Breakdown: Bigfoot Caught on Google Earth
Is it a good idea to look for Bigfoot from your couch using Google Earth? ParaBreakdown sees a few problems with this method of research.
Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story
This story was circulating the internet way back in 2004, or maybe as far back as 1999. Back when everybody was on 56k dial-up modems and a "Facebook" was just a regular book with directory listing of names and headshots. This story was so disturbing and so shocking that nobody believed it at the time. It was the Robert Lindsay " Bear Hunter: Two Bigfoots Shot and DNA Samples Taken " story of the time. And like Robert's Bear Hunter story , this witness didn't have a name. The only thing known about the witness is that this person was a government employee, anonymous of course. The author of the story was a science teacher named Thom Powell who believe it really happened and that the whole story was an elaborate cover-up. Powell said the anonymous government employee alerted the BFRO about a 7.5 feet long/tall burn victim with "multiple burns on hands, feet, legs and body; some 2nd and 3rd degree burns". Sadly, there was no DNA samples taken from...
first ha ha
ReplyDeleteHey, that's my line...Congrats though!!
DeleteHey Guys! I'm starting a brand new business.
DeleteNow in keeping up with the times, My new business will be: Paying Cash for pictures of "Dark Shadows", "burnt stumps" or anything black in the woods! i will also pay good money for "Faces in the woods". If you need extra cash go out into the woods, and start taking pictures Color only! No B&W
Mike B. will probably be my best customer! LOL!!
I can be reached at: DumbfucksGalore. com
Reply
Go to 'Texas Hillcountry Cryptozoological Society' channel on YouTube and check out his DNA samples, woodknocks and tree breaks.
DeletePeace.
TEAM HOMOS!
DeleteDAN CAMPBELL .GO HOME YOUR BEATEN !
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGood breakdown.
DeletePeace.
Joe I am sorry to say this but you clearly do not have a clue what you are talking about.
DeleteYou were sooooo wrong about sykes and you can't even admit it or apologise.
I apologise for being a little too good at my job that I should have boring... Very boring, unimaginative, hateful, scared, stupid little nobody's like you trolling each page for attention from me, and that people should read your slime.
DeleteYou are stupid, and you should go away.
This place gets trolled regardless of your presence or lack thereof.
DeleteYou've been wrong from the beginning about everything. You continue to be wrong and you will forever be wrong.
How you haven't taken your own life in your 30+ years is a testament to denial as a defense mechanism.
Blah blah blah blah, hate boring hate, more blah... Go away Campbell, people are sick of you bro. There are other ways of getting attention in this world.
Delete(Sigh)
I'll gladly leave provided you do the same. Yeah, I hope he cuts his wrists, so shove it, anonymous. This ain't my first rodeo.
DeleteI make myself unlikeable but it just is a natural occurrence for PBJ.
Danos a homo !!!
DeleteYou must be a very unhappy person.So much hatred towards other people.Curious,are you like this 24/7?It's sad to think a person lives his life that way.I've been watching the two of you carry on about the existence of Bigfoot and the two of you have brought it to a new level of a bitch fest.
DeleteYou both need a break.Maybe go and drink a beer and see the real world for a change.
I bet the two you couldn't stay away for a week.
Do me a favour and keep it to yourself. I have never initiated any of this crap and try and keep the discussion going as best I can... If you don't like it that I stick up for myself then deal with it.
DeleteI don't roll in hate... If you wanna brand me in the same league as that pervert then keep your nose out of my business.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteOh,keep it to myself.Just like you do.You make it our business when you post after post after post when another person says Bigfoot isn't real.Think about it Joe,that's exactly what you do.Don't you realize that Dan wouldn't troll you if you didn't post after post after post?You're not as disgusting as Dan but you are a post whore.You must post at least 100 times a day if not more.And it's not about different stuff it's same old drivel.I think everyone knows about MKs leaping Yeti cause you post that about 20 times a day.Get some new material.
DeletePS.WHO LOVES YOU BABY!!!
