tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post8325142605958670057..comments2024-03-28T05:42:11.199-07:00Comments on Bigfoot Evidence: Is Dr. Bryan Sykes Reviewing Ketchum's Paper?Shawnhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12059275107499275007noreply@blogger.comBlogger96125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-35664485502662854832013-06-16T03:16:47.198-07:002013-06-16T03:16:47.198-07:00I am regular reader, how are you everybody?
This ...I am regular reader, how are you everybody?<br /><br />This piece of writing posted at this web page is truly fastidious.<br /><br /><br />Take a look at my page: <a href="http://sacpulse.com/profile/ZoilaHamm" rel="nofollow">real estate agents</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-39350019845045790992013-02-20T14:56:31.852-08:002013-02-20T14:56:31.852-08:00Dr Swenson posted that entire statement directly o...Dr Swenson posted that entire statement directly on Dr Ketchum's facebook page. What is she quoting that he did not say? Big Jim Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07043746696699431972noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-21205326691184766862013-02-20T14:52:50.576-08:002013-02-20T14:52:50.576-08:00Without reading the paper you miss all the importa...Without reading the paper you miss all the important details she and the others took. The data is there all it needs now is someone to try to disprove it. The work was done by outside labs to verify findings. The processes used are the same as any other dna test I compared to.<br /><br />They had their findings tested by labs and processes that would show any contamination. Those results proved there was no contamination. All of the steps are listed in the paper. If you really want to know the truth you will have to get the paper. Or wait until someone proves the paper valid or not. <br /><br />The difference in the Smeja sample is easy. What is the remaining 75% of that labs testing? They saw bear dna and human dna and stopped right there. They did not identify three quarters of the dna and they did not do the whole genome testing that was done by Ketchum's study. <br /><br />You have to understand that this is not just Ketchum who did this paper. There are several others and several labs that were used to make sure everything was good. It makes no difference what so ever in how the paper was released. There is testable data. And for me after reading it, even the peer review matters little. The process used is valid. So just test the results. That is all that needs to be done. <br /><br />Since there is suppose to be proof of peer review, several labs confirmed the findings, and the paper is now out there I don't understand why no one is trying to disprove the data. Unless they can't so they trash the rest in hopes of making the results untrue.Big Jim Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07043746696699431972noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-80522462033745239072013-02-20T10:15:09.865-08:002013-02-20T10:15:09.865-08:00How is that trolling? You are possibly one of the ...How is that trolling? You are possibly one of the dumbest people I've ever come across.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-17319271164527673222013-02-20T10:03:54.890-08:002013-02-20T10:03:54.890-08:00How can she have ruled out contamination when she ...How can she have ruled out contamination when she had samples collected using bacon grease and didn't take DNA samples from all the submiters? How do you account for the difference in findings of the lab that tested Smeja's steak? All you have in that study is Melba's word on this, it's not been peer reviewed and it's been self published Jim. I'll admit I've not bought and will not give Melba any money whatsoever because it's a con.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-12771123565882452902013-02-20T07:31:00.763-08:002013-02-20T07:31:00.763-08:00doesn't mean they aren't apes*doesn't mean they aren't apes*Jay Cooneyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14300702399539846543noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-46180475936299619432013-02-20T07:28:53.943-08:002013-02-20T07:28:53.943-08:00You are a very naive person. Hominins are animals....You are a very naive person. Hominins are animals. Just because they look human like doesn't mean they are apes, and apes can use sign language. All it would take is for an ape to have a throat which allows the hyoid bone to produce language. If you would do your research, you would learn that just because their feet look superficially human like doesn't mean they're of the genus Homo. Mountain gorillas, which are the most terrestrial known apes, have toes that are more aligned like a human's foot. I would agree with them being a hominin for sure, just before the emergence of Homo. They obviously don't show material culture and such that members of the genus Homo had, and are likely Australopithecines if they are Hominins.Jay Cooneyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14300702399539846543noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-40199551751669252212013-02-20T06:31:43.168-08:002013-02-20T06:31:43.168-08:00^ Serious retardation in evidence.^ Serious retardation in evidence.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-84802146273350514422013-02-20T06:30:36.963-08:002013-02-20T06:30:36.963-08:00The facts are all in the study paper, it's pro...The facts are all in the study paper, it's proof and soon to become accepted as such, you're only lying through your ass whereas this study was done correctly using many known labs. