BIGFOOT BODY FOR SALE!


Editor’s Note: Dr. Matthew A. Johnson is one of the most credible people in the Bigfoot world. In July 1, 2000, Dr. Johnson had a "Class A" Bigfoot encounter with his family while hiking near the Oregon Caves. After his life changing sighting, he went to the public and described one of the most intense encounters ever. You can join him on Facebook at Team Squatchin USA.

Uhm.... I have obtained a Bigfoot body...... uhm..... yeah.... I found it in the woods. I have it in a freezer now. Anyway, I want all of you to join my website and pay me membership fees...... Uhm..... while I laugh all the way to the bank. Oh yeah.... I promise to reveal to you within the next year. I promise!!! .....and I'm going to have someone reputable like "Muskrat Alonzo" verify that I shot him in the gonads. I swear I did!!! Anyway..... please believe me because this ain't no HOAX. Oh... and please start sending me money right away. Okay? Thank you for being my blind and loyal minions!!! Don't worry, I will continue to supply all of you with my Kool-Aid over this next year..... so keep on drinking it.

Oh.... and one more thing..... I have a bridge to Hawaii that I would like to sell to you as well. It's a real steal of a deal.

P.S. I want "Facebook/Find Bigfoot" to give me the "2013 Bigfoot Researcher of the Year" award too. Thanks again. Now please send me money!!!!

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. Haha that the worst when you think you got it but don't better luck next time

      Delete
  2. Mr Moobs isn't amusing in the slightest. No more Dr J.

    MMG

    ReplyDelete
  3. Тhuѕ the woгd lіterаllу
    meant "A meeting place of three roads". A great dеal of factоrѕ οf
    FAG bearings such аs thе sοrt, dimension, aсcuraсy, cage kinԁ, load,.
    Flexuге bearіngѕ bеnd a bit of mаterial frequentlу.

    NTN Spherical Roller Bearings

    ReplyDelete
  4. That there is "ZERO, incumbency to accept" a claim "until that claim is proven" is a virtual non sequitur. Of course we don't accept anything until it's proven! This is the continuing failure to understand the difference between evidence and proof. What people addicted to the current template fail to understand is that

    the current template has no special claim to primacy in a scientific debate, other than proof being required to overturn it.

    What bigfoot skeptics seem to be - no actually they are - saying is that no evidence can even be considered until proof is obtained. This is contrary to scientific practice, and indeed makes scientific progress impossible. When bigfoot skeptics come down on proponents with all this no-proof stuff, what they fail to realize is that scienitific protocol is being followed, to the T, by the scientific proponents. Evidence comes to light; it is considered; and if warranted it is followed until the proof is obtained. Shouting it down (and that's just the precise term) because proof hasn't been obtained yet is like telling sailors to watch out for the edge of the Earth. Sooner or later, somebody had to go out there and prove that wasn't an issue.

    And I agree, totally, with LarryP that almost all the "skeptical" case against sasquatch doesn't even rise to the level of a case. What it basically amounts to is ranting. And getting wrapped around one's own axle, as here:

    " DWA loves to point to milestones from the past. But they also help bolster the skeptical argument against Bigfoot. Yes, those are great examples of paradigm shifts. Of things that were once skoffed at, but are now accepted as fact. But they key point is that those things were pursued and the claims were proven out."

    Um, major no. MAJOR no. Where Meldrum and Bindernagel are on sasquatch now is in "pursuing" until the claim is "proven out." This is so utterly obvious I didn't think it needed mentioning. But 184 pages are disputing me big time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I usually don't like it when too much reading guy says this, but seriously, too much reading

      Delete
    2. Travis, where did you have your bigfoot sighting? Was it recent? What happened?

      Delete
    3. He saw giant ape in da woods.

      Delete
    4. Cool story bro. Theres still no magic monkey out there. No matter how many fancy words you write.

      Delete
    5. How about a Liger It's pretty much my favorite animal. It's like a lion and a tiger mixed... bred for its skills in magic.

      Delete
    6. I saw one in 2005 in Josephine county Oregon. So not too recent

      Delete
    7. Was it a daylight sighting or at night?