You will never see me post obscene language... You will never see me initiate filth and I am more than happy to post the same old stuff because otherwise; it's the same old rude hateful skeptical crap that for some people who come here, possibly once and never come, have to see. It's either hate or truth and I couldn't give a rats arss of I have friends or not... How date you brand me with that scum. Do me a favour and learn something for once from my posts. I am dedicate to discussion and if you can't handle that then ta-ta numpty!
DeleteOh and 6:47... The only reason that pervert hates on me every day is because I was the reeled him in like a turd to come out of anonimaty and he can't debunk facts. Nothing else... He likes to be the big cheese but he's the most pathetic thing I have ever come across.
DeleteYou cuss and have called me plenty of names, dink. As a matter of fact that was part of the reasoning behind your banning.
DeleteYou are happy with the same repeated and tired material because that's ALL you have!
It's not like Sykes, FB, Dyer, Daisy, darkman, or anything has been coming to your aid. The only thing you have at all is ollllddd, rehashed, and dated. You talk about people looking for gorillas...well, Dr. Johnsonfitzgerald you still repeat all that information that came about looking for those gorillas. It's not like you post groundbreaking theory and new information.
You don't have any facts nor do I think you even properly comprehend the definition of 'fact.'
STEP 4 syndrome confirmed!! You think that because you have an initial answer for my points that a counter point is beneath you to counter in turn and the fact is that this is the reason you are so butt hurt. I was banned for saying two words which were laughable in the face of what floats around here on a regular basis, that is directed at me by Tardists cause I school for fun.
DeleteDisappointing Dan is back.
DeleteOh yay for the BEB.
Joe F: I love you guy! Keep up the good work. Don't let the trolls get to you. Keep given them, logical intelligent comments. Do not go down to there level. You have my backing in everything you do.
DeleteIf you ever find out where that Dan Campbell lives, I will drive down there for you and take care of him for you
Just joking of course!
Dan, you better not piss me off, or i'll drive now to you with my "Afro-American NEGRO" ex-football player, and he will sit on your face, and let one of his famous Atomic-, "That wing of the house is closed" Farts, in your face!
After he ate his "colored greens& Fried chicken dinners" Oh, and Dan, He is sitting right next to me as I type this, and is laughing so hard, that he starting to fart already! PHEW!
I'm back! And rested now.....
John W. Jones Spoke
I stopped reading Disappointing Dan's comments a long time ago. Unfortunately I decided to read above and saw he urged someone to commit suicide.
DeleteI'm going back to not reading any of Disappointing Dan's comments.
Um, JJ, I thought you were on safari this week. I worry about you, dude, you seem to be genuinely unhinged. Making threats on the Internet can get you into trouble--even if you say you're just kidding. Seriously, dude, I hope you are OK and highly recommend you seek professional help. I don't intend that to be mean.
Deletejoe fitzgeraldFriday, November 1, 2013 at 6:28:00 AM PDT
DeleteDo me a favour and keep it to yourself. I have never initiated any of this crap and try and keep the discussion going as best I can...
Well that is an easily provable distortion of fact.
Joe I'm sorry to say this but I'm beginning to believe you repeatedly reply to yourself anonymously in order to create conflict amongst yourself which is way scarier then anything Dan has done
DeleteWell Mr Bandini, I never had you down for the paranoid type and if you can't understand why I wouldn't have some support for my efforts then I can't help you there either.
DeleteI mean that respectfully... I have never answered my own points and find that notion a little embarrassing.
Peace.
Joe I was trying to lead you into a joke last night but you never said anything and I forgot what it was by now That was just the setup not the punch line that's why I was sure to say sorry in the beginning so you wouldn't take offense regardless it was ruined by last night relax otherwise you know I'd talk shit if I didn't like you
DeleteYou're quite right... Very sorry Bandini, I'm always too defensive.
