tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post8365858720403753278..comments2024-03-29T01:11:45.309-07:00Comments on Bigfoot Evidence: Dr. Melba Ketchum Declared Bigfoot ChampionShawnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12059275107499275007noreply@blogger.comBlogger71125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-61529524553323935382016-09-26T02:34:22.004-07:002016-09-26T02:34:22.004-07:00ASK HER ABOUT HORSESASK HER ABOUT HORSESAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18185412911292897655noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-79698926264388228562016-02-26T01:51:30.584-08:002016-02-26T01:51:30.584-08:00Kelly Shaw is the biggest hoaxer in Bigfooting. Kelly Shaw is the biggest hoaxer in Bigfooting. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-73809071058265973372016-02-25T13:19:40.268-08:002016-02-25T13:19:40.268-08:00"No. That would be you.
Taking wild conjectur..."No. That would be you.<br />Taking wild conjecture and speculation and misinterpretation and calling it a theory like you do is not scientific."<br />That type of schoolyard "I'm not, you are" is slightly cringey, especially for someone so keen to portray himself as clever, and there's more enough evidence to show that you don't understand the requirements of falsifiable evidence, repeatable evidence, as well as readily attempting to suppress evidence you haven't got the brains to understand, let alone try and explain away. Time and time again you refuse to be accountable for your baseless claims against the evidence I list, yet it's everyone else's conjecture. Spoiled brat. <br /><br />No, there is no conspiracy, only a flawed process. And whilst you adhere to things being thrown out because they have been shown to be manipulated, then so you should throw the peer review process out too. Don't take it from me, don't pathetically blame the Guardian, take it straight from a Nobel Winner. And here's the conclusion on that paper I sourced you;<br />"CONCLUSION<br />So peer review is a flawed process, full of easily identified defects with little evidence that it works. Nevertheless, it is likely to remain central to science and journals because there is no obvious alternative, and scientists and editors have a continuing belief in peer review. How odd that science should be rooted in belief."<br />http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/<br />... That's your beloved peer review process in pieces. And that's just one source of many. Why would anyone expect real science to come from that process? And no... You missed the boat, probably because you're a dishonest try-hard. The fact that Nature were going to take on, according to you, such "bad science" says it all. Take a look at this;<br />"Journal Accepts Paper Reading “Get Me Off Your F*****g Mailing List”<br />(Link will be provided in a separate comment below due to the swear word being whited out) <br /><br />That's your peer reviewed, journal science right there. 99% of enthusiasts didn't remotely believe a thing that Melba said or did... And as much as you NEED people to be percieved otherwise, it's merely a deflection from a deeper problem you have in addressing what you simply haven't the b*lls to, and that's the evidence. Using quotation marks doesn't get around to accomplishing much. And like I said earlier... A second round of testing, which is what is allegedly happening, should put it all to bed.Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-40505757058388477732016-02-25T13:16:58.870-08:002016-02-25T13:16:58.870-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-33978319328089404802016-02-25T10:03:26.363-08:002016-02-25T10:03:26.363-08:00> considering you fumble scienific theory so co...> considering you fumble scienific theory so comprehensively<br /><br />Um. No. That would be you.<br /><br />Taking wild conjecture and speculation and misinterpretation and calling it a theory like you do is not scientific.<br /><br />Why am I not surprised that you try to weasel out with that tired old "conspiracy of academia" line of crap. And your little conspiracy theory is not even self consistent. You quoted the Guardian: "The problem was exacerbated, he said, by editors who were not active scientists but professionals who favoured studies that were likely to make a splash." (Especially amusing when the Guardian of all things makes that complaint.) Well actual proof of bigfoot would be absolutely guaranteed to make a gigantic "splash". So according to your argument, Ketchum's results would have been eagerly accepted for publication. And as it turns out, and you admit, it was jumped at by Nature initially. But Nature jumped right out again after they got a look at what she actually had. Publishing it would have harmed its credibility irrevocably.<br /><br />Ketchum's "work" wasn't rejected by Nature because of some great dark conspiracy of academia like you seem to think in that crackpot conspiracy theory riddled brain of yours.<br /><br />It was rejected because it's complete and utter crap. Sloppy and dishonest. Just like 99.99999% of all bigfoot "research".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-82598042168701364732016-02-25T04:26:51.973-08:002016-02-25T04:26:51.973-08:00A second round of testing will resolve it... And h...A second round of testing will resolve it... And happening by all accounts. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-24802784591801942452016-02-25T04:02:51.001-08:002016-02-25T04:02:51.001-08:00Melba is a fraud and you are a fuctard!Melba is a fraud and you are a fuctard!