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-24604103646198580152013-02-20T06:27:52.402-08:002013-02-20T06:27:52.402-08:00You're such a troll. I mean c'mon, a rambl...You're such a troll. I mean c'mon, a rambling long post saying basically nothing. The people you mention don't want it to be real, they know it is but are assigned to either stall discovery or directly prevent it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-42956658412152626802013-02-20T06:22:48.086-08:002013-02-20T06:22:48.086-08:00Jay you're too gullible, go away. Sasquatch is...Jay you're too gullible, go away. Sasquatch is not an ape we'd found them if they were you've been led up the garden path by Krantz your idol Meldrum and cash horny agenda guys like Monkeymaker, now it's time you wrapped your head around that fact and stepped out of gagaland and into reality. The beings look humanlike apart from hair and shape, feet are humanlike they're bipedal and they speak a language. That's not fantasy that's fact it's what we're dealing with here, we're not chasing apes like some thought in the past mostly because of how they - emotionally - wanted it to be thus fitting better into their often religiously set pecking order and food chain visions. We know today they were all wrong to dream that laughable animal dream, these are hominin not beast. The dreaming is over, say goodnight Gracie. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-63369263411023681702013-02-19T21:53:34.797-08:002013-02-19T21:53:34.797-08:00I think the problems are coming from the goofy dna...I think the problems are coming from the goofy dna. Where there is double single double strand dna. I finally read the whole report. Dr Ketchum did a lot of work to ensure proper testing. When they found something odd they tried to recreate it with several methods to rule out errors.<br /><br />The whole genome portion was done by U of T, so that right there adds a big amount of credibility in my book. Plus with all the effort put in to rule out errors, controls to rule out contamination, etc it looks damn solid. At least to what I compared it to. Other dna reports were done in the same ways.<br /><br />So to keep getting the same oddity in the same places in several different samples when you rule out other possible causes means one thing. You have a oddity in the dna not an error. Then when other labs in blind studies get the same thing, it is pretty hard to reject.<br /><br />I now know half the people on here claiming to have the read the study are full of crap. I am going to start asking them for specific details from the report to prove they have it. Big Jim Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07043746696699431972noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-41105781952738939842013-02-19T21:35:43.272-08:002013-02-19T21:35:43.272-08:00Well, Trump was the spawn of an orangatan, so some...Well, Trump was the spawn of an orangatan, so someone should be studying his DNA.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-88651419290820332882013-02-19T19:51:15.217-08:002013-02-19T19:51:15.217-08:00Here's a post I found on Cryptomundo...for wha...Here's a post I found on Cryptomundo...for whatever its worth...this guy seems like legitimate professional in his field, but I suspect he may not realize that Melba is throwing quotes out from him that he never in fact said.<br /><br />Brien Foerster, Jeff Kart, and other interested parties. I went over the manuscript by Melba Ketchum on Bigfoot genomics. My desktop had difficulty with a blast analysis of the consensus sequences. It helped me understand more about the project. This collaborative venture has done a huge project that taxes me to fully grasp. I see interesting homology with a standard human sequence with 99% match for mitochondria. From my abbreviated study, the nuclear genome seems to have human and nonhuman sequences.<br /><br />My opinion of the creature is that it is a hybrid of a human mother and an unknown hominid male, Just as reported. For all practical purposes, it should be treated as human and protected under law.<br /><br />Brien, selection of Melba’s lab for your studies is a very good call.<br /><br />Sasquatch is real, as proven by genetic analysis.<br />David H. Swenson, Ph.D.andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03607292291092757810noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-33929162086633452302013-02-19T19:04:33.982-08:002013-02-19T19:04:33.982-08:00It lowers any credibility as a rational human bein...It lowers any credibility as a rational human being never mind a scientist!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-78952895451548727122013-02-19T18:41:59.239-08:002013-02-19T18:41:59.239-08:00Exactly. Plus she has an emotional connection to t...Exactly. Plus she has an emotional connection to the idea of Sasuqatch being people. Her genome project site has pictures of fallen tree limbs and matted horse hair as Sasquatch evidence, which lowers her scientific credibility greatly.Jay Cooneyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14300702399539846543noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-19530488389334482782013-02-19T18:37:36.397-08:002013-02-19T18:37:36.397-08:00Nope but contamination and bad science will probab...Nope but contamination and bad science will probably stop it getting validated that plus her conclusions make no sense whatsoever.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-78183726404016204832013-02-19T18:04:15.377-08:002013-02-19T18:04:15.377-08:00Think it's more than likely that Meldrum had a...Think it's more than likely that Meldrum had a hand in that as Sykes has already tested unknown Yeti samples from National Geo tv show that Shawn put up a YouTube link to a couple of weeks ago. We know that Meldrum is envolved in the study and if you remember your Lindsay bs Meldrum had to deny some rumours last year about links between the studies. I'm sure he'd heard bout Ketchum before and probably has a copy of her study now if only to read, compare and relate to in his own study. What he thinks of it could be anyone's guess! If he was to peer review it wouldn't that take valuable time away from his own study? Plus to peer review Ketchum's work you wouldn't have to be doing a similar study or anything you'd just have to work in the genetics field and know how to work with animal DNA. We've seen what Meldrum thinks of the study or rather his problems he has with it I'd place a bet that Sykes might have a few problems too?