DeleteYeah you're alright in my book man I may not share your views but you aren't just a dick to people for no reason and that's a decent person by my definition
DeleteI hear Figboot is going to be revealed in 2014 on the Garth Brooks Rides Again tour. She just can't handle another 50 years of hiding and being referred to as Patty. She'd be much happier in that special bigfoot way if people would call her by her native name: Tits-be-hangin'.
ReplyDeleteI don't get it, are you some high end British douchebag? Or Ala JREFer who secretly believes in Bigfoot. Cause I mean, you post on here, A LOT. Way beyond the norms of a troll. So I'm thinking you have a hidden agenda.
DeleteAwwww poor Daniel, too scared to say he believes so he puts on a facade. Kinda cute.
..Ahh, the old closet believer theory..A poster used to frequently troll skeptics with that one with some amusing and well timed comments...
DeleteA very funny concept, indeed: People that believe in bigfoot, but to avoid embarrassment tell their family and friends they are skeptics: "I read the books and blogs and watch all the shows because I am interested in human nature...."...lol..
I come here for the entertainment. And the donuts--
DeleteI would guess Daniel comes here for the same reason most of us do. Simply it is fun. He is a good debater and has a good wit. I for one like the cut of his jib.
DeleteThat's just beautiful.
DeleteEncouraging folks to commit suicide is 'good' debating?
You guys are a mess.
MMG
Lol... I come here for inspiring posts like "I keep my poop in a jar"...and the donuts...
DeleteWe all know why we are here. It is clear what needs to be done. Will we be treated to a 200,000 word paste job today? The answer is a resounding yes.
ReplyDeleteThe one below is just for you... Enjoy.
DeleteFooled ^
DeleteScientists are remaining stubbornly silent about a lost race of giants found in burial mounds near Lake Delavan, Wisconsin, in May 1912.
ReplyDeleteThe dig site at Lake Delavan was overseen by Beloit College and it included more than 200 effigy mounds that proved to be classic examples of 8th century Woodland Culture. But the enormous size of the skeletons and elongated skulls found in May 1912 did not fit very neatly into anyone's concept of a textbook standard.
They were enormous. These were not average human beings.
Strange Skulls
First reported in the 4 May 1912 issue of the New York Times, the 18 skeletons found by the Peterson brothers on Lake Lawn Farm in southwest Wisconsin exhibited several strange and freakish features.
Their heights ranged between seven and nine feet and their skulls "presumably those of men, are much larger than the heads of any race which inhabit America to-day."
Above the eye sockets, "the head slopes straight back and the nasal bones protrude far above the cheek bones. The jaw bones are long and pointed, bearing a minute resemblance to the head of the monkey. The teeth in the front of the jaw are regular molars."
Mystery of The Wisconsin Giants
Was this some sort of prank, a hoax played by local farm boys or a demented taxidermist for fun and the attention of the press? The answer is no.
The Lake Delavan find of May 1912 was only one of dozens and dozens of similar finds that were reported in local newspapers from 1851 forward to the present day. It was not even the first set of giant skeletons found in Wisconsin.
On 10 August 1891, the New York Times reported that scientists from the Smithsonian Institution had discovered several large "pyramidal monuments" on Lake Mills, near Madison, Wisconsin. "Madison was in ancient days the centre of a teeming population numbering not less than 200,000," the Times said. The excavators found an elaborate system of defensive works which they named Fort Aztalan.
"The celebrated mounds of Ohio and Indiana can bear no comparison, either in size, design or the skill displayed in their construction with these gigantic and mysterious monuments of earth -- erected we know not by whom, and for what purpose we can only conjecture," said the Times.
On 20 December 1897, the Times followed up with a report on three large burial mounds that had been discovered in Maple Creek, Wisconsin. One had recently been opened.
"In it was found the skeleton of a man of gigantic size. The bones measured from head to foot over nine feet and were in a fair state of preservation. The skull was as large as a half bushel measure. Some finely tempered rods of copper and other relics were lying near the bones."
Giant skulls and skeletons of a race of "Goliaths" have been found on a very regular basis throughout the Midwestern states for more than 100 years. Giants have been found in Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois, Ohio, Kentucky and New York, and their burial sites are similar to the well-known mounds of the Mound Builder people.