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-72583042500239067542016-02-25T02:29:03.668-08:002016-02-25T02:29:03.668-08:005:26... I keep reading a lot of "if only you ...5:26... I keep reading a lot of "if only you knew", from you... Put it like this, you can't be in too much of a position of academic authority considering you fumble scienific theory so comprehensively, and considering this, your "Mr Anomymous" sentiment is slightly audacious. I'm an astronaut on my days off. See how easy that was? And if I was trying to be remotely convincing of that, I'd have better arguments in line with the intelligence required to be qualified at that level. <br /><br />For example... You've been given scienific evidence, repeatable scientific evidence that has been verified by multiple impartial scientists, and you dodge it like some chronic denialist with a perverse level of rhetorics. It's really strange behaviour to see you time and time again, look stupid by having evidence that stands up rammed down your throat, evidence you cannot even begin to explain away and you come back inisiting there is none. It's quite an education on denialism, you come across like you're trying to convince someone sooooooo badly. It's funny. <br /><br />And why do you invest so much faith in the peer review process?? Surely this is a contradiction on your part, considering there are examples of it being manipulated to lie to the scientific community? Surely this whole process should be thrown out and never be considered reliable, right? <br /><br />"Leading academic journals are distorting the scientific process and represent a "tyranny" that must be broken, according to a Nobel prize winner who has declared a boycott on the publications. Randy Schekman, a US biologist who won the Nobel prize in physiology or medicine this year and receives his prize in Stockholm on Tuesday, said his lab would no longer send research papers to the top-tier journals, Nature, Cell and Science. Schekman said pressure to publish in "luxury" journals encouraged researchers to cut corners and pursue trendy fields of science instead of doing more important work. The problem was exacerbated, he said, by editors who were not active scientists but professionals who favoured studies that were likely to make a splash."<br />https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/09/nobel-winner-boycott-science-journals<br /><br />... If you didn't know, Nature accepted Melba's "shoddy science", but pulled out of publishing literally at the last minute. Oh, and here's an actual paper on how poor the peer retire process is; <br />http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/<br /><br />... Oh, and as any scientist knows, science is not a freethinking entity, it is a tool to look at data, to which has been used to verify physical and biolgical evidence that down-and-outs like you so amusingly fumble for all your alleged "credentials". If I was remotely frustrated, I would be over on pseudosceptical blogs reinforcing my belief system religiously. Telling about you really, eh?<br /><br />A second round of testing should put the Melba situation to bed. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-32297145891574156572016-02-25T00:49:10.804-08:002016-02-25T00:49:10.804-08:00DONT YOU MEAN , NO BIKE SEAT IS NEEDED ??
THERE ...DONT YOU MEAN , NO BIKE SEAT IS NEEDED ?? <br /> THERE TK??<br /> <br />Haa haa lol! AC collins :-)) AC collinsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-77816860569668071702016-02-25T00:42:29.619-08:002016-02-25T00:42:29.619-08:00Cause bieng a queer is lots of hella arce streched...Cause bieng a queer is lots of hella arce streched BUNFUN.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-56063589426640502192016-02-24T17:44:24.300-08:002016-02-24T17:44:24.300-08:00The really hilarious thing is that these rubes did...The really hilarious thing is that these rubes didn't seem to understand that the original post is parodying poor Melba!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-14371582210852528292016-02-24T17:26:18.417-08:002016-02-24T17:26:18.417-08:00> i don't see a DR in front of your name so...> i don't see a DR in front of your name so i'm assuming you aren't one so you have no scientific background mr anonymous<br />Hehehe. If you only knew.<br /><br />> You've been given the science of things. <br />Hah. No. I've been given a lot of blather and bullshit and ridiculous insistence that thing like a fully human skull somehow counts as "proof of bigfoot".<br /><br />If there were anything to Ketchum's "work" (or your "evidence" for that matter) then Current Anthro or American Anthro or the AJA or any number of proper, peer reviewed journals would be all over it. Because actual proof of bigfoot would be the greatest revolutionary anthropological discovery of all time, bar none.<br /><br />But they aren't.<br /><br />Instead bigfoot "research" has to crow about frauds and hucksters mucking about with rubber suits and ginning up their own publications in a pathetic effort to apply a veneer of legitimacy to their hokum.<br /><br />It must frustrate you to no end that you think you have all this "evidence", but at the end of the day real science agrees with me, not you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-50900961306112489012016-02-24T17:15:39.043-08:002016-02-24T17:15:39.043-08:00Emails on Hillary Clinton's secret server matc...Emails on Hillary Clinton's secret server matched top secret documents virtually word for word and included details of CIA drone strikes against Islamic radicals.....