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-35266508212551556472013-02-19T17:53:40.573-08:002013-02-19T17:53:40.573-08:00I wonder if Sykes is one of the people who did pee...I wonder if Sykes is one of the people who did peer review it. After reading it he wanted to test things for himself so he started his project. Would fall right into the timelines perfectly.Big Jim Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07043746696699431972noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-74266533447660846092013-02-19T17:53:12.237-08:002013-02-19T17:53:12.237-08:00Skeptardical Enquirer, wow! You actually posted so...Skeptardical Enquirer, wow! You actually posted something that for the most part wasn't just throwing insults and generally being a troll! I didn't think that you were capable to be honest, unless you are not the same believer that normally trolls here of course. However, let's get something straight yes there is a big difference between sceptics and what you call "skeptards" but also I don't think a single poster who comes on this blog (even Bigfoot is BS has said this herself) who doesn't want Sasquatch to be real. Everyone would like nothing more than for somebody to prove they exist, no matter what you think of PGF that first time you saw it as a kid either (if you're getting on a bit) maybe at the movies, on tv in the 70s or 80s or even saw it for the first time on MonsterQuest or YouTube you went "holy s@@t". Everyone has the same reaction to it, difference is some watch it and go "Wow there is a Bigfoot, it's true" and then others go "Wow, it looks like there could be a Bigfoot but I think we need more evidence cos this is just one bit of footage and as I wasn't there I don't know how genuine it is, it could be a guy in a suit?" No one watches it and says "It's bulls@@t!" straight away, maybe they decide that after looking at Bob H or looking into the personal lives of Patterson and Gimlin or whatever. The thing is there really are no "skeptards" even the trolls here want the monkey man to be real, even Bigfoot is BS does, even Renae does, Merchant, Strufert, Shawn and all the Tazer guys the difference is that like you said the want the real evidence. The "Skeptard" doesn't exist on this site it might exist out there on the streets or homes round the world but not on this blog or why come here? In fact you might even say the "Skeptard" is as elusive as Sasquatch as is hard to find either of em. There might be trolls you think act like "Skeptards" but really they're obviously sceptics just shooting their mouth off like you do sometimes with your rants! You're both essentially trolling being confrontational and obnoxious to get a rise outta other people the main difference is logic isn't on your side.<br />It's not up to people to prove a negative it's up to the reasearchers, filmakers and believers to prove a positive as the general consensus and accepted norm is that Bigfoot is a campfire tale. Science backs that up too, the media will back that up as well so it upto you guys to change our minds and provide empirical proof like a body, bones, tissue and decent uncontaminated hair or fluid (yuk!) samples that can be used by reputable geneticists (ie. Dr Sykes not a veterinarian) to shut us up forever! We don't want video footage because even in HD it can be a hoax, we don't want blobsquatches or trail cam photos, Flir thermal footage, tree knocks and strange noises from the woods we want real proof!!! What you have given us so far is millions of.moving and non-moving blobsquatches, millions of hoaxes, god damn habituaters making you all look like you belong in an asylum and a totally flawed DNA study with more red flags than a Civil War museum. Untill you do any of this people will not believe you and just take the p@@s out of you at any given opportunity. As much as I despise Dyer I hope he really has bagged a Bigfoot because I'm sick of all the hoaxes and damn sick of all the crazyness and illogical believer bs! Bigfoot really deserves better than Ketchum, Ed Smith, Dyer and all the other kooks and to be honest you believers deserve better too so stop bitching bout skeptards and go find evidence that's real!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-12305023489593235632013-02-19T17:30:21.708-08:002013-02-19T17:30:21.708-08:00Doesnt everyone have a few Sasquatch on their prop...Doesnt everyone have a few Sasquatch on their property that only they see and hear? This isnt psychosis but the norm in BigfootlandBigfoot is BSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-19812299344015898132013-02-19T17:25:28.173-08:002013-02-19T17:25:28.173-08:00Or, those peole are right, have been!
And you-all...Or, those peole are right, have been!<br /><br />And you-all are the nut-jobs?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-13897154511364325202013-02-19T17:23:41.351-08:002013-02-19T17:23:41.351-08:00"she found the truth" LOL what did she f..."she found the truth" LOL what did she find? She self published a paper that had no scientific methodology or standards Sykes might pay the 30$ to laugh his ass off....more than likely he doesnt even consider her paper legitimate, since it was a self-made 3rd grade science expirement using homeade primers which resulted in the thpical coverups mBigfoot is BSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-24939028899709668902013-02-19T13:17:58.682-08:002013-02-19T13:17:58.682-08:00Well, we know he's smart but whether he's ...Well, we know he's smart but whether he's also truly brave enough we don't yet know. If he is brave enough he'll validate her findings because we know that she's educated and qualified enough herself with what she's doing and that the data is good, now it's his turn. As I see it, he'll have to validate because DNA doesn't lie. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2925104810508047182.post-92149957036478095632013-02-19T13:10:48.608-08:002013-02-19T13:10:48.608-08:00The hating skeptards are shocked that Ketchum soun...The hating skeptards are shocked that Ketchum sounds so normal and nothing like the crazy lady they've painted her to be with their bullshit lies, she actually knows what she's doing unlike them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com