The spectrum of Mound builder history spans a period of more than 5,000 years (from 3400 BCE to the 16th CE), a period greater than the history of Ancient Egypt and all of its dynasties.
There is a "prevailing scholarly consensus" that we have an adequate historical understanding of the peoples who lived in North America during this period. However, the long record of anomalous finds like those at Lake Delavan suggests otherwise.
http://suite101.com/a/a-giant-mystery-18-strange-skeletons-found-in-wisconsin-a407191
... Suck on that guys!!
Peace.
The web page I referenced has great further reading regarding 'The Great Smithsonian Cover-Up'.
DeleteEnjoy.
Peace.
Words and more words, PJ.
DeleteWhen are you actually going to provide scientific evidence to the table instead of all kinds of hogwash backed by zero evidence?
Take yor issue up with the Smithsonian...
DeleteAnybody smell bums?
zzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Deleteno idea if i agreed or diagreed with that.who is going to read that
as for tis film,utter nonsense. 'could be anything' pictires so lets cll it bigfoot! all ver desperate to me
I'm not making outlandish claims, PJ, you are. Talking about all these giants who have been found for 200 years and the only outcome you can stir up for the lack of physical evidence is a big museum conspiracy.
DeleteMy gosh, when you look in the mirror everyday do you laugh at yourself or cry at your image?
No evidence ever to you equals giant cover up!
LOL
Danos a homo. !!!
DeleteMIKE YOU'RE BACK
DeleteDeal with the Smithsonian Campz, what's that? You can't... So it's back to 'Blah blah blah blah, hate boring hate, more blah'... Go away Campbell, people are sick of you bro. There are other ways of getting attention in this world.
Delete(Sigh)
Daniel, when you go down on your wife, how's it taste?
DeleteWell, my girlfriend's nectar has a sweet overtone with a hint of strawberry and pheromones.
DeleteAs for PJ - What am I supposed to deal with exactly? I don't believe your garbage and subsequent emails to Smithsonian has them outright denying every peice of it.
Can't believe you think the Smithsonian is covering this crap up. What about other countries? We talking worldwide academia and museum active cover ups?
Not everything is an X-Files episode, Mulder.
This comment has been removed by the author.
Delete..Much better Joe: Something specific that people can dismiss, believe, investigate and counter or investigate and agree...Big improvement over "Check out Jim Vierra"...Thanks for sharing....
DeleteThere is nothing to debate. No DNA even from the top samples from top researchers, science has looked at all your evidence, not a shred of physical scientific evidence has ever been proposed by you. There is no cover up at a multinational level of your monkey man and quite frankly in absentia of all this evidence, that means there is no Figboot.
DeleteThere's only misidentification, conmen, hoaxers, those for profit, cultural campfire stories, high school kids and a big imagination.
Maybe if you would put forth actual debatable material there would be something to discuss.
However, all you ever have is hearsay, opinion, and unfounded claims.
More science, less showmanship.
Check out my post at the bottom for a response to your 'version' of events.
DeleteI win, I win! I bet that Mike B. would slink back here today! It is only a moral victory, but victory nonetheless.
DeleteUNICORNS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SHOW PONIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LONG LIVE TROLLANDIA!!!!!!!!!!!!
LONG LIVE MUCKLEGRUNT!!!
DeleteLONG LIVE POOP IN THE JAR GUY!!!
LONG LIVE ANONY!!!
LONG LIVE BIGFOOT EVIDENCE!!!
ALL HAIL TROLLANDIA!!!
The Smithsonian had the Patterson Gimlin film on display during the summer of 1968. It was the unstabilized video on a repeating loop, that was actuated by pressing a button on the display. The attendant told me that they were supposed to be people. As the attendant also told me, the FBI came in an asked them to take the display down because Bigfoot were classified as top secret. The attendant further explained that they were going to take it down in a few weeks and that I was lucky to have seen it. I believe that I saw it around July 4th. The FBI has more recently explained to me that there is nothing illegal about studying Bigfoot since that are not recognized as a known species. They also said that they know that they are paranormal, and that there is a lot more creatures out there that are paranormal. Some of which are dangerous. But hey, that's just my memory talking.