<br />NO WAY ...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-88158480256763032712016-02-24T16:57:19.809-08:002016-02-24T16:57:19.809-08:00One of the 3 individual Sasquatches all of which w...One of the 3 individual Sasquatches all of which were verified by 11 blind-testing labs, had to SIGN the release of his or her DNA because they are human as also verified in an independent study...but the powerful forces that be and their many layers of protection would not allow the DNA to be accepted through the "official" Genbank data base AND would not accept publication of Melba's data. Many of these powerful individuals direct their orders to others on this site OR run this site....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-81810878544172006832016-02-24T15:13:56.059-08:002016-02-24T15:13:56.059-08:00A second round of testing should settle it really ...A second round of testing should settle it really then, shouldn't it? <br /><br />Nobody believed Biscardi. Nobody believed Dyer... In fact, with the exception of a very small amount of people, it was enthusiasts that called it all out from the very most earliest stages of each hoax. Wishing scenarios of alleged belief on people is pretty self evident of how you go about things. <br /><br />You've been given the science of things. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-28022304835222369372016-02-24T15:05:19.994-08:002016-02-24T15:05:19.994-08:00^ i don't see a DR in front of your name so i&...^ i don't see a DR in front of your name so i'm assuming you aren't one so you have no scientific background mr anonymous . even Dr Pepper or Dre have more knowledge of science than you do. Now go play your call of duty and leave us alone<br /><br />JoeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-60453103418679220282016-02-24T14:48:49.386-08:002016-02-24T14:48:49.386-08:00Oh please. She's full of crap.
She refuses t...Oh please. She's full of crap.<br /><br />She refuses to release her raw data for review. She refuses to allow access to the samples to real scientists. She refuses to even return the samples back to their owners so they can send them to competent and honest researchers. She can't get a single real journal to accept her results, and rightly so with everything above, so she invents a "peer reviewed journal" whole cloth to be her scientific circle jerk.<br /><br />She is not a scientist. She's just another fraud and hoaxer, and once again, just like you all swooned over Biscardi's bullshit, just like you all celebrated Dyers lies, you bigfoot "research" fools are falling for this fraud as well.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-21297317471035549492016-02-24T14:12:29.284-08:002016-02-24T14:12:29.284-08:00This is what Melba would day to you;
http://bigfoo...This is what Melba would day to you;<br />http://bigfootblogger.com/dr-melba-ketchum-how-we-proved-there-was-no-contamination-in-the-sasquatch-genome-project-samples/<br /><br />... And regardless of Melba, please don't pretend like you understand what's real and not real in science. The joke is you dodging the scienific evidence that can be listed like the plague. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-46777265203467791832016-02-24T14:08:28.331-08:002016-02-24T14:08:28.331-08:00Thats a whole lot of lying... An impossible amount...Thats a whole lot of lying... An impossible amount even. Iktomihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01520713363800264385noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-38914190291265151682016-02-24T14:04:13.735-08:002016-02-24T14:04:13.735-08:00And you people wonder why bigfoot "research&q...And you people wonder why bigfoot "research" is a joke to real science?<br /><br />This is why.<br /><br />Ketchum didn't sequence bigfoot DNA. She only managed to sequence human contamination. She only proved she's not a scientist. She's as big a fraud as Bullshit Biscardi, Todd the Fraud Standing, and Dyer the Liar, except they're smart enough to know they're frauds.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-65867628010522789682016-02-24T13:55:37.359-08:002016-02-24T13:55:37.359-08:00too late - TRUMP did it....too late - TRUMP did it....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-47077109350185419722016-02-24T13:21:57.161-08:002016-02-24T13:21:57.161-08:00A.C. , RUFF, UNO, AND RICTOR ALL GO FOR A BIKE RID...A.C. , RUFF, UNO, AND RICTOR ALL GO FOR A BIKE RIDE--------<br /><br />ONLY ---- ONE ------ BIKE IS NEEDED!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-19300162050380759742016-02-24T13:18:08.495-08:002016-02-24T13:18:08.495-08:00Hey lard ass, why you always wearing that leather ...Hey lard ass, why you always wearing that leather jacketAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-61659459817744644212016-02-24T13:14:04.848-08:002016-02-24T13:14:04.848-08:00lol thanks that cleared that up for me xxlol thanks that cleared that up for me xxpussinbootshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05640020760651019401noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-2696482130747443052016-02-24T13:01:16.779-08:002016-02-24T13:01:16.779-08:00Denny's is where the BIGFOOTS do their dumpste...Denny's is where the BIGFOOTS do their dumpster diving for vittles Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com