      Delete
    8. Had rocks thrown at us at night, and I saw it the following morning in full light. If you would like the full story, I posted it on the bff under the sightings section. Its titled my Oregon sighting and subsequent encounters

      Delete
  5. [yawn] Surprise ohiobill, I'm an amateur! But my opinions on this field mirror those of the pros. (No, I only count pros who demonstrate acquaintance with the evidence. The others repeatedly and amateurishly fail to acquaint themselves with it.) Ketchum and Sykes are sideshows. (As is 99% of this field.) To dump this topic because of them is not to be paying proper attention. YMMV...but it may be because you aren't paying attention. But your second sentence at least is correct.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think it's safe to say that we all know one or more people possibly afflicted with this disorder and the search for Bigfoot can attract these individuals for obvious reasons.

      A Treasury of Deception: Liars, Misleaders, Hoodwinkers, and the Extraordinary True Stories of History's Greatest Hoaxes, Fakes and Frauds

      Outsmarting the Scam Artists: How to Protect Yourself From the Most Clever Cons

      How to Cheat at Everything: A Con Man Reveals the Secrets of the Esoteric Trade of Cheating, Scams, and Hustles

      Delete
  6. Most credible person in Bigfoot and you uses terms like "shot in the gonads"? Whatever! This site is too biased like FOX News.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, the first line of the article says Johnson is "one of the most credible people in the bigfoot world."

      Really? He cries when he tells his story and says that he had a mental connection with the squatch that he spotted.

      Yeah, real credible.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, "shot in the gonads" is real classy sounding.

      Delete
  7. Is Gimlin lying about shooting Patty?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Patty was a dude in a suit. Unless you believe giant man-beast 7-12 feet tale have gone undetected for 100 years.

      Delete
    2. Gimlin has pwned all footers and still pwns them today. "Yerp it was just me n ole roger at the crik that day yes siree". Hes a good actor you just no hes crying with laughter on the inside with how easily fooled footers are.

      Delete
    3. I'm gonna say "Yes". I think several bigfoots were shot around the time the PGF was filmed. Why would they do such a shoddy jump of getting supporting evidence unless they had something to hide? Only two casts and no footage taken of the trackway? C'mon. Roger was a veteran researcher and would have offered up more than a very questionable development timeline.

      There is more to that story. Fact.

      Delete
    4. Your logic is not like our Earth logic.

      Delete
    5. Am I missing something? When did Gimlin say anything about Patty being shot?

      Delete
  8. Hello people, who do I contact first, and how do I post pictures of a dead Bigfoot shot here in Canada I asked last week on here but nobody seams to won't to help is this not a big deal I need some help here thanks I'm for Canada Ontario

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Contact Melba Ketchum--she will take care of you.

      Delete
    2. Can u actually phone these people do they have contact numbers to phone there business so u can actually talk on the phone I'm probably one of the few people who don't have a email nor do I now how to email u can laugh and that's what my friends do but I just do t care thanks

      Delete
  9. Johnson is not one of the most credible people in Bigfoot. He has extreme bizarre views that Bigfoot can turn invisible and run around like predator.

    He is clearly the nuttiest person in Bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's saying a lot. There are many nuts and much nuttiness in the bigfoot world.

      Delete
  10. SHAWN!! WAKE UP!!

    Matthew Johnson is no better than Dyer or FB/FB or Biscardi. It's an insult to legitimate bigfoot researchers everywhere to call Johnson credible. He thinks that bigfoots can detect cameras, mind speak and become invisible. Johnson makes wild claims of having recorded bigfoot conversations and bigfoot babies crying, but never backs up his claims with evidence. Johnson is absolutely not a credible or legitimate source of information regarding bigfoot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Matthew Johnson is an American hero!

      Delete
    2. there are NO legitimate bigfoot researchers due to the FACT that bigfoot don't exist. WAKE UP.

      Delete
    3. Fake American Hero Gay wants to cornhole Dr. Johnson.

      Delete
  11. I HAVE A QUESTION,WHO GAVE RICK DYER THE TITLE OF MASTER TRACKER? THE GUY IS A FRICKING USED CAR SALESMAN. THAT IDIOT COULDN'T FIND HIS ASS WITH BOTH HANDS. THAT GUY SHOULD BE CHARGED FOR TAKING MONEY FROM MENTALLY CHALLANGED PEOPLE,

    ReplyDelete
  12. So I won't get my money back for the gold membership ??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can kiss your money good-bye. Sucker.

      Delete
  13. Editor’s Note: Dr. Matthew A. Johnson is one of the most credible people in the Bigfoot world......More like one of the biggest hoaxer's in the bigfoot world. What an asshole!

    ReplyDelete
  14. I gotta say...Class - A hole bigfoot encounter made me lawl pretty hard nj...really nice ring to it lol

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story