DeleteWhy does Joe keep talking about Dan's balls?
DeleteKind of weird. Joe can't seem to forget it. I bet he rolls green olives around in his mouth when he types responses to Dan and myself.
Love,
THE KING
Anon 10:40 has now just given Joe, a bunch more hearsay ammo to argue with. Joe will soon ask for your email....use this as hard evidence...then argue with us that we can't disprove what you said. In the end this equals Joe being an absolute loon and clinically retarded.
DeleteThe King
Even a shred of proof that this outlandish claim is true 10:40? Anything...a link to when this film was shown at the museum would be nice. How about a description on the attendant? Should not be to hard to see if someone matching a description given by you worked there at the the time. Some proof of your correspondence with the FBI would be great as well. Thanks in advance.
DeleteA link for a 1968 showing at the Smithsonian? Exactly, what recording medium are you requesting this to be in? After, the internet had not been invented until 1973, and there is no other national recording medium that you will be able to find for 1968.
DeleteA link to an attendant, 45 years after she was well into even a 30 year federal retirement plan, who is now likely dead? Show me the database of all federal employees of the Smithsonian, and we will see if they also list things like height, weight, eye color, clothes that they wore on such and such a date in 1968. Can't find one can you. Of course not.
A copy of written correspondence from a telephone call to the local FBI office? More JREF tactics if I have ever seen them. Every major city has an FBI office. Why don't you take that ass-hat off and put your phone to your ear and call them? Of course you won't because you do not want to hear what they might say. Every office has a paranormal expert. You have to get past the blond that answers the phones, and talk to their paranormal expert. Just remember one thing. Be careful what you wish for.
Thanks Joe. I admit I know little about the burial giants and some day I will delve into it more as the ancient mysteries that do not fit modern day science's version and are dismissed by academia have intrigued me since the 1970s. We are fortunate in the states to have the discovery series of channels that are not afraid to tackle the mysteries of our past and present and they have tremendous amount of cash.
ReplyDeleteChuck
Here is another one of the problems with the cover up you describe Joe. Cover up was possibly a poor choice to label the article with as it infers a conspiracy when it is actually a consensus. In 1912 in this country all knowledge started and ended in the Ivy League schools. These were arrogant and smug people who deemed what would be and not be looked at. Since tiny Beloit College did not fit into the Ivy league culture their work was probably just dismissed and never studied. This is still a predominant view by institutions today and really went on as far back, probably much further to when Sir Issac Newton was the head of the Royal Society.
DeleteChuck
This comment has been removed by the author.
Delete^Ten yards of tinfoil needed.
DeleteCrazy time is upon us. Joe and Chuck in full effect.
Joe fitz will be getting his 3rd smoking 3weeks in succession this Sunday
ReplyDeleteFooters are claiming that sykes has not disproved bigfoot. Well this is true in a way as you can not prove a negative. However it is not as simple as these footers make out.
ReplyDeleteSykes tested the best of the best samples that were put through rigorous screening before making it into the study. These are the best samples footers have to offer. Samples that the footers claim are sure to be from a bigfoot. Well there is a MASSIVE problem there for the footers then when sykes showed every single sample to be from known animals - even cows (lol).
As it stood prior to the study there was no evidence such a creature exists. As it stands now there is no evidence of the creature but in addition to that, and what sykes has brought to the table, is that the claimed evidence from the people who make the bigfoot claim in the first place, is, well nonsense.
Bigfoot is well and truly in the category alongside mermaids and unicorns. All have equally zero evidence.
An 8 foot ape would leave an abundance of evidence and would have been discovered and studied long long ago.
What it leads to is a psychological phenomenon which can be linked to our own evolutionary roots of living in hostile woodland environments.
