he will read this post in that he seems to infer he knows the area where some dwell and is familiar with their habits. Some seem to be convinced he is on the level. From what I can surmise this seems to be somewhere in central Texas? I am curious about the terrain down there so I plan to order that book and hopefully there will be some pictures of the area. If Joe/lktomi ever does make it to that area and confirms what Mike says without proof than most will simply say it was a case of preaching to the choir. In others words he was disposed to believe in the first place and would not be objective with his findings. So - we all know that a body is needed for final proof.
What's my idea? You and Mike both agree on it being a flesh and blood creature. Mike infers that he is aware of what it eats, tangerines being one of them. Why not try a sedative mixed into the food and then have trailing dogs and posse pursue. Sure there is a danger of overdose but that is a chance one has to take for proof and would not constitute an outright killing. I understand the logistics and expense however if I was convinced it exists I sure would spare no expense and that it why I cannot understand why Mike is not being more aggressive in pursuing them. We are literally talking a payout of millions of dollars. Hunter guy was correct in his assessment of tracking dogs in my opinion and I for one do not believe they would be deterred by ANYTHING if properly trained. For those who come up with the argument that dogs are scared of bigfoot, or it can sense that food has been doctored or it's too intelligent or any of the myriad of excuses given I have no time for because NO ONE really knows for sure.
It may not be the right solution but if this is a flesh and blood animal it CAN be caught or (regrettably) shot. By the way Mike has never answered my question as to why he doesn't lobby the Falcon Project to come down there. I would think the terrain would be more conducive to spotting it and Mike says they are certainly in the area so it would be a good place to start.
Well there it is and now I AM going to get a lunch which I missed yesterday.
Bill Brock needin to gits on this and find that critter
DeleteDogs have been tried in the past 70's, and there are many reports of the same that once they catch a sniff trained or not they run and hide.
Delete10:44... Nobody is claiming to have proof. This is a leap that many make when trying to reinforce their points of view regarding this topic.
DeleteWitnesses; to suggest that tens of thousands of eyewitnesses who account for nearly every professional background you can think of, some of whom who are trained in finer details under stressful situations like police officers, witnesses that transition ten thousand years of cultural references... Is a leap of faith. Multiple eyewitness reports are very difficult to dismiss as mistakes and when such reports are supported by both physical and biological sources of evidence; they have a major source of supporting evidence.
Video/Pictures; about as conclusive as an experts opinion, and it is a contradiction on the entire scientific field to suggest tht opinions count for nothing when peer review processes adhere to just that. Technological advances defied by 47 years in one source; fitting you should bring that up.
Footprints; disputed by unqualified people, yes. When you have species traits that transcend States and decades, verified by a long line of impartial forensic experts, here is no way these can be faked.
Hair; disputed by unqualified people, when you have multiple camps of primatologists verifying uniform morphology, that have physical evidence in tracks and a sighting by government employees to support, then without question it has come from an unknown primate.
Scat; photographs exist however disputed, however you would require this to be tested steaming fresh for verification and this is very difficult.
DNA; disputed. However, if Sasquatch shares out exact DNA like earlier versions of us that had anatomical and morphological differences, then we may have already sequenced it and not even realised. A second round of testing of the Ketchum samples will put this to bed.
Audio; we have audio recordings hat have actually been published that are consistent with an unknown primate but outside of the frequency of a human primate.
So... We have this evidence that accounts for every source of evidence short of modern type specimen, that has been accumulated since the PGF, and though this doesn't prove anything, but what it does prove is there is the evidence for an unknown primate. Here is where we can can lean from scientific principles like Occam's Razor. Yes... We need a body to prove everthing, but the nature of be evidence is as useless as someone would rather it be, scientific research doesn't work like that though and does not start as conclusion. I can't agree more about not shooting one and for your exact reasons, not to mention that we could be dealing with a very rare creature, not to mention one that could quite easily draw in social group members to any kill site.
Regarding dogs, we in fact have three books plus written by an ex-police officer with the collaboration of many search and rescue personal that have documented very strange behaviour in their trained dogs who literally live for the search. Bears & mountain lions don't ignite this reaction.
Bigfoot doesn't exist
DeleteWILD BILL frum AIMS team sayin BIGFOOTs to smart fer trappin
DeleteNot officially at present... But an unknown bipedal primate twice the size of a human-primate certainly does.
DeleteA bipedal primate twice the size of a human-primate doesn't exist
DeleteKeep praying.
Deletepraying doesn't make an unknown bipedal primate twice the size of a human-primate or bigfoot, exist.
DeleteIt might help give you peace of mind for the evidence for it to go away.
DeleteReassurance isn't the best thing to seek out when I'm town son.
Bigfoot doesn't exist
Delete^ rocking in the corner, repeating himself at this point.
DeleteBigfoot doesn't exist
DeleteSorry Joe, but that dude just pwned the hell out of you!
DeleteOnce you put the pom poms down and develop the literacy to understand what I've posted... You'd have started to grow up a little.
DeleteBigfoot doesn't exist
DeleteBOBO says they are REAL
DeleteSo I've been on the phone all morning talking to my ex co worker and I found out from him that I didn't have all my facts straight when I wrote this story, which was supposed to be just a quick, short story in the first place. Just so you all know I've never told this story because I never believed it and don't expect anyone else too either. It was just lunchtime talk at the workplace in (2004) a 30 min break so my co worker never had the chance to disclose all the details till today.
ReplyDeleteIll try and update the full story tonight with facts from the witness himself
Ah,so beautiful and wonderful post!An opportunity to read a fantastic and imaginary blogs.
ReplyDeleteIt gives me lots of pleasure and interest.Thanks for sharing.