No longer can footers claim "science wont look at the evidence". They have time and time again and the only parallel that can be maintained among the science studys and the footers out in the woods is the unequivocal lack of an actual bigfoot or even a piece of a bigfoot, anywhere, ever.
It is in fact just as easy as Footers make out and no effort at putting a version of events across will change that. Sykes did not have the best samples footers had to offer, Melba had them. What 'rigorous screening' did these samples go through? Other than Smeja, at what stage have you heard the researchers 'swear' by their samples?? There were only 3-4 researchers on show in the documentary??? All major claims to try and make the simple truth a little more swayable for you... Unlucky, you're amongst adults.
DeleteMermaids and unicorns don't leave tracks... And apart from your 'version' of events up top, you have resorted to sensationalist comparisons that again... Doesn't cut it or counter anything.
The fact that people on every continent for thousands of years have reported this creatures where ever there are wild places isn't psychological phenomena but evidence of a requirement to investigate, especially when you have physical evidnece that would be good enough for a branch of wildlife biology to identify a new species.
Lastly; Patty and Russian Leaping Yetti.
Pub were very welcome.
Who said it was the best of the best? Smegma's Yogi steak should have been left out. That being tested disqualifies the
Deletestatement "best of the best". May as well have tested some of Dyers butt hair. And speaking of, how upset us Liar that he missed out on the opportunity to play another joke on the Bigfoot community?
I agree with you joe . I believe they were far from having the best evidence. I believe the best evidence is still out there and was never examined for what reasons, could be many. I hear that the re-broadcast on America tv will be two hours long. I wonder why and can't believe you come under such attack in such childish manner. I read a comment above where some one is referring to the "N" word and completely un-acceptable. I believe if there is a missing creature among us, it's the ever elusive Moderator. I am in the middle of the belief of sasquatch, but see you are genuine and respectful in nature until you are attack repeatedly. I don't know how you do it. It's very hateful here and hope accomplish your life's goals. For what it's worth, you are a hard worker on this subject ..thanx joe.
DeleteGod bless you and apologies for you having to read some of my nastier responses... I'm battling with that daily to be a better person... Not so successfully it seems.
DeleteMuch respect and thank you.
..Well, at the very least, the samples could be considered a random sampling of the best biological evidence the community has to offer: The samples were collected where bigfoots were thought to be, and could not be linked to known animals before the dna tests...
DeleteI can't see what is better than that, other than pulling the hairs off the body on a slab....Maybe someone has a suggestion...
7:19 you have it backwards:
DeleteSkeptards have been foaming and gasping that Sykes has disproved the yet and bigfoot.
That is a textbook JREF logical fallacy and shows a dim, ill mind hard at work.
Attack skeptics all you want it still doesn't prove your magic monkey man exists
DeleteHey Guys! I'm starting a brand new business.
ReplyDeleteNow in keeping up with the times, My new business will be: Paying Cash for pictures of "Dark Shadows", "burnt stumps" or anything black in the woods! i will also pay good money for "Faces in the woods". If you need extra cash go out into the woods, and start taking pictures Color only! No B&W
Mike B. will probably be my best customer! LOL!!
I can be reached at: DumbfucksGalore. com
YouTube-
DeleteTexas Hillcountry Cryptozoological Society
... Woodknocks, DNA samples, and tree breaks.
Peace.
Yes you can be reached right where you belong, at that URL, 8:53.
DeleteHow's that Great Big God Damned Aluminum Cowboy Hat fitting today? Does it match your crazy pants?
The amount of evidence which has been collected over the years in the form of eye witness accounts, foot prints and various other sounds and encounters has been referred to by David Attenborough, undoubtedly one of the most respected names in natural history, as sufficient to suggest something is out there. That is the difference between a scientific mind and the bed-wetters who keep arguing the toss. Look for evidence. If there is some, there must be something to leave said evidence. If there is no evidence, the best scientific explanation can only be stated as there is no evidence to support such a conclusion.
ReplyDelete